|
|
In article <fr9d935vtpvm2bvsfis4o31vjtugr0g6p7@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:59:07 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <f73tvi$ni3@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab
|
|
|
In article <f75jjh$bb4@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <5fn059F3cj7btU1@mid.individual.net>,
> ¥ UltraMan ¥ <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
> >tjab wrote:
> >> In article <x-4AC155.20590611072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> >
|
|
|
In article <5fn059F3cj7btU1@mid.individual.net>,
"¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
> tjab wrote:
> > In article <x-4AC155.20590611072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> > Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >> In article <f73tvi$ni3@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@w
|
|
|
In article <f7598i$56u@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
wrote:
> In article <x-4AC155.20590611072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> >In article <f73tvi$ni3@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
> >wrote:
> >
|
|
|
In article <x-C5FB95.23253512072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <f76r2g$m8b@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <x-8F3736.20075012072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com>
|
|
|
In article <x-0C9323.22140412072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <f76mgc$kc8@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <x-AF6122.21535012072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com>
|
|
|
In article <x-AC6C56.23152912072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
>Do you think every time a federal agency is re-organized Congress has to
>approve the number of employees at each level and their job titles and
>responsibilit
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <2vili.7205$zA4.4364@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Where does Bush get this executive privilege BS?
>
> It's been around long before Bu
|
|
|
In article <x-8F3736.20075012072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>And VoxJonezUltra found one other Larry in New York City, and he's
>convinced that's me. It's really a good thing that to be legally
>admissible, more than a nam
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-7B54AE.23231612072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <4d568$4696ede7$1860878d$30545@KNOLOGY.NET>,
> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:
>
> > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
> >
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-6AF7B1.23011310072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <4551d$4694464f$1860878d$12802@KNOLOGY.NET>,
> "Dennis \(Icarus\)" <nojunkmail@ever.invalid> wrote:
>
<snip>
> > >
> > > Yes, but in that case
|
|
|
In article <pt7d93td8fj8n7c2548pd7qh5bnoi9g59a@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>As I understand it, on 12 Jul 2007 12:33:12 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
>(tjab) wrote:
>>
>>How about it, Kent? Was that Iowa Supreme Court decision for a r
|
|
|
In article <x-AF6122.21535012072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <f76lmg$k3k@rac2.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <x-6818D4.20003112072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com>
|
|
|
I think the amount in question has to be higher though
|
|
|
if they live in a different state than you
|
|
|
In article <x-6818D4.20003112072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <f75aei$5qu@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <x-19C506.20290811072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com>
|
|
|
In article <017d93dj11upotjn6m8uf1b6a4qni4cb1c@4ax.com>,
Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> That aside, I sat in 4D. Deal with it.
>>>>
>>>>The bar code on your ticket says otherwise.
>>>
>>> Are you one of the X-Series? What ever h
|
|
|
In article <x-F569D1.20040112072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>In article <f75k1h$bla@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <469647D6.49E0803C@avenuecable.com>,
>> Theodore A. Kaldis <kaldis@worl
|
|
|
¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote:
> GeekBoy wrote:
>
>>"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
>>news:x-0F35AE.22441401072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
>>
>>>In article <1183344147.513966.292180@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>>>richard <lordofthebull@royal.ne
|
|
|
theodoric3@lycos.com wrote:
> On Jul 11, 10:45 am, a_plutonium <a_pluton...@hotmail.com> wrote:
snip
You're quoting a certified nutcase to us?
Go away.
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-14E134.21211412072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <onAli.46128$5j1.14701@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net>,
> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>
>> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in news:x-D0E846.20380612072007
>> @
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 1:14 pm, "Zippy P" <zip...@bokaloo.org> wrote:
> > Interpleader is basically a device for saying "I have no idea who to
> > give X to, so I'm going to make the guys who believe X is theirs get
> > into a lengthy legal battle", isn't it?
>
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 1:02 pm, Roy <a...@aa4re.ampr.org> wrote:
> DarkProtoman wrote:
> > How can the United States sue an inanimate, non-legal entity? What
> > does this case title mean: United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty
> > Kegs of Coca-Cola? In the de
|
|
|
> Interpleader is basically a device for saying "I have no idea who to
> give X to, so I'm going to make the guys who believe X is theirs get
> into a lengthy legal battle", isn't it?
Yes. Depends on the state you're in too. Unless you're talking f
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> [equivocation elided]
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> Good Lord! 1,350 posts, on THIS to
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-B5EABC.20211812072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
> In article <2vili.7205$zA4.4364@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS <xeton2001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Where does B
|
|
|
How can the United States sue an inanimate, non-legal entity? What
does this case title mean: United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty
Kegs of Coca-Cola? In the defandant's chair, was their a shipment of
Coke, and was the prosecutor cross-examining a
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 8:28 am, "McGyver" <Greyp...@msn.com> wrote:
> "aryder" <alanry...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1184165318.457531.57810@n2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> >I just found the DCA's freedom of information service and it gives you
> > a
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <5fn493F3cpnb2U1@mid.individual.net>,
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> Jailed teachers hidden
>>>> By PETER MARCUS - July 11, 2007
>>>> By PETER MARCUS
>>>>
>>>> Denver Daily
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-B482C4.20333612072007@news.west.earthlink.net...
> Bama Brian <bamaNOTbrian@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> Ever wonder why so many jurors get called, but so few are empaneled?
>> It's because both prosecutors
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 12:18 pm, DarkProtoman <Protoman2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How can the United States sue an inanimate, non-legal entity? What
> does this case title mean: United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty
> Kegs of Coca-Cola? In the defandant's chair,
|
|
|
n Jul 11, 10:45 am, a_plutonium <a_pluton...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The old saw used to go "look at how bad our political system is, until
> you look at foreign countries political
> systems, and you see that ours is better"
>
> Well that old saw is n
|
|
|
s I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:35:30 GMT, "Theodore A.
Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> [equivocation elided]
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>> Kent
|
|
|
s I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:18:09 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez
_" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> Conversely, if Kent is able to travel internationally, it is a
>> virtual certainty that he is not a convicted felon.
>
>An utterl
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 4:16 am, "foad" <f...@once.com> wrote:
> "DarkProtoman" <Protoman2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1184214466.058449.73160@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Should I file an interpleader action in this case:
>
> > My friend,
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:31:17 GMT, "Theodore A.
Kaldis" <kaldis@avenuecable.com> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>
>[Equivocating and mendaciously prevaricating]
>
>> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>> Theodore A. K
|
|
|
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:58:13 -0700, dr_phill123@yahoo.com wrote:
>_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>> Beware of children!
>
>In my city I routinely see white trash driving with one hand on the
>cell phone, the other hand with a cigarette and two kids in
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:19:36 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez
_" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>>> news:4694F740.5040005@it.com...
>>>> ...using Ted's li
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:23:52 GMT, Ken Smith
<forget@it.com> wrote:
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> "Ken Smith" <forget@it.com> wrote in message news:4694F740.5040005@it.com...
>>
>>>...using Ted's line of argument and standards of eviden
|
|
|
On Jul 12, 11:46 am, "=A5 UltraMan =A5" <ul...@man.jp> wrote:
> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>
>
>
> > dr_phill...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> I live in a blue collar town and amazed by how many edyot parents
> >> chain smoke in their ca
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:59:07 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <f73tvi$ni3@rac1.wam.umd.edu>, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article <x-7D49AA.20454411072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:25:37 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <5fl45dF3cka8tU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> First-class boards First ... that why they call is First-class, Ken.
|
|
|
Millions files for everyone. Music, movies, soft and other media.
Check it now!! http://www.gegereka.com
|
|
|
s I understand it, on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:33:06 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez
_" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>Ken Smith wrote:
>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...using Ted's line of argument and standards of evidence and proof.
>>>
|
|
|
s I understand it, on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:55:46 GMT, Ken Smith
<forget@it.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>>
>>>>No, I did that. Because Ken was basically prevaricating (like you
>>>>always do) and equivocating (which you're not smart enough to do). Why was
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 11 Jul 2007 13:37:14 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
(tjab) wrote:
>In article <38d99394m9pfnr3ob13ji7tdv2q2gf44bp@4ax.com>,
>Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>As I understand it, on 10 Jul 2007 23:37:04 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.ed
|
|
|
On 11 Jul 2007, nbvFOUR@gmail.com summarized:
> * * *
> I just want to know if a business has a rule
> in place that says "we have the right to terminate
> service at any time for any reason", is it [likely to
>
|
|
|
As I understand it, on 12 Jul 2007 12:33:12 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu
(tjab) wrote:
>In article <x-E2CD34.20331611072007@news.west.earthlink.net>,
>Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>>In article <5fkdutF3cunsgU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thepr
|
|
|
As I understand it, on Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:33:17 GMT, Larry <x@y.com>
wrote:
>In article <5fkdutF3cunsgU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> tjab wrote:
>>
>> > If Kent is trying to convince everyone he is no
|
|
|
<dr_phill123@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1184263093.328285.72810@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>
>> Beware of children!
& |
