Legal Spring Logo

"Why would I go anywhere else for Legal Services?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
__ Driver Dies in Fiery Wrong-Way Truck Crash Caught on Video <= should Diabetics be allowed to Drive? __



"Reality_Check©"
4/2/2008 10:37:27 PM


Driver Dies in Fiery Wrong-Way Truck Crash Caught on Video
Watch the Video:
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/myfox/MyFox/pages/sidebar_video.jsp?contentId=6201569&version=1&locale=EN-US
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
A Canadian truck driver drove into oncoming traffic for 20 minutes at high
speeds before dying in a crash when the truck went over an abutment, as seen
on eyewitness video obtained by FOX News.
The truck driver had a medical condition that may have contributed to the
incident, United Press International reported.
In the dramatic video footage of the incident, the truck hits a concrete
guard rail on an exit ramp near Edmonton, Alberta, becoming airborne and
falling onto railroad tracks, before exploding.
The truck clipped several cars and numerous others were forced into a ditch
along the highway, but no one other than the truck's driver was hurt,
according to the UPI report.
The driver, 25-year-old Mark Santos, was an insulin-dependent diabetic, his
brother Jordan Santos told the UPI.
A witness of Monday's afternoon crash described the driver to reporters as
looking "mad," "angry" and "zoned out."
"He was basically slumped down, head down, bobbing around, arms hanging down
at his side," Dave Hybeck told FOX News.
The driver's brother said he's been around his brother when he's gone into
hypoglycemia and Santos would be confused and sleepy.
"You don't know what was going on inside of the cab of that vehicle; you don't
know what that person was thinking, so all of those pieces are what our
officers need to bring this to a conclusion," Edmonton Police spokesperson
Karen Carlson told FOX News.
Autopsy results were expected later in the week.
 
 
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
4/2/2008 10:25:23 PM


We let convicted drunk drivers and speeders continue to drive so why
not everyone?
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/3/2008 9:25:25 AM


Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
We let convicted drunk drivers and speeders continue to drive so why
not everyone?
Sure, let's let blind people drive too, jackass.
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/3/2008 11:00:15 AM


Hypoglycemia is a very real danger both for diabetics on glucose-
lowering medications and those around them if they are operating heavy
machinery.
The brain absolutely requires glucose to function normally.
Smarter to eat less, down to the right amount to possibly cure the
type-2 diabetes:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart
A simple parable in hopes of promoting understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
Reality_Check=A9 wrote:
Driver Dies in Fiery Wrong-Way Truck Crash Caught on Video
Watch the Video:
http://www.myfoxdfw.com/myfox/MyFox/pages/sidebar_video.jsp?contentId=3D62=
01569&version=3D1&locale=3DEN-US
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
A Canadian truck driver drove into oncoming traffic for 20 minutes at hig=
h
speeds before dying in a crash when the truck went over an abutment, as se=
en
on eyewitness video obtained by FOX News.
The truck driver had a medical condition that may have contributed to the
incident, United Press International reported.
In the dramatic video footage of the incident, the truck hits a concrete
guard rail on an exit ramp near Edmonton, Alberta, becoming airborne and
falling onto railroad tracks, before exploding.
The truck clipped several cars and numerous others were forced into a ditc=
h
along the highway, but no one other than the truck's driver was hurt,
according to the UPI report.
The driver, 25-year-old Mark Santos, was an insulin-dependent diabetic, hi=
s
brother Jordan Santos told the UPI.
A witness of Monday's afternoon crash described the driver to reporters as=
looking "mad," "angry" and "zoned out."
"He was basically slumped down, head down, bobbing around, arms hanging do=
wn
at his side," Dave Hybeck told FOX News.
The driver's brother said he's been around his brother when he's gone into=
hypoglycemia and Santos would be confused and sleepy.
"You don't know what was going on inside of the cab of that vehicle; you d=
on't
know what that person was thinking, so all of those pieces are what our
officers need to bring this to a conclusion," Edmonton Police spokesperson=
Karen Carlson told FOX News.
Autopsy results were expected later in the week.
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/3/2008 12:02:56 PM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Hypoglycemia is a very real danger both for diabetics on glucose-
lowering medications and those around them if they are operating heavy
machinery.
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
The brain absolutely requires glucose to function normally.
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Smarter to eat less, down to the right amount to possibly cure the
type-2 diabetes:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
A simple parable in hopes of promoting understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Your pathetic god hates diabetics.
Andrew <><
Reality_Check wrote:
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/3/2008 2:23:01 PM


_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Yes. However, it would be reasonable to consider revoking a driver's
license if a diabetic is having frequent hypoglycemic episodes because
his/her diabetes is not optimally managed to prevent such
incapacitating events.
The surest way of preventing hypoglycemia would be by curing the
type-2 diabetes by losing the black fat (VAT). The smartest way of
losing the VAT is by eating less, down to the right amount:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart
Again, a simple parable in hopes of promoting understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
The brain absolutely requires glucose to function normally.
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Your pathetic god hates diabetics.
 
 
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
4/3/2008 6:40:55 PM


On Apr 3, 9:25 am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
Sure, let's let blind people drive too, jackass.
Now that just shows how dumb you are if you think sight is not
essential for driving!!!
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/3/2008 8:33:43 PM


On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:02:56 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
<theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
So should Diabetics be allowed to Drive ?
Your pathetic god hates diabetics.
And shills.
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/3/2008 8:37:31 PM


On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:23:01 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdoc22@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Yes. However, it would be reasonable to consider revoking a driver's
license if a diabetic is having frequent hypoglycemic episodes because
his/her diabetes is not optimally managed to prevent such
incapacitating events.
So let's say the guy had developed cataracts instead of diabetes;
would you also want to wait until he had "frequent episodes" before
you took his license away?
What if the diabetic kills someone with his very first "episode?" Why
do we have to wait for something bad to happen before we yank
someone's license?
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/4/2008 2:26:31 AM


Scott in SoCal wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
So let's say the guy had developed cataracts instead of diabetes;
would you also want to wait until he had "frequent episodes" before
you took his license away?
The visual impairment from cataracts would be more than frequent in
that it would be constant. Such a person would not pass the required
visual acuity screening to renew their license in the first place.
Truth is simple.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
 
Larry Bud
4/4/2008 5:43:46 AM


So let's say the guy had developed cataracts instead of diabetes;
would you also want to wait until he had "frequent episodes" before
you took his license away?
What if the diabetic kills someone with his very first "episode?" Why
do we have to wait for something bad to happen before we yank
someone's license?
You sould like Aunt Judy. That argument could be made about anything,
including your Vette.
Where do you draw the line? Seemlingly perfectly healthy 30 year olds
have been known to have strokes or die from an unknown heart problem.
Everyone is at risk, it's just a matter of the risk amount. I have
known people for 15 years that I had no clue had diabetes.
 
 
J666
4/4/2008 7:52:21 AM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 7:43:46 -0500, Larry Bud wrote
(in message
<d4bc72c0-f879-4e99-b481-76cd0ec13447@e67g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>):
Everyone is at risk, it's just a matter of the risk amount.
Warning - Life can be hazardous to your life
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/4/2008 7:11:57 AM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:26:31 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdoc17@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
Scott in SoCal wrote:
The visual impairment from cataracts would be more than frequent in
that it would be constant. Such a person would not pass the required
visual acuity screening to renew their license in the first place.
But if they already have the license, they won't have to take a vision
test for years. So this hypothetical driver would have plenty of
opportunity to drive legally - at least until his "episodes" became
"frequent."
Truth is simple.
That's right. The simple truth is diabetics who can fall into
hypoglycemic comas at unpredictable times should NOT be allowed to
drive.
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/4/2008 7:14:20 AM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT), Larry Bud
<larrybud2002@yahoo.com> wrote:
So let's say the guy had developed cataracts instead of diabetes;
would you also want to wait until he had "frequent episodes" before
you took his license away?
What if the diabetic kills someone with his very first "episode?" Why
do we have to wait for something bad to happen before we yank
someone's license?
You sould like Aunt Judy.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Occasionally Aunt Judy says
the right thing (for the wrong reason).
That argument could be made about anything, including your Vette.
A Corvette is not a serious medical condition which could result in
the driver blacking out at unpredictable times.
Where do you draw the line?
I draw the line at serious medical conditions which could result in a
driver blacking out at unpredictable times. :)
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
"Robert Miles"
4/4/2008 1:16:04 PM




"Scott in SoCal" <scottenaztlan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fidcv3h3rkr8t2ahcrs489d66dlgj3mrrc@4ax.com...

On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 02:26:31 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdoc17@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
But if they already have the license, they won't have to take a vision
test for years. So this hypothetical driver would have plenty of
opportunity to drive legally - at least until his "episodes" became
"frequent."
That's right. The simple truth is diabetics who can fall into
hypoglycemic comas at unpredictable times should NOT be allowed to
drive.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that many diabetics, especially if they're
the more common type 2, aren't likely to have any hypoglycemic comas.
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/4/2008 12:46:37 PM


Scott in SoCal wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
But if they already have the license, they won't have to take a vision
test for years. So this hypothetical driver would have plenty of
opportunity to drive legally...
Not in good conscience however.
- at least until his "episodes" became
"frequent."
Again, visual impairment from cataracts would be more than frequent
because this would be constant.
Truth is simple.
That's right. The simple truth is diabetics who can fall into
hypoglycemic comas at unpredictable times should NOT be allowed to
drive.
That would be your opinion rather than truth as evident by your use of
the word "should."
Again, truth is simple.
It is possible for you to fall into a hypoglycemic coma at any moment
if GOD so wills it.
Therefore, by your own measure, your driver's license (if you have
one) should be revoked.
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/4/2008 4:49:53 PM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Yes. However, it would be reasonable to consider revoking a driver's
license if a diabetic is having frequent hypoglycemic episodes because
his/her diabetes is not optimally managed to prevent such
incapacitating events.
And how many of these "episodes" does it take to cause a fatal accident?
The surest way of preventing hypoglycemia would be by curing the
type-2 diabetes by losing the black fat (VAT). The smartest way of
losing the VAT is by eating less, down to the right amount:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart
Again, a simple parable in hopes of promoting understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
The brain absolutely requires glucose to function normally.
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/4/2008 6:20:16 PM


_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
And how many of these "episodes" does it take to cause a fatal accident?
That would be knowable only by GOD.
"See you are well again. Now stop sinning or something worse may
happen to you." -- LORD Jesus Christ
Amen.
Thus, it remains smarter to eat less, down to the right amount:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeSmart
A simple parable given in hopes of promoting understanding:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/4/2008 6:56:50 PM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:16:04 -0500, "Robert Miles"
<robertmiles@bellsouthNOSPAM.net> wrote:


"Scott in SoCal" <scottenaztlan@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fidcv3h3rkr8t2ahcrs489d66dlgj3mrrc@4ax.com...

You seem to be ignoring the fact that many diabetics, especially if they're
the more common type 2, aren't likely to have any hypoglycemic comas.
Then we aren't talking about those people, are we?
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/4/2008 7:12:56 PM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdoc24@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
Scott in SoCal wrote:
Not in good conscience however.
The same could be said for drivers who are likely to slip into comas,
could it not? Why the double standard?
- at least until his "episodes" became "frequent."
Again, visual impairment from cataracts would be more than frequent
because this would be constant.
So where do you draw the line?
Truth is simple.
That's right. The simple truth is diabetics who can fall into
hypoglycemic comas at unpredictable times should NOT be allowed to
drive.
That would be your opinion rather than truth as evident by your use of
the word "should."
My opinion holds just as much "truth" as yours does.
Again, truth is simple.
Yes, it is. People who are a danger to others on the roads due to
their medical conditions should not be permitted to drive. That's the
truth (not to mention the law). This guy's doctor should have filled
out the Canadian equivalent of this form
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/forms/ds/ds326.pdf
and reported him to the DMV and gotten his license yanked. Notice that
Diabetes is specifically listed on this form, indicating that, despite
your OPINION, it is a cause for concern to the folks who actually give
out driver's licenses.
It is possible for you to fall into a hypoglycemic coma at any moment
if GOD so wills it.
Oh, and I suppose your fantasies about an invisible man in the sky are
"truth," as well?
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/4/2008 7:14:58 PM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:20:16 -0700 (PDT), "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdoc22@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
That would be knowable only by GOD.
Therefore YOU are not qualified to determine that it is safe for him
to continue to drive. Therefore his license should have been
immediately revoked for the sake of safety.
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
"Reality_Check©"
4/4/2008 8:27:33 PM




"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc22@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:4ac9f145-1945-4871-b483-38449e1f3086@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
That would be knowable only by GOD.
Which god ?
 
 
Tiger_Lily
4/4/2008 8:40:02 PM


Scott in SoCal wrote:
Yes, it is. People who are a danger to others on the roads due to
their medical conditions should not be permitted to drive. That's the
truth (not to mention the law). This guy's doctor should have filled
out the Canadian equivalent of this form
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/forms/ds/ds326.pdf
and reported him to the DMV and gotten his license yanked. Notice that
Diabetes is specifically listed on this form, indicating that, despite
your OPINION, it is a cause for concern to the folks who actually give
out driver's licenses.
a Semi driver in Alberta MUST have a complete physical exam every year
and get clearance from their Dr before they can renew their
license............ even if their Dr allows them, DMV can refuse the license
i drive a car........ i must have a Medical every year........ the DMV
is reported to every time i have an unconscious hypo or a severe hypo NO
MATTER if i'm driving or NOT....... the DMV has the final say on if i
will get my license (my last unconscious hypo was due to an insulin
change back in 1993)
are you telling me that *I* should not be driving?
i think you are 'over the top' in your opinion about 'potentially could
have a hypo'
ANYONE can have a heart attack at the wheel, and have been in 'good
health' up until that point......... i know........ my uncle died of a
heart attack at the wheel while doing 60MPH and 3 people in the car he
hit died :(
i guess under that logic YOU shouldn't be driving either?
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/4/2008 11:08:27 PM


Reality_Check=A9 wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Which god ?
There is only One.
Your asking simply demonstrates you don't know HIM.
May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as the Son of Man ...
=2E.. by being hungrier:
http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Hunger
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyTwo
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyThree
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyFour
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
=2E.. gone:
http://YouTube.com/watch?v=3DQb6d_z5C35E
Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
=2E.. for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Luke6_21
A simple parable for the wise and discerning:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
 
Màck©®
4/5/2008 11:25:13 AM


On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:49:53 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
<theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
And how many of these "episodes" does it take to cause a fatal accident?
about the same number as it would for you to kill someone while
driving while you have the flu, a severe cold and taking cough syrup,
etc. So because that is a very real possibility, you driving while
impaired, your license should be revoked now. you are a menace to
society.
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/5/2008 9:37:51 AM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
Reality_Check wrote:
There is only One.
Says who ?
Your asking simply demonstrates you don't know HIM.
How do you know it's a "HIM" ?
May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as the Son of Man ...
Fuck your god and @$#* what it stands for.
Any questions?
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/5/2008 9:40:16 AM


Mck wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:49:53 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez _"
<theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
about the same number as it would for you to kill someone while
driving while you have the flu,
And your proof of this absurd assertion is what, exactly?
a severe cold and taking cough syrup,
And your proof of this absurd assertion is what, exactly?
etc.
And your proof of this absurd assertion is what, exactly?
So because that is a very real possibility,
Just because you pull complete nonsense out of your ass
doesn't make it a "real possibility", "very" or otherwise, jackass.
you driving while impaired, your license should be revoked now. you are a
menace to
society.
You're lying again, jackass.
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/5/2008 8:43:23 AM


http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/ScienceByGOD
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/5/2008 9:58:52 AM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/ScienceByGOD
Fuck your god, and @$#* what it stands for, you superstitious imbecile.
Any questions?
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/5/2008 9:26:15 AM


neighbor_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Fuck your god, and @$#* what it stands for, you superstitious imbecile.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to unwittingly demonstrate what life would be without HIM.
Laus Deo ! ! !
http://HeartMDPhD.com/LausDeo
May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as the Son of Man ...
.... by being hungrier:
http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Hunger
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyTwo
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyThree
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyFour
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
.... gone:
http://YouTube.com/watch?v=Qb6d_z5C35E
Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
.... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Luke6_21
A simple parable for the wise and discerning:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be euglycemic:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/5/2008 10:35:17 AM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
neighbor_ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
Many thanks,
Fuck your god.
much praise,
Fuck your christ.
and all the glory to GOD for
Fuck your holey ghost.
HIS compelling you to unwittingly demonstrate what life would be without HIM.
So you admit there is no god, eh nutter?
 
 
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
4/5/2008 9:38:22 AM


QED
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/ScienceByGOD
 
 
Scott in SoCal
4/5/2008 10:32:21 AM


On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:40:02 -0600, Tiger_Lily <me@privacy.net> wrote:
ANYONE can have a heart attack at the wheel, and have been in 'good
health' up until that point......... i know........ my uncle died of a
heart attack at the wheel while doing 60MPH and 3 people in the car he
hit died :(
i guess under that logic YOU shouldn't be driving either?
If I had a medical condition that would make me LIKELY to have a heart
attack, then yes, I should not be driving either.
--
"Dave's not here, man!"
- Tommy Chong
 
 
necromancer <55_sux@worldofnecromancer_no_spam_no_way.org>
4/5/2008 4:40:07 PM


SFB spewed:
On Apr 3, 9:25 am, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <thep...@jonez.net> wrote:
Now that just shows how dumb you are if you think sight is not
essential for driving!!!
Why not> You think that operational brakes are not essential to
driving....
--
"Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS," advocates
driving a car with half of its braking system inoperative:
"If you drive slow and supplement the front brakes with
transmission braking, you'll be fine - as long as the
front brakes don't spring a leak too. Big thing is
drive slow."
--Speeders & Drunk Drivers Are MURDERERS, 4/4/08
Ref: http://tinyurl.com/5qzjgc
Msg ID: bb6b10f4-e9ae-495e-8449-d06fb1f99ba5@q10g2000prf.googlegroups.com
 
 
"_ Prof. Jonez _"
4/5/2008 4:02:07 PM


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
QED
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/ScienceByGOD
Piss on your christ, nutter.
 
 
russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew T. Russotto)
4/5/2008 5:29: