misc.legal

--------------FD76C85AC82A298C14E88784 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit impeach the bastard Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote: > http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6233

In article <5fd8r8F3bukjkU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <5fd7v5F3c9sg1U1@mid.individual.net>, > > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > > >> Larry wrote: > >>> In article <5fd3t7F3c6

Larry wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> Larry wrote: >>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >>>> Cliff and Linda Griffith wrote: >>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message >> >>>>>>>> Duck declined to rel

Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:56:52 -0000, > gordonb.l25c8@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote: > >>>>> There's no requirement that a TM be registered. >>>>> >>>> I figured I am not following something. Doesn't a nam

Gordon Burditt wrote: >>>> There's no requirement that a TM be registered. >>>> >>> I figured I am not following something. Doesn't a name or a mark >>> have to be registered to be called a trademark? >>> >>> >> >> Nope. You'll see some words wi

IO wrote: > Does anyone know if there is any law in US or Canada against > co-sleeping or sharing bedroom with a teenage kid? There might be a law against it in some #@($hole dictatorship or fanatical religious state, like Afghanistan or Saudi Arabi

Does anyone know if there is any law in US or Canada against co-sleeping or sharing bedroom with a teenage kid? My ex-wife insists in sharing bedroom with our son (13) and bed with daugher (5). I would like to know if there is any legal way to stop thi

nin <fermenting13@yahoo.com> wrote in news:1183912201.518835.235930@n60g2000hse.googlegroups.com: > On Jul 5, 11:17 pm, rem6...@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see > http://tinyurl.com/uh3t) wrote: >> > From: nin <fermentin...@yahoo.com> >> > my hudge [s

Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:37:57 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" > <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > [...] > > >> >> BTW, do these four digits mean anything to you? 8128 >> > > No. So you won't mind if the other 5 are poste

In article <5fd8grF3ckdpjU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Cliff and Linda Griffith wrote: > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > >>>> Duck declined to release the girl's blood alcohol level but s

In article <5fd7v5F3c9sg1U1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <5fd3t7F3c60s7U1@mid.individual.net>, > > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > > >> Larry wrote: > >>> In article <bl6293ld5j

On Jul 9, 12:45 am, Troll <t...@master.com> wrote: > nin <fermentin...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:1183953714.825476.175770@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: > > > > > > > On Jul 8, 9:28 pm, rem6...@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see > >http://tinyurl.com/uh3t)

On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:05:02 GMT, "David Martel" <marte005@earthlink.net> wrote: > I believe Mr. Hollaar does practice intellectual property law. It's the >only law that he responds to on this newsgroup. Not sure of his knowledge of >labor law.

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:52:39 -0700, Andrew <kckkim@hotmail.com> wrote: >Ok, so in my case, my software was completed long before signing the >Employment Agreement, and it was >created without any "work made for hire". It was purely my personal >wor

In article <5fd6iiF3brioqU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <5fd3erF3a6oimU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > > >> Larry wrote: > >>> In article <f6r5l5$79e

"Hertz_Donut" <somewhere@outthere.com> wrote in message news:xoCdnb6G8rKTDQ3bnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@hawaiiantel.net... > > "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote in message > news:NZ%ji.3988$bz7.3764@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net... >> >> "Hertz_Donut" <s

In article <5fd4vsF3ca9gvU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <5fchumF39fi3kU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > > > >> Richard McBeef wrote: > >>> > >>

In article <5fd0vaF3bk7qeU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <5facm4F3b67baU1@mid.individual.net>, > > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > > > >> ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote: > >>> tjab wrote: >

In article <5fd3t7F3c60s7U1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <bl6293ld5jbb5ib6ohqklid7i4smtvkgma@4ax.com>, > > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Ju

In article <5fd3erF3a6oimU1@mid.individual.net>, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > Larry wrote: > > In article <f6r5l5$79e@rac3.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) > > wrote: > > > >> In article <kn52931jcv5dmojen9b8tp49t51dhd3245@4ax.com>

>>> There's no requirement that a TM be registered. >>> >>I figured I am not following something. Doesn't a name or a mark have >>to be registered to be called a trademark? >> >> > > Nope. You'll see some words with tm after them. They are >tra

Kent Wills wrote: > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: [...] >> (And the chump [Kent Bradley Wills] >> even pretends to be going first class.) > There was no pretending. We travel first class. You LYING SACK! This boarding pass: <http:

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:31:58 GMT, Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote: >Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in >news:621293p60eudodt5321uk4pd1kge3sl9ao@4ax.com: > >> As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 05:46:49 GMT, Deadrat >> <a@b.

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:56:52 -0000, gordonb.l25c8@burditt.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote: >>>> There's no requirement that a TM be registered. >>>> >>>I figured I am not following something. Doesn't a name or a mark have >>>to be r

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:28:21 +0000 (UTC), Arnoud Engelfriet <galactus@stack.nl> wrote: >On 2007-07-08, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >> Nope. You'll see some words with tm after them. They are >> trademarked, but not R

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:11:26 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> Kent Wills wrote: >> >>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> (And the chump >> >> [Kent Bradley Wills] >> >>

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:53:07 GMT, The only KNOWN felon on misc.legal, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote: > >[...] > >>> (And the chump > >[Kent Bradley Wi

On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:28:21 +0000 (UTC), Arnoud Engelfriet wrote... > Ok, so what happens if I put the r-in-a-circle after a word, > thus pretending the word is a registered trademark, yet the > word is not in fact registered with the USPTO? > > I l

On Jul 8, 9:28 pm, rem6...@yahoo.com (Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t) wrote: > > From: nin <fermentin...@yahoo.com> > > that was around 1988, so he must have forgotten all about it. > > I met only one gal that entire year, and she had smal

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:20:28 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <5fd4vsF3ca9gvU1@mid.individual.net>, > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> > In article <5fchumF39fi3kU1@mid.individual.net>, >> > "_

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:49:22 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: [...] >>> The link where I DON'T say that I'm "going to turn you in" ? >> >> I issued a dare to turn me in. True, the dare was directed at >> tjab, but

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:37:57 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: [...] >>> >>> With so much at stake regarding your career and "reputation", >>> one would think you'd want to get this matter cleared up once >>> and for

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:56:34 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > Seriously, why is this surprising to you? I don't get why you're so >> > worked up over this. Do you think I'd deny knowing my registration >> > number if I

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:49:06 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >Larry wrote: >> In article <5fd3t7F3c60s7U1@mid.individual.net>, >> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >> >>> Larry wrote: >>>> In article <bl6293ld5jb

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:16:00 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <5fd3t7F3c60s7U1@mid.individual.net>, > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: > >> Larry wrote: >> > In article <bl6293ld5jbb5ib6ohqklid7i4smtvkgma@4ax.com>,

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:47:45 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >In article <bl6293ld5jbb5ib6ohqklid7i4smtvkgma@4ax.com>, > Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 10:00:26 -0600, "_ Prof. Jon

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 17:53:22 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: [...] >>> >>>> So why are you still stammering on and on about reporting him >>>> to his school, >>> >>> He's not in the Iowa Licensed Teachers

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:28:30 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > So why are you still stammering on and on about reporting him >> > to his school, >> >> He's not in the Iowa Licensed Teachers database, jackass. > >So yo

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:25:20 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: [...] >>> The State of Iowa has no one named Kent Wills licensed >>> as a teacher. So was Kent lying yet again, or did he hack >>> into the Iowa Board of

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:14:46 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> > So you're saying he's not a teacher? >> >> The State of Iowa has no one named Kent Wills licensed >> as a teacher. So was Kent lying yet again, or did he ha

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:32:09 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: [...] >>> My guess would be that you don't. (Lest you misinterpret this, >>> there's a clue above in my parenthetical remark that the first two >>> minute

In article <f6rgqt$b4s@rac3.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > In article <x-F83979.15420008072007@news.west.earthlink.net>, > Larry <x@y.com> demanded: > > > >If you believe 1) Kent is a teacher, 2) he's a felon, and 3) felons are

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 15:55:45 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >Larry wrote: >> In article <f6r53d$74d@rac3.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) >> wrote: >> >>> In article <x-F6BBB3.12133008072007@news.west.earthlink

As I understand it, on 8 Jul 2007 16:18:37 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: >In article <x-F83979.15420008072007@news.west.earthlink.net>, >Larry <x@y.com> demanded: >> >>If you believe 1) Kent is a teacher, 2) he's a felon, and 3) felons are

As I understand it, on Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:42:01 GMT, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: [...] >> >If he's not, what's the point of reporting him to a school district? >> >> Exactly. > >If you believe 1) Kent is a teacher, 2) he's a felon, and 3) felons a

As I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:24:23 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: [...] >> You really think the AG's office would get involved in this and issue >> a report as to whether someone is a felon or not? > >Not typica

s I understand it, on Sun, 8 Jul 2007 18:11:28 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >Larry wrote: >> In article <5fcg0vF3bn61kU1@mid.individual.net>, >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> Larry wrote: >>>> >>>> So

Jean-MArc Lienher <oksid@bluewin.ch> wrote in news:69d21$4690d740$50533a77$21515@news.hispeed.ch: >> Perhaps you could explain why you think this license would be useful. >> In the example, the original (the .doc) tries to disclaim any >> obligati