yaakuku@yahoo.com wrote in news:dc7f16e1-8dcd-4d5a-94ae-c887a117f878
@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com:
On Apr 11, 8:08 pm, Flash Bazbo <djflsd...@dlsfdslkf.cmk> wrote:
If I'm not wrong, and NGO's made (or probably would make) such a case
to the legislatures and courts that such a word was a slur &
corrective or punitive results were later issued upon its use, then
yes.
However, if no recognizable outcry had stemmed from use of the word,
then no.
(
But in the McPeak case, there are no NGOs (these are charitable
organizations) making such a case for the word "jewry." There are no
organizations of any kind making such a case to "legislatures and courts."
The First Amendment precludes "punitive results" for this kind of word
usage.
And to top it off, the complaining organization, a political pressure group
opposed to the Obama campaign, isn't complaining about the word, and
actually uses the word itself!
