|
|
|
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1730150,00.html
Friday, Apr. 11, 2008
The Obese Feel More Discrimination
By Alice Park
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our acceptance of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University suggests the
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, the
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated against now
than they did a decade ago.
Led by Tatiana Andreyeva, a postdoctoral research associate at Yale's Rudd
Center for Food Policy and Obesity, a team of researchers questioned 1,100
subjects, aged 35 to 74, twice over a 10-year span (once between 1995 and
1996, and again between 2004 and 2006). The respondents answered 11
questions about whether they had been discriminated against in the context
of common life experiences including applying to college or for a
scholarship, renting or buying a home in a neighborhood they desired,
applying for a bank loan or dealing with police. Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats. The subjects were asked to indicate the reasons they
felt they had been discriminated against (facing police harassment, for
example, or being denied bank loans), whether it was because of age,
gender, race, height or weight, physical disability, sexual orientation or
religion. Between the two survey periods, the rate of discrimination due to
height or weight increased from 7% of respondents to 12% of respondents.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
The study is one of the first to track patterns of discrimination based on
weight. It's worth noting, however, that the survey relied on people's own
perception of discrimination the authors did not require the subjects to
document bias in any way. In addition, the authors found that rates of
discrimination by age and gender also increased in the same time period,
suggesting that several forms of bias or perhaps sensitivity to perceived
bias is on the rise overall, not just against the overweight.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common form of
prejudice. "If a person perceives he is being discriminated against,"
Andreyeva says, "it might have significant consequences for his or her
health and mental health. Even the perception of discrimination can be
important because it is self-perpetuating." And if rates of weight
discrimination are indeed on the rise, say the authors, then it's up to
society to mandate legal protections for those who are overweight, just as
laws protect people from discrimination by race, gender, disability and
age.
|
| |
| |
On Apr 11, 10:18 pm, rol...@nowhere.com (Roland) wrote:
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1730150,00.html
Friday, Apr. 11, 2008
The Obese Feel More Discrimination
By Alice Park
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our acceptance of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University suggests the
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, the
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated against now
than they did a decade ago.
Led by Tatiana Andreyeva, a postdoctoral research associate at Yale's Rudd
Center for Food Policy and Obesity, a team of researchers questioned 1,100
subjects, aged 35 to 74, twice over a 10-year span (once between 1995 and
1996, and again between 2004 and 2006). The respondents answered 11
questions about whether they had been discriminated against in the context
of common life experiences -- including applying to college or for a
scholarship, renting or buying a home in a neighborhood they desired,
applying for a bank loan or dealing with police. Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats. The subjects were asked to indicate the reasons they
felt they had been discriminated against (facing police harassment, for
example, or being denied bank loans), whether it was because of age,
gender, race, height or weight, physical disability, sexual orientation or
religion. Between the two survey periods, the rate of discrimination due to
height or weight increased from 7% of respondents to 12% of respondents.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
The study is one of the first to track patterns of discrimination based on
weight. It's worth noting, however, that the survey relied on people's own
perception of discrimination -- the authors did not require the subjects to
document bias in any way. In addition, the authors found that rates of
discrimination by age and gender also increased in the same time period,
suggesting that several forms of bias -- or perhaps sensitivity to perceived
bias -- is on the rise overall, not just against the overweight.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common form of
prejudice. "If a person perceives he is being discriminated against,"
Andreyeva says, "it might have significant consequences for his or her
health and mental health. Even the perception of discrimination can be
important because it is self-perpetuating." And if rates of weight
discrimination are indeed on the rise, say the authors, then it's up to
society to mandate legal protections for those who are overweight, just as
laws protect people from discrimination by race, gender, disability and
age.
I wonder which liberal Democrat will pander for the "obese vote". I
can see it now:
"These are the real consumers, the backbone of our economy, yet they
are overlooked and discriminated against. When I'm elected President,
I'll create the Department of Personal Trainers to motivate these
underappreciated citizens."
I can hear this silly speech in my head more with a Hillary voice than
with an Obama voice.
<grin>
|
| |
| |
Roland <roland@nowhere.com> wrote
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1730150,00.html
Friday, Apr. 11, 2008
The Obese Feel More Discrimination
And so they should. We are paying the immense cost of their terminal stupidity.
By Alice Park
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so
might our acceptance of those who are overweight.
Nope, anyone with a clue doesnt.
But a new study from Yale University suggests the converse trend: rather
than feeling tolerance in our society, the overweight and obese say they
feel more heavily discriminated against now than they did a decade ago.
And so they should be.
Led by Tatiana Andreyeva, a postdoctoral research associate
at Yale's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, a team of
researchers questioned 1,100 subjects, aged 35 to 74,
They're 'subjects' now ? Better than objects I spose.
twice over a 10-year span (once between 1995
and 1996, and again between 2004 and 2006).
Proves @$#* all about what was purportedly 'measured'.
You clowns havent eliminated the possibility that its the repeat
that produced the different result, just because its a repeat.
The respondents answered 11 questions about whether they
had been discriminated against in the context of common life
experiences - including applying to college or for a scholarship,
renting or buying a home in a neighborhood they desired,
applying for a bank loan or dealing with police.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
Participants answered nine additional questions about everyday
experiences, such as how they were treated in restaurants, and
whether they had encountered name-calling, harassment or threats.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
The subjects were asked to indicate the reasons they
felt they had been discriminated against (facing police
harassment, for example, or being denied bank loans),
whether it was because of age, gender, race, height
or weight, physical disability, sexual orientation or religion.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
Between the two survey periods, the rate of
discrimination due to height or weight increased
from 7% of respondents to 12% of respondents.
The rate of CLAIMS of discrimination did, actually.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who
reported discrimination due to height or weight were also
more likely than other participants to be overweight or obese.)
Wota packa wanker...
The study is one of the first to track patterns of discrimination based on weight.
No it didnt. It at most purported to 'track' CLAIMS about discrimination, a
different matter entirely. It didnt even bother to measure actual discrimination.
It's worth noting, however, that the survey relied on people's
own perception of discrimination - the authors did not
require the subjects to document bias in any way.
So its completely useless and doesnt do anything like what you claim.
In addition, the authors found that rates of discrimination
by age and gender also increased in the same time period,
No it did. It ACTUALLY found an increase in the
CLAIMS of discrimination, a different matter entirely.
suggesting that several forms of bias - or
perhaps sensitivity to perceived bias - is on
the rise overall, not just against the overweight.
Again, its just what those objects CLAIMED.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time,
And didnt bother to check whether it was just the
repeating of the questions that produced the result seen.
and Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense
of maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes.
Wrong again.
In this report, weight ranked third behind age
and race as the most common form of prejudice.
Plenty of age discrimination is completely reasonable, stupid.
It makes no sense to treat 35 year olds the same as 74 year olds
when they are applying for a bank loan or scholarship etc, stupid.
"If a person perceives he is being discriminated against," Andreyeva says,
"it might have significant consequences for his or her health and mental health.
It might not too.
Even the perception of discrimination can
be important because it is self-perpetuating."
Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.
And if rates of weight discrimination are indeed on the rise, say the authors, then
it's up to society to mandate legal protections for those who are overweight, just
as laws protect people from discrimination by race, gender, disability and age.
Or we can get a clue and realise that there is plenty of discrimination that makes
a hell of a lot of sense and thats true in spades with the obese where that is the
overwhelming evidence about the quality of what they have between their ears.
|
| |
| |
On Apr 12, 12:41=A0am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
Roland <rol...@nowhere.com> wrote
And so they should. We are paying the immense cost of their terminal stupi=
dity.
Nope, anyone with a clue doesnt.
And so they should be.
They're 'subjects' now ? =A0Better than objects I spose.
Proves @$#* all about what was purportedly 'measured'.
You clowns havent eliminated the possibility that its the repeat
that produced the different result, just because its a repeat.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
And you clowns didnt bother to check whether the
CLAIMS about discrimination were real or imagined.
The rate of CLAIMS of discrimination did, actually.
Wota packa wanker...
No it didnt. It at most purported to 'track' CLAIMS about discrimination, =
a
different matter entirely. It didnt even bother to measure actual discrimi=
nation.
So its completely useless and doesnt do anything like what you claim.
No it did. It ACTUALLY found an increase in the
CLAIMS of discrimination, a different matter entirely.
Again, its just what those objects CLAIMED.
And didnt bother to check whether it was just the
repeating of the questions that produced the result seen.
Wrong again.
Plenty of age discrimination is completely reasonable, stupid.
It makes no sense to treat 35 year olds the same as 74 year olds
when they are applying for a bank loan or scholarship etc, stupid.
It might not too.
Easy to claim, hell of a lot harder to actually substantiate that claim.
Or we can get a clue and realise that there is plenty of discrimination th=
at makes
a hell of a lot of sense and thats true in spades with the obese where tha=
t is the
overwhelming evidence about the quality of what they have between their ea=
rs.
Thanks for tearing this article apart. Damn sympathizers piss me off!
|
| |
| |
On Apr 12, 8:57=A0am, Liberals are Guilt-mongering Fascists
<talkradiotruth...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:41=A0am, "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1730150,00.html
Friday, Apr. 11, 2008
The Obese Feel More Discrimination
By Alice Park
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so
might our acceptance of those who are overweight.
But a new study from Yale University suggests the converse trend: rath=
er
than feeling tolerance in our society, the overweight and obese say th=
ey
feel more heavily discriminated against now than they did a decade ago=
..
Led by Tatiana Andreyeva, a postdoctoral research associate
at Yale's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, a team of
researchers questioned 1,100 subjects, aged 35 to 74,
twice over a 10-year span (once between 1995
and 1996, and again between 2004 and 2006).
The respondents answered 11 questions about whether they
had been discriminated against in the context of common life
experiences - including applying to college or for a scholarship,
renting or buying a home in a neighborhood they desired,
applying for a bank loan or dealing with police.
Participants answered nine additional questions about everyday
experiences, such as how they were treated in restaurants, and
whether they had encountered name-calling, harassment or threats.
The subjects were asked to indicate the reasons they
felt they had been discriminated against (facing police
harassment, for example, or being denied bank loans),
whether it was because of age, gender, race, height
or weight, physical disability, sexual orientation or religion.
Between the two survey periods, the rate of
discrimination due to height or weight increased
from 7% of respondents to 12% of respondents.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who
reported discrimination due to height or weight were also
more likely than other participants to be overweight or obese.)
The study is one of the first to track patterns of discrimination base=
d on weight.
It's worth noting, however, that the survey relied on people's
own perception of discrimination - the authors did not
require the subjects to document bias in any way.
In addition, the authors found that rates of discrimination
by age and gender also increased in the same time period,
suggesting that several forms of bias - or
perhaps sensitivity to perceived bias - is on
the rise overall, not just against the overweight.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time,
and Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense
of maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes.
In this report, weight ranked third behind age
and race as the most common form of prejudice.
"If a person perceives he is being discriminated against," Andreyeva s=
ays,
"it might have significant consequences for his or her health and ment=
al health.
Even the perception of discrimination can
be important because it is self-perpetuating."
And if rates of weight discrimination are indeed on the rise, say the =
authors, then
it's up to society to mandate legal protections for those who are over=
weight, just
as laws protect people from discrimination by race, gender, disability=
and age.
Thanks for tearing this article apart. =A0Damn sympathizers piss me off!- =
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Ron Speed couldn't tear tissue paper apart. All that asshole ever does
is make contrary statements with no supporting data. He's an absolute
joke.
I have no doubt that his response to me will be something along the
lines of;
No I don't and No I'm not.
W.
|
| |
| |
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--0-2017446482-1208181914=:18069
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Roland wrote:
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our acceptance of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University suggests t=
he
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, the
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated against now
than they did a decade ago.
That's because the skinny people of American tend to be size hating=20
bigots. Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people=20
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats.
I.E., dealings with hate filled size bashers. I'm sure most people of=20
size have had encounters like those above, I know I have. Yet, for some=20
reason, it's legal unless you are a protected class in America.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
That's because size bigots hate obese people.
The study is one of the first to track patterns of discrimination based o=
n
weight. It's worth noting, however, that the survey relied on people's ow=
n
perception of discrimination =97 the authors did not require the subjects=
to
document bias in any way.
And yet when TV talk shows put a skinny person in a "fat suit", the=20
subject reports the same discrimination as this study finds. Often times=
=20
the skinny person had no idea what type of tourment fat people face on a=20
daily basis. This gives me the impression that the results are valid.
In addition, the authors found that rates of
discrimination by age and gender also increased in the same time period,
suggesting that several forms of bias =97 or perhaps sensitivity to perce=
ived
bias =97 is on the rise overall, not just against the overweight.
Look above.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common form o=
f
prejudice.
And yet race and age discrimination is illegal. It's sad that the bigots=
=20
hate people that are different then they are.
--0-2017446482-1208181914=:18069--
|
| |
| |
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Liberals are Guilt-mongering Fascists wrote:
I wonder which liberal Democrat will pander for the "obese vote". I
can see it now:
"These are the real consumers, the backbone of our economy, yet they
are overlooked and discriminated against. When I'm elected President,
I'll create the Department of Personal Trainers to motivate these
underappreciated citizens."
No way, I don't want federally funded personal trainers, I just want it
against the law to discriminate. I want size added to the list of
protected classes, including age, sexual orientation, gender, disability,
and race.
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Roland wrote:
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our acceptance of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University suggests
the
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, the
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated against now
than they did a decade ago.
That's because the skinny people of American tend to be size hating
bigots.
Normal people don't usually hate normal people. Normal people usually do
dislike big fat beasts!
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats.
I.E., dealings with hate filled size bashers. I'm sure most people of
size have had encounters like those above, I know I have.
And yet you're STILL a big fat beast!?
Yet, for some
reason, it's legal unless you are a protected class in America.
Even the gov't doesn't like big fat beasts!
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
That's because size bigots hate obese people.
Everybody hates big fat beasts!
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common form
of
prejudice.
And yet race and age discrimination is illegal. It's sad that the bigots
hate people that are different then they are.
Different? Bwahahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!
Wearing white shoes and belt in November is different.
Being a big fat@$#* sweaty smelly beast is hideous!
|
| |
| |
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Liberals are Guilt-mongering Fascists wrote:
No way, I don't want federally funded personal trainers,
You love being a big fatass lazy beast!
I just want it against the law to discriminate.
Naa, we're having too much fun with it!
I want size added to the list of protected classes, including age, sexual
orientation, gender, disability, and race.
Never happen.
Listen, fat@$#*, turn OFF the computer and go run around the block a few
times!
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 1:04 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Roland wrote:
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our acceptance of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University suggests
the
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, the
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated against now
than they did a decade ago.
Normal people don't usually hate normal people. Normal people usually do
dislike big fat beasts!
Normal people!!!!!? What would you know of normal people? And please
don't claim that you are one, it would be far too insulting to those
that are.
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats.
I.E., dealings with hate filled size bashers. I'm sure most people of
size have had encounters like those above, I know I have.
And yet you're STILL a big fat beast!?
And yet you're still a bigoted creep?
Yet, for some
reason, it's legal unless you are a protected class in America.
Even the gov't doesn't like big fat beasts!
What does "like" have to do with protected classes of people? The so-
called norms aren't protected either, does that mean the government
does not "like" them as well? You're an idiot.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
That's because size bigots hate obese people.
Everybody hates big fat beasts!
What is with this speaking for everyone crap? Don't pretend to speak
for everyone unless you have permission. I don't remember giving you
my permission to speak for me, so shut the @$#* up.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common form
of
prejudice.
And yet race and age discrimination is illegal. It's sad that the bigots
hate people that are different then they are.
Different? Bwahahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!
Wearing white shoes and belt in November is different.
No, that's just bad taste.
Being a big fat@$#* sweaty smelly beast is hideous!
Correct for once, at least within the context of your limited
statement. But the discussion is not about beasts, it's about people
and their right not be discriminated against. I know it can be
difficult for the stupid but if you insist on participating, do try
and stay with the subject.
Ragnar
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, The communist Hillary lover known as Patriot Games
wrote:
Normal people don't usually hate normal people. Normal people usually do
dislike big fat beasts!
"Fat beasts" sort of proves your hate towards the obese, bigot.
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, the communist Hillary lover known as Patriot Games
wrote:
I just want it against the law to discriminate.
Naa, we're having too much fun with it!
So, you admit you are a size hating bigot?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 1:42 pm, The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, the communist Hillary lover known as Patriot Games
wrote:
I just want it against the law to discriminate.
So, you admit you are a size hating bigot?
He doesn't need to admit it. Since he's actively waving his bigotry
around in public, it can be taken as fact without admission on his
part.
Ragnar
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, the communist Hillary lover known as Patriot Games
wrote:
I just want it against the law to discriminate.
So, you admit you are a size hating bigot?
I admit big fat@$#* beasts are hideous and disgusting and anything we can do
to make their lives suck we should do to force them to eat right and get
exercise and slim down to normal!
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 1:42 pm, The Master <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam>
wrote:
He doesn't need to admit it. Since he's actively waving his bigotry
around in public, it can be taken as fact without admission on his
part.
Yeah. So?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 1:04 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
Normal people!!!!!? What would you know of normal people? And please
don't claim that you are one, it would be far too insulting to those
that are.
Of course I'm normal.
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Overweight" is NOT "obese."
Don't try to pretend you're overweight.
We already know we could bend you over and show a widescreen HD movie on
your ass!
Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats.
I.E., dealings with hate filled size bashers. I'm sure most people of
size have had encounters like those above, I know I have.
And yet you're STILL a big fat beast!?
And yet you're still a bigoted creep?
ohhh, BooHoo!!!
Yet, for some
reason, it's legal unless you are a protected class in America.
Even the gov't doesn't like big fat beasts!
What does "like" have to do with protected classes of people? The so-
called norms aren't protected either, does that mean the government
does not "like" them as well? You're an idiot.
Normal people don't need protection because we're the majority.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than
other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
That's because size bigots hate obese people.
Everybody hates big fat beasts!
What is with this speaking for everyone crap? Don't pretend to speak
for everyone unless you have permission. I don't remember giving you
my permission to speak for me, so shut the @$#* up.
I couldn't speak for you, I'm not a big fat@$#* beast.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In
this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common
form
of
prejudice.
And yet race and age discrimination is illegal. It's sad that the
bigots
hate people that are different then they are.
Different? Bwahahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!
Wearing white shoes and belt in November is different.
No, that's just bad taste.
Correct for once, at least within the context of your limited
statement. But the discussion is not about beasts, it's about people
and their right not be discriminated against. I know it can be
difficult for the stupid but if you insist on participating, do try
and stay with the subject.
Yes, its about big fat@$#* beasts. We, the normal people, the majority, do
not like big fat@$#* beasts. Its not discrimination. We just don't like
'em. They smell. They sweat too much. They breathe too much. They're ugly.
We don't want them working for us or with us. We don't want them living
near us. We DAMNED SURE don't want them in the airplane seat next to us.
We don't want to share a taxi with one because then the taxi leans to one
side and embarasses us! We don't want to be in an elevator with one in case
they have some kind of attack and fall on us.
|
| |
| |
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, The communist Hillary lover known as Patriot Games
wrote:
"Fat beasts" sort of proves your hate towards the obese, bigot.
So?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 4:31 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
Of course I'm normal.
Yeah okay, do you have proof of that?
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Overweight" is NOT "obese."
Don't try to pretend you're overweight.
We already know we could bend you over and show a widescreen HD movie on
your ass!
"We" do? do you have proof of that as well? I for one would love to
see it.
BTW, who is "we"? Is that the royal "we" or do you have a turd in your
pocket?
Participants answered nine
additional questions about everyday experiences, such as how they were
treated in restaurants, and whether they had encountered name-calling,
harassment or threats.
I.E., dealings with hate filled size bashers. I'm sure most people of
size have had encounters like those above, I know I have.
And yet you're STILL a big fat beast!?
And yet you're still a bigoted creep?
ohhh, BooHoo!!!
Stop crying. It's embarrassing.
Yet, for some
reason, it's legal unless you are a protected class in America.
Even the gov't doesn't like big fat beasts!
What does "like" have to do with protected classes of people? The so-
called norms aren't protected either, does that mean the government
does not "like" them as well? You're an idiot.
Normal people don't need protection because we're the majority.
Again with the "we" and claims of normalcy. LOL. You might just be a
lot of things but "normal" you aren't. You might be normal in weight
(not yet verified) but you are obviously of much lower than normal
intelligence. But on the up side, you are obliviously much higher on
the scale of social ineptitude.
(The scientists determined separately that the people who reported
discrimination due to height or weight were also more likely than
other
participants to be overweight or obese.)
That's because size bigots hate obese people.
Everybody hates big fat beasts!
What is with this speaking for everyone crap? Don't pretend to speak
for everyone unless you have permission. I don't remember giving you
my permission to speak for me, so shut the @$#* up.
I couldn't speak for you, I'm not a big fat@$#* beast.
But you are big fat @$#*tard.
Nevertheless, the study did track the same population over time, and
Andreyeva says that an increase even in people's perceived sense of
maltreatment is an important measure of our society's attitudes. In
this
report, weight ranked third behind age and race as the most common
form
of
prejudice.
And yet race and age discrimination is illegal. It's sad that the
bigots
hate people that are different then they are.
Different? Bwahahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!
Wearing white shoes and belt in November is different.
Yes, its about big fat@$#* beasts. We, the normal people, the majority, do
not like big fat@$#* beasts.
"We" again. It's revolting how you keep feces stuffed in your
pockets.
Just more proof that you aren't normal.
Its not discrimination. We just don't like
'em. They smell. They sweat too much. They breathe too much. They're ugly.
We don't want them working for us or with us. We don't want them living
near us. We DAMNED SURE don't want them in the airplane seat next to us.
We don't want to share a taxi with one because then the taxi leans to one
side and embarasses us! We don't want to be in an elevator with one in case
they have some kind of attack and fall on us.- Hide quoted text -
You know what the normal people of this world really don't
like?.....Stupid people.
We don't want them living near us for fear of fires, explosions and
the stigma it places on the neighborhood. We don't want them working
for or with us because they are useless, they @$#* up and make
everyone look bad. We don't want them flying with us because in case
of an in flight emergency they panic like sheep. And we don't want
them around us socially because interacting with them causes us to
doubt the future of the human race. But despite all this we still
can't seem to get rid of the likes of you and your ilk.
So we go through life pretending you aren't there and pray constantly
that god strikes you sterile.
Ragnar
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 4:32 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
So?
Thank you for not denying that you are a bigot, at least you are aware
of your social limitations.
So I guess referring to you as a willfully ignorant slob wouldn't be
all that big of a surprise to you.
Ragnar
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 4:31 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
Yeah okay, do you have proof of that?
Sure.
86% of America believes in God, I believe in God, so I'm normal.
98% of the world is heterosexual, I'm heterosexual, so I'm normal.
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Overweight" is NOT "obese."
Don't try to pretend you're overweight.
We already know we could bend you over and show a widescreen HD movie on
your ass!
"We" do? do you have proof of that as well? I for one would love to
see it.
Sorry, can't see the movie when you're bent over. Maybe we'll bend over
another fat@$#* for the rerun and you can see it then...
BTW, who is "we"? Is that the royal "we" or do you have a turd in your
pocket?
I don't have your lunch in my pocket.
Normal people don't need protection because we're the majority.
Again with the "we" and claims of normalcy. LOL. You might just be a
lot of things but "normal" you aren't. You might be normal in weight
(not yet verified) but you are obviously of much lower than normal
intelligence. But on the up side, you are obliviously much higher on
the scale of social ineptitude.
Its not my fault it sucks being you.
Its not discrimination. We just don't like
'em. They smell. They sweat too much. They breathe too much. They're
ugly.
We don't want them working for us or with us. We don't want them living
near us. We DAMNED SURE don't want them in the airplane seat next to us.
We don't want to share a taxi with one because then the taxi leans to one
side and embarasses us! We don't want to be in an elevator with one in
case
they have some kind of attack and fall on us.- Hide quoted text -
You know what the normal people of this world really don't
like?.....Stupid people.
That's true too.
We don't want them living near us for fear of fires, explosions and
the stigma it places on the neighborhood. We don't want them working
for or with us because they are useless, they @$#* up and make
everyone look bad. We don't want them flying with us because in case
of an in flight emergency they panic like sheep. And we don't want
them around us socially because interacting with them causes us to
doubt the future of the human race. But despite all this we still
can't seem to get rid of the likes of you and your ilk.
Its true. So how stupid is it to be a big fat@$#* beast knowing the world
hates you for it?
VERY stupid.
So we go through life pretending you aren't there and pray constantly
that god strikes you sterile.
Too late. 5 children (none of them big fat@$#* beasts), 11 grandkids (none
of them big fat@$#* beasts)!
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 4:32 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
Thank you for not denying that you are a bigot, at least you are aware
of your social limitations.
I don't like fat people. I don't have to like fat people. I've never hired
a fat person.
I made a scene on an airplane once because they tried to sit me next to a
big fat@$#* beast who's enormous fat@$#* asscheek HAD ALREADY spread over
into MY seat so they gave me FREE First Class tickets.
NOBODY would sit next to the big fat@$#* beast! So they made him buy a
second ticket for the second half of his ass!! bwahahahahahahhahaha!!!!
So I guess referring to you as a willfully ignorant slob wouldn't be
all that big of a surprise to you.
Nothing you big fat@$#* beasts do would surprise me.
Well, if you started eating healthy, getting daily exercise, and losing
weight THAT WOULD surprise me.
Bottom Line: Fat people are mentally ill. NOBODY with pride, honor and
dignity would allow themselves to do that to themselves ON PURPOSE. 98% of
fat@$#* beasts have a fat@$#* beast problem and a mental illness that got
'em that way. (2% have an actual medical condition.)
We will NEVER accept you until you LOSE WEIGHT.
We will ALWAYS discriminate against you until you LOSE WEIGHT.
|
| |
| |
On Apr 15, 12:54=A0pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
Sure.
86% of America believes in God, I believe in God, so I'm normal.
98% of the world is heterosexual, I'm heterosexual, so I'm normal.
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Overweight" is NOT "obese."
Don't try to pretend you're overweight.
We already know we could bend you over and show a widescreen HD movie o=
n your ass!
"We" do? do you have proof of that as well? I for one would love to
see it.
Sorry, can't see the movie when you're bent over. =A0Maybe we'll bend over=
another fat@$#* for the rerun and you can see it then...
I don't have your lunch in my pocket.
Normal people don't need protection because we're the majority.
Its not my fault it sucks being you.
Its not discrimination. =A0We just don't like
'em. =A0They smell. They sweat too much. They breathe too much. =A0They=
're
ugly.
We don't want them working for us or with us. =A0We don't want them liv=
ing
near us. =A0We DAMNED SURE don't want them in the airplane seat next to=
us.
We don't want to share a taxi with one because then the taxi leans to o=
ne
side and embarasses us! =A0We don't want to be in an elevator with one =
in
case
they have some kind of attack and fall on us.- Hide quoted text -
You know what the normal people of this world really don't
like?.....Stupid people.
That's true too.
Its true. =A0So how stupid is it to be a big fat@$#* beast knowing the wor=
ld
hates you for it?
VERY stupid.
Too late. =A05 children (none of them big fat@$#* beasts), 11 grandkids (n=
one
of them big fat@$#* beasts)!- Hide quoted text -
Obviously @$#*tards breed like rats.
Ragnar
|
| |
| |
On Apr 14, 10:12=A0am, The Master
<tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Liberals are Guilt-mongering Fascists wrote:
No way, I don't want federally funded personal trainers, I just want it
against the law to discriminate. =A0I want size added to the list of
protected classes, including age, sexual orientation, gender, disability,
and race.
Bravo, for you, obesity is the last category on the planet where its
ok to dicscrimintate. lets have a law to stop it. jenius
|
| |
| |
On Apr 15, 1:12=A0pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
I don't like fat people. =A0I don't have to like fat people. =A0I've never=
hired
a fat person.
I made a scene on an airplane once because they tried to sit me next to a
big fat@$#* beast who's enormous fat@$#* asscheek HAD ALREADY spread over
into MY seat so they gave me FREE First Class tickets.
NOBODY would sit next to the big fat@$#* beast! =A0So they made him buy a
second ticket for the second half of his ass!! =A0bwahahahahahahhahaha!!!!=
Nothing you big fat@$#* beasts do would surprise me.
Well, if you started eating healthy, getting daily exercise, and losing
weight THAT WOULD surprise me.
Bottom Line: Fat people are mentally ill. =A0NOBODY with pride, honor and
dignity would allow themselves to do that to themselves ON PURPOSE. =A098%=
of
fat@$#* beasts have a fat@$#* beast problem and a mental illness that got
'em that way. =A0(2% have an actual medical condition.)
We will NEVER accept you until you LOSE WEIGHT.
We will ALWAYS discriminate against you until you LOSE WEIGHT.
fat people are not mentally ill. would you call James Earl Jones
mentally ill? How about Queen Latifah, is she mentally ill? no no,
you're mentally ill, so please invest in some counselling and get off
this group. jenius
|
| |
| |
On Apr 18, 5:02=A0pm, Ragnar <Ragnarsgh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 15, 12:54=A0pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote: On Apr 14, 4:31 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
On Apr 14, 1:04 pm, "Patriot Games" <Patr...@America.com> wrote:
"The Masterbater" <tar...@nospam.sdf.lonestar.org.nospam> wrote in=
message
news:Pine.NEB.4.64.0804141350130.18069@sdf.lonestar.org...
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Roland wrote:
As obesity rates continue to rise in the U.S., so might our
acceptance
of
those who are overweight. But a new study from Yale University
suggests
the
converse trend: rather than feeling tolerance in our society, t=
he
overweight and obese say they feel more heavily discriminated
against
now
than they did a decade ago.
That's because the skinny people of American tend to be size hati=
ng
bigots.
Normal people don't usually hate normal people. =A0Normal people u=
sually
do
dislike big fat beasts!
Normal people!!!!!? What would you know of normal people? And pleas=
e don't claim that you are one, it would be far too insulting to thos=
e that are.
Of course I'm normal.
Yeah okay, do you have proof of that?
Anyone of size already knew the hate that most skinny people
have, and discrimination is the end result.
Big fat beasts know they are not liked or wanted.
That's interesting, especially when you consider that 60% of the US=
population is overweight. I guess there are a lot of friendless
unwanted people out there. lol.
Overweight" is NOT "obese."
Don't try to pretend you're overweight.
We already know we could bend you over and show a widescreen HD movie=
on
your ass!
"We" do? do you have proof of that as well? I for one would love to
see it.
BTW, who is "we"? Is that the royal "we" or do you have a turd in your=
pocket?
Normal people don't need protection because we're the majority.
Again with the "we" and claims of normalcy. LOL. You might just be a
lot of things but "normal" you aren't. You might be normal in weight
(not yet verified) but you are obviously of much lower than normal
intelligence. But on the up side, you are obliviously much higher on
the scale of social ineptitude.
Its not discrimination. =A0We just don't like
'em. =A0They smell. They sweat too much. They breathe too much. =A0Th=
ey're
ugly.
We don't want them working for us or with us. =A0We don't want them l=
iving
near us. =A0We DAMNED SURE don't want them in the airplane seat next =
to us.
We don't want to share a taxi with one because then the taxi leans to=
one
side and embarasses us! =A0We don't want to be in an elevator with on=
e in
case
they have some kind of attack and fall on us.- Hide quoted text -
You know what the normal people of this world really don't
like?.....Stupid people.
We don't want them living near us for fear of fires, explosions and
the stigma it places on the neighborhood. We don't want them working
for or with us because they are useless, they @$#* up and make
everyone look bad. We don't want them flying with us because in case
of an in flight emergency they panic like sheep. And we don't want
them around us socially because interacting with them causes us to
doubt the future of the human race. But despite all this we still
can't seem to get rid of the likes of you and your ilk.
So we go through life pretending you aren't there and pray constantly
that god strikes you sterile.
Obviously @$#*tards breed like rats.
Ragnar- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
As many people have noted recently, only the stupid people are
breeding.
W.
|
< | |
