|
LEVEL FOUR SANCTION
By a vote of 3 in favor and none opposed, the Moderation Committee
is imposing a level four sanction on Sam Sloan 11115292 as a result of
his posts:
MQ:Where are Bauer, Berry, and Channing on the Finances?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am #89659
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:USCF Financial Problems "The sky is falling."
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am #89647
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:Why Are We Talking About Cutting the Magazines?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am #89637
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ: Sloan v. Truong - Affidavit on Federal Question Issue
by samsloan on Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm #90810
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is published today
samsloan on Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:35 am #93727
No advertising
Accordingly, Sam Sloan 11115292 is to be suspended from posting to
the USCF Forums for one year as outlined in the AUG: One year
suspension: A poster in a moderation queue who repeatedly submits
posts that violate the AUG may be suspended from posting for one year.
After the year elapses, the poster returns to the queue and is
considered to have two offenses.
Would the sysadmin please enact the sanction?
|
| |
| |
.....give USCF the benefit of the doubt?
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
| |
yet the idiot keeps spamming this group.
LEVEL FOUR SANCTION
By a vote of 3 in favor and none opposed, the Moderation Committee
is imposing a level four sanction on Sam Sloan 11115292 as a result of
his posts:
MQ:Where are Bauer, Berry, and Channing on the Finances?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am #89659
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:USCF Financial Problems "The sky is falling."
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am #89647
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:Why Are We Talking About Cutting the Magazines?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am #89637
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ: Sloan v. Truong - Affidavit on Federal Question Issue
by samsloan on Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm #90810
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is published today
samsloan on Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:35 am #93727
No advertising
Accordingly, Sam Sloan 11115292 is to be suspended from posting to
the USCF Forums for one year as outlined in the AUG: One year
suspension: A poster in a moderation queue who repeatedly submits
posts that violate the AUG may be suspended from posting for one year.
After the year elapses, the poster returns to the queue and is
considered to have two offenses.
Would the sysadmin please enact the sanction?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 8, 4:44 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can't they suspend you from posting here as well?
|
| |
| |
Can't they suspend you from posting here as well?
No, and that's why he was impersonated. They can't shut anyone up in this
group.
--
Ray Gordon, The ORIGINAL Lifestyle Seduction Guru
Finding Your A-Game:
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Includes 29 Reasons Not To Be A Nice Guy (FREE!)
The book Neil Strauss and VH-1 STOLE The Pivot From
Click HERE: for the ORIGINAL pivot chapter:
http://www.cybersheet.com/pivot.pdf
Here's my Myspace Page: And Pickup Blog (FREE advice)
http://www.myspace.com/snodgrasspublishing
Don't rely on overexposed, mass-marketed commercial seduction methods which
no longer work. Learn the methods the gurus USE with the money they make
from what they teach.
Thinking of taking a seduction "workshiop?" Read THIS:
http://www.dirtyscottsdale.com/?p=1187
Beware! VH-1's "The Pickup Artst" was FRAUDULENT. Six of the eight
contestants were actors, and they used PAID TARGETS in the club. The paid
targets got mad when VH-1 said "there are no actors in this club" and ruined
their prromised acting credit. What else has Mystery lied about?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 7, 11:34 pm, Offramp <alaneobr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Can't they suspend you from posting here as well?
No, this is an unmoderated USENET group.
In any event, he does not seem to be an evil man, but unfortunately he
is a bit confused about a few things, which has led to some unwise
actions. Some have reacted to him as though he were evil, which is
itself mistaken.
John Savard
|
| |
| |
All of the postings 5 postings listed above, for which I was suspended
for one year, were all posted simultaneously here too. You can search
and find them easily.
None of them were in any way objectionable.
They pointed out things like the fact that the USCF is losing $300,000
so far this year. They made what was intended to be helpful
suggestions to change that.
Unfortunately, Bill Hall, who controls the moderators, will not brook
any implied criticism. These moderators were all notoriously anti-Sam
Sloan at the time they were appointed and indeed that is the reason
why they were appointed.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
| |
On Apr 8, 6:25 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, Bill Hall, who controls the moderators, will not brook
any implied criticism. These moderators were all notoriously anti-Sam
Sloan at the time they were appointed and indeed that is the reason
why they were appointed.
So it's true, then-- the whole world revolves
around Sam Sloan! I always suspected as
much, but this post confirms it.
-- help bot
|
| |
| |
e: Sanction Notice - samsloan - Level 4
Sent at: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:47 pm
From: lblair
To: samsloan
Here is a copy of the most recent sanction announcement, together with
copies of the posts that it mentions:
Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:52 pm
#97447
LEVEL FOUR SANCTION
By a vote of 3 in favor and none opposed, the Moderation Committee
is imposing a level four sanction on Sam Sloan 11115292 as a result of
his posts:
MQ:Where are Bauer, Berry, and Channing on the Finances?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am #89659
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:USCF Financial Problems "The sky is falling."
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am #89647
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:Why Are We Talking About Cutting the Magazines?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am #89637
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ: Sloan v. Truong - Affidavit on Federal Question Issue
by samsloan on Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm #90810
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is publishedtoday
samsloan on Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:35 am #93727
No advertising
Accordingly, Sam Sloan 11115292 is to be suspended from posting to
the USCF Forums for one year as outlined in the AUG: One year
suspension: A poster in a moderation queue who repeatedly submits
posts that violate the AUG may be suspended from posting for one year.
After the year elapses, the poster returns to the queue and is
considered to have two offenses.
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am
#89637
You fail to understand. Yes, we need to cut expenses, but the
place to cut is not to cut the magazine which is the only benefit most
members receive.
We need to cut staff. We have a bloated, overpaid and under-worked
staff. We have a lazy, unqualified and incompetent Executive Director
who had never even worked in an office before he was hired as
Executive Director and is often out "sick". At the May 20, 2007 board
meeting at Stillwater Oklahoma I asked him to provide a simple list of
how many employees we have and brief job descriptions. Bill Hall
refused to answer the questions or to provide the list. We still do
not know how many employees we have. We still do not know what
happened to the $2 million we had in a money market fund in 1999 that
subsequently disappeared. In 2003 we had 23 employees and we also had
$6 million in revenues. Now, I understand that we have 28 employees
and only $3.1 million in revenues. Why will nobody answer the
questions about where all the money went? Why are we taking about
eliminating one magazine and cutting the other, both of which are
produced out of the office, when we should be talking about cutting
our payroll?
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am
#89647
On Jan 31, 8:12 am, "Brian Mottershead" <br...@riverscape.info>
wrote:
Polgar's going on about legal
fees, internet insurance, and web development costs, etc, is
both
incorrect and misleading -- not to mention self-serving.
Talk about self-serving, please note that she says that Channing
agrees with her, but it was Channing who did the things she complains
about.
It was Channing's idea to play $50,000 to upgrade the website and
he had us hire an Internet guru to tell us how to do that.
It was also Channing's idea that we pay $15,000 for "Internet
Insurance".
It was also Channing's idea to spend $10,000 to fly all the USCF
insiders to Florida for a "retreat".
In short, most of the wasteful expenditures that Susan complains
about were done by Channing who is now her ally.
Also, recall that after making a brief presentation at the Finance
Committee Workshop in Cherry Hill, Channing said, "If you have any
questions, I will be in the bar."
He is still in the bar and he has never answered any of our
questions.
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am
#89659
Randy Bauer has long had a reputation for being lazy.
Sorry to tell you that, but that is the truth.
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm
#90810
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
__________________________________________
Sam Sloan,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 07-CV-8537 (DC)
-against-
Hoainhan "Paul" Truong, Zsuzsanna "Susan" Polgar,
Joel Channing, William Goichberg, The United States
Chess Federation, Bill Hall, Herbert Rodney Vaughn,
Gregory Alexander, Frank Niro, Grant Perks, William
Brock, Randall Hough, Randy Bauer, Jim Berry,
Texas Tech University and United States of America,
Defendants
__________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION
TO DISMISS ON FEDERAL QUESTIONS ISSUE
__________________________________________
Samuel H. Sloan, the plaintiff herein, being duly sworn, deposes
and says:
1. I make this affidavit in opposition to the motion by various
defendants to dismiss this action on the grounds of lack of a federal
question.
2. Frankly, I consider the issues raised by the moving defendants
to be frivolous. There are a great abundance of federal questions
here. I think the defendants are just trying to buy time and to
convince their clients that they are doing the best they can.
3. The United States Chess Federation ("USCF") has 86,000 members.
Every state of the 50 states have members, with the least being
Wyoming with more than 50 members. The USCF represents the United
States of America internationally. We are the equivalent to the United
States Olympic Committee, except that instead of representing the USA
in hundreds of sports, we only represent the USA in one activity,
chess.
4. It is obvious that if the United States Olympic Committee or
any other comparable organization such as the National Football League
or the National Basketball Association had experienced the massive
election fraud, identity theft, online forgery, impersonations,
misappropriations of funds and so on as have characterized the USCF in
the past two years, the FBI would have moved in already and started
making arrests. There would be people in jail now. This has not
happened because there is not that much interest in chess.
5. There have been three forensic reports produced thus far. There
are the Mottershead Report, the Jones Report and the Ulevitch Report.
These three reports all reach the same conclusion. The Mottershead
Report has proved absolutely, conclusively that Hoainhan "Paul" Truong
sent 2464 fake or forged Internet postings over a two year period from
June 25, 2005 until October, 2007. That is two thousand four hundred
sixty four postings, most of which impersonated me, Sam Sloan,
although some of them impersonated Ray Gordon, Andrew Zito and other
real or fake personalities.
6. As to why I in particular would be the target of most of these
impersona
|
| |
| |
-- In fide-chess@yahoogroups.com, jerryhanken@aol.com wrote:
Sam, give me an example of one or two posts the moderators took down from
you which were not objectionable. What posts got you banned? You are so
obsessed with your attacks on the Bills, you don't know who your natural allies
are. It's a shame because you are so right on point on Poltroung. Jerry Hanken
I am glad to. Here are the five posts, in their entirety, that got me
banned from posting for ONE YEAR. Please tell me what is wrong with
any of these five postings, which were spread out over a period of two
months:
Sanction Notice - samsloan - Level 4
Sent at: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:51 pm
From: Terry_Vibbert
To: nolan samsloan
LEVEL FOUR SANCTION
By a vote of 3 in favor and none opposed, the Moderation Committee is
imposing a level four sanction on Sam Sloan 11115292 as a result of
his posts:
MQ:Where are Bauer, Berry, and Channing on the Finances?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am #89659
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:USCF Financial Problems "The sky is falling."
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am #89647
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:Why Are We Talking About Cutting the Magazines?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am #89637
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ: Sloan v. Truong - Affidavit on Federal Question Issue
by samsloan on Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm #90810
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is published today
samsloan on Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:35 am #93727
No advertising
Accordingly, Sam Sloan 11115292 is to be suspended from posting to the
USCF Forums for one year as outlined in the AUG: One year suspension:
A poster in a moderation queue who repeatedly submits posts that
violate the AUG may be suspended from posting for one year. After the
year elapses, the poster returns to the queue and is considered to
have two offenses.
Re: Sanction Notice - samsloan - Level 4
Sent at: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:47 pm
From: lblair
To: samsloan
Here is a copy of the most recent sanction announcement, together with
copies of the posts that it mentions:
Mon Apr 07, 2008 2:52 pm
#97447
LEVEL FOUR SANCTION
By a vote of 3 in favor and none opposed, the Moderation Committee is
imposing a level four sanction on Sam Sloan 11115292 as a result of
his posts:
MQ:Where are Bauer, Berry, and Channing on the Finances?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am #89659
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:USCF Financial Problems "The sky is falling."
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am #89647
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:Why Are We Talking About Cutting the Magazines?
by samsloan on Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am #89637
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ: Sloan v. Truong - Affidavit on Federal Question Issue
by samsloan on Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm #90810
Do not make personal attacks or defamatory or disparaging comments
about any person, group or company.
MQ:The Blue Book and Encyclopedia of Chess is published today
samsloan on Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:35 am #93727
No advertising
Accordingly, Sam Sloan 11115292 is to be suspended from posting to the
USCF Forums for one year as outlined in the AUG: One year suspension:
A poster in a moderation queue who repeatedly submits posts that
violate the AUG may be suspended from posting for one year. After the
year elapses, the poster returns to the queue and is considered to
have two offenses.
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:09 am
#89637
You fail to understand. Yes, we need to cut expenses, but the place to
cut is not to cut the magazine which is the only benefit most members
receive.
We need to cut staff. We have a bloated, overpaid and under-worked
staff. We have a lazy, unqualified and incompetent Executive Director
who had never even worked in an office before he was hired as
Executive Director and is often out "sick". At the May 20, 2007 board
meeting at Stillwater Oklahoma I asked him to provide a simple list of
how many employees we have and brief job descriptions. Bill Hall
refused to answer the questions or to provide the list. We still do
not know how many employees we have. We still do not know what
happened to the $2 million we had in a money market fund in 1999 that
subsequently disappeared. In 2003 we had 23 employees and we also had
$6 million in revenues. Now, I understand that we have 28 employees
and only $3.1 million in revenues. Why will nobody answer the
questions about where all the money went? Why are we taking about
eliminating one magazine and cutting the other, both of which are
produced out of the office, when we should be talking about cutting
our payroll?
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:28 am
#89647
On Jan 31, 8:12 am, "Brian Mottershead" <br...@riverscape.info> wrote:
Polgar's going on about legal
fees, internet insurance, and web development costs, etc, is both
incorrect and misleading -- not to mention self-serving.
Talk about self-serving, please note that she says that Channing
agrees with her, but it was Channing who did the things she complains
about.
It was Channing's idea to play $50,000 to upgrade the website and he
had us hire an Internet guru to tell us how to do that.
It was also Channing's idea that we pay $15,000 for "Internet
Insurance".
It was also Channing's idea to spend $10,000 to fly all the USCF
insiders to Florida for a "retreat".
In short, most of the wasteful expenditures that Susan complains about
were done by Channing who is now her ally.
Also, recall that after making a brief presentation at the Finance
Committee Workshop in Cherry Hill, Channing said, "If you have any
questions, I will be in the bar."
He is still in the bar and he has never answered any of our questions.
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:53 am
#89659
Randy Bauer has long had a reputation for being lazy.
Sorry to tell you that, but that is the truth.
Sam Sloan
samsloan wrote:samsloan
Tue Feb 05, 2008 7:19 pm
#90810
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
__________________________________________
Sam Sloan,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 07-CV-8537 (DC)
-against-
Hoainhan "Paul" Truong, Zsuzsanna "Susan" Polgar,
Joel Channing, William Goichberg, The United States
Chess Federation, Bill Hall, Herbert Rodney Vaughn,
Gregory Alexander, Frank Niro, Grant Perks, William
Brock, Randall Hough, Randy Bauer, Jim Berry,
Texas Tech University and United States of America,
Defendants
__________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION
TO DISMISS ON FEDERAL QUESTIONS ISSUE
__________________________________________
Samuel H. Sloan, the plaintiff herein, being duly sworn, deposes and
says:
1. I make this affidavit in opposition to the motion by various
defendants to dismiss this ac
|
| |
| |
--- In fide-chess@yahoogroups.com, jerryhanken@aol.com wrote:
I am sorry to have to say this, but your slanderous and untrue remarks about
Bill Hall alone, would be enough to get you a long suspension. Then your
entire bogus law suit is filled with madcap, unsubstanciatablel charges. Sam,
YOU HAVE AN OBSESSION, and the sooner you realize this, the better off we all
will be. It is sad that the USCF must run up legal bills to defend a suit which
will no doubt be tossed out the first time a judge looks at the content.
Sam, I know you care about the Federation and you love chess. You must simply
fight off the tragic results of your obsession. What else can I say. Jerry Hanken
If you are saying that my remarks about Bill Hall are untrue or
inaccurate, then you are just blind as to what has been going on in
Crossville.
The USCF has lost $500,000 since Bill Hall has been Executive Director
and is losing $300,000 so far this year. (Hall was hired just a few
weeks before Channing came on the board.) Besides, the USCF Issues
Forum has rules. The Rules are that one is not allowed to call a
person a liar (even though they are) nor is one allowed to accuse
somebody of "unethical conduct".
I did neither. I merely stated that Bill Hall is incompetent, lazy,
unqualified, inexperienced and often out "sick". All of this is true
and none of this calls him a liar. Thus, my posting did not violate
any rules and thus I should not be sanctioned, suspended or banned for
writing and posting it.
Sam Sloan
|
| |
| |
On Apr 12, 11:06 am, samsloan <samhsl...@gmail.com> wrote:
--- In fide-ch...@yahoogroups.com, jerryhan...@aol.com wrote:
If you are saying that my remarks about Bill Hall are untrue or
inaccurate, then you are just blind as to what has been going on in
Crossville.
The USCF has lost $500,000 since Bill Hall has been Executive Director
and is losing $300,000 so far this year. (Hall was hired just a few
weeks before Channing came on the board.) Besides, the USCF Issues
Forum has rules. The Rules are that one is not allowed to call a
person a liar (even though they are) nor is one allowed to accuse
somebody of "unethical conduct".
I did neither. I merely stated that Bill Hall is incompetent, lazy,
unqualified, inexperienced and often out "sick". All of this is true
and none of this calls him a liar. Thus, my posting did not violate
any rules and thus I should not be sanctioned, suspended or banned for
writing and posting it.
Sam Sloan
lol
|
| |
| |
|
