Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
__ CHILDREN of smokers are 70% more likely to end up in Hospital <= Child Abuse! __



"Reality_Check©"
3/24/2008 11:54:55 PM


Hospital shock for kids of smokers
Mar 23 2008 by James McCarthy, Wales On Sunday
CHILDREN of smokers are a shocking 70 per cent more likely to end up in
hospital than youngsters whose parents don't light up, according to a top
medic.
And Dr Iolo Doull, consultant respiratory paediatrician at the University
Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, claims about a third of youngsters he treats are
there because of chest-related problems linked to passive smoking in the
home.
Dr Doull said: "If either parent smokes your chances of having a chest
problem are 20 per cent greater and chances of having an ear problem are 60
per cent greater. Sudden infant death syndrome, or cot death, is twice that
in mothers who smoke.
"Basically, you're more likely to have coughing and wheezing in the first
two years of life. The risks of coming into hospital are 70 per cent greater
than if you have got parents who don't smoke."
Dr Doull said the regularity with which children visited with chest problems
compared to the amount their parents smoked showed the extent of its
effects.
He added: "Parents should not smoke in the house. It doesn't matter if the
parents are in the living room and the child is in the kitchen, they should
smoke outside.
"You would hope with the ban on smoking in public places these problems
might decrease in future. I would hope it would have an effect for two
reasons - if it's inconvenient to smoke, people are less likely to. And
secondly, if they do smoke they get more used to doing it outside."
Tanya Buchanan is director of anti-smoking group Ash Wales.
She said: "Children whose parents smoke are more prone to chest infections
and things like glue ear, so if your parents are smoking you're more likely
to end up getting unwell.
"A survey by the Royal College of Physicians estimated that 50,000 children
are admitted to hospital as a result of smoke in the home every year."
 
 
"BaaBaaBlackSheep"
3/25/2008 9:47:20 AM


Shame your parents didn't smoke you straight from your crib into a grave .


"Reality_Check" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in message
news:64ridgF2domo3U1@mid.individual.net...

Hospital shock for kids of smokers
Mar 23 2008 by James McCarthy, Wales On Sunday
CHILDREN of smokers are a shocking 70 per cent more likely to end up in
hospital than youngsters whose parents don't light up, according to a top
medic.
And Dr Iolo Doull, consultant respiratory paediatrician at the University
Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, claims about a third of youngsters he treats
are there because of chest-related problems linked to passive smoking in
the home.
Dr Doull said: "If either parent smokes your chances of having a chest
problem are 20 per cent greater and chances of having an ear problem are
60 per cent greater. Sudden infant death syndrome, or cot death, is twice
that in mothers who smoke.
"Basically, you're more likely to have coughing and wheezing in the first
two years of life. The risks of coming into hospital are 70 per cent
greater than if you have got parents who don't smoke."
Dr Doull said the regularity with which children visited with chest
problems compared to the amount their parents smoked showed the extent of
its effects.
He added: "Parents should not smoke in the house. It doesn't matter if the
parents are in the living room and the child is in the kitchen, they
should smoke outside.
"You would hope with the ban on smoking in public places these problems
might decrease in future. I would hope it would have an effect for two
reasons - if it's inconvenient to smoke, people are less likely to. And
secondly, if they do smoke they get more used to doing it outside."
Tanya Buchanan is director of anti-smoking group Ash Wales.
She said: "Children whose parents smoke are more prone to chest infections
and things like glue ear, so if your parents are smoking you're more
likely to end up getting unwell.
"A survey by the Royal College of Physicians estimated that 50,000
children are admitted to hospital as a result of smoke in the home every
year."
 
 
Bart Goddard
3/25/2008 1:14:31 PM


"Reality_Check" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in
news:64ridgF2domo3U1@mid.individual.net:
CHILDREN of smokers are a shocking 70 per cent more likely to end up
in hospital than youngsters whose parents don't light up, according to
a top medic.
Wait. Not "according to a correctly designed and run statistical
study", but "according to ONE physician's gut feeling"? And you
call yourself "Reality_Check"?
Let's see how mentally agile this "top medic" is:
"You would hope with the ban on smoking in public places these
problems might decrease in future.
Banning smoking OUTSIDE the home is somehow supposed to
decrease it INSIDE the home? Any sensible person would
suspect the opposite.
Here's the real reality check: If you have to lie to make
your point, maybe your point ought not to be made.
B.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
 
 
"BaaBaaBlackSheep"
3/25/2008 12:32:56 PM


So lets get this straight.
You hate smokers
You hate God
You hate Bush
You hate guns
You hate Iowa?
You hate everything but your own self-image and _ Prof. Jonez _ (who, I
think is your BC bum buddy!!)
This is why the New World Order must be stopped! Because it a negative
reaction from its very seed as opposed to a positive force of change that
looks to draw people towards a better life and system of doing things.
You push too hard and your gonna find out a lot of us normally friendly
rural living ugly @$#*s will push back and remember were the ones with the
red necks, guns, baccy and moonshine you hate so much!


"Reality_Check" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in message
news:64ridgF2domo3U1@mid.individual.net...

Hospital shock for kids of smokers
Mar 23 2008 by James McCarthy, Wales On Sunday
CHILDREN of smokers are a shocking 70 per cent more likely to end up in
hospital than youngsters whose parents don't light up, according to a top
medic.
And Dr Iolo Doull, consultant respiratory paediatrician at the University
Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, claims about a third of youngsters he treats
are there because of chest-related problems linked to passive smoking in
the home.
Dr Doull said: "If either parent smokes your chances of having a chest
problem are 20 per cent greater and chances of having an ear problem are
60 per cent greater. Sudden infant death syndrome, or cot death, is twice
that in mothers who smoke.
"Basically, you're more likely to have coughing and wheezing in the first
two years of life. The risks of coming into hospital are 70 per cent
greater than if you have got parents who don't smoke."
Dr Doull said the regularity with which children visited with chest
problems compared to the amount their parents smoked showed the extent of
its effects.
He added: "Parents should not smoke in the house. It doesn't matter if the
parents are in the living room and the child is in the kitchen, they
should smoke outside.
"You would hope with the ban on smoking in public places these problems
might decrease in future. I would hope it would have an effect for two
reasons - if it's inconvenient to smoke, people are less likely to. And
secondly, if they do smoke they get more used to doing it outside."
Tanya Buchanan is director of anti-smoking group Ash Wales.
She said: "Children whose parents smoke are more prone to chest infections
and things like glue ear, so if your parents are smoking you're more
likely to end up getting unwell.
"A survey by the Royal College of Physicians estimated that 50,000
children are admitted to hospital as a result of smoke in the home every
year."
 
 
"Reality_Check©"
3/25/2008 7:49:50 PM




"BaaBaaBlackSheep" <BaaBaaBlackSheep@_remove_gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fsb46t$u3c$1@news.datemas.de...

So lets get this straight.
You hate smokers
Everybody hates smokers. Smokers hate themselves.
You hate God
There is no god.
You hate Bush
All moral and ethical people hate Bu$h.
You hate guns
Why hate an inanimate object.
You hate Iowa?
Ibid.
You hate everything but your own self-image and _ Prof. Jonez _ (who, I
think is your BC bum buddy!!)
Why do you lie?
This is why the New World Order must be stopped!
Can you say Gallactic Class Non Sequitur ?
Because it a negative reaction from its very seed as opposed to a positive
force of change that looks to draw people towards a better life and system
of doing things.
Are you drunk again ?
You push too hard and your gonna find out a lot of us normally friendly
rural living ugly @$#*s will push back and remember were the ones with the
red necks, guns, baccy and moonshine you hate so much!
You really are a delusional dip#@($, aren't you boy?


"Reality_Check" <Reality@Check.it> wrote in message
news:64ridgF2domo3U1@mid.individual.net...

 
 
"Real titty_Chuck@þÜ-T®Ø££$"
3/26/2008 5:58:40 PM


James McCarthy make's an asshole of himself with the
help of an asshole that don't know what reality is.!
Hospital shock for kids of smokers
Mar 23 2008 by James McCarthy, Wales On Sunday
Let's see how now.
CHILDREN of smokers are a shocking 70 per cent more likely to end up in
hospital than youngsters whose parents don't light up, according to a top
medic.
==>We can't name the medic eh? So we' ll use another scape goat.
And Dr Iolo Doull, consultant respiratory paediatrician at the University
Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, claims about a third of youngsters he treats
are
there because of chest-related problems linked to passive smoking in the
home.
==>Ok so that's 30% of his customers. Now this is a consultant somehow?
Remember !00% of his people are all ill. (Specialist right)
Dr Doull said: "If either parent smokes your chances of having a chest
problem are 20 per cent greater and chances of having an ear problem are 60
per cent greater. Sudden infant death syndrome, or cot death, is twice that
in mothers who smoke.
==> Just because he's say's it don't make it so. (not proof)
"Basically, you're more likely to have coughing and wheezing in the first
two years of life. The risks of coming into hospital are 70 per cent
greater
than if you have got parents who don't smoke."
==>All babies cough and wheeze, nothing new, wet lungs. 9 mos.
submerged.
Dr Doull said the regularity with which children visited with chest
problems
compared to the amount their parents smoked showed the extent of its
effects.
==> All his patients are sick 100% ~ the largest portion from non smoking
population.
He added: "Parents should not smoke in the house. It doesn't matter if the
parents are in the living room and the child is in the kitchen, they should
smoke outside.
==> Does he doctor outside or inside?
"You would hope with the ban on smoking in public places these problems
might decrease in future. I would hope it would have an effect for two
reasons - if it's inconvenient to smoke, people are less likely to. And
secondly, if they do smoke they get more used to doing it outside."
==>OK asshole, if they did, then 100% of his patients ane non smokers kids.
Now whatcha going to blame. Ever heard of BOYA?
Tanya Buchanan is director of anti-smoking group Ash Wales, or
WHORES women hording our rights every
==> Just ther name of another asshole thrown in the mix.?
Is she a doctor? Was that Dr. Tanya B..? er...Not.
She said: "Children whose parents smoke are more prone to chest infections
and things like glue ear, so if your parents are smoking you're more likely
to end up getting unwell. <== a dr. would have said... ill.
Smoking and glue ear, sounds like a big problem..
BaWahahahahahahahahaaaaaa
"A survey by the Royal College of Physicians estimated that 50,000 children
are admitted to hospital as a result of smoke in the home every year."
But the Royal Assholes didn't account for the 3x or 150, 000 children
of the Non~ Smokers that are receiving treatment from the royal
consultant asshole.
Simply Shocking !
RUBBISH !
Final analagy:
Non Smokers children are 3: 1 sicker than smokers kids.
Make the cheapskates pay more for health coverage.!
 
 
Report this post for offensive content


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004