misc.legal

In article <x-95D729.23154926062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5skcg$lvf@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-666FDA.23025526062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com>

As I understand it, on 26 Jun 2007 21:02:03 -0800, pxhxz@cadence.com (Pete nospam Zakel) wrote: >>Because minors at school-sponsored events, where the school is acting in >>loco parentis, do not have the full panoply of constitutional rights >>tha

Bo Raxo wrote: > >"Murderous Speeding Drunken Driver" <drunk@the_wheel.com> wrote in message >news:bq7383lnfj5rnu6cb1195qi7k630df5g8k@4ax.com... >> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: > >>> >>> >>>When cops break the law they should real

As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:51:26 -0700, "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: >I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendment for >speech regarding drugs. One would think - especially with the Tinker >decision - th

In article <x-7F7C10.23072526062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5sk27$lsv@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-18EB51.22512226062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com>

As I understand it, on 26 Jun 2007 23:05:24 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>> Why do you put so much effort into defending Kent's efforts >>> to cover up his lies? >> >>If it achieves the goal of eradicating Vox from Usenet, it's w

As I understand it, on 26 Jun 2007 22:37:23 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>How about this - what if Kent offered to lose the index file after you >>agreed to lose your web browsers and news readers, with promises never >>to reins

In article <x-666FDA.23025526062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5sjih$lpn@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: >> >> Putting aside for the moment the question of whether your interpretation >> of t

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:41:33 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> Lose the lame index file you placed there after the fact and allow the >> directory view, >> then lets see what the dates are on the files, liar. > >How abou

As I understand it, on 26 Jun 2007 22:34:34 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >> >>I've never claimed to be the king of the world. Nor do I tell others >>how to run their private lives. I do, however, know more crim

In article <x-4385E2.22515826062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5sih3$lie@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-79EA59.20413226062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com>

=EF=81=B4 What are key compelling reasons for outsourcing by the US firms? =EF=81=B4 What is the break-up of total spending by the top US based law firms? =EF=81=B4 Where the business of legal outsourcing emanate from? =EF=81=

In article <x-18EB51.22512226062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5sibq$lgj@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-9EC007.20392026062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com>

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:39:22 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> >Don't tell him how to run his own web site, you moron. You're not king >> >of the world, despite your delusions to the contrary. >> >> Pot, kettle, black.

Dave Head <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in news:5u4383p9s4ui9em8ahnjmhtaovpc6c0iin@4ax.com: > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:35:00 -0700, John David Galt > <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: > >>Matthew T. Russotto wrote: >>> In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blu

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:37:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> Failure to report a felony is also a crime in many jurisdictions, so anyone >> aware >> of Kent's new confessed felonious activities -- especially an officer o

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:34:37 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > Long if he violates or catches a new charge. >> >> Like owning a weapon or maybe even discussing his case here and lying >> abiout it maybe. >> >> If som

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:33:44 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> I do not know them well enough to say, but they are proved fools here. > >When was the last time you contributed ANYTHING substantive to a legal >discussion?

In article <x-895A9E.21182826062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <8dudnZOiA6dANR3bnZ2dnUVZ_qyjnZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > >> I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendm

In article <zVhgi.7564$bP5.565@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net>, Deadrat wrote: >> Have you heard about what's going on in Iraq? Amazing what an armed >> population can do to even the world's strongest and most advanced >> military. > In the first

As I understand it, on 26 Jun 2007 22:24:55 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >>Countenance is a noun, you ignorant moron. > >Shades of Kent Wills! > He was and is correct. I'm a bit shocked you would admit that I'm correct as you've done

"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in news:5edg86F38ulrrU1@mid.individual.net: > Deadrat wrote: >> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in news:5ecvv5F37sk38U1 >> @mid.individual.net: >> >>> Deadrat wrote: >>>> "editor@netpath.net" <editor@netpa

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:30:33 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > Let's say, for argument's sake, Kent was the infamous "garage >> > burglar." So what? >> >> So why would you associate with and defend a pig-ignorant lying

As I understand it, on Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:28:33 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > I should point out the last time I recall using it as my >> > E-mail address for Usenet posts was in 2004. The account is still >> > active, though I h

In article <0ho383tt243mvvdq5110vkmi4hkt1d2s41@4ax.com>,=20 orionca@earthlink.net says... > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:50:39 -0600, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> > wrote: >=20 > >In article <tvf383tpd331nis5aca7ason3jsabsuddb@4ax.com>,=20 > >orionca@

In article <x-FD82DE.21122626062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <46811D3D.BDF5715A@avenuecable.com>, > "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> >> > Let's say, for argument's sake,

In article <x-79EA59.20413226062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <5e8ebiF36pve0U2@mid.individual.net>, > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >> Kent Wills wrote: >> > As I understand it, on Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:58:

In article <x-9EC007.20392026062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > >I've never claimed to be the king of the world. Nor do I tell others >how to run their private lives. I do, however, know more criminal law >than you, Kent,

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:35:00 -0700, John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: >Matthew T. Russotto wrote: >> In article <f5pibs$2td$2@blue.rahul.net>, >> John David Galt <jdg@diogenes.sacramento.ca.us> wrote: >>> But certainly any att

In article <x-2534BA.20324726062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <5ebki3F37m7usU1@mid.individual.net>, > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> > In article <f5m9j3$749@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.

n Jun 26, 9:30?am, "? UltraMan ?" <u...@man.jp> wrote: > ** Supreme Court Guts 1st Amendment <= No Separation of Church and Executive > Office ** > > By LINDA GREENHOUSE > Published: June 26, 2007 > WASHINGTON, June 25 - The Supreme Court on Monday

Larry wrote: > In article <stmdndwa2JPLcxzbnZ2dnUVZ_u7inZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > > >>Larry wrote: >> >>>In article <UcmdnanG4ZYedxzbnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@comcast.com>, >>> "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: >>

In article <x-B4C024.20275426062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <f5rm01$1j5@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <5ebiihF38c5ceU1@mid.individual.net>, >> ¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wr

Larry wrote: > In article <h8p383tvakf77qt762gugki8592o0lcn26@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> My personal opinion is that the suspension was too much. A >>reprimand would have been adequate, I think. However, I wasn't >>c

"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message news:5edfugF373f2cU1@mid.individual.net... > Steve wrote: >> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message >> news:5ecl4iF37qlakU1@mid.individual.net... >>> Boy, 7, kills 8-year-old cousin while play

Larry wrote: > In article <j7KdnZNzAZRRdRzbnZ2dnUVZ_ufinZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > > >>Kent Wills wrote: >> >>>As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:51:26 -0700, "Fred G. >>>Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: >>

In article <5edkndF38dp5hU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > > In article <5ecl4iF37qlakU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > > >> Davis said the boy's mother was in the a

Larry wrote: > In article <UcmdnanG4ZYedxzbnZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: >>And since a reasonable interpretation is that it criticized current drug >>laws, it should be protected speech. > > > And sinc

In article <tvf383tpd331nis5aca7ason3jsabsuddb@4ax.com>,=20 orionca@earthlink.net says... > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:30:39 -0300, "=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ultra@man.jp> > wrote: >=20 > >** Supreme Court Guts 1st Amendment <=3D No Separation of Church and Ex

tjab wrote: > > > Putting aside for the moment the question of whether your interpretation > of the banner is correct, had it said "Legalize Marijuana" would it have > been protected speech? > <quote> Justice John Roberts wondered whether a b

"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> writes: >"samsloan" <samhsloan@gmail.com> wrote >> Oh, yes we do. We have a paid staff of 23 persons >> in our Crossville Headquarters. >And they do what exactly? Sam can't or won't read the ma

Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:51:26 -0700, "Fred G. > Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > > >>I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendment for >>speech regarding drugs. One would think - especially w

Larry wrote: > In article <f5sjih$lpn@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) > wrote: >>Putting aside for the moment the question of whether your interpretation >>of the banner is correct, had it said "Legalize Marijuana" would it have >>been

Does the SUV have V,Z, or W speed rated tires with a cap ply and jointless edge caps? "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in message news:5ed10cF3817pnU1@mid.individual.net... > Gov. Corzine's 91 mph trooper back on the road > By Tom Hester Jr.

Larry wrote: > In article <8dudnZOiA6dANR3bnZ2dnUVZ_qyjnZ2d@comcast.com>, > "Fred G. Mackey" <do@not.spam> wrote: > > >>I didn't realize there was an exception to the First Amendment for >>speech regarding drugs. > > > There isn't. There's

"Paul Thomas, CPA" <paulthomascpapc@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:6Regi.4017$s8.920@bignews1.bellsouth.net... > > "samsloan" <samhsloan@gmail.com> wrote >> Oh, yes we do. We have a paid staff of 23 persons >> in our Crossville Headquarters.

On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:50:39 -0600, quibbler <quibbler247@yahoo.com> wrote: >In article <tvf383tpd331nis5aca7ason3jsabsuddb@4ax.com>, >orionca@earthlink.net says... >> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:30:39 -0300, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> >> wrote: >>

In article <x-95D729.23154926062007@news.west.earthlink.net> Larry <x@y.com> writes: >In article <f5skcg$lvf@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >wrote: > >> In article <x-666FDA.23025526062007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >> Larry <x@y.com> wr