|
|
"Scott" <blackhole@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:f5n1d6$cf8$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk...
> There is an alternative, that all these positions are nonsense. The
> atheist, agnostic and religious view is wrong. Arguing about the truth of
> the
|
|
|
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:49:31 -0500, none@isp.com (Dersu Uzala) wrote:
>In article <0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com>,
>the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com says...
>>
>>
>>Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness
>>doctrin
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> tjab wrote:
>>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more
>>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...]
>> Thank God I've never done anything like that.
> What, burglarize
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:56:17 -0500, Kent Wills
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> FYI: That last time I recall using the Yahoo address was in
>2004.
I should point out the last time I recall using it as my
E-mail address
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:42:36 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
[...]
>> >The operant word here being confession. Good for the soul, maybe
>> >you should try it yourself.
>> >
>>
>> I hereby confess to spanking (as the term is us
|
|
|
On Jun 25, 1:03 pm, "McGyver" <Greyp...@msn.com> wrote:
>snip<
> I doesn't matter whether they are in the business of extending credit. All
> that matters is whether they are in the business of collecting debt. There
> are two ways to qualify as a d
|
|
|
Wayne Delia wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> tjab wrote:
>>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more
>>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...]
>> Thank God I've never done anything like that.
> And than
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:38:26 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
[...]
>Let's say, for argument's sake, Kent was the infamous "garage burglar."
>So what?
Ted wouldn't be the only KNOWN felon on misc.legal. Beyond
that, it would
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:25:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <f5m9j3$749@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <58rs73df0i9js2s0mqbtus0nlqu96sj9uf@4ax.com>,
>> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.c
|
|
|
teak,
There are laws that may affect this but children are not prohibited from
working or being paid. Child actors come to mind. In a campaign though most
workers are unpaid volunteers, they get donuts and coffee.
If you plan to hire your mi
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 21:31:54 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
(tjab) wrote:
>In article <t8p083hjgubttvqjeutpf6gnidg3ebn0aa@4ax.com>,
>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.ed
|
|
|
I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendment for
speech regarding drugs. One would think - especially with the Tinker
decision - that students should be allowed to make statements, no matter
how much school administrators disagree
|
|
|
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:17:11 -0700, HiC <brassplyer@yahoo.com> wrote:
>If you're on a TV talent show and want to perform a particular song,
>is it correct that it has to be cleared by a particular performance
>rights organization?
If you're talkin
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:40 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
>
> <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
> > <Shakes
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:46 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
>
> <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
> ----- Ori
|
|
|
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR
> RIGHTS
>
> OF PARTIES TO A TRUST
>
> THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH
|
|
|
"The Grand Beckoning" <the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com> wrote in message
news:0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com...
>
> Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness
> doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all a
|
|
|
In article <0rr083droo15srp34mirrtnjpkfngj5ld4@4ax.com>,
the@gr4ndb3ck0n1ng.com says...
>
>
>Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness
>doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all about free
>speech without g
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:43 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: John Nottingham
To: jjnn77 vaio
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 6:51 PM
Subj
|
|
|
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR
> RIGHTS
>
> OF PARTIES TO A TRUST
>
> THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH
|
|
|
Why haven't you checked in on the issue of talk radio and the fairness
doctrine? Seems like you guys should be squealing all about free
speech without gov't restriction.
|
|
|
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: John Nottingham
To: jjnn77 vaio
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:40 PM
Subject: Fw: TITLE: RESPONSE TO ORDER:BY JUDGE TINDER NO
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:40 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
>
> <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW
|
|
|
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR
> RIGHTS
>
> OF PARTIES TO A TRUST
>
> THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
>
> <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:32 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
> <Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
> UNITED STATES CO
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:29 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
~
APPELLANT'S BRIEF TO COURT
VERIFIED COMPLA
|
|
|
In article <t8p083hjgubttvqjeutpf6gnidg3ebn0aa@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
>(tjab) wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>
>>>>Now put YOUR www directory back to directory v
|
|
|
n Jun 25, 5:26 pm, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: John Nottingham
To: jjnn77 vaio ; jonyahoo
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007
|
|
|
n Jun 24, 11:43 am, "Shakespeare...@hotmail.com"
<Shakespeare...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> THEY DON'T WANT TO READ YOUR BRIEF, AREN'T CURRENT ON TRUST LAW OR
> RIGHTS
>
> OF PARTIES TO A TRUST
>
> THEY SEEK TO DISMISS CASES, LET LOWER COURT JUDGES SUCH
|
|
|
Good. No criminal coddling here. Speeders are kid-killers and
kid-cripplers and deserve this and more.
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/18/1818.asp
Virginia Introduces $3550 Speeding Ticket
Virginia motorists convicted of minor traffic viola
|
|
|
In article <b9j083pcs2dg54q05oqh58s96vaj99mmh3@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:03:22 GMT, "Theodore A.
>Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>
>>Wayne Delia wrote:
>>
>>> Theodore A.
|
|
|
In article <f5pidd$le5@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab <tjab@wam.umd.edu> wrote:
>In article <5eas7fF2sjam7U1@mid.individual.net>,
>¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan
|
|
|
In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blue.rahul.net>, John David Galt wrote:
> There ought to be a mechanism for kicking out of office, and putting in
> jail, any lawmaker who violates his oath of office so blatantly.
They are acting as rulers now and becomin
|
|
|
Can we discuss more?
Weight Loss : http://www.healthopts.com
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:27:01 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
(tjab) wrote:
>In article <b9j083pcs2dg54q05oqh58s96vaj99mmh3@4ax.com>,
>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:03:22 GMT, "Theodore A.
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 25 Jun 2007 20:23:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
(tjab) wrote:
[...]
>>>
>>>Now put YOUR www directory back to directory view by removing
>>>the index.html file and lets take a look as the created/modified dates on
>>>the file
|
|
|
Scott wrote:
> Jeckyl wrote:
>> "Scott" <blackhole@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>> news:f5gp0f$n01$1$830fa7a5@news.demon.co.uk...
>>> Jeckyl wrote:
>>>>>> Indeed, it is the opposite .. it IS possible that some god
>>>>>> exists, exactly due to the
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> As I understand it, on 24 Jun 2007 22:23:48 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
> (tjab) wrote:
>
>> In article <642u73t3napkd8todaihtimm70vrup9cad@4ax.com>,
>> Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2
|
|
|
eckyl wrote:
> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message
> news:5e8vlkF35kp4bU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Jeckyl wrote:
>>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message
>>> news:5e7cq6F37i0c2U1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> Jeckyl wrote:
>>>>> "
|
|
|
"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message
news:5eartqF38g16iU1@mid.individual.net...
> SaPeIsMa wrote:
>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message
>> news:5e9sj7F37s9ddU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> foad wrote:
>>>> "Kent Wills" <compuel
|
|
|
In article <uji0835oimof6hroo3acdv4uod3ii9s3oq@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:00:12 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥"
><ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>
>>Kent Wills wrote:
>>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24
|
|
|
On Jun 25, 4:14 pm, John David Galt <j...@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us>
wrote:
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>
> > Virginia Introduces $3550 Speeding Ticket
>
> > Virginia motorists convicted of minor traffic violations will face a
>
|
|
|
In article <5eas7fF2sjam7U1@mid.individual.net>,
¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥"
>> <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> As I understand
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> tjab wrote:
>
>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more
>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [...]
>
> Thank God I've never done anything like that.
And thank God you left your antece
|
|
|
tjab wrote:
> In article <467FFFBF.6C56D47C@avenuecable.com>,
> Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>> tjab wrote:
>>
>>> [...] (Personally I consider giving a tire iron to gay-bashers more
>>> insidious than burglarizing a garage, [
|
|
|
Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> Larry wrote:
>
>> snorey wrote:
>>> Larry wrote:
>
>>>> I'm not saying the Kents are the same person, I'm not saying
>>>> they're not the same person. But those who make the claim that he
>>>> is have to address these t
|
|
|
Kent Wills wrote:
> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:51:11 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥"
> <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:58:00 +0100, "¥ UltraMan
>>> ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
SaPeIsMa wrote:
> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message
> news:5e9sj7F37s9ddU1@mid.individual.net...
>> foad wrote:
>>> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6p6v739coqk2908fthopcr86a09k6qe2hq@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>> He's
|
|
|
In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blue.rahul.net>,
John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
>
>But certainly any attempt to apply this "tax" to tickets issued before it
>was signed into law would be an "ex pos |