|
|
"richard" <spam@google.dom> wrote in message
news:gh44m391mhvs0r1nvn53pnckmfh86tlda9@4ax.com...
> Right now on headline news, Quannel X of the new black panthers is
> taking the heat from the moderator.
> Here's the issue being discussed:
> A texa
|
|
|
<thebookman@kc.rr.comNULL> wrote in message
news:4761ffe0.36024921@news-server.kc.rr.com...
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:31:42 -0700, Art Deco <erfc@caballista.org>
> wrote:
>
> >Chad Stone <chad_stone@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> >
> >> krp entered into test
|
|
|
Kenneth R. Pangborn is the proud father of Megan shown here:
http://tinyurl.com/2bmevt
Barbara, from Holguin, is his wife.
They are proud of their Megan!
http://tinyurl.com/2bmevt
http://tinyurl.com/2bmevt
http://tinyurl.com/2bmevt
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 9:28 pm, "dragonsgirl" <dragonsg...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:82005310-6315-4e0c-b0ab-7c0fdc26ddf7@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >G > Moore, Did you see where your buddies
|
|
|
yince34080@mypacks.net (apparently Ken Smith) wrote:
[...]
> Just hanging out at the public terminal in an airport, killing time. (I'll
> give you a hint: shorts weather.) Props to Ted for not blasting my location
> all over the Web [...]
Some
|
|
|
forevernitefan wrote:
> Teddie, how's your brother in law's murder charge doing so far? Has your
> sister cast a spell for him yet?
My sister (presumably unlike you) is not in the habit of casting spells.
--
Theodore A. Kaldis
kaldis@worldne
|
|
|
"Dan Sullivan" <dsulldan@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:442af901-bd6f-4ca5-86f5-673260182a31@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 13, 3:01 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> KRP > They are joined at the asshole Gregg.
>>
>> DS >
|
|
|
jl wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> jl wrote:
[...]
>>> Ken Smith is a level-headed guy [...]
>> Oh? What does the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board have to say about that?
> Hey, you pompous old bastard, you deviously snipped my quotes
|
|
|
On Dec 8, 4:03 pm, Stephen <stephend152...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In the 15th installment, I publish the latest document I actually filed
> with the Bar Court, an opposition to the State Bar's motion for entry of
> default. Comment to predict the cour
|
|
|
In article <4761e4aa$0$2311$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
"GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
> news:x-61D2DC.20465913122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > In article <4761de95$0$2331$4c368faf@ro
|
|
|
<nospam@isp.com> wrote in message
news:lej2m3p55qcb62j71u9udjlhh75q9d3ei4@4ax.com...
> On 13 Dec 2007, "Pete" <nospam.ple@se> wrote:
>>
>> So, what's a discretionary appeal?
>
> The OP began this thread to ask what a "mandatory appeal" is in th
|
|
|
"Jonathan Kamens" <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> wrote in message
news:fjqaqo$aq6$1@jik3.kamens.brookline.ma.us...
> In other words, usually when the defense or prosecution files for an
> appeal, the appellate court reviews the request and decides
|
|
|
In article <4761de95$0$2331$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
"GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
> news:x-161535.20270313122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > In article <4761d9c5$0$2321$4c368faf@ro
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 10:03 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kids should be raised by their biological parents.
Correct.
Next best choice would be people who love them and treat them as their
own children.
But absolutely NOT by non related per
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 5:20 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2:13 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 13, 3:01 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > KRP > They are joined at the asshole Gregg.
>
> > > D
|
|
|
In article <4761d9c5$0$2321$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
"GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
> news:x-B35499.19561113122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > In article <4761a6ba$0$5005$4c368faf@ro
|
|
|
richard <spam@google.dom> wrote in news:18f2m3pai8uiego75h2a1rhbs9c8l1p7le@
4ax.com:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:05:15 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> <Noemailplease@comcast.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>Evidence From Waterboarding Could Be Used in Military T
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-61D2DC.20465913122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> In article <4761de95$0$2331$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> "GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
"Greegor" <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ed6a09c4-13e3-4a15-b0da-08cb177c6a06@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 13, 11:36 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 9:11 pm, " krp" <web24...@verizon.net> wrote
|
|
|
In article <4761a6ba$0$5005$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
"GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
> "Like" what kind is that?
>
> One who makes all the decisions and determines your guilt alone?
>
> This pathetic piece of #@($ "judge" needs t
|
|
|
In article <jh92m39a69r7ufbpi5h5h31tf3pp1vuiu4@4ax.com>,
richard <spam@google.dom> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:56 -0500, Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <e7c1m3tdrvul4h3t1km1i1ev0t251a9fck@4ax.com>,
> > richard <spam@google.dom> wro
|
|
|
In article <de92m3dktbvtsu4h022os3bhuob81n9gs2@4ax.com>,
richard <spam@google.dom> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:41:17 -0500, Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <stb1m3l4ahi6bbfkuk5mf8aekqachcjvt2@4ax.com>,
> > richard <spam@google.dom> wro
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-161535.20270313122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> In article <4761d9c5$0$2321$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> "GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
>
>> "Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
>>
|
|
|
On 13 Dec 2007, "Pete" <nospam.ple@se> wondered further:
>
>"Jonathan Kamens" <jik@kamens.brookline.ma.us> wrote
>
>> . . . usually when the defense or prosecution files for
>> an appeal, the appellate court reviews the request and
>> decides wheth
|
|
|
"Larry" <x@y.com> wrote in message
news:x-B35499.19561113122007@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> In article <4761a6ba$0$5005$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>,
> "GeekBoy" <nerd_revenge@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
>
>> "Like" what kind is that?
>>
>> One
|
|
|
Art Deco wrote:
> krp <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>"John "C"" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>news:CeGdndnW37qsYsLanZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>>
>>> " krp" <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Q5S7j.16751$
|
|
|
Art Deco wrote:
> krp <web2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>"John "C"" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>>news:xc2dnS6xaoJZY8LanZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@centurytel.net...
>>>>
>>>> >>>> Sure Arty - Chad will fix you up right away. This time YOU
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 12:53 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 12:44 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 1:14 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 13, 11:26 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull.
|
|
|
I am on disability because of a unrepairable injury 2 years ago. I
had unum life. I got social security and awarded a check for past
months due. I until this time was given extra money to retrain and
take classes ect... In my reward for ssdi They sta
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 2:02 pm, " krp" <web24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ed6a09c4-13e3-4a15-b0da-08cb177c6a06@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 11:36 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@op
|
|
|
"Greegor" <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e51c5997-3002-44d0-8374-a33d747e214d@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>G > Moore, Did you see where your buddies DENY any connection to you?
> G >
> G > Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 4:45 pm, " krp" <web24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:442af901-bd6f-4ca5-86f5-673260182a31@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Dec 13, 3:01 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com>
|
|
|
"ah" <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4761c76b$0$35893$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> Art Deco wrote:
> > Oh look, Clockbrain has Kenny Kakes EXCITED now, he's gone into
> > all-caps mode.
>
> I'll go "all-caps" for yo
|
|
|
G > Moore, Did you see where your buddies DENY any connection to you?
G >
G > Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?
G >
G > That you are like something gooey they have
G > to scrape off the bottom of their shoe?
EXHIBIT A
BW > I
|
|
|
"Greegor" <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2dbfa4cb-0996-4cf2-896b-82edab2f4eef@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>G > Moore, Did you see where your buddies DENY any connection to you?
> G >
> G > Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy
|
|
|
nospam@isp.com writes:
>All appeals that are not constitutionally or legislatively made
>mandatory -- which, basically, are most appeals (in civil and in
>criminal cases) -- are "discretionary" in the sense that (although,
>not uncommonly, the decisio
|
|
|
G > Moore, Did you see where your buddies DENY any connection to you?
G >
G > Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside?
G >
G > That you are like something gooey they have
G > to scrape off the bottom of their shoe?
BW > I would imagine h
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 4:40 pm, "GeekBoy" <nerd_reve...@nerdyfive.net> wrote:
> "Like" what kind is that?
>
> One who makes all the decisions and determines your guilt alone?
>
> This pathetic piece of #@($ "judge" needs to be removed.
>
> If you want that kin
|
|
|
"Like" what kind is that?
One who makes all the decisions and determines your guilt alone?
This pathetic piece of #@($ "judge" needs to be removed.
If you want that kind of "judge," you are always welcome to move to
Communist Korea or China.
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 5:43 pm, "Theodore A. Kaldis" <kal...@avenuecable.com>
wrote:
> jl wrote:
> > Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
> >> jl wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> Ken Smith is a level-headed guy [...]
> >> Oh? What does the Colorado Bar Examiners' Board have t
|
|
|
FM> This sentence totally pisses me off. !$ 140 years would'nt have
FM> been enough. If it were up to me she do her time getting
FM> needles stuck in her eyes and her tongue burned with fork
FM> several times per day.
G> This woman was a Foster Cont
|
|
|
he New York Times
December 13, 2007
Charity¹s Share From Shopping Raises Concern
By STEPHANIE STROM
Shopping has become virtuous, especially at this time of year. Buy a ³Better
World² scarf at American Eagle Outfitters, and the retailer says $10
|
|
|
Thursday December 13, 2007
MONEY OBSERVER
Digital Edition
24th January
Revealed: how UK banks exploit charity tax laws
Wednesday December 5, 2007
Britain's high street banks have raised billions of pounds in funds through
complex financial deal
|
|
|
On Dec 13, 2:13 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Dec 13, 3:01 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > KRP > They are joined at the asshole Gregg.
>
> > DS > Being that you claim our "connection" is you, pangborn... you are
|
|
|
In article <oh1tl3p1kmbp3m6tc56un42ju2f5b2m7h4@4ax.com>,
Paul Cassel <pcasselremove2@comremovecast.net> wrote:
>verivin wrote:
>
>[real estate purchase. op is seller]
>
>> My question is: is it ok to
>> receive additional offers to purchase (in
|
|
|
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:44:56 -0500 from Mike Jacobs
<mjacobslaw@gmail.com>:
> You realize of course that you were not obligated to extend the
> agreement in the first instance, since "time is of the essence" in a
> contract for sale of realty
Not in
|
|
|
<null@aol.co.uk> wrote:
> PartyA lists a home for sale. PartyB submits an offer,
> followed by PartyA's counteroffer at an acceptable
> price.. PartyB agrees verbally, but suggest the date
> needs to move out a month. In addition and without
> a
|
|
|
In article <gh1tl3pknnsbt2133qpvbuktics491ior3@4ax.com>,
" ." <null@aol.co.uk> wrote:
> Party A lists a home for sale. Party B submits an offer, followed by
> Party A's counteroffer at an acceptable price. Party B agrees verbally,
> but suggest
|
|
|
" ." <null@aol.co.uk> wrote in message
news:gh1tl3pknnsbt2133qpvbuktics491ior3@4ax.com...
> Party A lists a home for sale. Party B submits an offer, followed by
> Party A's counteroffer at an acceptable price. Party B agrees verbally,
> but suggest
|
|
|
On Dec 11, 7:45 am, " ." <n...@aol.co.uk> wrote:
> Party A lists a home for sale. Party B submits an offer, followed by
> Party A's counteroffer at an acceptable price. Party B agrees verbally,
> but suggest the date needs to move out a month. In ad
|