Legal Spring Logo

"Should I form an Incorporation or an LLC?"
Find out at LegalSpring.com
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: No God®
"Scott" <blackhole@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:f5n1d6$cf8$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > There is an alternative, that all these positions are nonsense. The > atheist, agnostic and religious view is wrong. Arguing about the truth of > the


Re: Dear ACLU,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:49:31 -0500, none@isp.com (Dersu Uzala) wrote: >In article <0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com>, >the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com says... >> >> >>Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness >>doctrin


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
tjab wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> tjab wrote: >>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more >>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...] >> Thank God I've never done anything like that. > What, burglarize


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:56:17 -0500, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > FYI: That last time I recall using the Yahoo address was in >2004. I should point out the last time I recall using it as my E-mail address


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:42:36 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> >The operant word here being confession. Good for the soul, maybe >> >you should try it yourself. >> > >> >> I hereby confess to spanking (as the term is us


Re: Reappearance of old debt on credit report
On Jun 25, 1:03 pm, "McGyver" <Greyp...@msn.com> wrote: >snip< > I doesn't matter whether they are in the business of extending credit. All > that matters is whether they are in the business of collecting debt. There > are two ways to qualify as a d


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
Wayne Delia wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> tjab wrote: >>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more >>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...] >> Thank God I've never done anything like that. > And than


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:38:26 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >Let's say, for argument's sake, Kent was the infamous "garage burglar." >So what? Ted wouldn't be the only KNOWN felon on misc.legal. Beyond that, it would


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:25:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5m9j3$749@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <58rs73df0i9js2s0mqbtus0nlqu96sj9uf@4ax.com>, >> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.c


Re: Election Law NJ 2
teak, There are laws that may affect this but children are not prohibited from working or being paid. Child actors come to mind. In a campaign though most workers are unpaid volunteers, they get donuts and coffee. If you plan to hire your mi


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 21:31:54 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <t8p083hjgubttvqjeutpf6gnidg3ebn0aa@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.ed


No thread about Bong-hits-for-jesus decision?
I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendment for speech regarding drugs. One would think - especially with the Tinker decision - that students should be allowed to make statements, no matter how much school administrators disagree


Re: Legalities of performing a song on TV
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:17:11 -0700, HiC <brassplyer@yahoo.com> wrote: >If you're on a TV talent show and want to perform a particular song, >is it correct that it has to be cleared by a particular performance >rights organization? If you're talkin


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 5:40 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > > > <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > > <Shakes


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:46 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > > > <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > ----- Ori


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR > RIGHTS > > OF PARTIES TO A TRUST > > THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH


Re: Dear ACLU,
"The Grand Beckoning" <the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com> wrote in message news:0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com... > > Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness > doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all a


Re: Dear ACLU,
In article <0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com>, the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com says... > > >Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness >doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all about free >speech without g


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > ----- Original Message ----- From: John Nottingham To: jjnn77 vaio Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:51 PM Subj


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR > RIGHTS > > OF PARTIES TO A TRUST > > THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH


Dear ACLU,
Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all about free speech without gov't restriction.


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: John Nottingham To: jjnn77 vaio Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:40 PM Subject: Fw: TITLE: RESPONSE TO ORDER:BY JUDGE TINDER NO


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:40 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > > > <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR > RIGHTS > > OF PARTIES TO A TRUST > > THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > > > <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:32 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > UNITED STATES CO


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ~ APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO COURT VERIFIED COMPLA


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
In article <t8p083hjgubttvqjeutpf6gnidg3ebn0aa@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu >(tjab) wrote: > >[...] > >>>> >>>>Now put YOUR www directory back to directory v


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" > > ----- Original Message ----- From: John Nottingham To: jjnn77 vaio ; jonyahoo Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007


Re: Is Obstruction of Justice a Way of Life for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals~
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com" <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote: > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR > RIGHTS > > OF PARTIES TO A TRUST > > THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH


Virginia now gives out $3500 fines for speeding!!! - YAAAYYYY
Good. No criminal coddling here. Speeders are kid-killers and kid-cripplers and deserve this and more. http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/18/1818.asp Virginia Introduces $3550 Speeding Ticket Virginia motorists convicted of minor traffic viola


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
In article <b9j083pcs2dg54q05oqh58s96vaj99mmh3@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:03:22 GMT, "Theodore A. >Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >>Wayne Delia wrote: >> >>> Theodore A.


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
In article <f5pidd$le5@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote: >In article <5eas7fF2sjam7U1@mid.individual.net>, >¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >>Kent Wills wrote: >>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan


Re: Virginia now gives out $3500 fines for speeding!!! - YAAAYYYY
In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt wrote: > There ought to be a mechanism for kicking out of office, and putting in > jail, any lawmaker who violates his oath of office so blatantly. They are acting as rulers now and becomin


Re: Response to the Inane Rants of Terry Polevoy
Can we discuss more? Weight Loss : http://www.healthopts.com


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:27:01 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <b9j083pcs2dg54q05oqh58s96vaj99mmh3@4ax.com>, >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:03:22 GMT, "Theodore A.


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>> >>>Now put YOUR www directory back to directory view by removing >>>the index.html file and lets take a look as the created/modified dates on >>>the file


Re: No God®
Scott wrote: > Jeckyl wrote: >> "Scott" <blackhole@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:f5gp0f$n01$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk... >>> Jeckyl wrote: >>>>>> Indeed, it is the opposite .. it IS possible that some god >>>>>> exists, exactly due to the


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on 24 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu > (tjab) wrote: > >> In article <642u73t3napkd8todaihtimm70vrup9cad@4ax.com>, >> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2


Re: No God®
eckyl wrote: > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message > news:5e8vlkF35kp4bU1@mid.individual.net... >> Jeckyl wrote: >>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message >>> news:5e7cq6F37i0c2U1@mid.individual.net... >>>> Jeckyl wrote: >>>>> "


Re: One more reason why "gun control" should apply to police FIRST!
"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message news:5eartqF38g16iU1@mid.individual.net... > SaPeIsMa wrote: >> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message >> news:5e9sj7F37s9ddU1@mid.individual.net... >>> foad wrote: >>>> "Kent Wills" <compuel


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
In article <uji0835oimof6hroo3acdv4uod3ii9s3oq@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:00:12 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥" ><ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >>Kent Wills wrote: >>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24


Re: Virginia now gives out $3500 fines for speeding!!! - YAAAYYYY
On Jun 25, 4:14 pm, John David Galt <j...@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: > Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: > > > Virginia Introduces $3550 Speeding Ticket > > > Virginia motorists convicted of minor traffic violations will face a >


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
In article <5eas7fF2sjam7U1@mid.individual.net>, ¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥" >> <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >> >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> As I understand


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > tjab wrote: > >> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more >> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...] > > Thank God I've never done anything like that. And thank God you left your antece


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
tjab wrote: > In article <467FFFBF.6C56D47C@avenuecable.com>, > Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote: >> tjab wrote: >> >>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more >>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > Larry wrote: > >> snorey wrote: >>> Larry wrote: > >>>> I'm not saying the Kents are the same person, I'm not saying >>>> they're not the same person. But those who make the claim that he >>>> is have to address these t


Re: Kent Wills is the REAL Felon Here (attn: Larry)
Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥" > <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:58:00 +0100, "¥ UltraMan >>> ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >>> >>>


Re: One more reason why "gun control" should apply to police FIRST!
SaPeIsMa wrote: > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message > news:5e9sj7F37s9ddU1@mid.individual.net... >> foad wrote: >>> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:6p6v739coqk2908fthopcr86a09k6qe2hq@4ax.com... >>> >>>> He's


Re: Virginia now gives out $3500 fines for speeding!!! - YAAAYYYY
In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: > >But certainly any attempt to apply this "tax" to tickets issued before it >was signed into law would be an "ex pos