Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Telecommuting Data Entry Jobs!
A Consortium of a software park wishes to recruit home based data entry workers on contract basis.The applicant with basic computer knowedge,accurate typing speed and having a P.C.with internet connection are requested to contact with the advertiser.Ea


Telecommuting Data Entry Jobs!
A Consortium of a software park wishes to recruit home based data entry workers on contract basis.The applicant with basic computer knowedge,accurate typing speed and having a P.C.with internet connection are requested to contact with the advertiser.Ea


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:1179683440.000276.204700@u36g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On May 19, 1:46 pm, "foaddoc" <f...@#@&@^slap.org> wrote: > "Fred G. Mackey" <d...@not.spam> wrote in > messagenews:g9qdnRe_e48MAtPbnZ2dnUVZ_q


Re: Jury duty
"Noon Cat Nick" <chatdemidiSPAMBEGONE@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Um44i.124748$_c5.46161@attbi_s22... > Larry wrote: > >> You suffer from FIFTY SEVEN disabilities, but not one has been diagnosed >> >>by a licensed medical doctor? >> >>Pe


Re: Jury duty
Larry wrote: > You suffer from FIFTY SEVEN disabilities, but not one has been diagnosed > >by a licensed medical doctor? > >Perhaps hypochondria is one of them? > > From the length of his list, my guess is he probably thinks hypochondria


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
<fredfighter@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:1179681943.744899.273100@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On May 18, 5:50 pm, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> "Global Warming K00ks Gone Wild again" <Global Warming k00k @ ELF.org> >> wrote innews:46


Re: Who is This <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.htm> Alky Man?
>>I believe Ted has an overwhelming, insurmountable >>need to phrase every statement, indeed live his entire life, constantly >>engaging in some form of intentional disingenuous dishonesty. >> > > It permits Ted wiggle room when caught. Having bee


Re: Changing names on a home..
>My divorced son who has resided with me the past year I would like to >put his name on my home here in California...he has excellent credit >but I can't help thinking about the "what if's"...if he become >disabled his EX could put a lien on the home f


Re: Jury duty (was: could robert maas ...)
In article <rem-2007may20-010@yahoo.com>, rem642b@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t) wrote: > > > By the way, if (in the USA) a potential juror is dismissed for no > > > other reason than that the juror is disabled, but with no spe


Re: Free Paris Hilton !!!!!!!
On Mon, 21 May 2007 00:28:56 GMT, The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >Porgy Tirebiter wrote: >> >> "The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message >> news:464F8343.3CCA@ix.netcom.com... >> > Bob's Backfire Burrito wrote: >


Re: Changing names on a home..
sunflower50uk@yahoo.co.uk wrote in news:1179686124.255618.114990@r3g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > On May 20, 10:55 am, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> sunflower5...@yahoo.co.uk wrote in news:1179643565.965350.233320 >> @u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote in news:1179685591.215209.292890@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com: > On May 20, 6:08 pm, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> fredfigh...@spamcop.net wrote >> innews:1179681943.744899.273100@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com: >> >


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
oaddoc wrote: > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote in message > news:g9qdnRe_e48MAtPbnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com... > >>foaddoc wrote: >> >>>"Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote in message >>>news:ntKdnd-lVbk3RtDbnZ2dnUVZ_qmpnZ2d@comcast.com.


Re: Andrew Kingoff disharmonies and MANY other LIES are dubious at best!
"Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >"Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> wrote : >> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> >>> >>>"The One LYING AND HARASSING <Andrew_Kingoff@yahoo.com> wrote : >>> >>> Subject changed du


Re: Is this link legit?
On May 20, 5:11 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote: > The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On May 20, 4:50 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > >>http://tinyurl.com/289v37http://apps.alameda.cour


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 19:26:10 -0500, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > Soon I'll have the pictures from the Mexico trip posted as >well. I've been meaning to post them, but just never got around to >scanning th


Re: Is this link legit?
On May 20, 8:11 pm, Peter Bowditch <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> wrote: > The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > >On May 20, 4:50 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > >>http://tinyurl.com/289v37http://apps.alameda.cour


Re: Jury duty (was: could robert maas ...)
As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 22:10:55 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >Think of it this way: If you were on trial for a serious crime, would >you want someone like you, with multiple alleged disabilties, a short >attention span, an


Re: Jury duty (was: could robert maas ...)
s I understand it, on Sat, 20 May 2007 11:22:58 -0700, rem642b@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t) wrote: >> > By the way, if (in the USA) a potential juror is dismissed for no >> > other reason than that the juror is disabled, but w


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: >Technically, NATO was at war in the Balkans. The US mostly supplied air >power. Remind me of the number of casualties. Was is two or three? Actually the United States had a squad of terrorists invade there as well so


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 18:44:51 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [snip] >>> >>>Read the decision. >> >> Read the applicable law. > >The decision is the applicable case law. If you think you have >anything at all that contrad


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <eof153phdn3i2apg7nlgqcqmia6rfortof@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 16:15:10 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu >(tjab) wrote: > >>In article <cq6153pggcide1n2i220kc7umgts8uq51o@4ax.com>, >>Kent


Re: Your White House War Criminal: Score Yet Another Impeachable ("Breathless") Act!
fredfighter@spamcop.net wrote in news:1179681943.744899.273100@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com: > On May 18, 5:50 pm, Deadrat <a...@b.com> wrote: >> "Global Warming K00ks Gone Wild again" <Global Warming k00k @ >> ELF.org> wrote >> innews:464dc4a5$0


Re: Changing names on a home..
sunflower50uk@yahoo.co.uk wrote in news:1179643565.965350.233320 @u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com: > My divorced son who has resided with me the past year I would like to > put his name on my home here in California...he has excellent credit > but I ca


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
In article <gvu0531ptgm9k3jdapblcprqt2801llq2b@4ax.com>, Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver </dev/nul> wrote: >SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: >>> It frightens me that you can't see the difference between >>> murder and legal killing. It honestly frig


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 16:15:10 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <cq6153pggcide1n2i220kc7umgts8uq51o@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 12:44:02 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.ed


Re: __ Kent Will's God Rips, Kills Toddler from Mother's Arms <= yeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaa! Braise Jayzus ! __
In article <bJednQJ_Lfa_b9LbnZ2dnUVZ_q-vnZ2d@comcast.com>, DanielSan <danielsangeo@comcast.net> wrote: >Daniel Packman wrote: >> In article <famdnb5Iafs6UdLbnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@comcast.com>, >> DanielSan <danielsangeo@comcast.net> wrote: >> ..... >>>


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
In article <cq6153pggcide1n2i220kc7umgts8uq51o@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 12:44:02 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu >(tjab) wrote: > >>In article <qID3i.304$mD.200@trndny02>, >>Wayne Delia <wmd@deli


Re: Funny thing Kent, but ....
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Wayne Delia wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: > >>>> If you want to think I have multiple felony convictions, I really don't >>>> care. > >>> Because it's true. > >> Technically, that's


Re: Changing names on a home..
<sunflower50uk@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:1179643565.965350.233320@u30g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > My divorced son who has resided with me the past year I would like to > put his name on my home here in California...he has excellent credit


Is this link legit?
On May 20, 4:50 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/289v37http://apps.alameda.courts.ca.gov/fortecgi/fortecgi.exe?Servicename=D... > > Motion for order req. plaint. to file an undertaking to secure cost > > ... Barrett & Pole


Barrett and Polevoy to Post $433,715.93 Bond in their SLAPP suit Loss to Ilena Rosenthal
http://tinyurl.com/289v37 http://apps.alameda.courts.ca.gov/fortecgi/fortecgi.exe?Servicename=DomainWebService&PageName=Image&ID=1&Parent=13174143&Action=19825551 Motion for order req. plaint. to file an undertaking to secure cost ... Barrett & Po


Re: Who is This <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.htm> Alky Man?
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Larry wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >>> The exculpatory facts WERE brought out at trial. > >> I thought you said the "H-Bomb" class evidence was NOT brought out ... >> which is it? > > Larry, you still g


Re: __ Kent Will's God Rips, Kills Toddler from Mother's Arms <= yeeeeeeeeee haaaaaaaaaaa! Braise Jayzus ! __
As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 10:51:06 -0400, "foaddoc" <foad@#@&@^slap.org> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:3bl053ds5c3htk9dj0209j5jlljqiovp0a@4ax.com... >> As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 08:2


Re: Who is This <http://mywebpages.comcast.net/kaldis/AlkyMan.htm> Alky Man?
As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 14:35:39 GMT, Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Larry wrote: >> >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >>>> The exculpatory facts WERE brought out at trial. >> >>> I thou


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
As I understand it, on Sun, 20 May 2007 12:41:28 -0400, Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver <drunk@the_wheel.com> wrote: >SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: >> >>>> Regardless of what the "perp" had done, it is not the cop's job to >>>> dish out punishme


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 12:44:02 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <qID3i.304$mD.200@trndny02>, >Wayne Delia <wmd@deliafamily.net> wrote: >>Kent Wills wrote: >>> As I understand it, on Fri, 18 May 2007 15:39:14 -0700, "T


Re: Why Does Kent B. Wills Disgrace His Name? - (was.Re: can a supreme court justice be impeached?
As I understand it, on 20 May 2007 12:39:27 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <bics43tf4fg9h4vrmtgtt4f47tov6e2lro@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> While it is possible you lied about it, this is an odd lie to


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
> There's a pretty big difference between my encounters and the one > Matthew describes: I did not go out of my way to provoke the cops. I > was polite and respectful, and was on my way in a few moments. No > nightsticks were pulled, no cuffs were slap


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1179030331.441934.198120@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > The officer should have been fired. > THE OFFICER SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHOT AND KILLED


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
And the officer did over react. > AND HE SHOULD BE KILLED FOR DOING SO, TO GIVE HIM A FREE VACATION (PAID SUSPENSION) JUST ENCOURAGES THE NEXT PIG TO DO THE SAME THING. IF HE WERE KILLED FOR ACTING LIKE AN ASSHOLE, MAYBE THE NEXT PIG WOULD ACTU


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
>>THEN we'll see whether he'd >> consider killing to defend house and home. > > He would, as would most. This isn't the same as killing a law > enforcement officer, which is the matter to which I was replying. > KILLING A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFI


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
> It was pretty obvious what he meant. YES, PIGS ARE SCUM AND SHOULD ALL BE SHOT AND KILLED


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
Only a sociopath would BECOME A PIG


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
> It frightens me that you can't see the difference between > murder and legal killing. It honestly frightens me. > IT FRIGHTENS ME THAT PIGS CAN'T SEE THAT DIFFERENCE. DEATH TO COPS, KILL THEM ALL TIME TO BOMB PIG STATIONS.


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
>>DEATH TO COPS. > > Why? BECAUSE THEY ARE USELESS PILES OF SHIT FOR STARTERS. .. > >> >>DO YOU KILL COPS TOO? >> > > Only a sociopath would intentionally kill anyone. > ONLY A SOCIOPATH WOULD BECOME A COP IN THE FIRST PLACE


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
BIG FUCKING DEAL, PIG FUCKS UP, GETS A SUSPENSION (i.e., VACATION) WITH PAY, WHAT KIND OPF HORSECRAP IS THAT? WHEN A PIG FUCKS UP, HE SHOULD BE SHOT AND KILLED. DEATH TO PIGS, KILL THEM ALL.


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: >And the officer did over react. >> > >AND HE SHOULD BE KILLED FOR DOING SO, TO GIVE HIM A FREE VACATION (PAID >SUSPENSION) JUST ENCOURAGES THE NEXT PIG TO DO THE SAME THING. > >IF HE WERE KILLED FOR ACTING LIKE AN A


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim wrote: > >"Tim Crowley" <timmyturmoil@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1179030331.441934.198120@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> The officer should have been fired. >> > >THE OFFICER SHOULD HAVE BEEN SHOT AND KILLED >


Re: Cop suspended for arresting nutso doing 63 in a 35
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:srpk43htlsfkrqqdguvsp8evf3an06horp@4ax.com... > As I understand it, on Wed, 16 May 2007 00:09:17 GMT, > "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" <killgod@killgod.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> To which the offic