Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Stalker-Boy Kaldis Strikes Again!!!
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > I was going through some old picture files and came across the following: > > <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.htm> > > This lush looks like he's soused to the gills, three sheets to the wind. > Anybody


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 01:36:27 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <eg2c435sk00qj5hqhkutd53dru7a2rmjjd@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I wasn't aware there were checkpoints to check for how fast >>


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 01:35:35 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <ajbb43dban2dq5s958d89hg13g46e6rp9q@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 01:46:49 GMT, Larry <x@y.co


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 20:25:17 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Larry wrote: > >>>> Everything you know about this case is third hand? > >>> I was out


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 03:15:44 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <46468146.C9D84BBB@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Everything you know about this case is


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 02:18:09 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> I was going through some old picture files and came across the following: >> >> <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/A


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Wayne Delia wrote: > Anyway, a lot of your admissions tonight are seriously going to impeach > your standing as a key player in the Team Geragos Inner Circle, and will > certainly make the book you're planning to write about the trials much > less a


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
On May 13, 1:59 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote: > >On May 13, 1:48 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >> osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote: > >> >On May 13, 1:29 am, rfisc...@sonic.ne


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 20:25:17 -0700, The self admitted felon and LSD user, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Larry wrote: > >>>> Everything you know about thi


Re: Who is This <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.htm> Alky Man?
Ken Smith wrote: > The only entities left are the voices in your head. But you were asked to submit to a psychological examination by the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board. -- Theodore A. Kaldis kaldis@worldnet.att.net


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
On May 13, 1:48 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > osprey <noneedtok...@mail.com> wrote: > >On May 13, 1:29 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >> <nos...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >> >"Fred G. Mackey" <d...@not.spam> wrote in mes


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 03:27:43 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <4646851D.C81E6ABD@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> Larry


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 02:32:51 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <46467894.60D3B13@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> foreve


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
On May 13, 1:29 am, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > <nos...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Fred G. Mackey" <d...@not.spam> wrote in messagenews:JK-dnY4IIPWj2tvbnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com... > >> nos...@sbcglobal.net wrote: > >> > "james g. kee


there is a better than 50 to 50 chance that Wikipedia goes before the USA Supreme Court over...
I am not sure how the Consumer Fraud charge on Wikipedia over the Arky nickname of Archimedes Plutonium will end. We have to wait and see. But I am sure of one thing. That I am not the only person Wikipedia has dissed and maligned. And that there w


Historical Triva: DEATHS OF 3 MENTAL PATIENTS LINKED TO HEAT WAVE
The New York Times July 16, 1981 DEATHS OF 3 MENTAL PATIENTS LINKED TO HEAT WAVE By RONALD SULLIVAN New York City's Chief Medical Examiner said yesterday that the deaths of two mental patients at state hospitals and that of another at a city hos


it is Consumer Fraud to allow Wikipedia to call itself a "Encyclopedia"
By allowing Wikipedia to call itself an encyclopedia cloaks it as a respectable product, when in fact it is low quality. I posted what a ridiculous entry of "superdeterminism" was on Wikipedia. It is a form of Consumer Fraud that Wikipedia pretends


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
The officer should have been fired.


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <Fpt1i.1696$mR2.491@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:jgkeegan-1B265A.20562212052007@individual.net... > > In article <Uht1i.1694$mR2.429@news


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Kent Wills wrote: > Larry wrote: >> Everything you know about this case is third hand? > Which means, of course, Ken has better information than Ted. Ken has been > to the scene and read the contents of the case file (at the time of his > visi


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Larry wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Larry wrote: >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>>> Larry wrote: >>>>> Everything you know about this case is third hand? >>>> I was out of state when the accident happened. I have never discussed >>>>


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <zot1i.1695$mR2.1476@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Take a minute and read more than the first page. No matter > how the question is asked, more Americans favor this ban than > oppose it. on the contrary


Re: Stalker Ted strikes again! (was Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 13 May 2007 00:30:39 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >forevernitefan wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >>>As I understand it, on Fri, 11 May 2007 14:00:59 -0700, "Theodore A. >>>Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <46465C44.2040806@it.com>, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > > "james g. keegan jr." wrote: > >>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>>"james g. keegan jr." wrote: > >> > >>>>bush's supreme court appointees, john


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <Uht1i.1694$mR2.429@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:jgkeegan-3E8943.19195612052007@individual.net... > > In article <JK-dnY4IIPWj2tvbnZ2dnUV


Re: Eric Gisin drinks glyphosates for breakfast
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 19:02:15 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <u14c43pfiuvbvckg73j8k3tfabq2gsqqi5@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on Fri, 11 May 2007 16:47:45 -0500, "TNKev" >


Re: Stalker-Boy Kaldis Strikes Again!!!
As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 23:51:28 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> I was going through some old picture files and came across the following: >> >> <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.h


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 15:29:54 -0700, "Theodore A. Kaldis, Accessory Before the Fact in an Armed Robbery (a felony)" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >forevernitefan babbled: > >> Teddie doesn't give a damn, that's the point if his


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 14:47:25 -0700, forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: [...] >> >(Maybe next time I'm in the area I'll pop by and >> >take a couple of pics from the ground? It's just off the interstate, after >> >all.) >>


Re: Where's that CRIMINAL Kent Wills?
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 17:27:07 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <lt3c43doqobpb9360ker58p70vtgifqoki@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 01:53:58 GMT, Larry <x@y.c


Re: Where's that CRIMINAL Kent Wills ?
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 17:18:19 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <6h4c4353m1gf7vur18vfn1lp5lj7mj8jkc@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 01:58:33 GMT, Larry <x@y.c


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Larry wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Larry wrote: >>> Everything you know about this case is third hand? >> I was out of state when the accident happened. I have never discussed the >> matter directly with Cameron, and his attorney has


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
On Sat, 12 May 2007 15:09:43 -0400, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > "Respecting settled precedents" is an extremely vague expression. It >> > > doesn't really mean anything taken literally. Congress took it to >> > > me


Re: Wikipedia is no longer a encyclopedia but a obnoxious Reality TV show and restrict it with Do-Not-Call-List
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 13:55:29 -0700, a_plutonium <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote: >Wikipedia, in its very early days may have looked like an encyclopedia >whose consumer product was facts and >information. But as I and many others have


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Larry wrote: > Everything you know about this case is third hand? I was out of state when the accident happened. I have never discussed the matter directly with Cameron, and his attorney has never really discussed the details of the case with me.


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
Deadrat wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: >>> [...] At least, when Clinton lied, no one died. >> Tell that to the families of the soldiers killed in Mogadishu. > Sure. Clinton lied about his sex life, and that got peopl


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
As I understand it, on Sat, 12 May 2007 13:26:55 -0700, "RG" <rg@nospam.gfy> wrote: >(snip) > >> > >> >We live in a fear based society now. Fear of this, fear of that. Law >> >enforcement bases its power on fear far too much. IMO a motorist should


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
tjab wrote: >> So what? Politicians lie all the time. > Who would have thought Kaldis would post a defense of Bill Clinton? Who's defending him? It's simply an observation. I just can't help but notice the hypocrisy that keegan exhibits. To


Re: Got a DUI just before moving to another state and need advice
As I understand it, on 12 May 2007 17:35:11 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>>> >>>> I suggest contacting the DMV in Colorado, and asking them >>>>about it. >>> >>>Or you could tell the people in your new state you don't really


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
David Johnston wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> David Johnston wrote: >>> No, it doesn't. A statement that someone "respects established >>> precedent", says very little. And while I suppose Congress could decide >>> to impeach based on assuming a


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
Ken Smith wrote: > David Johnston wrote: >> "james g. keegan jr." wrote: >>> your childish defensiveness validates my comment. >> No, it doesn't. A statement that someone "respects established >> precedent", says very little. And while I supp


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
Ken Smith wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Deadrat wrote: >>> [...] the question was whether a Supreme Court Justice may be impeached. >>> The answer is yes, it is possible. Not only is it possible, it has >>> happened once. >>> Convic


Re: Who is This Alky Man?
Larry wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> forevernitefan babbled: >>> Teddie doesn't give a damn, that's the point if his post to infer he can >>> stop by Ken at any time he wishes. >> But I CAN'T "stop by Ken" any time I wish (though you mig


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <JK-dnY4IIPWj2tvbnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com>, "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > nospam@sbcglobal.net wrote: > > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:jgkeegan-8FFB4B.18055512052007@individual.net..


Re: Eric Gisin drinks glyphosates for breakfast
In article <u14c43pfiuvbvckg73j8k3tfabq2gsqqi5@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on Fri, 11 May 2007 16:47:45 -0500, "TNKev" ><serviceadvisor@adodgedealer.invalid> wrote: > >[...] > >>>> Anyway, I don't know any


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <lXq1i.2544$UU.1203@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>, <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:jgkeegan-8FFB4B.18055512052007@individual.net... > > In article <Oxp1i.1627$mR2.799@news


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <Oxp1i.1627$mR2.799@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Forget the fact a majority of Americans favored the ban. cites please. and also show some evidence that the "majority of Americans" know what the non-


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <5b8c43h6hjfhievprrv824sno15oslequf@4ax.com>, David Johnston <david@block.net> wrote: > On Sat, 12 May 2007 15:09:43 -0400, "james g. keegan jr." > <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > "Respecting settled precedents" is an extre


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:jgkeegan-1B265A.20562212052007@individual.net... > In article <Uht1i.1694$mR2.429@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net>, > <nospam@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmai


Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
"Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote in message news:JK-dnY4IIPWj2tvbnZ2dnUVZ_szinZ2d@comcast.com... > nospam@sbcglobal.net wrote: > > "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:jgkeegan-8FFB4B.18055512052007@individual.net... > >