misc.legal

In article <1175019094.259164.65240@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >

In article <eub6ue$7sd@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <x-B1497A.19593326032007@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > > > >Are you saying the police cannot shoot back until they see someone else > >

In article <1174986195.020987.188400@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > > I am quickly coming to the point where I shove the horses face > into the water, and force it to drink it's way to air. Sick.

In article <1174983955.716921.141120@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > > As I have told you, Kent, my tollerance with you is running out > quickly. I'm giving your your last chance to behave like a reasonable >

In article <1174986266.560854.233590@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Until you can start being honest,

<nospam@isp.com> wrote in message news:ac6j039nb0jtp87a75n70k903foeba30f0@4ax.com... > On 26 Mar 2007, "John Muscovy" <none@none.none> summarized: > >> [ I'm contemplating strategy/tactics for a N.Y.] Type >> II action . . . . a single family resid

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:20:15 -0700, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: >On Mar 27, 6:54 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: >> > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:11:37 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >You are dismissed You are a thumb sucking moron who does not have the authority to dismiss anyone. --

As I understand it, on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:10:24 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <1175044212.114727.149320@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > >> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > "proffsl" <

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:10:12 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > >> > As I have told you, Kent, my tollerance with you is >> > running

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:07:15 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > >> > Since there is no lie about my claim that k_flynn >> > started th

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:02:57 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > >> > And, I have produced links to where both Larry and >> > K_Flynn denies having

As I understand it, on Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:07:48 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <1175044498.866857.205600@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > >> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > (I'm

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 18:14:58 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >The other >> >kind containing claims they did not start the personal attacks, those >> >constituting lies. >>

On 26 Mar 2007, "John Muscovy" <none@none.none> summarized: > [ I'm contemplating strategy/tactics for a N.Y.] Type > II action . . . . a single family residence, septic system, > utilities and driveway [i.e., the sort of project which, > if on

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 17:54:57 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote:

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 17:38:11 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote:

Bishop@OnTheBoard.com wrote in news:4609b594$0$27084$4c368faf@roadrunner.com: > "DES MOINES, Iowa(AP) Democratic presidential hopeful > Hillary Rodham Clinton on Monday blamed the Bush > administration's fear of scandal for the firing of > eight U.S

In article <x-47001E.19542827032007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <eub6ue$7sd@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-B1497A.19593326032007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com>

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message news:56t0hrF27nhigU1@mid.individual.net... > Max Bialystock wrote: >> If I'm walking along a street and I come across a traffic accident >> does a policeman have a right to ask me to stop takin

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:48:02 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:09:17 -0700, Uncle Vic ><address@withheld.com> wrote: > >>In article <611i035ftnr8dho02t0sms38ibuh5039gl@4ax.com>, >> Kent Wills

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:43:10 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 09:27:13 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu >(tjab) wrote: > >>In article <611i035ftnr8dho02t0sms38ibuh5039gl@4ax.com>, >>Kent Wills <compuelf@gma

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:37:49 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:24:30 -0400, Christopher >A.Lee <calee@optonline.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 05:47:42 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.c

n 26 Mar 2007 "Trace" <tracey12_12@yahoo.com> wrote: >I was talking with my mom today when she dropped a bomb in my lap. >She said that she expects the USA to have another civil war in a few >years. >Shocked, I said "Why do you think that??" >She sa

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 17:07:06 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >"a425couple" <a425cou...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > >> > The answer to the question: "When is it OK for a >> > cop t

On Mar 27, 9:14 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > And, I have pro

On Mar 27, 9:04 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > The other kind containing claims they did not > >

On Mar 27, 9:01 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > > It might be a statement that Kent is (unfortunately) > > > > pow

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 13:40:36 -0700, "Bongo" <jeffchip9@hotmail.com> wrote: >I have an original letter and envelope dated 19 Sep 1990 on >letterhead, addressed to me, which makes the circumstances absolutely >clear. There are no quest

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > And, I have produced links to where both Larry and > > > > K_Flynn denies havi

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 12:21:09 -0700, "Bongo" <jeffchip9@hotmail.com> wrote: >I have a letter and envelope dated September 19, 1990 on a company's >letterhead, addressed to me, that I am currently exploring ways to >post online. Stay t

On Mar 27, 8:51 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 11:33:44 -0700, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: [snip for brevity] > >> > > and that you didn't see on that same link provided above where >> > > k_flynn wrote: "Look, if you hadn;t started it, it wouldn't be >> > > h

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 11:30:16 -0700, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: >On Mar 27, 12:11 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > > Kent Wills <compu.

On Mar 27, 8:39 pm, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > k_fl...@lycos.com wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > And, I have produced links to

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > The other kind containing claims they did not > > > > start the personal attacks, those constituting > > > > lie

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 11:23:25 -0700, "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I see no such cla

Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > > > > It might be a statement that Kent is (unfortunately) > > > powerless to enforce, but its no different than you > > > "dismissin

As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:50:22 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <1174986266.560854.233590@r56g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, > "proffsl" <proffsl@my-deja.com> wrote: > >> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > "proffsl" <

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 11:10:21 -0700, k_flynn@lycos.com wrote: >On Mar 27, 3:04 am, "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: >> >> > Until you can sta

"Bongo" <jeffchip9@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1175028036.393799.216440@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >I have an original letter and envelope dated 19 Sep 1990 on > letterhead, addressed to me, which makes the circumstances absolutely > cl

As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:54:28 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <eub6ue$7sd@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-B1497A.19593326032007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:

As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:59:04 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >Deadrat wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in >>> Larry wrote: >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >>>>> Larry w

Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > Larry <x...@y.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > "proffsl" <prof...@my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > >

As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:09:17 -0700, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote: >In article <611i035ftnr8dho02t0sms38ibuh5039gl@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As I understand it, on Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:39:37

On Mar 27, 4:01 pm, "Bugman" <jmpos...@hotmail.com> wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in messagenews:56t1vpF2a98qaU1@mid.individual.net... > > > White House Spokesman Tony Snow has Cancer in Abdomen (Update5) > > > By Roger Running

As I understand it, on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 10:45:00 -0400, RHR <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote: >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:48:01 -0400, Christopher A.Lee ><calee@optonline.net> wrote: > >>On 27 Mar 2007 09:27:13 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >> >>>In

As I understand it, on 27 Mar 2007 09:27:13 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <611i035ftnr8dho02t0sms38ibuh5039gl@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:39:37 -0600, "_ Prof. J