misc.legal

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:58ah12F2esu5dU1 @mid.individual.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589vh5F2fsr20U1 >> @mid.individual.net: >> >>> Deadrat wrote: >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _"

Yes, this is the point exactly. My brother is acting in a way which would suggest that something is being kept from the rest of us. He was in charge of my mother's finances in the final years of her life. It appears that he might have been using her

In article <v1j023lrvuh703vllof55cf030add3kfvj@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > That's not a very accurate way to measure BMI. Simply using > height and weight doesn't take into account that the person could have > muscles bulging out of th

On 12 Apr 2007 23:16:02 -0700, jtnospam@yahoo.com wrote: > That castrating #@&@^ had those Duke boys tried,convicted and judged >on her show. When the case unravelled, she would disappear from her >show whenever it was in the news, and now she always

Fred G. Mackey wrote: > http://test.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_5652261 > > > Light 'em up, my fellow smokers. > > <quote> > Adams County Judge Robert S. Doyle last week ruled that the smoking > ban is unconstitutional because of the exemption

Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> American Taliban John Walker Lindh Transferred To "Supermax" Prison >> >> POSTED: 4:25 pm PDT April 12, 2007 >> >> FLORENCE, Colo. -- John Walker Lindh, serving a 20-year sentence >> after fighting for the Taliban in Afg

As I understand it, on Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:25:35 GMT, "jenna tulls" <Jenna7@mindspring.net> wrote: > >"dratster" <drichardson_all4one@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:1176313569.594850.77440@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 11, 12:43 pm,

John W. Kennedy wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: >> In article <hnUTh.22$%n3.10@newsfe12.lga>, >> "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@attglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>> Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any >>>> law that p

"redc1c4" <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message news:46208EB6.6DE2B9F3@drunkenbastards.org.ies... > "¥ UltraMan ¥" wrote: >> >> Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> >> American Taliban John Walker Lindh Transferred To "Supermax" Prison >> >>

BTR1701 wrote: > In article <hnUTh.22$%n3.10@newsfe12.lga>, > "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@attglobal.net> wrote: > >> BTR1701 wrote: >>> Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any law >>> that puts people in jail merely for

° Shanghai Lil ° wrote: > Fred G. Mackey wrote: > >>http://test.denverpost.com/entertainment/ci_5652261 >> >> >>Light 'em up, my fellow smokers. >> >><quote> >>Adams County Judge Robert S. Doyle last week ruled that the smoking >>ban is unconst

nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote: > I was researching libel on the internet, and was > surprised to find that writing under a pseudonym > and changing peoples names apparently > doesn't protect you from a libel suit. Is that > correct? Yes, as a m

On 13 Apr 2007 , "A Michigan Attorney" <miattorney@gmail.com> wrote: > <bigxgiantxh...@Khotmail.com> wrote: > >> You shoot someone. They do not die. >> You stand trial for attempted murder. >> You are acquitted. >> New evidence emerges plus you'v

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:58a70mF2fvlndU1@mid.individual.net: > BTR1701 wrote: >> In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal libel. >>

On 13 Apr 2007, spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote: > Please comment on the meaning and applicability > of the federal statute below. It means what it says -- namely, that if [1] some state actor, e.g., a police officer or other gover

_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: > dejaQ wrote: >> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: >> >> >> Why hasn't Daryl Hunt dropped the dime on terrorist-aiding, >> America-hating troll Vox Populi yet? > > You've been sucking his cock That homo stuff really revs ya up, e

In article <589v58F2g8emoU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > Francis A. Miniter wrote: > > _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: > >> Deadrat wrote: > >> > >>> nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote in news:1176479181.969476.169000 >

In article <58a70mF2fvlndU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal

In article <58a75mF2fvp4nU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal

In article <58a7kpF2fidhuU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal

In article <58a7m1F2g8rhuU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal

In article <58a7t1F2g2ev8U1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal

In article <46200940$0$16374$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>, "° Shanghai Lil °" <Lilly@Shanghai.cn> wrote: > John W. Kennedy wrote: > > BTR1701 wrote: > >> Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any > >> law that puts people i

In article <hnUTh.22$%n3.10@newsfe12.lga>, "John W. Kennedy" <jwkenne@attglobal.net> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any law > > that puts people in jail merely for telling the truth about

Today, Rob Mitchell called USCF Executive Director Bill Hall to advise and recommend that he retain counsel to file suit against Sam Sloan for revealing that Bill Hall has often been absent from work. It is not likely that Bill Hall will take this

BTR1701 wrote: > Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any law > that puts people in jail merely for telling the truth about something is > prior restraint No it isn't. -- John W. Kennedy "Those in the seat of power

Nice pickup of my sarcasm. > I hope you get kidnapped by them as well. If you refuse to accept > Islam while you are in captivity, you'll be buried without your head > attached to your body. > > You will have to pretend to accept Islam as your way

In article <mjQTh.14678$JZ3.9802@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>, a@b.com says... > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589vh5F2fsr20U1 > @mid.individual.net: > > See Unauthorized Practice of Law, etc. > > A url would be helpful here

BTR1701 <btr1702@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:btr1702-014EF4.15032313042007@news.giganews.com: > In article <589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net>, > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > >> CRS 18-13-105. Criminal libel. >> Statute text

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:42:56 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: - Refer: <587ugtF2fiskhU1@mid.individual.net> >April 11, 2007, 10:21PM >Judge orders external audit for church > > >By ALLISON HOFFMAN Associated Press Writer > >S

On Apr 12, 8:44 pm, "Steve" <nobodyh...@example.com> wrote: > > Your logic would make any adult film actor/actress a prostitute. Is that > your intent? My intent? My intent is to find out the distinction. Calling these women "film actresses"

_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote: Why hasn't Daryl Hunt dropped the dime on terrorist-aiding, America-hating troll Vox Populi yet?

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589vh5F2fsr20U1 @mid.individual.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589r8qF2g14tiU1 >> @mid.individual.net: >> >>> Deadrat wrote: >>>> >>>> *** I am not

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:28:19 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote: >On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:30:01 GMT, Mike_B <usenet@localhosts.net> >wrote: > >>In message <5855toF2ff1gmU1@mid.individual.net>, _ Prof. Jonez _ >><theprof@jonez.net> writes >>>UK lawmaker s

"jadel" <delcolja@mail.ab.edu> wrote in news:1176486254.920366.139500@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com: > On Apr 13, 1:28 pm, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> "jadel" <delco...@mail.ab.edu> wrote in news:1176481775.690562.37060 >> @y5g2000hsa.googlegroup

"jadel" <delcolja@mail.ab.edu> wrote in news:1176486625.064476.120880 @l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com: > Here in West Virginia truth is not an absolute defense in libel > suits. The true statement must also have been published with good > motives for

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589r8qF2g14tiU1 @mid.individual.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> >> *** I am not a lawyer, so this can't be legal advice. *** > > Actually it could be legal advice whether you are a lawyer > or not, th

"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589qskF2fvgadU1@mid.individual.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote in news:1176479181.969476.169000 >> @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: >> >>> I was researching libel on the int

John W. Kennedy wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: >> Sounds like a great 1st Amendment challenge with that statute. Any >> law that puts people in jail merely for telling the truth about >> something is prior restraint > > No it isn't. BTR1701 didn't get m

On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:30:01 GMT, Mike_B <usenet@localhosts.net> wrote: >In message <5855toF2ff1gmU1@mid.individual.net>, _ Prof. Jonez _ ><theprof@jonez.net> writes >>UK lawmaker says assassinating Blair would be justifiable >> >>LONDON, England

"jadel" <delcolja@mail.ab.edu> wrote in news:1176481775.690562.37060 @y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com: > On Apr 13, 11:46 am, nadin...@mailinator.com wrote: >> I was researching libel on the internet, and was surprised to find >> that writing under a ps

"francois cap" <ezmickey@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1176406317.237598.116290@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > it is my wish that i find out who owns > wells fargo and where are corporate > offices in the united states and also > in canada, and

Deadrat wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589vh5F2fsr20U1 > @mid.individual.net: > >> Deadrat wrote: >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:589r8qF2g14tiU1 >>> @mid.individual.net: >>> >>>> Deadrat wrote

Spob, > I wouldn't pay these knuckleheads 10 cents. Perhaps, but as everyone has hinted, you need to get out in the real world more. The web-site presents a fantasy and gives you some dirty pictures. No one believes that the "barely legal"

"Francis A. Miniter" <miniter@attglobalZZ.net> wrote in news:461fa9fa@kcnews01: > nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote: > >> I was researching libel on the internet, and was surprised to find >> that writing under a pseudonym and changing peoples names

nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote in news:1176479181.969476.169000 @n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: > I was researching libel on the internet, and was surprised to find > that writing under a pseudonym Just because you change your *name* doesn't make yo

spam@uce.gov (Citizen Bob) wrote in news:461f90fe.74981296@news-server.houston.rr.com: > Please comment on the meaning and applicability of the federal statute > below. > > In particular what is meant by "injunctive relief", "declaratory > decre

As I understand it, on 13 Apr 2007 08:46:23 -0700, nadine_t@mailinator.com wrote: >I was researching libel on the internet, and was surprised to find >that writing under a pseudonym and changing peoples names apparently >doesn't protect you from a l

As I understand it, on Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:50:15 GMT, Big Giant Head <bigxgiantxhead@SPAMBLOCKhotmail.com> wrote: >You shoot someone. They do not die. > >You stand trial for attempted murder. > >You are acquitted. > >New evidence emerges plus y