|
|
"tempgal" <tempgal@bellsouth.net> wrote in
news:_UmYj.45238$7a.22833@bignews1.bellsouth.net:
>
> Hi --
>
> My boss is having a zoning problem and a lawyer friend of his told him
> that he must submit a constitutional objection when he makes his
|
|
|
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in
news:69ebdqF32vublU1@mid.individual.net:
> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote
>>>> krp <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote
>>>>> ItsJustMe <ells
|
|
|
UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND DEPARTMENT
------------------------------------------X
No. 2008-02071
DAYAWATHIE RANKOTH,
Docket No. O-18182-05
Petitioner - Respondent
Queens County Family Court
- against
|
|
|
"tempgal" <tempgal@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:eGnYj.45260$7a.43408@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Thank you! Given some hints, I can usually construct something.
>
> Any suggestions regarding format, i.e., a letter, a public announcement,
|
|
|
<"opeir"@fd wrote in message
news:cg0f24hp2bok4gk868jdmvc8cbdmj25ps9@4ax.com...
> The guy was a cop before becoming an actor. You'd think he'd have a
> better grasp of the subject of entering an airport with a gun.
>
> http://americanvandals.com/n
|
|
|
"tankfixer" <paul.carrier@gmail.comm> wrote in message
news:MPG.229a9270a958cf089896cb@nntp.earthlink.net...
> In article <69b4dnF31l9jgU1@mid.individual.net>, Reality@Check.it
> says...
>
>
>> Diaz was on parole for an unspecified crime, and a
|
|
|
In article <69eu27F31sohiU1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > Take the example of exceeding your authorized access, and consider
> > some situations. Suppose someone goes behind the counter of a
|
|
|
In article <69etegF31f3jjU1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <69esvmF32dmgjU1@mid.individual.net>,
> > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Larry wrote:
> >>> In art
|
|
|
"Deadrat" <a@b.com> wrote in message
news:1isYj.1398$mh5.1023@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com...
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> Janice <Nothank@you.com> wrote in
>>>> " krp" <krp2457k@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>> "Seth" <se
|
|
|
My interpretation of the indictment deadrat gave a link to
http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2008/images/05/15/my.space.drew.indictment.pd
f
1) drew violated a contractual agreement to use myspace
2) she caused intentional emotional duress to the victim, a
|
|
|
When I was reviewing a certain website to help an acquaintance in a certain
sheriff's department, something odd struck me.
It wasn't a case of something that was IN that website (which had more than
1000 webpages, which I was looking through for the
|
|
|
In article <69esvmF32dmgjU1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article <dIqYj.616$Q57.115@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in news:x-1E38A2.221
|
|
|
In article <69eseeF2t14tlU1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> MB wrote:
> > In article <6gis24tvfhv060vq08pjnb3bbgh5qr573h@4ax.com>,
> > richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Bull#@($.
> >> No grand jury
|
|
|
"tempgal" <tempgal@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:_UmYj.45238$7a.22833@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
> Hi --
>
> My boss is having a zoning problem and a lawyer friend of his told him
> that he must submit a constitutional objection when he
|
|
|
May 20, 2008
Supreme Court Upholds Child Pornography Law
By LINDA GREENHOUSE
WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the latest Congressional
effort to curb the spread of child pornography on the Internet, a 2003 law
that makes it a crime t
|
|
|
In article <69es4vF32i151U1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> Larry wrote:
> > In article
> > <retard-5941C1.18580619052008@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>, MB
> > <retard@whittehouse.govv> wrote:
> >
> >> In arti
|
|
|
In article <69ekf9F31at1oU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > it's for intentional infliction of emotional harm.
>
> Which is criminal activity that resulted in a corpse.
Not according to the indictment. Acc
|
|
|
In article <KCiYj.4887$nW2.504@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Simply violating the TOS without committing an attendant crime or tort (or
> attempting to) doesn't violate 18USC1030.
True, but I would think the TOS would have to
|
|
|
In article <jp2334ti9uvgfpo2ddik0dmhp77dtfi1lh@4ax.com>,
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 00:16:25 -0500, "ItsJustMe" <ells9824_@_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I don't want to snip the article, but this is exactly what we said
|
|
|
In article <B28Yj.1109$co7.485@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com>,
"ItsJustMe" <ells9824_@_gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't want to snip the article, but this is exactly what we said a few
> days ago.
> Violating a TOS to a free web network is not a federal offense
|
|
|
In article <69erbcF327oq7U1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
> Deadrat wrote:
> > sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:g0s9el$mht$1@reader2.panix.com:
> >
> >> In article <OdNXj.219$ah.138@trnddc06>, krp <krp2457k@
|
|
|
In article <9LqYj.618$Q57.122@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in
> news:x-7E6FBB.22132419052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
>
> > In article <wnqYj.595$Q57.100@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com
|
|
|
In article <e0d3dfb4-16ca-4a57-acae-3b31be91c10f@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
<Betten_Mann@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Proof The Smokers are the Spenders.
>Ban The Smoker's Will You !
>Adopt a Ban in your state if you Dare...
>Make No Mistake ! This is REAL
|
|
|
In article <69d31kF312qquU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The feds got an indictment by alleging the defendant committed a tort.
> > It's not far.
>
> Wrong, as always.
That is what I gathered from the g
|
|
|
In article <dIqYj.616$Q57.115@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in news:x-1E38A2.22103019052008@earthlink.vsrv-
> sjc.supernews.net:
>
> > In article <retard-5941C1.18580619052008@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net
|
|
|
In article <6HqYj.611$Q57.576@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in news:x-40A5D5.22080119052008@earthlink.vsrv-
> sjc.supernews.net:
>
> > In article <irb434l9bsvh8p56mqa4m9acdekveuorgs@4ax.com>,
> > richar
|
|
|
In article <69cigsF31r4lsU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > - using any information obtained from the MySpace Services in order to
> > harass,
> > abuse, or harm another person or entity, or attempting to do t
|
|
|
In article <c8kYj.1612$qH4.1451@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>,
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
> Well, think again. Did she exceed her authorization on a public
> computer? I think not, but it's awfully difficult to define what this
> is. 18USC1030 (E)(6) ma
|
|
|
In article <wnqYj.595$Q57.100@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
> news:clb434h32ivofod09m52q7uf34rk37itik@4ax.com:
>
> > On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:09:19 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth)
> >
|
|
|
sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:g0ssvg$dff$1@reader2.panix.com:
> In article <9NiYj.4888$nW2.4787@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:g0s9el$mht$1@reader2.panix.com:
>
>>> The statute in q
|
|
|
In article <retard-087A28.18595819052008@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
MB <retard@whittehouse.govv> wrote:
> In article <x-5B1C6A.00593917052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> > Why? What TOS from my ISP am I v
|
|
|
In article <retard-5941C1.18580619052008@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net>,
MB <retard@whittehouse.govv> wrote:
> In article <x-5B1C6A.00593917052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
>
> > > Freedom of speech is not covere
|
|
|
In article <irb434l9bsvh8p56mqa4m9acdekveuorgs@4ax.com>,
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:20:32 +0000 (UTC), sethb@panix.com (Seth)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <699e5nF30snbrU1@mid.individual.net>,
> >Reality_Check© <Rea
|
|
|
"Sara Brown" <SaraTGinMD@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cb45d430-63d3-442a-a0d1-406611e1b081@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> This woman should be executed asap.
for what ? bad manners???
the girl CHOSE to off herself. where was her MOTHER?
|
|
|
In article <i5qYj.591$Q57.129@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in
> news:x-09E2D2.21205919052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
>
> > In article <BIoYj.1673$qH4.988@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat
> > <a
|
|
|
In article <30b434dvi12lk8dnps0i4kvv0gh58l2hoe@4ax.com>,
richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote:
> Having read the actual law Ms. Drew is charged under, the court should
> dismiss these false charges.
>
> The entire heart of the law is aimed at perso
|
|
|
In article <x-1E38A2.22103019052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
Larry <x@y.com> wrote:
> > Have you even read the TOS of you newsserver and isp?
>
> I have never accessed information in excess of the authorization granted
> to me by my I
|
|
|
"tankfixer" <paul.carrier@gmail.comm> wrote in message
news:MPG.229bdeef41431205989713@nntp.earthlink.net...
In article <69er6rF32adkaU1@mid.individual.net>, theprof@jonez.net
says...
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <69bvodF3249feU1@mid.individu
|
|
|
In article <9NiYj.4888$nW2.4787@nlpi064.nbdc.sbc.com>,
Deadrat <a@b.com> wrote:
>sethb@panix.com (Seth) wrote in news:g0s9el$mht$1@reader2.panix.com:
>> The statute in question says nothing about "deliberately inflict
>> injury". It refers to acce
|
|
|
Mayor: Officers in taped beating will be fired
4 officers to be fired, 3 will be disciplined, supervising sergeant demoted
City officials: Beatings were inexcusable but had nothing to do with race
Suspect's mother says she, attorney not allowed to
|
|
|
In article
<71bacff5-b7ad-411d-a7f7-f2f88eacb08e@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Betten_Mann@yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 18, 6:11 pm, "David L. Martel" <marte...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Betten,
> >
> > I live near Durham, NC where you suggest
|
|
|
In article
<e0d3dfb4-16ca-4a57-acae-3b31be91c10f@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Betten_Mann@yahoo.com wrote:
> Proof The Smokers are the Spenders.
> Ban The Smoker's Will You !
> Adopt a Ban in your state if you Dare...
> Make No Mistake ! This i
|
|
|
Larry <x@y.com> wrote in
news:x-CAB188.15145419052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
> In article
> <e277b886-75f5-4d1c-b7db-bcb28b043b31@k1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
> johns <johns321@moscow.com> wrote:
>
>> > It's this impulse that feder
|
|
|
In article <BIoYj.1673$qH4.988@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
wrote:
> Larry <x@y.com> wrote in
> news:x-EC0422.18214319052008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net:
>
> > In article <FbmYj.4542$7k7.3834@flpi150.ffdc.sbc.com>,
> > Deadrat
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <69eu27F31sohiU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> Take the example of exceeding your authorized access, and consider
>>> some situations. Suppose someone goes behind
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> Take the example of exceeding your authorized access, and consider
> some situations. Suppose someone goes behind the counter of a
> grocery store and takes cash from the register. Or what if a 16 year
> old buys a ticket to a PG-13 m
|
|
|
Noel O'Gara wrote:
> http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/44333/Human-rights-loopholes-condemned
> Detective Chief Superintendent Chris Gregg said dangerous criminals
> were trying to use the legislation to complain about their own human
> rights being
|
|
|
Larry wrote:
> In article <wnqYj.595$Q57.100@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com>, Deadrat <a@b.com>
> wrote:
>
>> richard <member@newsguy.com> wrote in
>> news:clb434h32ivofod09m52q7uf34rk37itik@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:09:19 +0000 (UTC), sethb@pan
|
|
|
UPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND DEPARTMENT
------------------------------------------X
No. 2008-02071
DAYAWATHIE RANKOTH,
Docket No. O-18182-05
Petitioner - Respondent
Queens County Family Court
- against
|
