|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote
> How do we secure these rights?
first, one has to justify that they are not granted by man, a permission,
caprice or whimsey of the monarch, but are eternal- deemed; we 'hold' that
these truths are 'sel
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> It was indeed. But you have to have the standing to be heard, and the
>>> Preamble asserted standing.
>> And perhaps the meaning of the preamble hasn't found its way to the m
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> If you don't mind me kibbutzing,
>> Then nor should you mind me doing likewise.
>>> it seems that you're both right in a sense, but talking different
>>> languages.
>>>
|
|
|
"Carol Lee Smith" <human@csd.uwm.edu> wrote
> It was a list of grievances against one king george.
And not to have to pick another monarch from the approved list, or stand in
rebellion to a lawful government, or defer to a foreign power for approval
|
|
|
THE BASIS OF FREEDOM
The American heritage of church-state relations, always
complex, has generally been that of separation of church and
state. This relationship was not due merely to compromise
among diverse religious groups, but was founded
|
|
