|
Ever been sued for USD $30 million?
There's this psychotic woman, Karin Kaufman.
She was given millions by her rich NYC real estate family,
parked in a house in Westchester County in NY. Despite having
a history of ceasing her meds and going psychotic, her
family never checked up on Karin Kaufman.
Karin Kaufman incorporated a number of companies and hired
personnel, including importing (O-1 visas) several scientific
researchers. I was her web/security person.
After she fired a bunch of us, I contacted her family and
they confirmed she was a life long psych patient. I recorded
the phone calls. I have up on my site a recording of rich
father Melvyn Kaufman who said it keeps happening (Karin
ceasing her meds and going nutso) and there was nothing
he could do about it.
Yes, you could have, Mr. Kaufman, you could have arranged
for a financial guardian for her.
How crazy is Karin Kaufman? For example, on her world-body
web site, she states she has won the right to use nuclear
weapons against Drug Cartel All Time Criminals. Karin
believes she is a major player in the world's affairs.
The first law firm Karin hired quit their client after I
showed them my online documentation about her being crazy.
I put my documentation online because that's where I put
them: I'm an erstwhile netcop. Then I went about contacting
NYS authority after authority to get this sick woman (who
gave me employment) some help. No luck, go figure. The
fired ex-employee has no cred.
Although the first law firm quit, there's always some piece
of #@($scum lawyer who is willing to get paid at hundreds
of dollars an hour, in this case to sue me for USD $30
million for being defamatory (including in Usenet!), and
for hurting her companies with the material on my web site.
That lawyer is Harvey Mars, a Local 802 musician's union
representative, who also takes on misc "labor" suits.
Bad news for Harvey Mars: after two years and seven months
I prevailed in the lawsuit. It was discontinued with prejudice.
Here is the current version of the web site documentation:
<a href="http://psychotic-karin-kaufman.org/">Harvey Mars</a>
Any media out there care to report on this unfinished story?
This post is my documented opinion.
|
| |
| |
That lawyer is Harvey Mars, a Local 802 musician's union
representative, who also takes on misc "labor" suits.
Bad news for Harvey Mars: after two years and seven months
I prevailed in the lawsuit. It was discontinued with prejudice.
I have a question if it is OK to trash a lawyer in NYS.
There is a lawyer who is very terrible, violating court rules, lying under
Oath, filing forged authorities, and others. I prepared to write an article,
to post on blog, to show how the attorney practices at law (I have the
documents, not defamation). The lawyer said I cannot tell anyone how she (a
female) practices at law. If I do that, I violate NYS law, and she will sue
me. Is that true there is such law?
|
| |
| |
Anony <no-spam-invalid-email@equation.com> wrote:
"Information Security" <Harvey_Mars@Evil-Lawyer.Org> wrote:
I have a question if it is OK to trash a lawyer in NYS.
There is a lawyer who is very terrible, violating court rules, lying under
Oath, filing forged authorities, and others. I prepared to write an article,
to post on blog, to show how the attorney practices at law (I have the
documents, not defamation). The lawyer said I cannot tell anyone how she (a
female) practices at law. If I do that, I violate NYS law, and she will sue
me. Is that true there is such law?
No such law. Nor did she put it that way to you.
If you feel you have a proper grievance (as I do) you need to put together a documentation (I am) and send it to the Grievance Committee (I will be). You're in Manhattan, so it is the Appellate Division's First Department's Grievance Committee.
Their contact info:
61 Broadway, 2nd Fl
Ugh, call them at 212-401-0800 for the zip.
They said their cross-street is Rector.
What you don't want to do is start blogging your claims online. If they're strong enough, the Grievance Committee will pass it on to the Appellate Division for full review. If you blog about it, she can sue you for defamation per se and get a court order to take the information down until her lawsuit is decided, which can take years. Lawyers cost $350/hour here, and you can be sure she'll sue you for big bucks.
BTW, there's FREE Lexis Nexis access in the Court's library at 80 Centre Street, fourth floor.
You can research cases she's been involved with at http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASMain .
You can then pull the files for her cases at 60 Centre Street, Court Clerk's Office (basement).
Some entity, possibly the NY BAR, can tell you if she's been disciplined before.
NYS law:
=========================================
Defamation is the injury to one's reputation, either by written expression
(libel) or oral expression (slander). (Morrison v National Broadcasting
Co., 19 NY2d 453 [1967].) The elements of libel are: (1) a false and
defamatory statement of fact; (2) regarding the plaintiff; (3) which is
published to a third party; and which (4) results in injury to plaintiff.
(Idema v Wager, 120 F Supp 2d 361 [SD NY 2000]; Ives v Guilford Mills,
Inc., 3 F Supp 2d 191 [ND NY 1998].) Certain statements are considered
libelous per se. They are limited to four categories of statements that:
(1) charge plaintiff with a serious crime; (2) tend to injure plaintiff in
its business, trade or profession; (3) plaintiff has some loathsome
disease; or (4) impute unchastity. (Liberman v Gelstein, 80 NY2d 429
[1992]; Harris v Hirsh, 228 AD2d 206 [1st Dept 1996].) Where statements are
libelous per se, the law presumes that damages will result and they need
not be separately proved.[FN*]
"Trade libel," although closely related to libel per se, is not the same.
Trade libel is the knowing publication of false and derogatory material
regarding another's business, that is calculated to prevent others from
doing business with the defamed party or otherwise interferes with its
business relationships. The party alleging trade libel must establish that
the publication of the false material was a substantial factor in inducing
others not to have business dealings with it. ([*4]Waste Distillation Tech.
v Blasland & Bouck Engrs., 136 AD2d 633 [2d Dept 1988]; United States
Luggage Co., L.P. v Vormittag Assoc., Inc., 5 Misc 3d 1019[A], 2004 NY Slip
Op 51446[U] [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2004].) Trade libel requires proof of
special damages, while libel per se, even if based on disparagement in
business, requires no such proof of special damages.
As with any claim for defamation, both libel per se and trade libel are
defeated by a showing that the published statements are substantially true.
(Newport Serv. & Leasing, Inc. v Meadowbrook Distrib. Corp., 18 AD3d 454
[2d Dept 2005].) They are also subject to a defense that the material, when
read in context, would be perceived by a reasonable person to be nothing
more than a matter of personal opinion. (Immuno AG. v Moor-Jankowski, 77
NY2d 235 [1991].)
=========================================
--
<a href="http://psychotic-karin-kaufman.org/">Harvey Mars</a>
|
| |
| |
Anony <no-spam-invalid-email@equation.com> wrote:
No such law. Nor did she put it that way to you.
If you feel you have a proper grievance (as I do) you need to put together
a documentation (I am) and send it to the Grievance Committee (I will be).
You're in Manhattan, so it is the Appellate Division's First Department's
Grievance Committee.
Their contact info:
61 Broadway, 2nd Fl
Ugh, call them at 212-401-0800 for the zip.
They said their cross-street is Rector.
What you don't want to do is start blogging your claims online. If they're
strong enough, the Grievance Committee will pass it on to the Appellate
Division for full review. If you blog about it, she can sue you for
defamation per se and get a court order to take the information down until
her lawsuit is decided, which can take years. Lawyers cost $350/hour here,
and you can be sure she'll sue you for big bucks.
BTW, there's FREE Lexis Nexis access in the Court's library at 80 Centre
Street, fourth floor.
You can research cases she's been involved with at
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/FCASMain .
You can then pull the files for her cases at 60 Centre Street, Court
Clerk's Office (basement).
Some entity, possibly the NY BAR, can tell you if she's been disciplined
before.
NYS law:
Congratulations. Pro se prevails.
Thank you for the information.
|
| |
| |
|
