|
Well Kunt? STILL need to LIE?
|
| |
| |
On Apr 17, 4:41=A0pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
Well Kunt? =A0STILL need to LIE?
No one cares !!!!!!!!!!
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:41:10 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
Well Kunt? STILL need to LIE?
What more can I say? The scan is too small for me to be certain
what is printed.
It looks like it could be a government document. Sadly, it's so
small, it's impossible to tell.
The scan:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/Cubamarriage-certforWills.jpg
The EXIF info (I encourage everyone to verify it with their own viewer
to see it's not been altered since Kenny-Bob sent it):
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/exif_info.jpg
--
"We'd like to arrange for YOUR rape..."
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting, from an argument with a
woman on the talk.rape newsgroup
|
| |
| |
Well Kunt? STILL need to LIE?
< No one cares !!!!!!!!!!
Bobbee go HATCH your computer- some people think his lies ARE important.
|
| |
| |
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:41:10 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
What more can I say? The scan is too small for me to be certain
what is printed.
It looks like it could be a government document. Sadly, it's so
small, it's impossible to tell.
Kunt I sent you a SECOND scan. WHY do you continue to LIE about it? The
first was large enough. The second is a HUGE file.
|
| |
| |
On Apr 18, 3:51 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
| |
| |
krp wrote:
< No one cares !!!!!!!!!!
Bobbee go HATCH your computer- some people think his lies ARE important.
ESPECIALLY YOU!
--
<Greg Hanson>
"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
|
| |
| |
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:51:39 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
Kunt I sent you a SECOND scan.
If you say so. I've not checked Gmail in several days.
WHY do you continue to LIE about it?
What lie?
The
first was large enough. The second is a HUGE file.
The scan can be seen by anyone who wishes by visiting
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/exif_info.jpg.
Checking the EXIF info will PROVE that it's not been altered since you
sent it. The date and time of the last modification was BEFORE you
sent it.
The scan is the size you sent. Very tiny. No amount of your
lying will ever alter this simple truth.
Next Kenneth Robert Pangborn pathological lie, please.
--
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies?"
Ken Pangborn expressing his fondness for child porn in Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
|
| |
| |
What more can I say? The scan is too small for me to be certain
what is printed.
It looks like it could be a government document. Sadly, it's so
small, it's impossible to tell.
Kunt I sent you a SECOND scan.
If you say so. I've not checked Gmail in several days.
How convinient. Others got the SAME file as you. NONE complained they
couldn't see it. What you posted was smaller than what I sent. BUT - even
if it weren't it too ME seconds to expanit it and clearly read it. Nice LIE.
|
| |
| |
On Apr 19, 9:23 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:23:30 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
What more can I say? The scan is too small for me to be certain
what is printed.
It looks like it could be a government document. Sadly, it's so
small, it's impossible to tell.
Kunt I sent you a SECOND scan.
How convinient.
For most truth is convenient.
I did check after I was done with Usenet. The second one is
larger, but not by much. I can post it to photobucket and anyone with
an interest can see it. They can check the EXIF info as well and see
that it's not been altered since you sent it.
That's what really hurts you. I can offer proof that the image
is exactly as you sent it. No modification of any sort has been done
by anyone between when you sent the image and when I make it available
on photobucket.
Pooooooor Kenny-Bob. There's no way for you to lie your way out
of this one.
Others got the SAME file as you. NONE complained they
couldn't see it. What you posted was smaller than what I sent.
Liar.
BUT - even
if it weren't it too ME seconds to expanit it and clearly read it. Nice LIE.
Where's the lie?
You sent a very small jpg. It's the same size you sent. The
proof of this has been offered. I suspect, but can't know, you
examined it.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn LYING and claiming David Moore is his gay
lover. Message-ID: <_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:23:30 GMT, " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
What more can I say? The scan is too small for me to be certain
what is printed.
It looks like it could be a government document. Sadly, it's so
small, it's impossible to tell.
Kunt I sent you a SECOND scan.
How convinient. Others got the SAME file as you.
Additional reply.
Small problem with that claim. Oh it's possible you sent the
normal size scan to others. I can't know if you did or not, but as
the relevant portions of the headers from your E-mail show, I was the
ONLY person to receive the image you sent me:
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:24:45 -0500
From: "krp" <web2457k@verizon.net>
Subject: CUBA MARIAGE CERT
To: <compuelf@gmail.com>
Message-id: <002201c89bdf$cac0e2b0$0201a8c0@kpc914c18116bd>
MIME-version: 1.0
You may recall I posted headers from E-mail sent to me at Gmail
when it was as a BCC. It didn't list my address at all.
Since you'll LIE and claim you didn't see it, I sent myself a BCC
from my Yahoo account.
Note how the To: line looks:
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kent Wills <compuelf@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: compuelf@yahoo.com
Subject: BCC test
To: Undisclosed Recipients
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <114722.15947.qm@web42107.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Pretending that you're telling the truth about sending the scan
to others, why did you send a normal size to them, and a very tiny one
to me?
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn LYING and claiming David Moore is his gay
lover. Message-ID: <_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
|
| |
| |
|
