Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Dateline stings = farce
I wrote this as a Letter to the Editor of the NY Times but it wasn't published. It might be of interest here. --- There's no doubt that Dateline NBC's predator stings make for entertaining television and it may seem like a valuable public servi


Re: fee for services not ordered
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:35:27 -0400, mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.com> wrote: >OP: This was "just" an accountant. Was he a CPA? They get more. Or non-cpas get less, is another way to look at that. I have no idea what is the going rate or the going b


Re: fee for services not ordered
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:04:37 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > > >And as you say above, he provided some services to you. So unless it >was part of your agreement that the flat rate would cover this, the >attorney is likely entitled to _something_


Re: libel etc
In article <1193192470.658709.291050@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, richard <lordofthebull@royal.net> wrote: > On Oct 23, 10:37 am, Chet Kincaid <c...@notarealemail.com> wrote: > > What sort of libel or other caselaw is there regarding publically >


Re: fee for services not ordered
In article <1193194000.919992.245000@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, arek <johnkowalski5189@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Oct 23, 10:05 pm, richard <lordoftheb...@royal.net> wrote: > >... > > > Are you obligated to pay a bill just because some idiot


Re: fee for services not ordered
In article <1193194000.919992.245000@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, arek <johnkowalski5189@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On Oct 23, 10:05 pm, richard <lordoftheb...@royal.net> wrote: > >... > > > Are you obligated to pay a bill just because some idiot


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE SUPER STING
"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message news:a61th3d3al9vtdhqcflkc0ctueqnr1vvg4@4ax.com... > As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:07:52 GMT, "KRP" > <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >> >>"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> w


Re: libel etc
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:21:10 -0700, richard <lordofthebull@royal.net> wrote: >Be careful what you call libel, it could backfire on you. Yea, you should know about that one Bullis. Claiming you were special forces when, in actuality, you were given


Re: fee for services not ordered
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:46:40 -0700, arek <johnkowalski5189@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > >Richard, > >I appreciate your opinion. > >The difference is he really provided some services for me while you >have not provided any so your analogy is not qui


Re: Kate & Gerry McCann
And bof <nothingread@hotmail.com> was like: > In message <m3d4v522yv.fsf@kennel.dogslobber.demon.co.uk>, Patrick > Hardlentil <dontmakemefetchmycormorant@dogslobber.demon.co.uk> writes > > > >And August West <august@kororaa.com> was like: > > >


Re: False PPO filed against me.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:34:30 -0700, flavem@gmail.com wrote: >A false PPO What do you mean by PPO?


Re: Kate & Gerry McCann
In message <m3d4v522yv.fsf@kennel.dogslobber.demon.co.uk>, Patrick Hardlentil <dontmakemefetchmycormorant@dogslobber.demon.co.uk> writes > >And August West <august@kororaa.com> was like: > >> "Patrick Hardlentil" >> <dontmakemefetchmycormorant@dogs


Re: dowry is prenup ?
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:46:33 -0700, john <qjohnny2000@gmail.com> wrote: > >There was nothing in the "marriage contract" about if the policy >would be maintained after divorce, or how long I had to keep the >policy. All it said was: >"dowry: $1m


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@optonline.net> wrote in message news:LqsTi.3$B52.0@newsfe12.lga... >>>> >> >>>>> >> Because the letter was, and is, nothing more than a >>>> >> >>>>> >> solicitation >>>> >> >>>>> >> for donations. >>>> >> >>>>>


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message news:VgsTi.6617$MV4.3591@trnddc03... > > "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message > news:m7nTi.68$nN3.39@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net... > >>>>>>Is your HERO DAVID MOORE's name up >>


Re: Kenny boy, aren't you glad you came to asCPS?
"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@optonline.net> wrote in message news:1193169199.495719.69100@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> Are they corrected Danny? >> >> >> >> > Not all. >> >> >> >> >> Are you SURE Danny? What's wrong with them t


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@optonline.net> wrote in message news:1193149149.791435.55240@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >>>>> >> Because the letter was, and is, nothing more than a >> >> >>>>> >> solicitation >> >> >>>>> >> for do


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
"dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:m7nTi.68$nN3.39@newssvr17.news.prodigy.net... >>>>>Is your HERO DAVID MOORE's name up >>>>>there? Do you think they send out letters to the KLAN Danny? Is David >>>>>Dukes' >>>>>na


Re: Kenny's Challenge Ron loses AGAIN
BADASS DAVID MOORE "freedom" <aboutKRPken@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message news:a24dd8dece259024dc0daf02e15b8e17@msgid.frell.theremailer.net... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > KENNETH PANGBORN CHILD ABUSER > On Tue, 23 Oct 2


Re: fee for services not ordered
On Oct 23, 10:05 pm, richard <lordoftheb...@royal.net> wrote: >... > Are you obligated to pay a bill just because some idiot sent you one? > What's your address dude? I'll send you one for the same services at > twice the rate. Richard, I app


Re: Kenny's Challenge Ron loses AGAIN
KRP wrote: > "Ron" <apositiveplace@netscape.net> wrote in message > news:ps3Ti.22187$UN.18323@newsfe24.lga... > >>>>>>> > Ronny - nice shifting of the burden of proof. You want me to >>>>>>> prove I do >>>>>>> > NOT have that HUGE crimin


Re: Kenny boy, aren't you glad you came to asCPS?
"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@optonline.net> wrote in message news:1193151325.064633.325390@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> Are they corrected Danny? >> >> >> > Not all. >> >> >> >> Are you SURE Danny? What's wrong with them today Cap


Re: libel etc
On Oct 23, 10:37 am, Chet Kincaid <c...@notarealemail.com> wrote: > What sort of libel or other caselaw is there regarding publically > describing someone in a bad light or however you might properly term it? > > For example let's say you get on your


Re: LLC Incorporation publication requirement in New Jersey
kbelayachi@gmail.com wrote: > Does New Jersey have a publication requirement > [as a condition of forming a new LLC in that state]? See N.J. Stats. Ann. 42:2B-18. Certificate of formation serves as notice A certificate of formation [of


Re: fee for services not ordered
On Oct 23, 8:21 pm, arek <johnkowalski5...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > My accountant just sent me a $1000 bill for services rendered from > January > to October. > At $160 per hour he counted every phone conversation and every email > we exchanged in 15m


Re: Richard the stoopid is back (Re: Legality of publishing video without consent in To Catch a Predator?)
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:29:17 -0700, art_deco_erfc_1024@yahoo.com wrote: >On Oct 23, 12:07 pm, TNKev <oopsIforgotmya...@hmmmm.what?> wrote: >> The One True Roger wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:35:26


Re: Richard the stoopid is back (Re: Legality of publishing video without consent in To Catch a Predator?)
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:07:40 -0500, TNKev <oopsIforgotmyaddy@hmmmm.what?> wrote: >The One True Roger wrote: >> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:35:26 -0500, TNKev >> <it'sMondayagain@mydesk.blech> wrote: >> >>>> Of the few shows


Re: So, Kent...
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:10:55 -0000, Tip <tip@cotse.net> wrote: [...] >> > jonez/vox/ultra/shanghai/whatever advocates murdering a woman for >> > being Wiccan. >> > Message-ID: <5iieliF3pnbp...@mid.individual.net> > >


Re: So, Kent...
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:10:38 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:f3aqh39ht5pdumh2qopihuu96eq1ru5dlo@4ax.com... >> As was fortold by the sage, on Mon, 22 O


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:16:49 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:h7vqh3t9na1bc8n8re7rui5es985u00joi@4ax.com... >> >>>>>name up there Danny? George Lincol


Re: Where are all the client supporters from ken pangborn's decades of winning their cases?
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 13:15:01 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:6t9qh39sfe2vn1kqjr26ggjm3t0ml3vq3n@4ax.com... >>> >>>>> Because the letter was,


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE SUPER STING
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:07:52 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:d1cqh3tcmetabdb6qo8f4evjl5thlfffdl@4ax.com... > >>>> The seven year old girl saying he w


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE SUPER STING
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:04:45 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:2ubqh3tep6pvobp7kio7fhhc9a9b15dotj@4ax.com... > >>>> An accusation wouldn't be available


Re: Does donating blood save lives?
As was fortold by the sage, on 23 Oct 2007 16:19:27 GMT, "A M L [Manchester England]" <abuse@rochdale.gov.welt> wrote: >csm7532@hotmail.com wrote in news:1193098600.504203.145990 >@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com: > >> As you say, no such thing as bei


Re: Legality of publishing video without consent in To Catch a Predator?
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:25:18 -0500, The One True Roger <love2play@gawab.com> wrote: >On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:59:08 -0700, WIlliam Donner ><willyd@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>The actress or actor who says "come >>on in and ea


fee for services not ordered
My accountant just sent me a $1000 bill for services rendered from January to October. At $160 per hour he counted every phone conversation and every email we exchanged in 15min increments. The problem is we never discussed his fees upfront and I w


Re: Legality of publishing video without consent in To Catch a Predator?
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:24:06 -0500, "Dr.TNKev MD" <it'sMondayagain@mydesk.blech> wrote: [snips for brevity] >>>> >>>> Because it was all staged? >>> it isn't staged. >> >> There's a reason he's called "Richard the


Re: Kate & Gerry McCann
And August West <august@kororaa.com> was like: > "Patrick Hardlentil" > <dontmakemefetchmycormorant@dogslobber.demon.co.uk> writes: > > > Then again, I don't speak Dutch. Where's Mr Todd when you need him? > > Hunting pies & sausages. Been


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on 23 Oct 2007 12:14:07 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>>>>West's North Western Reporter >>>>>Second Series >>>>>A Unit of the National Reporter System >>>>>Volume 696 N.W.2d >>>>> >>>>>Cite as 696 N.


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:18:34 -0500, The One True Roger <love2play@gawab.com> wrote: >On 23 Oct 2007 12:11:18 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>In article <29vrh3ldmearudpjsmillsa8uhqvb3kfab@4ax.com>, >>The One Tr


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on 23 Oct 2007 12:11:18 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>>Supreme Court of Iowa >> >> >>Wow, right back to the beginning of the circle eh Tjab? You have yet >>to prove that this is the same Kent Wills, t


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:10:44 -0500, The One True Roger <love2play@gawab.com> wrote: >On 23 Oct 2007 13:59:06 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>Problem is, your road to "beyond a reasonable doubt" takes a big detou


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:16:00 -0400, John Baker <nunya@bizniz.net> wrote: >On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:34:23 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: > > >Who the hell are you people and why are you crossposting this crap to >alt.atheis


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on 23 Oct 2007 12:08:38 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: [...] >>> To show that the North Western Reporter is recognized as the official >>> reporter by/for the Iowa courts. Is your quibble that I could have >>> t


Re: PROOF: Kent Wills is a Lying Cunt -- another Athiest mother DROWNS her CHILDREN __
As was fortold by the sage, on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:56:23 -0500, The One True Roger <love2play@gawab.com> wrote: >On 22 Oct 2007 21:36:13 -0400, tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab) wrote: > >>STATE of Iowa, Appellee >> >> v. >> >>Kent Bradley Will


Re: Kenny's Challenge Ron loses AGAIN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- KENNETH PANGBORN CHILD ABUSER On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: >DAVID PATHOLOGICAL LIAR MOORE >"freedom" <aboutKRPken@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message >news:ef85e284f4b5b2b8a


Re: libel etc
> not even for Bill Cosby. LOL nice catch there.


Re: dowry is prenup ?
<nospam@isp.com> wrote in message news:765sh3doe1mhqdofv8cdbhs59t1nvqifkl@4ax.com... > john <qjohnny2000@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I . . . married . . . a muslim girl and in that culture >> the husband pays a dowry. Basically I signed a >> marriage


Re: Richard the stoopid is back (Re: Legality of publishing video without consent in To Catch a Predator?)
art_deco_erfc_1024@yahoo.com wrote: > On Oct 23, 12:07 pm, TNKev <oopsIforgotmya...@hmmmm.what?> wrote: >> The One True Roger wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:35:26 -0500, TNKev >>> <it'sMondayag...@mydesk.blech> wrote: >>>>> Of


Re: Does donating blood save lives?
csm7532@hotmail.com wrote in news:1193098600.504203.145990 @v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com: > As you say, no such thing as being too safe. That's not true. You would never do anything if it was. -- http://broomleigh.com/