Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal
Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Dear Friend, This is not a scam, I have done it myself! Can you really make money so easily? OPRAH WINFREY and an article published in t


Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal
Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Dear Friend, This is not a scam, I have done it myself! Can you really make money so easily? OPRAH WINFREY and an article published in t


Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal
Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Make your $6 earn $1000s in just a month with Paypal Dear Friend, This is not a scam, I have done it myself! Can you really make money so easily? OPRAH WINFREY and an article published in t


Re: ~~ Democracy in Action ~~
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in news:5ohl1iFmu2otU1@mid.individual.net: > guess the Jews were just disgruntled > > "It's all a bit strange" <strangethingshappen@turkeygoy.com> wrote in > message >> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> w


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
Mike wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > news:5ohgtfFmu2fqU1@mid.individual.net... > > > > "uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message > > > >> One of the main arguments against the existence of a benevolent God


Re: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS
Kent Wills wrote: > As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:18:22 -0500, ªºª > rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: > > [...] > > >>> Charles "Atlas Bugged" Novins, Esq. has NO credibility with >>>anyone. >>> Heck, he's claimed


Re: ~~ Immigrants win $20 MILLION PowerBall Jackpot ! ~~
Chuck Wright wrote: > Kent Wills wrote: >> As was fortold by the sage, on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:16:59 -0600, "¥ >> UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >> >> >>> By Hector Gutierrez, Rocky Mountain News >>> October 24, 2007 >>> Eugen and Stanislawa Mar


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
> x-no-archive: yes What are you so cowardly that you don't want your posts archived? > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:27:33 -0400, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post > may be used any


Re: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS
As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:18:22 -0500, ªºª rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: [...] >> Charles "Atlas Bugged" Novins, Esq. has NO credibility with >> anyone. >> Heck, he's claimed anyone who posts his real name is goin


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
Mike wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > news:5ohgtfFmu2fqU1@mid.individual.net... >> >> "uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message >> >>> One of the main arguments against the existence of a benevolent God >>> is <


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:02:46 -0500, Uncle Vic <address@withheld.com> wrote: © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. >One fine day in a


Re: Kenny's Challenge MOORE loses AGAIN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: >DAVID LIAR MOORE >"freedom" <aboutKRPken@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message >news:30daa6c6f281a9fbde8b8aee70fcd230@msgid.frell.theremailer.net.


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:43:23 -0600, "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. >> x-no-archive: yes


Re: Do I have a case?
nystateofmind00@hotmail.com wrote: > I would like to know if I have a basis for a case. I am employed in > Texas for a Global non profit based out of the UK. I was hired 3 > months ago as a general ledger accountant and I have excelled and > received


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:50:42 -0400, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. > >"john w @yahoo.com>"


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
In article <4723dba5$0$7204$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote > >> > > >> > To not dismiss that person means that there is no rule of law, but that > >> > court cases would be decided according


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
One fine day in alt.atheism, john w <johnw<no>@yahoo.com> bloodied us up with this: > x-no-archive: yes > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:12:38 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" > <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE FEMINIST SUPER STING
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:15:09 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: >SELF SUPPORTING DAVID DANIEL MOORE >"freedom" <aboutKRPken@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message >news:69e0788d992795a65139e4368c8ee4ed@msgid.frell.theremailer.net... >


Do I have a case?
I would like to know if I have a basis for a case. I am employed in Texas for a Global non profit based out of the UK. I was hired 3 months ago as a general ledger accountant and I have excelled and received nothing but compliments and positive feedbac


sudbury stalker
http://www.freewebs.com/wandererartificialstupidity/ http://www.geocities.com/wandererartificialstupidity http://wandererartificialstupidity.tripod.com http://members.aol.com/lalonm/ http://www.wanderers.freewebweb.com/ michael lalonde news mich


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
"john w @yahoo.com>" <johnw<no> wrote in message news:a1k7i31nhm28tucqpt40rdnc99bb3i74jv@4ax.com... > x-no-archive: yes > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:27:33 -0400, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no porti


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote >> > >> > To not dismiss that person means that there is no rule of law, but that >> > court cases would be decided according to biblical instructions and >> > requirements. *That* would be improper. >> >> I think whether


Re: Bush's AG Nominee Is Another Dissembler In The Gonzo Mold! MUKASEY Won't Answer Torture Questions!
Pneuma wrote: > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:43:43 -0700, "Dr. Cavortian" > <kinkysr@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> You'd think your White House war criminal, in his position as >> Nincompoop-In-Chief of The Un-United States, would have learned that >> our nation


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
In article <4723b4a2$0$7209$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message > news:x-53BCC8.17404927102007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net... > > In article <4723ac62$0$7227$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.co


Re: Do I have a case?
"Paul Cassel" <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote in message news:JMCdnRi6b8Q-Wr7anZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@comcast.com... > nystateofmind00@hotmail.com wrote: >> I would like to know if I have a basis for a case. > > No. It's not illegal discriminati


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message news:x-53BCC8.17404927102007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net... > In article <4723ac62$0$7227$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com>, > "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > >> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote >> >> >> Of course that


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
In article <4723ac62$0$7227$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote > > >> Of course that would be religious discriminate against anyone following > >> the > >> biblical admonition to require more


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message news:5ohgtfFmu2fqU1@mid.individual.net... > > "uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message > >> One of the main arguments against the existence of a benevolent God is > <snip> > > that non


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote >> Of course that would be religious discriminate against anyone following >> the >> biblical admonition to require more than one witness. But I suppose the >> lawyers get around this by deliberately not stating why they d


Re: Shoplifter of DONUT could get life sentence.
In article <9b07i3t9sonhgtkq4g5j5mhv3t2a2vrjea@4ax.com>, Kent Wills <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: > As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:18:02 -0700, > "bvallely@aol.com" <bvallely@aol.com> wrote: > > > > >> >"Masters, who lives in the nearb


Re: Truthfulness of witnesses a rebuttable presumption?
In article <47236ac7$0$7219$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com>, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: > "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote > > >> Actually, if you talk to some lawyers, they will suggest that if a juror > >> does not consider it possible that one person'


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:27:33 -0400, "Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote: © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. > >"_ Prof. Jonez _" <t


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
x-no-archive: yes On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:12:38 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: © 2007 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author. > >"uri" <da


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
"Mike" <no.spam@please.com> wrote in message news:4723ad63$0$7230$6d2eeca5@news.sirus.com... > > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message > news:5ohgtfFmu2fqU1@mid.individual.net... >> >> "uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in messa


...serious concerns with regard to the Commission's record management practices, and its ability to properly respond to requests for public records.
ENSE PETIT PLACIDAM SVB LIBERTATE QVIETEM http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_of_Massachusetts The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division http://www.sec.state.ma.us/arc/arcrmu/rmuid


Re: __ another Christian mother DROWNS her CHILDREN <= God's will ! __
"stoney" <stoney@the.net> wrote in message > On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:12:40 -0400, Larry <x@y.com> wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> CLEVELAND, Ohio (AP) -- A mother arrested after the apparent bathtub >>> drownings >>> o


Re: ATLAS BUGGED's PARANOID DELUSIONS AND OBSESSIONS
Kent Wills wrote: > As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:19:00 -0500, ªºª > rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: > > [...] > > >>>But you ARE just a sock-puppet, and many other disgusting things, >>>which I've been able t


Re: Bush's AG Nominee Is Another Dissembler In The Gonzo Mold! MUKASEY Won't Answer Torture Questions!
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:43:43 -0700, "Dr. Cavortian" <kinkysr@yahoo.com> wrote: >You'd think your White House war criminal, in his position as >Nincompoop-In-Chief of The Un-United States, would have learned that >our nation can't abide a crooked, inc


Re: ~~ the Third Reich was Democratically Elected <= Jews were just disgruntled political losers ? ~~
guess the Jews were just disgruntled "It's all a bit strange" <strangethingshappen@turkeygoy.com> wrote in message > "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in >> October 26, 2007 >> U.S. and Turkey Thwart Armenian Genocide Bill >> By CARL HULSE >>


Re: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS
Kent Wills wrote: > As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:08:51 -0500, ªºª > rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: > > >> >>Atlas Bugged wrote: >> >> >>>"KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>news:CCDUi.413$TO4.2


Re: ATLAS BUGGED's PARANOID DELUSIONS AND OBSESSIONS (was: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS)
As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:19:00 -0500, ªºª rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: [...] >> But you ARE just a sock-puppet, and many other disgusting things, >> which I've been able to prove beyond doubt repeatedly just by do


Re: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS
As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:08:51 -0500, ªºª rrock <invalid@address.here> wrote: > > >Atlas Bugged wrote: > >> "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message >> news:CCDUi.413$TO4.245@trnddc07... >> >>>DAVID MOORE FROM A


Re: DAVID MOORE'S PERVERSIONS
As was fortold by the sage, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 09:34:26 GMT, "KRP" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote: >DAVID MOORE FROM AN EGYPTIAN ANONYMOUS REMAILER >"The One True Roger" <love2play@gawab.com> wrote in message >news:eqt3i3piues3lblllohof2k0mt5r64j8rc


Re: BETTY'S STING OF ASSMONKEY AND MOORE
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:55:10 -0500, "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [Snips for brevity] >>>> Did he think breaking it would stop her from eating or crying or >>>> something? >> >>> That's not what he said. >


Re: ~~ Immigrants win $20 MILLION PowerBall Jackpot ! ~~
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:43:07 -0600, Chuck Wright <cawrigh@yahoo.com> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> As was fortold by the sage, on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:16:59 -0600, "¥ >> UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote: >> >> >>>By Hector Gut


Re: Shoplifter of DONUT could get life sentence.
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:18:02 -0700, "bvallely@aol.com" <bvallely@aol.com> wrote: > >> >"Masters, who lives in the nearby town of Park Hills, has been >> >arrested more than a dozen times: for being drunk, for shoplifting, >> >fo


Re: Are Prepaid Credit Cards "Creditor-Proof"?
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 05:58:08 -0700, JDP <ianpower@gmail.com> wrote: >Hello folks, > >I'm a recent university graduate in Canada with a pretty hefty student >loan. While I'm doing everything I can to keep my lender happy, my >re


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE FEMINIST SUPER STING
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:59:51 -0500, "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [...] >> Observing something and commenting on it is NOT the same as APPROVING >> of it or putting it into practice Kent, except for peopl


Re: BETTY'S MASSIVE FEMINIST SUPER STING
As I understand it, on Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:44:27 -0500, "dragonsgirl" <dragonsgirl@sbcglobal.net> wrote: [...] >> Betty there are people here with VERY LURID NEEDS. I said I did not want >> to be GRAPHIC. It seems we have a couple people who NEED


Re: Does God exist? <= NO
"uri" <danny99@bezeqint.net> wrote in message > One of the main arguments against the existence of a benevolent God is <snip> that none of you stammering imbeciles has postited a SINGLE, LOGICAL, CONGRUENT argument FOR god.