Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
"LK" <Patism66@gmail.com> wrote in message news:d6e04a4c-3af4-47c3-b8f2-edd6c741b028@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... On Mar 21, 10:31 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > KW > As you should know, I informed Les > KW > that I made my suppositi


Citibank Cheats Grandmaster Benko out of $70,000
Citibank Cheats Grandmaster Benko out of $70,000 As every chess player knows, Ruth V. Cardoso, the South American Woman's Chess Champion, was the constant companion of Grandmaster Pal Benko. They were together for thirty years from 1970 until her dea


Re: __ 'Disastrous' Iraqi humanitarian crisis: AI/IIRC Reports <= Bu$h/Cheney = War Criminal SCUMBAGS! __
"Felix D." <#1Chekist@OGPU.org> wrote in message news:Br6dnXfwz_lc3HnanZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com... > > "bigTITS" <clitteigh@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:13dc5d7c-9b3f-40dc-a9a7-363602319ceb@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... >> "So? How Abo


Re: And The SECOND AMENDMENT Winner Is ...
In article <64itneF2b9sfqU1@mid.individual.net>, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > DeepSea wrote: > > "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in > >> "Thanatos" <atropos@mac.com> wrote in message > >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jon


Re: And The SECOND AMENDMENT Winner Is ...
Thanatos <atropos@mac.com> wrote in news:atropos-235FFE.22564621032008 @news.giganews.com: > In article <64itneF2b9sfqU1@mid.individual.net>, > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > >> DeepSea wrote: >> > "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
Kent, I saw how you posted the same old crap over and over in rapid succession, but nowhere was there any link. Why is that?


Re: And The SECOND AMENDMENT Winner Is ...
"DeepSea" <deep_sea01@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A68A0AD3C111deepsea01yahoocom@216.196.97.136... > "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in > news:64gitdF2bq9rhU1@mid.individual.net: > >> >> "Thanatos" <atropos@mac.com> wrote in mes


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
TN Kev > Lost already proved the "backchannel email" TN Kev > conspiracy was false, G > Oh good idea! Piss off LIT by G > calling her a liar about the e-mails. KW > Kim, aka Lost in Translation LIED about KW > the E-mails! She knowingly, intent


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
"John "C"" <honestjohn@centurytel.net> wrote in message news:0pudnSp-k_kNRnzanZ2dnUVZ_oaonZ2d@centurytel.net... > ""Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message > > > I love to spam 'alt.support.child-protective-services' >> >>(º·.¸(¨*·.¸


Re: And The SECOND AMENDMENT Winner Is ...
"Thanatos" <atropos@mac.com> wrote in message news:atropos-60FD88.17360721032008@news.giganews.com... > In article <Xns9A68A0AD3C111deepsea01yahoocom@216.196.97.136>, > DeepSea <deep_sea01@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check.it>


Re: Just think: When guns are outlawed, gun packing "law-abiders" like this wont have a legal gun !
In article <13u8pgcah97pvf1@corp.supernews.com>, SaPeIsMa@Hotmail.com says... > > "tankfixer" <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wrote in message > news:MPG.224df57cc7af1794989d06@nntp.earthlink.net... > > In article <13u3vi0qq140jf6@corp.supernews.co


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Mar 21, 10:31=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > KW > As you should know, I informed Les > KW > that I made my supposition based > KW > on comment you both made. > > LK > What comment was that Kent? > > Got a link, Kent? Come on, Ke


Re: Just think: When guns are outlawed, gun packing "law-abiders" like this wont have a legal gun !
"Jim Alder" <jimalder@ssnet.com> wrote in message news:Xns9A68D8B4D602Bjimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142... > tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wrote in > news:MPG.224df51be2fb85a7989d05@nntp.earthlink.net: > >> In article <Xns9A6713A8EEA93j


Re: Just think: When guns are outlawed, gun packing "law-abiders" like this wont have a legal gun !
"tankfixer" <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wrote in message news:MPG.224df57cc7af1794989d06@nntp.earthlink.net... > In article <13u3vi0qq140jf6@corp.supernews.com>, SaPeIsMa@Hotmail.com > says... >> >> "tankfixer" <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wr


Re: And The SECOND AMENDMENT Winner Is ...
On Mar 18, 9:13=A0am, James Fenimore <slipuva...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Walter E. Dellinger ... may it please the court. [...] This guy may be a winner, but he's gonna lose this one.


Re: Just think: When guns are outlawed, gun packing "law-abiders" like this wont have a legal gun !
tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wrote in news:MPG.224df51be2fb85a7989d05@nntp.earthlink.net: > In article <Xns9A6713A8EEA93jimaldersssnetcom@216.196.97.142>, > jimalder@ssnet.com says... >> tankfixer <paul.carrier@us.kat.army.mil> wrote i


Re: Come on Betty! Explain this!
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:50:43 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"TNKev" <TNKevtoo@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:frunk4$4em$3@news.datemas.de... >>>>>>>>>> If only I had his musical talent! >>>>>>>>>> Oh, Kenny-Bob also thinks David M


Re: FEMINAZI LOGIC AND KUNT WILLS
n Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:18:21 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:2sl3u35qh5v2ke7i5iqnt84gbq0s20rrns@4ax.com... > >>>After a protracted DENIAL of having lept to conclusions KUNT WILLS


Re: Need help on a case situation~
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:09:21 -0700, richard <i.do.not@ca.re> wrote: [...] >Which tv show was this on? Matlock? > >Marriage does not always protect against criminal procedings. >As the crime was committed before any marriage issue took place, her


Re: Novins...why are you no longer part of your family's law practice? Kent Wills and INTERNET ACCESS IN CUBA
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:19:44 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:ibj3u35r921qinnullivi6g1hqhdbsibf5@4ax.com... >>> >>>>>> <snip whatever *that* was> >>>>>> >>>>>>> When one is


Re: Speaks for itself KUNT WILLS the Certidied AAAAAA++++ expert on Cuba redux and how he LIES
n Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:00:49 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: [...] >>>>Visas are easy for them. Pick an >>>>Irish lass for example. You can get her shipped right to your doorstep. >>>>She >>>>doesn't even need a visa, just a plane ticke


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
KW > As you should know, I informed Les KW > that I made my supposition based KW > on comment you both made. LK > What comment was that Kent? Got a link, Kent?


Re: small claim against LTD for an interview
Tom, > I applied for a position at a University. > The search was conducted by a private firm - an LTD. > The CEO of the LTD agreed to reimburse me for hotel and travel. How did this happen? Were you having a telephone conversation? Where were


Re: __ Immigrants More Honest than most U$ Citizens! __
On Mar 9, 10:08 pm, "Reality_Check=A9" <Real...@Check.it> wrote: > "Peter Franks" <n...@none.com> wrote in message > > news:8x1Bj.21381$yk5.4595@newsfe18.lga... > > > > > Reality_Check=A9 wrote: > >> POMONA, California (AP) -- A thrift store worke


Re: David Daniel Moore DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Ave, Calumet City, IL
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:21:56 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:eql3u3tb5q1rs5t1jqsam1b9d60sebkf5b@4ax.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> uh uh. No such record. No evidence. No reason to b


Re: Come on Betty! Explain this!
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:24:25 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >LIT > DOC photo mug shots are only >LIT > available for current inmates; >LIT > not those formerly in-house. >LIT > This is so for 43 states. > >It looks like Iowa do


Re: Come on Betty! Explain this!
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:24:15 -0700 (PDT), lostintranslation <lostintranslation111@gmail.com> wrote: [...] >DOC photo mug shots are only available for current inmates; not those >formerly in-house. This is so for 43 states. While this is possi


Re: Ventrification - manufactured by wind
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:24:07 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >KRP > I LOVE how KUNT WILLS comes up with >KRP > his #@($. One minute he is SCREAMING >KRP > that Greg is UNEMPLOYED now he has >KRP > "PROVEN" that you and Gregg work


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:07:41 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:ekd3u3lak1h71qnu4fkas8o2ian70lob9c@4ax.com... >>>> >>>>>> You confirmed that Americans couldn't travel directly


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:54:03 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mar 19, 4:30 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in messagenews:64d199F2abmhuU1@mid.individual.net... >> >>


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mar 19, 5:07 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote: >>  krp wrote: >> > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote in message >> >news:64d199F2abmhuU


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:03:44 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message >news:64dh5mF2aemf4U1@mid.individual.net... >> >>>>>>>> You confirmed that Americans couldn't travel directly to


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:20:23 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:07:02 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" >> <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> krp wrote: >>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:07:02 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: > krp wrote: >> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote in message >> news:64d199F2abmhuU1@mid.individual.net... >>> krp wrote: >>>> "Kent Wills" <compuelf@gmail.


Re: What IS Kent Wills' complaint? and his LIES
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:18:06 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:06:38 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" >> <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> forevernitefan wrote: >>>> On Mar 19, 12:35 pm, "_ P


Re: Speaks for itself
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:19:39 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >KW > I've put my intellect against yours a few times. > >Didn't you mean "I have PIT my intellect against yours." ? > No. Are you unaware of modern colloquialisms


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:18:35 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >TN Kev > Lost already proved the "backchannel email" >TN Kev > conspiracy was false, > >Oh good idea! Piss off LIT by calling her a liar >about the e-mails. > Ki


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:00:52 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >LK > So Betty, what you're saying is that if >LK > you had any personal info about me >LK > you'd spread it around through >LK > back-channeling? > >LK > Would kind o


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Mar 21, 7:47=A0pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:00:52 -0700 (PDT), Greegor > > <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > >LK > So Betty, what you're saying is that if > >LK > you had any personal info about me > >LK > you'


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >KW > Les and Greg are, from what I can gather, >KW > co-workers and friends in real life. > >BW > And I'm the one that told him that. >BW > Or, at least I think I am.


Re: Speaks for itself
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:54:55 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"LK" <Patism66@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:d527376c-3463-4e7b-911e-fd727aa4c11c@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > >In response to some INCREDIBLY DUMB comments from Mo


Re: Speaks for itself
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:49:27 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"forevernitefan" <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote in message >news:27490d35-e0af-433a-88e7-21b87d30822b@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > >< Nope, but I have encountered racism and


Re: Speaks for itself
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:44:51 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >[...] >KW > She commented in ascps. >KW > And she didn't claim her comment was in E-mail. > >Got a link? > Several. >Remember that Betty said she was expressin


Re: Speaks for itself
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:03:21 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote: > >"LK" <Patism66@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:e5f72451-f9d6-4e97-9da4-32cefdc20dac@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... >On Mar 19, 9:25 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wro


Re: Ruh Roh! Kent paraphrased one of the e-mails he ""never got""
On Mar 21, 7:43=A0pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:43:24 -0700 (PDT), Greegor > > <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: > >KW > Les and Greg are, from what I can gather, > >KW > co-workers and friends in real life. > > >BW


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:04:46 -0700 (PDT), forevernitefan <fvrnite@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Mar 19, 6:14 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote: >> forevernitefan wrote: >> > On Mar 17, 7:37 pm, "Reality_Check©" <Real...@Check.it> wrote: >> >>


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:54:34 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote: >KW > You have called for the death of me (for >KW > marrying a Hispanic woman), my wife >KW > (for being Hispanic) and our children >KW > (for being half Hispanic). >


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:33:03 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >forevernitefan wrote: >> On Mar 19, 6:35 pm, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:37:20 -0600, "Reality_Chec


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:32:27 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >forevernitefan wrote: >> On Mar 20, 11:20 am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote: >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:35:23 -0600, "_ Prof. Jon


Re: Infant 'as well as could be expected' after sexual attack
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:20:53 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:35:23 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _" >> <theprof@jonez.net> wrote: >> >>> Kent Wills wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 18:37:20