uk.legal

In message <s2cvsvcipkdmlp7128g3bvidekjotjr43g@4ax.com>, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> writes >On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:18:55 -0000, "Bob Roberts" ><melmoth1901@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>I recently had a hands-free kit fitted to the car

In article <0JPV9hlFUO0$EwCf@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>, Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> writes >From a legal perspective this has been a fascinating trial. Fascinating to hear some sick @$#* lie about how he snuffed out the lives of

Anyone like to make a book on it? Over one hour 10-1 45 min to one hour 5-1 20 min to 45 min 5-2 less than 20 min 4-5 -- Alexander Baron http://www.abaron.demon.co.uk/

Alan G wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:54:08 -0000, "DDEckerslyke" > <spambin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > >> >>> "I laugh in the face of danger" >>> "Then I hide until it goes away" >> >> Nothing to say apart from this sig always makes me laugh. >>

On 4 Dec 2003 09:04:50 -0800, davidjones@post.com (David) wrote: >I understand the lessor can force the work to be done. It is in fact >their responsibility to get the work done, so why is it that the >managers seem to believe that the lessees have a

"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:9hq1tvkkmjdp8fqjn2bd7rf0pdl0rq0os2@4ax.com... > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:07:33 -0000, "Rhoy the Bhoy" > <callasberrGANSPAM@tinet.ie> wrote: > > >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publ

"terry" <terry@lewis.lewisonlinedotdom.com> wrote in message news:XfWdnT10lKcGAE2iRVn-hA@giganews.com... > My car tax disc has been stolen. > > I have to go to the local DVLA office (30 miles away) to get a new one. They > say I can't drive there

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/news/120303_local_mayo.html Incidentally, she got 10 years for this

> >Huntley's extravagantly unbelievable scenario hinges on the fact that > >the girls came into the house so he could help Holly (he claimed) > >staunch a nosebleed. But he told Maxine it was the dark-haired one who > >had a nosebleed. Maxine knew he'd

On 4 Dec 2003 20:57:34 -0800, rossprat@hotmail.com (smicker) wrote: >"Derek Hornby" <derek.hornby_uk@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:<bqkorp$4c4$1@sparta.btinternet.com>... >> "Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote >> >> > reported that he *did* in

>"Michael Farrell" Mike.Farrell@upthedale.freeserve.co.uk wrote: >>> What really is irritating is that on her release she will no doubt >>> auction her story and earn enough to retire on. >> >>Annoying that the 'papers will pay her, yes, but then pe

<MI5.Victim@five.orgNOSPAM.uk> wrote in message news:5412tvkbu9be7fuhvav7mp1nk4otcsv72f@4ax.com... > On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:25:21 +0000, Paul Burridge > <pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote: > > >I managed to get his account with Toronto Free Net pu

Yes, I have contacted the landlord, and I have to say there has now been an improvement, as the tenant is now leaving room for me to pass. I guess the only permanent answer is to move to a house in the countryside! "bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com>

"Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3fd0ebdd.0@entanet... > > "Santa Snot" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:bqobpc$2453cv$2@ID-199229.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > > "Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:3fcfa

Yes, they could just claim they quoted me the higher sum, but it might be a matter of who blinks first. Thanks to all who contributed. I will pay the lower figure and see what reaction I get. "Bob Regis" <bob_regis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message n

If you are going to do, then do it quickly. Government is intending to introduce new legislation to "close loopholes". "Dennis" <thebreaker@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:bqqgcf$d0o$1@sparta.btinternet.com... > Hi folks > I would like to s

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 22:26:47 +0000, MI5.Victim@five.orgNOSPAM.uk wrote: >On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:30:23 -0000, "Rob@example.com" <rob@example.com> >wrote: > >>Just watching breakfast news on BBC1 , and dermot and natasha, at the end of the program sai

"Mistermoisture" <mistermoisture@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:a5a52e01.0312051201.15f4e676@posting.google.com... > "Purfffffect" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<bq3d5r$1un3ja$1@ID-199229.news.uni-berlin.de>... > > "Stan Mould" <me@priv

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:04:54 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:01:41 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>>So with the doctors reporting that people are dying in large numbers >>>due to an

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:15:26 GMT, spam@spam.com (First Maje) wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:55:27 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>No, the threat was from a mass killer who had been refusing to hand >>over his wea

Peter Parry wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:32:48 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" > <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: > > > >> It may not have an auctioneer, but it is still an auction site. I >> see the word "auction" mentioned once on the homepage alo

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:00:18 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:53:37 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>>1) A missile site is not a WoMD (and nor were the missiles BTW). >> >>At least 50

In article <njp1tv8bkfgg7ss9qfpuc8s4hdtt9u8t0p@4ax.com>, bigbrian<harry8611@shotmail.com> wrote: >On 5 Dec 2003 02:31:01 -0800, nichughes@mailandnews.com (nic) wrote: >>So, at the risk of repeating myself here are the criteria as I >>understand them

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 20:13:17 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:49:12 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>The point - moron - is that they could still be an effective weapon. >>Even after y

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 22:02:49 +0000, Andrew Hodgson <news@nospam.hodgsonfamily.org> wrote: >We just need volunteers to help moderate the group, >then when we have these, we can then raise an RFD and have the group. Lets get the process off the grou

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:55:35 +0000, hummingbird <YPREUABXQHIB@spammotel.com> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:49:12 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> > suddenly appeared out of the Usenet mist to educate us all with... > >>On

"D.M. Procida" <real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> wrote in message news:1g5i4z5.46h77z1atdzerN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk... > Craig <dhnet2@aol.comma> wrote: > > > Far more likely he just lost his temper with the girl

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:30:23 -0000, "Rob@example.com" <rob@example.com> wrote: >Just watching breakfast news on BBC1 , and dermot and natasha, at the end of the program said something on the lines of "people say we shouldn't say 'see you later', I know

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:25:21 +0000, Paul Burridge <pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote: >I managed to get his account with Toronto Free Net pulled some years >ago. But the situation was far worse back then. Unless you were a keen >net-head and knew h

In message <MPG.1a3af596c817a5649897b8@news-text.blueyonder.co.uk>, Alex Threlfall <alex@nospam.cyberprog.net> writes >When I had to get some quotes from some repairers for my car I was told >by one that I could go wherever I wanted to get the repairs

"Bob Regis" <bob_regis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:bqqso0$245m5e$1@ID-206094.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > jonah wrote: > > Guilty of murder. He murdered the girls after a sexual assualt then > > tried to destroy all evidence. He turied the t

In message <Xns9448D8B70772Dnospamal@130.133.1.4>, Al <spamtrap@hotmail.com> writes >Without a hint of irony, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> uttered: > >> >> A "mobile phone" is defined in terms of operating frequency so they just >> need to know th

"Andrew Howe" <never@you.mind> wrote in message news:3fd0f068$0$14066$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk... > "bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote > > > I'm not saying I believe him, I'm saying it's (for the most part) a > > > plausible story. Again,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:36:08 +0000, Bob <bob_davidson@onetel.net.uk> wrote: >On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC), "Derek Hornby" ><derek.hornby_uk@btopenworld.com> wrote: > >>He seems to be a ve

"bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message news:Cd5Ab.416$Jd7.3338@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net... p.s. unless it was the home secretary who said it "on the telly". :-)

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 21:32:48 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: >It may not have an auctioneer, but it is still an auction site. I see the >word "auction" mentioned once on the homepage alone thats not including the >re

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqqhqq$25kdf2$2@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > NNTP NTL wrote: > > Hi, I'm in the process of creating designs for my new online T-shirt > > business. Most of the designs will be of famous ba

"NJ Lewis" <nick@smartweb.co.uk> wrote in message news:5956f312.0312050216.1cde5bb0@posting.google.com... > I have been working for a company for 6 years and the redundancy > policy has always been known as one months pay for every year worked. > This

"Richard Michael Briggs" <noone@home.at.this.address> wrote in message news:0fm1tv8qu5r2mfcs5gs9rt4hdp19kfnqgf@4ax.com... > Had a very strange taxi ride today in which it was clear that the > driver was trying to find out information about me - such

jayarcee wrote in message <9a49d622.0312071012.eccf302@posting.google.com>... >The defence are not entitled to give an opening speech if the >defendant is the only witness that they are calling. Maxine Carr's >counsel was entitled to give an openin

On 5 Dec 2003 12:30:24 -0800, exdos@lineone.net (buckshee) wrote: >AIANL, the rule at any auction is "caveat emptor", Ebay isn't an auction however. If it were many of its conditions would be illegal. -- Peter Parry. http://www.wpp.l

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:45:06 -0000, "That_Bloke" <thatbloke-nospammie@postmaster.co.uk> wrote: >So if he admits to pushing the girl, and thus indirectly causing the injury >to the head (by her falling), what is the range of sentences that the judge >

Peter Parry wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:08:46 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" > <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: > > >> On the website... > > Where? > > Where it says "eBay is Only a Venue. eBay is not an auctioneer. > Although, we are commonly

"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:9hq1tvkkmjdp8fqjn2bd7rf0pdl0rq0os2@4ax.com... > No he is not 100% right, in fact he is nowhere near right. To sound > your horn, at any time of the day, in the way that was bein

Dave Mayall wrote: > "Otis Wengatz" <otis_wengatz@gawab.com.invalid> wrote in message > news:Xns9447B5980A039otiswengatzgawabcom@news-60.giganews.com... >> "polterposty" <polterposty@mouse-potato.com> wrote in >> news:ckKzb.16771 $lm1.136258@wards

"> > > > Anyone able to advise me as to whether it is worth reporting this to > > the police? After all, no crime has yet been committed, but I do fear > > that something bad is about to happen.... > > > You could report it but I do not see really

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 07:40:08 +0000, Paul Hyett <pah@nojunkmailplease.co.uk> wrote: >In uk.politics.misc on Thu, 4 Dec 2003 at 12:28:51, Cynic wrote : >>Not only are they not obliged to discuss the basis upon which they >>made their verdict, but the

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqla5b$23l9sn$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > "Rob" <rob@anisp.com> wrote in message > news:bql7p2$kn0$1@sparta.btinternet.com... > > > > "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqla37$23ut5u$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > "Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote in message > news:bql6j5$tji$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... snip> > I don't have a wedsite as such, how

n 5 Dec 2003 10:38:09 -0800, CptSensible@go.com (Lord Sutch) wrote: >> I understand what you mean, but I do not regard it as a particularly >> valid argument except in those rare cases where images have been >> created for sale. >I cannot agree wi

Otis Wengatz wrote: > Peter anon <spam@spamnonefree.uk> wrote in > news:0001HW.BBF5FDEB00506D5CF02845B0@news.freeserve.net: > >> HOWEVER, [off topic] morally you should have asked about the VAT >> element -even although they should have told you-

Without a hint of irony, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> uttered: > Bob Brenchley. wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:44:18 +0000, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> In message <Xns9447BA41F77E9nospamal@130.133.1.4>, Al >>> <spamtrap@hot

jonah wrote: > Guilty of murder. He murdered the girls after a sexual assualt then > tried to destroy all evidence. He turied the two girls but then even > returned to the burial place later to burn thier bodies when he > relised that he may not o

Without a hint of irony, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> uttered: > In message <Xns9447BA41F77E9nospamal@130.133.1.4>, Al > <spamtrap@hotmail.com> writes >>Without a hint of irony, CptSensible@go.com (Lord Sutch) uttered: >> >>> Day off work today b

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:39:58 -0000, "Tony Mac" <t_mccabe@hotmail.com> wrote: >On another note, they also say:- > >5.3 'Any bid that you make via this Website constitutes a legal offer to buy >the item from the relevant Bumblebee Auction Organisati

quel surprise...... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3295169.stm

Post the item number so we can have a look at how it was advertised please.. "Mr. Man" <no@sp.am> wrote in message news:YyVzb.34$8z5.16100@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net... > Another eBay one I'm afraid - > > I sold a laptop recently for £455, beli

"bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote > > I'm not saying I believe him, I'm saying it's (for the most part) a > > plausible story. Again, someone fails to make that distinction. > you think it's plausible? Yes, that's what I just said, except

I am very familiar with this road indeed. If you paid attention you would be too. > >Here in Bournemouth, there is a long stretch of dual carriageway >leading out of town, heading north. For years, the speed limit on this >road was 70mph (as you'd

"Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3fce689b.0@entanet... > In the hope that this thread is not hi-jacked by the idiots again, and > there can be genuine legal discussion, I thought I'd mention that I > have had a personal demonstrati

> Anyone able to advise me as to whether it is worth reporting this to > the police? After all, no crime has yet been committed, but I do fear > that something bad is about to happen.... Find out from the taxi firm who the driver was, then put it

"spacey" <readman@zoom.co.uk> wrote in message news:3FCF72B2.A944C86D@zoom.co.uk... > I have a much better way to stop all drive offs, what's more they can use > my idea for free > get somebody off their arse to take the money and put your fuel in,

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:08:46 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: >On the website... Where? Where it says "eBay is Only a Venue. eBay is not an auctioneer. Although, we are commonly referred to as an online auction web

"Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3fcf969d.0@entanet... > > "Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message > news:9totsvgojrgtovhgb0psu8cfcco1rlan2q@4ax.com... > > On 3 Dec 2003 23:30:57 GMT, Ubatch <1058793@icq.com> wrote: > >

"Griff" <griff@home.> wrote in message news:knfvsvg5meovpoh36n0tofj3hualoeg8ko@4ax.com... > Can anyone give me advice on the best way to sue my neighbour? > Following an argument over a boundary, he is using an psychoelectronic > device to read my

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:47:06 -0000, "Trent C" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >Pretty much everywhere on the site, but how about here in the first >paragraph of the 'about ebay' page: Ah, the one that says "eBay is the world's largest personal o

Even more obsessed loony "Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3FD06050.7CDD5468@privacy.net... > Wonderful Stan Mould wrote: > > > > "Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > > news:3FCF7867.B6E30BB0@privacy.net... > > > > > C

"Alan Hope" <ahope@skynet.be> wrote in message news:1gkvsvk603krjt9b7f1ffrst2qdrujm31g@4ax.com... > half_pint goes: > > >"Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote in message > >news:sojusvsla81n25i7dcmqb8i0i08tu3bt4v@4ax.com... > >> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:2

"bigbrian" <harry8611@shotmail.com> wrote in message news:p4evsv8lk3v8pfekl17ot3d31mn4jb3r52@4ax.com... > On 4 Dec 2003 21:04:32 GMT, Tom Moore > <jackie.ashenden@broomleigh.org.uk> wrote: > > >"Purfffffect" <me@privacy.net> wrote : > > > >> A re

"Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote > You have to twist and warp the statement to arrive at your conclusion. He's good at doing the twisting. > Perhaps he is simply pointing out an obvious inconsistency in the law. Exactly, the age of consent w

"smicker" <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote I believe I have made a mistake here Not the first time, and sure won't be the last time either. > You are not saying it is ok for you to have sex with 13-14 year olds. You are > syaing you would not do thi

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:11:13 +0000, Chris Street <trash.thegreypilgrim@ntlworld.com> wrote: >On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:57:15 -0000, Andy Lord wrote: > >>> >> Makes no difference to Brenchley, he's completely unable to accept that he's >> wrong even whe

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:54:08 -0000, "DDEckerslyke" <spambin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > >> "I laugh in the face of danger" >> "Then I hide until it goes away" > >Nothing to say apart from this sig always makes me laugh. > A quote from Buffy the va

"Dr Rita Pal" <rpal@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:532888dd.0312042030.74319d56@posting.google.com... > "The Todal" <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote in message news:<bqnjtm$23rvhe$1@ID-164291.news.uni-berlin.de>... snip>> I never went public

"Santa Snot" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:bqobpc$2453cv$2@ID-199229.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3fcfab73.0@entanet... > > > Try looking at > > http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/publish/

"Hognoxious" <freddy@breadball.com> wrote in message news:3fd09b08$1$280$ba620e4c@reader4.news.skynet.be... > "Fenris Wolf" <Fenris@reality8.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > news:jhxbXtA056y$EwT$@reality8.demon.co.uk... > ... > > I have yet to see a

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 06:05:01 -0600, Otis Wengatz <otis_wengatz@gawab.com.invalid> wrote: >Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> wrote in news:IWW0BBFh2F0$Ew04 >@WINDOZE.fensoft.local: > >> AIUI, putting a leaflet under a windscreen-wiper is criminal damage

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:27:45 +0000, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> wrote: >In message <vuh0tv47sepqlvps8saq09vbb1kgckf7ch@4ax.com>, bigbrian ><harry8611@shotmail.com> writes >>On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 01:56:56 GMT, despam.c.street@ntlworld.com (Chris >>S

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:07:33 -0000, "Rhoy the Bhoy" <callasberrGANSPAM@tinet.ie> wrote: >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in >message news:tpeusv8a78j9kb4udvanh3h8po3mgitta0@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 10:46:41 -0000, "ha

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:16:19 +0100, "Hognoxious" <freddy@breadball.com> suddenly appeared out of the Usenet mist to educate us all with... >"hummingbird" <YPREUABXQHIB@spammotel.com> wrote in message >news:dltpsv49caeg4lqc197eu68g11vivl553q@4ax.com..

"Mike" <nospam@at.all> wrote in message news:3fd0e876$0$14064$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk... > As far as I know, barristers are not allowed to turn down a brief however > unpalatable it may seem. They are appointed on the basis of their > speciality

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqoilj$250tv7$4@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > I can't help but think that Carr is just another victim of Huntley, all > she can't really be accused of is being loyal to her former partner. >

"DDEckerslyke" <spambin@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:b6a4c181.0312050749.56e4a0a@posting.google.com... > "Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<3fcd0f5e.0@entanet>... > <snip> > > This, and the other reply about leaving a cop

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqok92$24l9pa$3@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > Andrew Howe wrote: > > "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:bqoilj$250tv7$4@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > >> And then

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:09:57 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >I wouldn't be reading emergency manuals for the first time in an emergengy You would learn by wrote over 500 pages, many containing intricate tables? I certainly would no

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 02:05:33 GMT, "Sleepy" <Sleepy@dozy.com> suddenly appeared out of the Usenet mist to educate us all with... > >If you two can't play nicely you will have to stand in the corner of the >newsgroup :-) Alan Hope's gone off to b

"D.M. Procida" <real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> wrote in message news:1g5ib52.qrx5u6fdwcp5N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk... > bryan <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > what is it about this story that doesn't fi

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:57:35 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:25:36 +0000, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>>As one example - a recently captured soldier of an enemy that is known >>>not to mistreat its prison

On 5 Dec 2003 02:31:01 -0800, nichughes@mailandnews.com (nic) wrote: >Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<eUuPqRKfC4z$Ewfl@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>... >> In message <20031204092500.10854.00000126@mb-m24.aol.com>, Crai

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:49:12 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >The point - moron - is that they could still be an effective weapon. >Even after years of storage in far from ideal conditions they are >still VERY dangerou

When I had to get some quotes from some repairers for my car I was told by one that I could go wherever I wanted to get the repairs done. Now most insurance companies ask you for 3 quotes or something along these lines, what obligation do you have

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:49:30 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >You seem to have the wrong end of the stick I am talking about broadcast >analogue pictures, the blackbars are transmitted and both WS and normal >sets will receive and disp

If the jury comes back with 2 x murder, life meaning life is the only possible result. No problem. But what if they don't? Any other result could mean anything from one sex murder to a panicked killing of limited culpability, and the actual verd

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:01:41 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >>So with the doctors reporting that people are dying in large numbers >>due to an acute shortage of basic medical supplies, the Americans send >>them washin

Richard Michael Briggs wrote: > Had a very strange taxi ride today in which it was clear that the > driver was trying to find out information about me - such as exactly > which flat I occupy in the house he dropped me off at. He claimed to > be a frie

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 19:28:38 +0000, Richard Michael Briggs <noone@home.at.this.address> wrote: >>Had a very strange taxi ride today in which it was clear that the >>driver was trying to find out information about me - such as exactly >>which flat I

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:53:37 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >>1) A missile site is not a WoMD (and nor were the missiles BTW). > >At least 50 of the missiles were. Bull#@($. Some missiles had a range that was slig

"Andrew Howe" <andrew@confounding-factor-nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:bqqiju$ss1$1$8302bc10@news.demon.co.uk... > "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bqqhqr$25kdf2$4@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > The only person

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:25:36 +0000, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote: >>As one example - a recently captured soldier of an enemy that is known >>not to mistreat its prisoners is held at gunpoint whilst his captors >>set up an ambush in the path

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:46:48 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:25:00 +0000, Tone <tone@antb.org.uk> wrote: > >>>Today's unfortunate climate of hysteria about the type of allegation >>>being made is such that it could resu

In message <BBF55EE696685A701D@g3.local.domain>, Ian Miller <ism_9022@bifroest.demon.co.uk> writes >I find this all too plausible. It fits with various posters comments >about lack of signs of unnatural interest in young girls, or any signs >of pl

"Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bqqe2t$s2$1@titan.btinternet.com... > Peter Parry wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:49:10 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" > > <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> But ebay is

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:49:12 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> suddenly appeared out of the Usenet mist to educate us all with... >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:30:46 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: > >>On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:

> "I laugh in the face of danger" > "Then I hide until it goes away" Nothing to say apart from this sig always makes me laugh. cheers dd

>"INRI" jon_1940@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >> I'm just making the point it's another possible scenario. People seem >to >> >think >> >> he's a paedophile and sexually assaulted them. There's nothing to >suggest >> >any >> >> such thing. >> > >>

In message <oso0tv48johopkmfuqhs9l9hprqm5epjur@4ax.com>, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> writes >Richard Miller goes: > > >>Again, you have misunderstood the law as it applies to this case. > >>If a person is saying that the balance of their mind was

In message <baa1704a.0312050213.7f1b8ff7@posting.google.com>, nic <nichughes@mailandnews.com> writes >Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:<cXC$q2Nv56z$Ewea@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>... >> In message <baa1704a.0312040

>JoJJaz02@hotmail.com (JoJo) wrote: >> >> >Maxine tells Latham that Huntley told her (more than once) it was the >> >dark-haired one who - supposedly - had a nosebleed. Maxine says she >> >told Huntley it was Holly who got nosebleeds, not Jessica.

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 18:25:15 +0000, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> wrote: >I'm tempted to agree with you re banning hard core from broadcast media, >to prevent access by children and young people, but where would you draw >the line? As soon as you

In message <bqphnk$25iqki$1@ID-164291.news.uni-berlin.de>, The Todal <the_todalnospam@msn.com> writes >It has also been confirmed: " on 30th June 1998 the Crown Prosecution >Service discontinued an allegation of rape against Ian Kevin Huntley" > >S

"Joe Green" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3fd0a340$0$13350$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com... > Of course he is guilty, they said so on TELEVISION. did they? but that would jeopardise the case... have you informed the judge?

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:40:52 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >FFS! I don't care if they were first raised back in the stone age, I >have looked into the facts they are based upon reasonably well, That is not good enough when you are challe

In news:bqqgcf$d0o$1@sparta.btinternet.com, Dennis <thebreaker@btinternet.com> mused: > Hi folks > I would like to swap my property for another of the same value, both > myself and the other person agree the values of our respective > properties ( ap

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:54:19 -0000, "Trent C" <spamtrap@spamcop.net> wrote: >I'm sure the laws governing how traffic plod behaves is fairly explicit on >the subject of obeying their instructions, but I wonder whether it also >defines under what circu

In message <baa1704a.0312050231.7fcb857a@posting.google.com>, nic <nichughes@mailandnews.com> writes >Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:<eUuPqRKfC4z$Ewfl@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>... >> In message <20031204092500.1

"starwars" <nobody@tatooine.homelinux.net> wrote in message news:6c419d6113b3c4f047d033530d4a8003@tatooine.homelinux.net... > "W K" <hyagillot@tesco.net> wrote: > > > > > "Stephen" <newsmail02@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > > news:1aQzb.419$v64.36

"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:ehl1tvgu6d7l8883pq10hu9b3uludbd4i0@4ax.com... > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:10:29 -0000, "Andy Lord" <no@thank.you> wrote: > > > > >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net

thanks to all who replied G -- ************************************************************ Gareth and Janet Boote's Websites: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~gboote/ http://www.gareth-boote.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ ******************

"Dennis" <thebreaker@btinternet.com> wrote: >Hi folks >I would like to swap my property for another of the same value, both myself >and the other person agree the values of our respective properties ( >approx.Â£250k) , so my question is, how do we

"Uno Hoo!" <kevlunn@spambustlunn11.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:bqqamq$sqm$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk... > terry wrote: > > My car tax disc has been stolen. > > > > I have to go to the local DVLA office (30 miles away) to get a new > > one. T

"smicker" <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote > He knew it before Benedict but chose to ignore it just like he is > ignoring the post about a murdered paedophile I made at 04-47 today on > here:-) Here, where is here? YOu corss posted, so you need to be

On 4 Dec 2003 13:23:41 -0800, hampstead.guy@lycos.co.uk (R Soni) wrote: >She has not written me an email saying that unless I pay all of the >cancelation charge she will go to the metropolitan police with the >voicemail. >Any advice you can give

Had a very strange taxi ride today in which it was clear that the driver was trying to find out information about me - such as exactly which flat I occupy in the house he dropped me off at. He claimed to be a friend and ex-housemate of my landlord and

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:06:37 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: > >>What I don't like is the idea of kids coming across that sort of stuff >>late at night while casually chann

In message <vge1tv8j4ji37dstfs4p2tibb8pml6ijnc@4ax.com>, Daytona <abuse@cox.net> writes >After you've tidied up, photograph or film the property & any potential points >of conflict (perhaps when they're doing the inventory). To make it more legally >

"Craig" <dhnet2@aol.comma> wrote in message news:20031204192316.22983.00000160@mb-m27.aol.com... > >"bryan" ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com wrote: > > >> I'm just making the point it's another possible scenario. People seem to > >think > >> he's

Alan Hope wrote: > Cynic goes: > >> On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 00:27:53 +0100, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> >> wrote: > >>> Same old question yet again, I'm afraid: what was he panicking >>> about, at this point in the timeline? A girl has just fallen into

John wrote: > Can an overseas visitor to the UK from USA, who is sectioned under the > Mental Health Act, be charged the cost of their treatment whilst being > treated in an NHS unit. I understand that the UK does not have any > agreement with the

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:25:58 -0000, "Comfortably Numb" <nothanks@nottoday.co.uk> wrote: >> He said that it was because the sink was full of dirty dishes. Also >> they don't keep kitchen towel in the kitchen so the bathroom was the >> only place to g

>Cynic cynic@none.none wrote: >>I don't think getting your mobile wet enough to cause it to turn off >>is really considered a freak event. It's a relatively common mishap.. > >In fact, a big splash as Holly fell in the bath that soaked the pocket >

On 5 Dec 2003 05:29:09 -0800, susanbaxter@postmaster.co.uk (SuzySue) wrote: >Once a house sale is agreed is it usual/advisable to insist that the >house is taken off the market and to get this in writing that the >vendor will not accept any other off

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:55:27 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >No, the threat was from a mass killer who had been refusing to hand >over his weapons for over 10 years. Don't forget that France, Germany and Russia were

On 5 Dec 2003 03:45:05 -0800, Simon <sus_it@yahoo.com> wrote: > Ah rear-end shunts eh? Like the ones you get when drivers run out of > stopping distance when something unexpected brings everyone to a > sudden stop? I think you'll find these are exact

"Bob" <bob_davidson@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message news:jr21tv4qriar0jq6ioaradiq1kic0934q8@4ax.com... > On 5 Dec 2003 05:12:12 -0600, Archibald <me@privacy.net> wrote: > > >and you can stop all the other childish and > >obsessive posts that you ma

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:51:53 -0000, "DaveK" <davek@fsnet.co.uk> wrote: >Some years ago I asked a timber/dampcourse specialist to examine a house I >was buying. He made a full examination, found minor defects, supplied >brochures for approved treatment

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:10:29 -0000, "Andy Lord" <no@thank.you> wrote: > >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message >news:sgm0tv486top71omcg6jd5i0kb846c3ihe@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:36:35 -0000, "Andy Lord" <no@tha

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:52:31 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:49:47 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>>ROTFL - Which ones are these then.? Food mixers.? mincers.? >>>ice-cube crushers.

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 12:35:02 GMT, axel@white-eagle.co.uk wrote: >In uk.politics.misc Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >> >The ONLY fact you have to accept is that NO WMD have been >> >found in Iraq since the invasion and likel

"Archibald" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3FCEF879.8FB3B285@privacy.net... > > BTW Have you spoken to Jim Hulbert on the phone recently? Has he hung up > on you recently? ________________________________________________________________

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:54:50 -0000, "Dave Mayall" <dave@research-group.co.uk> wrote: >If they detected a goodbye signal, the phone was turned off or suffered a >flat battery. Or switched itself off due to getting a soaking. -- Cynic

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:48:02 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:44:37 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>At this stage it is far too early for them to crow over anything. At >>the current

On 5 Dec 2003 04:31:54 -0800, letsbelievethetelevision@hotmail.com (Letsbelievethetelevision) wrote: >I don't think getting your mobile wet enough to cause it to turn off >is really considered a freak event. It's a relatively common mishap.. In fa

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:44:28 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:29:48 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>>>I think "none" is a gross exaggeration. > >>>Give me any report of a WoMD that h

"Stan Mould" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:3fce6da5.0@entanet... > > BTW, who's Rose Davies? You? __________________________________________________________ Ypu beat me to it: I meant to ak that question ;) -- JH

RomaNazi is our resident village idiot, a known spammer with deep hatred against Jews and Turks. Who knows what comes next? He's an Armenian asylum seeker, confessed to go "willy watching in Berlin pissoirs". He has no credibility whatsoever. WolfW

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:30:46 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:25:13 +0000, Bob Brenchley. ><Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: > >>>>Harmless - definitely not, effective as weapons - most certainly. It >>>>seems to

bryan <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote: > > > what is it about this story that doesn't fit? > > I'm not Ian Huntley, nor his defence > > counsel, nor am I defending him. > > okay! okay! > > > I was talking in general about how > > easy it i

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:25:00 +0000, Tone <tone@antb.org.uk> wrote: >>Today's unfortunate climate of hysteria about the type of allegation >>being made is such that it could result in some serious real-World >>repercussions. >Fisticuffs at dawn or

"Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote in message news:lbi1tvsmp2lsn5muu359c25oso47t1053h@4ax.com... > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:23:43 -0000, "That_Bloke" > <thatbloke-nospammie@postmaster.co.uk> wrote: > > >So.. He admits that he did push her, and yes he kno

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:42:03 +0000, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote: >Cynic I can understand your wish to stand up where you see injustice >but you are wrong in this particular case. The allegations were first >raised at least a full year befor

In article <fWTT0KA9UQz$Eweu@privacy.net>, PeteM <me@privacy.net> wrote: >> To convict Mr Huntley *purely* on the basis that his >>story seems unlikely would be *very* dangerous. Something very >>similar happened to Sally Clark, >I don't think

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC), "Derek Hornby" <derek.hornby_uk@btopenworld.com> wrote: >He seems to be a very bitter person, as look how he reacts when in a rage, >tells lies, makes up stories about other people. >A very nasty person is Sm

"Letsbelievethetelevision" <letsbelievethetelevision@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c2e961fe.0312050431.7cd70f40@posting.google.com... > Or maybe he didn't kill her at all, hence the lack of evidence such as > DNA or scratches. AFAIK there is no

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:15:45 +0000, Benedict White <benedict@NOmyrealboxSPAM.com> wrote: > > >Derek Hornby wrote: > >> >> True, I mean how easy is it to trace who Smicerk is, and his home address, >> so that the details can be passed on to the

"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bqqhqr$25kdf2$4@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > The only person who said there was a nosebleed was Huntley, why take his > word for it? Because he's the only person left alive who was in a pos

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:08:01 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:38:46 +0000, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>Maybe I have a different judgement scale than you but anyone terr or >>squad who decides to die delib

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3293447.stm "Catherine Donkers, 29, was nursing her baby daughter on an Ohio highway while driving at 65mph. She said she did not stop because she was talking on the phone to her husband and taking notes on th

In message <aup0tv0g0qinlqngld7juoeuuopcp75ko2@4ax.com>, Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> writes >On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:59:18 +0000, Mike <spamdump@fensoft.co.uk> >wrote: > > >>Myself neither but my not wanting to do or view something in no reason >>f

nic wrote: > real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote in > message > news:<1g5gcll.hw6whiutp9zN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>... >> JackW <jack_wednesday@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> 1) People don't drop dead

Thanks for your comments. To be fair, I didn't deliberatly avoid mentioning VAT in the initial call, it didn't occur to me that it would be an issue. "Peter anon" <spam@spamnonefree.uk> wrote in message news:0001HW.BBF5FDEB00506D5CF02845B0@news.frees

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:23:43 -0000, "That_Bloke" <thatbloke-nospammie@postmaster.co.uk> wrote: >So.. He admits that he did push her, and yes he knows that was totally >unacceptable behaviour, BUT he didn't do any of the other things. > >So if it doe

Cynic wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:52:12 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>> Deaths can occur due to mistakes that are as trivial. There was a >>> case where a single typo led to the deaths of a few hundred people, >>> and anot

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:03:14 GMT, Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: >What I don't like is the idea of kids coming across that sort of stuff >late at night while casually channel surfing. It is very hard core and >needs an age limit. That part I

Libel law has me confused :), here's what's what... I operate a web-site on which anyone can post reviews, comments or whatever for local pubs, clubs, etc. In November a statement that could be interpreted as being libellous appeard on the site, th

In message <bqqemi$d7b$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>, mja <mja48@--no-spam--cam.ac.uk> writes > >"Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote in message >news:bqqeeq$1h0$1@titan.btinternet.com... >> Why? Surely anyone can use the excuse their tax disc

Andrew Howe wrote: > "bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote >> "Andrew Howe" <andrew@confounding-factor-nospamplease.com> wrote >>> Perfectly servicable except it was full of dirty pans, > >> and the dirty pans were piled so high they obscured the

lurker@zahadum.com wrote in message <75f1tvc81pu7c6e6hfpr6484rbug445ifn@4ax.com>... >On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:45:39 -0000, "The Todal" ><the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote: > >> What really is irritating is that on her release she will no doubt >> auctio

"Richard" <richard4576@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bqptg0$24rkrq$1@ID-89874.news.uni-berlin.de... > If somebody pays me by cheque and I lose this cheque, having cancelled the > old one, are they within their rights to refuse to submit me anoth

> >Heavens I just had a thought. I wonder if Huntley did have another woman >round the house when Holly and Jessica turned up. Perhaps this is >fantasising just a little bit too far. > Like his ex-wife who works at Lakenheath perhaps ? If we

Cynic wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:41:00 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>> <sigh> because he will not have to suffer the black bands, and will >>> also get more definition from a widescreen DVD. So long as he >>> doesn't forg

"D.M. Procida" <real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> wrote in message news:1g5hyo7.20os8k1sllcm5N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk... > bryan <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote: > > > so... huntley has his hand over the nose and m

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:31:16 -0000, "Zoe Brown" <zoe.brown@d-o-n-o-t-s-p-a-m-tfn.com> wrote: >They have sent me a list of things that are wrong with the property. This >is an abstract from my letter replying to all the defets that they have >mention

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:32:39 -0000, "The Todal" <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote: >> No. It would be terribly wrong for a 13 year old to get the idea that >> sex is in any way a *normal* activity. >Nearly right. >It would be terribly wrong for a

Hi folks I would like to swap my property for another of the same value, both myself and the other person agree the values of our respective properties ( approx.£250k) , so my question is, how do we go about this? Is there a recognised legal route

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 23:02:09 +0000, hummingbird <YPREUABXQHIB@spammotel.com> enlightened the denizens of uk.politics.misc by writing: >On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:03:47 +0000, Solon <nobody@nowt.com> > suddenly appeared out of the Usenet mist to educate

"Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote in message news:cqf1tvgt208m6ln4kseflq6ujqqnucd72g@4ax.com... > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:10:07 -0000, "The Todal" > <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote: > > >I don't see that there was anything in her evidence on that topic

"Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bqqdf6$i3c$1@hercules.btinternet.com... > Paul Milburn wrote: > > I notice that some UK forces have auction sites for lost property see > > http://www.bumblebeeauctions.co.uk ) > > Thats

Richard Miller <richard@seasalter0.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<XG+tuNhc8Qz$EwfV@seasalter0.demon.co.uk>... > In message <f888ed61.0311301441.2588ed41@posting.google.com>, George > Bray <GeorgeBray1961@hotmail.com> writes > > > >This possibili

lease distribute this to individuals and News Groups VOMIT UK 49/03 Victims Of Masonic Ill Treatment 6 December 2003 Before relying upon anything attributed to VOMIT please check with us for accuracy.Â Â Â Our Web page was sabotaged by people who

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:10:07 -0000, "The Todal" <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote: >I don't see that there was anything in her evidence on that topic that was >worthy of refuting, surely? As I recall, she said that he was in a bail >hostel and that eve

"Andrew Howe" <andrew@confounding-factor-nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:bqq1ka$ijp$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk... > "bryan" wrote > It's possible for him to be a child killer and yet be telling the truth, > isn't it? If you remove the emot

"Otis Wengatz" <otis_wengatz@gawab.com.invalid> wrote in message news:Xns94487D549AA95otiswengatzgawabcom@news-60.giganews.com... > "chopsmcp" <sithom35@yahoo.com> wrote in > news:bqnmj5$23umej$1@ID-171243.news.uni-berlin.de: > > > Probably, unless

On 5 Dec 2003 05:27:41 -0800, didds2@excite.com (Ian Diddams) wrote: >> That would be one of the rare cases where a rear-end shunt would be >> judged to be his fault rather than yours. >Yiou are of course right... but IO would respectfully suggest

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 12:03:56 -0000, "Uno Hoo!" <kevlunn@spambustlunn11.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >> When someone cuts in between you and the vehicle you are following, >> simply drop back to regain the correct following distance. Even if it >> happens

"Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote in message news:bqqeeq$1h0$1@titan.btinternet.com... > terry wrote: > > My car tax disc has been stolen. > > > > I have to go to the local DVLA office (30 miles away) to get a new > > one. They say I

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:45:39 -0000, "The Todal" <the_todalnospam@msn.com> wrote: > What really is irritating is that on her release she will no doubt > auction her story and earn enough to retire on. Annoying that the 'papers will pay her, yes, but

terry wrote: > My car tax disc has been stolen. > > I have to go to the local DVLA office (30 miles away) to get a new > one. They say I can't drive there because I have no tax disc. > > Is that not a bit ridiculous. > > Time for a change in the l

"Dan" <dalbesREMOVETHISSHIT@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:bqq8p8$23vh2n$1@ID-109594.news.uni-berlin.de... > I just logged in into the web page to access my credit card online. There, > in the list of "Transactions (since your last Statement)",

Peter Parry wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:49:10 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" > <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: > > > >> But ebay is an auction site. > > Where does it say that? On the website...

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 14:38:46 +0000, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote: >Maybe I have a different judgement scale than you but anyone terr or >squad who decides to die deliberately is not brave but stupid and a >risk to the rest of his team. Th

"smicker" <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote > Cynic I can understand your wish to stand up where you see injustice > but you are wrong in this particular case. Notice, that Smicker is only able to say Cynic is wrong. where is the evidence that Smicker

Paul Milburn wrote: > My wife has just come back from our childrens Primary School and told > me that lost property is collected, kept for a few months and then > disposed off in the rubbish. They believe that this is their only > option and that they

NNTP NTL wrote: > Hi, I'm in the process of creating designs for my new online T-shirt > business. Most of the designs will be of famous bands and cult > figures. > > Please can you help. > > I need to know where I stand with copyright issues: >

> >I > You have not got what you have paid for. The fact that they sent out > the goods in two parcels is immaterial. Ask them for the goods you > paid for and demand they fulfil their part of the contract. If they > refuse then you can get the money b

> >But ebay is an auction site. > > Where does it say that? Pretty much everywhere on the site, but how about here in the first paragraph of the 'about ebay' page: http://pages.ebay.co.uk/community/aboutebay/overview/index.html

Andrew Howe <never@you.mind> wrote: > > IMO a telling off from his parents would have > sufficed. Normal sexual > > play between children is not a sex offence - it is growing up. > So it's normal but he should have been told off for it? So is

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:49:10 +0000 (UTC), "Beck" <becksnews@REMOVEbtopenworld.com> wrote: >But ebay is an auction site. Where does it say that? -- Peter Parry. http://www.wpp.ltd.uk/

The same circumstances would apply as do those regarding an MOT renewal when you are permitted to drive to a garage (of your choice) to have the vehicle checked as long as your intention is to drive directly to that place for that purpose. Barry

"Benedict White" <benedict@NOmyrealboxSPAM.com> wrote > Now you know where he is because he was not hiding it. fine, thank you, I will pass it on. Derek

"W K" <hyagillot@tesco.net> wrote: > > "Stephen" <newsmail02@ntlworld.com> wrote in message > news:1aQzb.419$v64.367@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net... > > > > Exactly. But many cyclists refuse to accept that the motorists benefit the > > country

"Paul Taylor" <itchyfeetoriginal@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:de595b7f.0312050254.6749f42d@posting.google.com... > "Neil" <neil.k.walker@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:<bqoe4t$23r51p$1@ID-111374.news.uni-berlin.de>... > > "Paul Taylor"

Cynic wrote: > On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:52:33 -0000, "bryan" <ntlhell@NOSPAMhotmail.com> > wrote: > >> indeed. who would want blood dripped on the kitchen floor (where >> there's a perfectly servicable sink) when it could easily be dripped >> all the w

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:19:48 +0000, Cynic <cynic@none.none> wrote: >On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 08:59:14 +0000, Tone <tone@toneb.f9.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>Now please bugger off out of a row that really doesnt concern you > >>>No. > >>Please ??? > >No. It

Craig <dhnet2@aol.comma> wrote: > Far more likely he just lost his temper with the girls for some trivial reason > and panicked. Far, far more likely imo. But what? He didn't like Manchester United? They made fun of his job/accent/dog/PlayStation?

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:42:09 -0000, "Zoe Brown" <zoe.brown@d-o-n-o-t-s-p-a-m-tfn.com> wrote: >Good parenting would involve giving the child a reason as to why they can't >do something, "because you might hurt yourself", "because it is breaking the >l

Derek Hornby wrote: > > True, I mean how easy is it to trace who Smicerk is, and his home address, > so that the details can be passed on to the authorities, with the > complaint of harassment, and making serious libellous statements. > No

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:40:57 -0000, "Andrew Howe" <never@you.mind> wrote: >> I was so angry when I saw this article the boy was behaving just as I >> remember many 8 year old boys (and older and girls) did at this age. To >> label this child a sex o

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:39:21 -0000, "Dan" <dalbesREMOVETHISSHIT@hotmail.com> wrote: > >Yes, I have heard of that before. The truth is that I don't know because I >don't know if it will look different in each case. > >I just logged in into the w

On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 05:52:17 -0600, Otis Wengatz <otis_wengatz@gawab.com.invalid> wrote: >So why the push to paracetemol? > >If paracetemol has greater risk of death, and greater risk of long term >harm, what advantages does it have? Children u

"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:sgm0tv486top71omcg6jd5i0kb846c3ihe@4ax.com... > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:36:35 -0000, "Andy Lord" <no@thank.you> wrote: > > >> >Now for once admit that you were wrong. > >> > >>

On 5 Dec 2003 03:33:43 -0800, jack_wednesday@yahoo.co.uk (JackW) wrote: >I agree, if the phone is dreadfully unreliable then that would explain >the problem with that part of his story; however, the defence haven't >tried to bring that up, and other