uk.legal

MM wrote: > > Won't be long before the police demand everybody's DNA must be stored. > Except that of police officers. They believe storing police officers' DNA would expose them to the danger of being fitted up. -- Mike

>> >5/ Every day for a few seconds rub all your fingers >> >on the coarsest glasspaper in random directions, >> I believe a less painful method is to rub fresh pineapple on them >> each day for an indeterminate time. The proteolytic action of >> br

"Ian Stirling" <root@mauve.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:442ae23f$0$70324$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net... > Emperor's New Widescreen <me@invalid.net> wrote: > > The laces on my trainers keep coming undone. > > Can I sue? > > Is it perh

"Mabon Dane" <mdane@h2009.com> wrote in message news:1143664803.661017.204240@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > If an individual wearing Reebok trainers trips over as a result of the > laces of his trainers becoming undone, and injures another indivi

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:37:22 +0100, "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >I appreciated it as I didn't want to have to register just to read an >article. I registered long ago and read the full article. The Barrister for AOL I

Alex Heney wrote: > On 29 Mar 2006 16:15:58 GMT, Cove <me@privacy.net> wrote: > >> "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in >> news:065b5eecc91692491dcac9c80ace5aee.111419@mygate.mailgate.org: >> >>> http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguard

"tim (in sweden)" <tim_in_sweden2005@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:490bocFmablgU1@individual.net... > > "Emperor's New Widescreen" <me@invalid.net> wrote in message > news:pGAWf.38346$u31.25746@newsfe2-win.ntli.net... > > The laces on my train

Mike Ross wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >> Alex Heney wrote: >>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" >>> <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >>>> No you w

On 29 Mar 2006 09:17:34 -0800, "Ken" <autosuggestion54@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > <snip> > >The interesting thing about this case, is why on earth the claimant >involved the ISPs, which reduced the chances of him winning his action >to almost zero,

On 29 Mar 2006 16:15:58 GMT, Cove <me@privacy.net> wrote: >"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in >news:065b5eecc91692491dcac9c80ace5aee.111419@mygate.mailgate.org: > >> http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1740150,00.htm

>How do we know that there are any 'mistaken' acquittals in rape cases??? >We do not, because we can never know for certain whether any jury verdict is >right or wrong. >This is just another authoritarian attempt to increase conviction rates.

"Mabon Dane" <mdane@h2009.com> wrote in message news:1143667913.922509.268240@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > > tim (in sweden) wrote: > > "Emperor's New Widescreen" <me@invalid.net> wrote in message > > news:pGAWf.38346$u31.25746@newsfe2-win.ntl

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:29:54 +0100, Mike <mike@kempston.net> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:38:12 GMT, "Steve Robinson" ><steve@colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> wrote: > >><who me@privacy.net> wrote in message >>news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:17:50 +0100, "Andy Pandy" <spam8times@wonderful.spam.invalid> wrote: > >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:itcl225coqbha3j2od1bi0nv1p7nk6gvkg@4ax.com... >> For the purposes of mileage claims, what this mean

Mike wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:46:31 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >> Mike wrote: >> >>> On a point of information, the Net is *not* firewalled by BT, if by >>> that it's meant that BT transparently proxy al

On the 29 Mar 2006 14:51:43 -0800, mightyhugh@yahoo.co.uk wrote: >My old washing machine packed it in last week divorce her.

>The call centre operator was insistent that it says on their >website that the old appliance must be completely disconnected first, >but I can't find any mention of it there, I did a quick search and the first page was as follows. Free deli

"Emperor's New Widescreen" <me@invalid.net> wrote in message news:pGAWf.38346$u31.25746@newsfe2-win.ntli.net... > The laces on my trainers keep coming undone. > Can I sue? Why, does the man from Reebok not do them up properly each time? tim

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:32:24 +0100, "Adrian Boliston" <adrian@boliston.co.uk> wrote: >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:itcl225coqbha3j2od1bi0nv1p7nk6gvkg@4ax.com... > >> Yes, this is the case. >> >> Companies have always bee

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:50:21 +0100, "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >> I think you will find that all UK internet connections will go >> through BT at some point. > >True unless it is an LLU ISP, it will in fact have to at som

Alan Holmes wrote: > > Years ago, local authorities had the power to compulsory purchase land, > and > buildings for development purposes. > > Are they still allowed to do this? > > And, if they are, why don't local authorities use this to force

<tum4tummy@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1143536333.189617.250800@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > Hi! I have been experiencing bad water pressure and it's effecting the > shower facilities. My landlord got the water company to came in to fix > t

Mike wrote: > That's a fair point. But I'm still at a loss to understand how a VAT > receipt for petrol is any evidence at all that a car was used for the > business journey. The receipt could have been for petrol purchased > for private use, so i

"greb" <aff@fsdh.com> wrote in message news:501m22toaup2103vvho87bpd8dnfoh64tm@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:31:25 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >>> >>You have not produced a single piece of evidence suggest

"Mike Ross" <mike@corestore.org> wrote in message news:oebm22paugpjdn5v5ljm04es0s65a16jvd@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >>Alex Heney wrote: >>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31

"Mike" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message news:75rl22l9b1mfkgt9rc7i61brbakdvhj9co@news.kempston.net... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:38:12 GMT, "Steve Robinson" > <steve@colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> wrote: > >><who me@privacy.net> wrote in message >>n

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:46:31 +0100, "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >Mike wrote: > >> On a point of information, the Net is *not* firewalled by BT, if by >> that it's meant that BT transparently proxy all outbound Web >> conn

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:31:25 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >> >You have not produced a single piece of evidence suggesting how many >Paedophilic pornsites are on the www. >> >All you do is rubbish a BBC news article.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:44:28 +0100, PeteM <Otcbn@callnetuk.com> wrote: >Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> posted >> >>>And if so, can I claim a reduction of one day in my council tax as the >>>council would of saved a fortune in the days pay savings??

On 29 Mar 2006 19:25:04 GMT, "Alex" <no.spam@mail.com> wrote: >At 17:00:48 on 28/03/2006, spam@johnband.org delighted uk.legal by announcing: > >> macerata wrote: >> > Below is an email I've sent that covers what I am intending to write to >> > the

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:04:43 GMT, AlanG <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:35:52 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:53:55 GMT, AlanG <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:04:44 GMT, AlanG <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 28 Mar 2006 16:28:37 -0800, popy_jokey@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > >>AlanG wrote: >>> You're wasting your time. >>> Alex grovels to officialdom. >>> It's quite possible he would pay

"Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote in message news:442aff93$0$70327$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net... > Mike wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" >> <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >> >>> Alex

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:19:28 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:59:29 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>Most would not get the chance, because no responsible parent would >>allow 5-7 year old children

On 29 Mar 2006 18:36:33 GMT, "chippy" <chippy@wood.co.uk> wrote: >Alex Heney wrote: > >> > The school sports day takes place on a public playing field in the >> > school nearest me, I cannot obviously speak for other places. >> >> I did say that

Dan Holdsworth <dan1701usenet@ntlworld.com> wrote: > So, at best policing just acts a brake on drugs gang expansion; it > doesn't shut down the continual low level of drugs activity, as the > recent investigation of cocaine metabolites in sewage demon

From another place <a@b.invalid> wrote in message news:l5idnQvdMpwMZLfZRVnyrA@pipex.net... > Today's BBC news has a constable on it saying DNA evidence shows that > the probability of someone not being a rapist is one in a billion. > > Yesterday on

"brian bennett" <shpoym@hotmail.com> wrote: > "do drug dealers have morals when they sell to kids?" -- apparently > not. so why would you support the current system that allows such > activities to occur? licensed drug dealers who sell alcohol and >

Grant wrote: > "Mike" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message > news:7hul22pddur5ui4lu16cnu3qvqgv4e07rj@news.kempston.net... >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" >> <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >> >>> Alex Heney wrote: >>>>

> Emergency maintenance workers for the Mersey Tunnels apparently walked out > causing the closure of two of the busiest roads in the UK. There`s more info on the debt situation here: <http://www.parliament.the-stationery- office.co.uk/pa/ld20020

> Sack the lot of them, I say. The "85 rule" is not what is at issue for the council workers, despite how the government promote that as the reason. The government want to "remove" up to about 45% of the pension or early retirees - pensions the

Mike wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >> Alex Heney wrote: >>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" >>> <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >>> >>>> Alex Heney

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:34:48 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >I think you will find that all UK internet connections will go through BT at >some point. No, they don't! BT haven't had a monopoly on provision of teleco

In article <1143668768.323341.63010@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Turk182 <digitalradiouk@aol.com> writes >Well ........... Labour took us to war because they have testicles for a >brain, and now they are forcing this for the same reason. It's Poll

In article <MPG.1e9510a7e708e23b989990@news.individual.net>, Colin Wilson <void@btinternet.com> writes >The government want to "remove" up to about 45% of the pension or early >retirees - pensions they have already accrued and paid in to. > >Effecti

> Emergency maintenance workers for the Mersey Tunnels apparently walked out > causing the closure of two of the busiest roads in the UK. I would say this > route is essential and the unions should be ashamed of themselves for > letting this happen.

"Mike" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message news:7hul22pddur5ui4lu16cnu3qvqgv4e07rj@news.kempston.net... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >>Alex Heney wrote: >>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 1

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:09:37 +0200, "tim $in sweden$" <tim_in_sweden2005@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >"Mike" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message >news:75rl22l9b1mfkgt9rc7i61brbakdvhj9co@news.kempston.net... >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:38:12 GMT, "Steve Ro

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:vrsl22l5h66rlmdsmmc1st4ofombqftq2a@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:11:07 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >> >>"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:0tsl22hdips2m8sc5c12nvuasupb4jkbha@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >>Alex Heney wrote: >>> >>> But I have looked at e

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:10:38 +0100, "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >Alex Heney wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" >> <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >> >>> Alex Heney wrote: >>>> >>>> But I

"Mike" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message news:75rl22l9b1mfkgt9rc7i61brbakdvhj9co@news.kempston.net... > I know it's an EU ruling and we don't have a choice but it really does > seem very peverse. The normal reason for requiring a VAT receipt is

"Michael Swift" <mike.swift@yeton.co.uk> wrote in message news:8okn9JAGTvKEFwu5@ntlworld.com... > In article <ouAWf.44318$wl.39364@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, Steve > Robinson <steve@colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> writes >>Yes that's correct , up unti

> My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back at > a fixed rate per mile which he puts on an expense claim at the end of > the month. > He has now been told that he has to include "a receipt" for his petrol > with each claim oth

Alex Heney wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" > <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: > >> Alex Heney wrote: >>> >>> But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough >>> spam, that I am sure I would have

Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote in news:ni2m221rl44uglg5eslfdjd2cpjaoqq28u@4ax.com: > On 29 Mar 2006 16:15:58 GMT, Cove <me@privacy.net> wrote: > >>"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in >>news:065b5eecc91692491dcac9c80ace5aee.11

Grant wrote: > "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote in message > news:442ab5c9$0$6981$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... >> Alex Heney wrote: >>> >>> But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough >>> spam, t

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:31:41 +0100, "Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote: >Alex Heney wrote: >> >> But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough >> spam, that I am sure I would have noticed anything remotely >

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:11:07 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:7pbl229d3nrl8tgk13io49heqrblet1jvl@4ax.com... >> >>>> >>>Where do you get this information from? >>

Alex wrote: > At 00:15:07 on 29/03/2006, Scott delighted uk.legal by announcing: > > >>Cynic wrote: >> >>>On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:15:30 +0100, Scott <blackhole@nowhere.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>The media usually delights in reporting agg

"Tim S" <ts@dionic.net> wrote in message news:442afe0c$0$1175$5a6aecb4@news.aaisp.net.uk... > Mabon Dane wrote: > >> My vote will go to the party who does not support ID cards. >> Mabon Dane > > The Liberals claim they oppose ID cards on their w

Interesting question. If DNA is the only evidence needed to convict someone can anyone be fitted up for any crime going? Mabon Dane

Monkee wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if anyone can offer any advice - There is a fence on the > right side of our garden which has been standing for many years > (both myself and my neigbour have just moved into our properties) > My neighbour is claimin

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:38:07 GMT, Jasbird <Jasbird@houdini.com> wrote: > >Andrew Lansley, MP for South Cambridgeshire, and the shadow >health minister, disagrees. > >He said: "What I do think is right from the point of view of >drug users is that

AlanG wrote: > On 29 Mar 2006 10:06:12 -0800, "J Smith" <birdingworld@hotmail.co.uk> > wrote: > >> "No there's not >> The registration of disabled people was stopped when the disability >> discrimination act came into play. If it wasn't stopped I ha

I think there is a link between "loans" to Labour politican family members and the noted increase in runners using Reebok trainers in the London marathon. Have people also noticed who those using Nike or Puma brands always seem to "struggle" in the mar

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:11:27 GMT, "Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> wrote: > >"Phil Stovell" <phil@stovell.org.uk> wrote in message >news:pan.2006.03.29.13.59.37.630887@stovell.org.uk... >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 +0000, airbus wrote: >

Monkee <none@none.none> posted >Hi, > >I wonder if anyone can offer any advice - There is a fence on the right side >of our garden which has been standing for many years (both myself and my >neigbour have just moved into our properties) My neighbou

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:38:12 GMT, "Steve Robinson" <steve@colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> wrote: ><who me@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4ax.com... >> My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage

"Brave New Britain" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:adll22dfajvvmcag18rhst2tq44pkibsvl@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:13:21 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:32:55 +0100, " Grant" >><Grant@Mcl

"Darwin" <english_tourist@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:442a54a2$0$13221$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... > Hi, > > hope this is as easy one for someone , > > Trading standards got a warrant to search my house for breach of The Trade > marks act

In article <ouAWf.44318$wl.39364@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, Steve Robinson <steve@colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> writes >Yes that's correct , up until last year the vat was reclaimable without >a receipt on mileage allowance unfortunately the EU said i

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:06:38 GMT, "Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> wrote: > >"Derek Potter" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:qlkk22htf3lnlos0fsnvoe49karatggrcg@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:04:33 +0100, Alex Buell >> <alex.bue

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:11:27 GMT "Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> waved a wand and this message magically appeared: > > That's why I want heroin legally available to addicts. > > I want people prevented from becoming addicts. Ah! Then by y

Wear sandals instead, you will have no such problems.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:08:27 GMT, "Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> wrote: > ><inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message >news:1143638604.528787.182800@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... >> >> airbus wrote: >> >>> selling something that could kil

In some parts of Britain Tesco have bought land, sometimes to build a temporary store, using the excuse that the land will then be passed on, so the local authority can make use of it, perhaps as sites for other supermarkets. In Slough, the Co-op

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:11:27 GMT, "Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> wrote: >> That's why I want heroin legally available to addicts. > >I want people prevented from becoming addicts. I want a private income of £25,000,000/y but it ain't gonn

"Graham Murray" <newspost@gmurray.org.uk> wrote in message news:873bh15mvj.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk... > Richard Faulkner <richard@estate.demon.co.uk> writes: > >> Why not just withhold it and see what happens. > > Because owing the system of pa

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:13:21 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:32:55 +0100, " Grant" ><Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >>>>Pete Townsend would disagree! tracked via his Visa card. If it were not to >>>

At 13:28:55 on 28/03/2006, Sharky delighted uk.legal by announcing: > Adam Lipscombe wrote: > > Folks, > > > > More ebay grief - I swear his is the last time I am going to use it - far > > more trouble than its worth. > > > > Anyway.... > >

Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> posted > >>And if so, can I claim a reduction of one day in my council tax as the >>council would of saved a fortune in the days pay savings?? >> > >No. Why do you say this? -- PeteM *** Free account sponsored

"Alan Holmes" <alan.holmes@virgin.net> wrote in message news:pbzWf.6117$NN4.5845@newsfe7-win.ntli.net... > > "Joel" <joelx@usa.net> wrote in message > news:5irk22d0e5d4rhjhtipefrip4l7g1ip5jl@4ax.com... > > "airbus" <none@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >

Emperor's New Widescreen <me@invalid.net> wrote: > The laces on my trainers keep coming undone. > Can I sue? Is it perhaps not Reebok, but invisible MI5 operatives?

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 GMT, airbus presented this to alt.drugs.ecstasy: > > "Joel" <joelx@usa.net> wrote in message > news:5irk22d0e5d4rhjhtipefrip4l7g1ip5jl@4ax.com... > > "airbus" <none@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >>Id have given him longe

At 17:00:48 on 28/03/2006, spam@johnband.org delighted uk.legal by announcing: > macerata wrote: > > Below is an email I've sent that covers what I am intending to write to > > the European Commission about, since I believe the BBC may be in breach

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:itcl225coqbha3j2od1bi0nv1p7nk6gvkg@4ax.com... > For the purposes of mileage claims, what this means is that you must > provide VAT receipts which show a total amount of VAT paid on fuel > that is

>I seperated from my ex-partner in November 2000 and she has since been > living in the house which we bought together as tenants in common in > 1995. She is now living there with her three sons, the youngest two > being 17 years and 20 years, both sti

At 00:15:07 on 29/03/2006, Scott delighted uk.legal by announcing: > Cynic wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:15:30 +0100, Scott <blackhole@nowhere.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > The media usually delights in reporting aggravating factors that t

On 29 Mar 2006 10:06:12 -0800, "J Smith" <birdingworld@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >"No there's not >The registration of disabled people was stopped when the disability >discrimination act came into play. If it wasn't stopped I have had >civil servants l

The laces on my trainers keep coming undone. Can I sue?

J Smith wrote: > "Have you lost an account somewhere, now that you're using google to > troll with? " > > HeHe! Nope & why would I lose an account? > > Wanadoo have closed their newsgroup server down that's all. And I > don't intend paying for the

"Adrian Boliston" <adrian@boliston.co.uk> wrote in message news:48vr4pFm55mlU1@individual.net... > "Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:itcl225coqbha3j2od1bi0nv1p7nk6gvkg@4ax.com... > >> Yes, this is the case. >> >> Companies

MM <kylix_is@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:mqdl221r239qtj7nfkgjkt8vvrgqel0kdq@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:34:23 +0100, "Paul Nutteing" > <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote: > > >Storage of people's actual full DNA for further > >studies/u

"Adrian Boliston" <adrian@boliston.co.uk> wrote in message news:48vpscFlu7cbU1@individual.net... > <who me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4ax.com... > >> My mate uses his own car for business - he claims h

<who me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4ax.com... > My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back at > a fixed rate per mile which he puts on an expense claim at the end of > the month. >

Alex Heney wrote: > > The school sports day takes place on a public playing field in the > > school nearest me, I cannot obviously speak for other places. > > I did say that those would be an exception. > > > The fields are in veiw from a public

In article <8tednTQrsulbIbfZRVnyvw@pipex.net>, Fat Freddy's Cat <port_26@hotmail.com> writes > >So, all in all, if they do decide to scrap it then do it for new starts who >sign up to those particular terms and conditions, dont tamper with those on

Steve Robinson wrote: > > <popy_jokey@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:1143595847.394353.77080@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > Steve Robinson wrote: > > > You haou ave no claim against them , it always annoys me when > > > people with lon

"I.A.A.L" <I.A.A.L@hotmailNOSPAM.com> wrote in message news:88ydnbDMBMpgOLTZRVnyig@bt.com... >> Mind you, I don't mind so much if the judge has a clue. There is a >> well >> known district judge in London (whose name I cannot of course >> disclo

sean wrote: > On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:05:22 +0000, Cynic > <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > > >Yes, I can see how that could work. But I am not understanding > >something. How does the uploader of the vile material get his money > >from the

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:59:29 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote: >Most would not get the chance, because no responsible parent would >allow 5-7 year old children unsupervised access to the 'net. >But there are enough who would that there is

Hi, I wonder if anyone can offer any advice - There is a fence on the right side of our garden which has been standing for many years (both myself and my neigbour have just moved into our properties) My neighbour is claiming that 'my fence' is on

I.A.A.L wrote: > > "Peter" <peterwn@parazzdise.net.nz> wrote in message > news:4429fbab@clear.net.nz... >> I.A.A.L wrote: >> >>>> As a tenant, do >>>> I have a right to seek compensation from the landlord, because >>>> effectively, the landlord

In news:48vpscFlu7cbU1@individual.net, Adrian Boliston <adrian@boliston.co.uk> typed: > <who me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4ax.com... > >> My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:32:55 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >>>Pete Townsend would disagree! tracked via his Visa card. If it were not to >>>pay then what would it be for? >> >> I have said elsewhere that there may be *t

"Morlock" <temPorarily0utoforDer@coldmail.moc> wrote in message news:442ab5c9$0$6981$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... > Alex Heney wrote: >> >> But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough >> spam, that I am sure I wou

On 29 Mar 2006 03:35:37 -0800, "Webmanager_CritEst" <webmanager@critest.com> wrote: >The truth is the truth, whether we like it or not. I was merely >confirming (with a verifiable source) the claim that they are shut down >PDQ - I was successful i

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:7pbl229d3nrl8tgk13io49heqrblet1jvl@4ax.com... > >>> >>Where do you get this information from? > > My mind. > So its total fantasy then!

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:31:49 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >>>Have you got children? >> Yes, and I never had any problem with allowing them to run around in >> swimming costumes. Which are the sort of images we are ta

The Todal wrote: <snip> If police officers could not claim for a similar sort of problem over the Hillsborough stadium disaster, they would not have much chance here.

"Alex Panda" <alex1385NOSPAM@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:sGyWf.144904$zk4.125937@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > > The union view is that the changes should only apply to new joiners, say > from April 2006 - so they would know what th

Morlock wrote: > Alex Heney wrote: > > > > But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough > > spam, that I am sure I would have noticed anything remotely > > approaching that number of CP sites. > > No you wouldn't because th

On 29 Mar 2006 08:44:31 -0800, news@europa.demon.co.uk wrote: >Mike Ross wrote: >> Rubbish. Most free software makes determined use of copyright, to >> ensure that it stays free. Exemplar: the GPL. >> >> You seem to be confusing 'free' (as in sof

On 29 Mar 2006 08:36:29 -0800, news@europa.demon.co.uk wrote: <big snip> >That's why copyright has become less necessary, or even entirely >questionable, with other types of material first. One of the earliest >being computer software, where Free

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:32:06 GMT, "Alex Panda" <alex1385NOSPAM@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > >I can tell you, as an LGPS administrator. Are the government proposing to change this for police and prison officers too or is it just directly employe

A Compulsery Purchase of land is the market price of that land plus 30% bonus. There is no profit in the council interfering. Mabon Dane

On 29 Mar 2006 06:50:03 -0800, "J Smith" <birdingworld@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >Peter Crosland scribed: > > >There is no such thing as registered disabled anymore. > >Yes there is smart-arse! No there's not The registration of disabled people w

Hi, bit complex this but I'm sure you're up for the challenge! 1. I purchased a property via a UK agency called 'A&B' (name changed by me). 2. It turns out A&B is not a UK Limited company, but a trading name of a Spanish co. 3. The Spanish holding c

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:36:31 +0100, Graham Murray <newspost@gmurray.org.uk> wrote: >MM <kylix_is@yahoo.co.uk> writes: > >> Er, how would my writing a letter to you record YOUR responses on >> reading it? Sure, I can keep a copy of what *I* wrote, b

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:34:23 +0100, "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote: >Storage of people's actual full DNA for further >studies/useage, rather than storing a few abstracted numbers and >destroying the original samples, is very much t

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:10:51 +0100, "Adrian Boliston" <adrian@boliston.co.uk> wrote: ><who me@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:ge8l22tlgnd345cdf69e8bfetm9ip4ed25@4ax.com... > >> My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:itcl225coqbha3j2od1bi0nv1p7nk6gvkg@4ax.com... > Yes, this is the case. > > Companies have always been able to claim back the VAT element of > mileage claims... So if an employee claims 35p/mi

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:04:55 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:28:58 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>>It uses the same "logic" to show that images of terrorist incidents >>>increase the number of t

Alex Heney wrote: > > But I have looked at enough "normal" porn, and have received enough > spam, that I am sure I would have noticed anything remotely > approaching that number of CP sites. No you wouldn't because the Net is firewalled by BT and a

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:10:46 +0100, who me@privacy.net wrote: >My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back at >a fixed rate per mile which he puts on an expense claim at the end of >the month. > >He has now been told that he

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:17:19 +0100, scrambled egg <me@privacy.net> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:07:02 GMT, "PhilÅ" <iclgateway@hotmail.com> >wrote: > >>Am I understanding it that the staff lose a days pay?? >> >>And if so, can I claim a reducti

"Fat Freddy's Cat" <port_26@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:8tednTQrsulbIbfZRVnyvw@pipex.net... > > "Alex Panda" <alex1385NOSPAM@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message > news:sGyWf.144904$zk4.125937@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > >> >> The union

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:55:56 -0800, Mike Ross <mike@corestore.org> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:57:03 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> >wrote: > ><snip> > >>you can forget films such as James Bond or StarWars, and will have to >>make do wi

"Phil Stovell" <phil@stovell.org.uk> wrote in message news:pan.2006.03.29.13.59.37.630887@stovell.org.uk... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 +0000, airbus wrote: > >> selling something that could kill poeple ? do drug dealers have morals >> when t

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:38:22 +0100, Graham Murray <newspost@gmurray.org.uk> wrote: >Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> writes: > >> Morally, it is reasonable use. >> >> In the normal English usage of the word, it is reasonable use. >> >> But legally,

PhilÅ wrote: > "Darwin" <english_tourist@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:442a54a2$0$13221$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com... >> Hi, >> >> hope this is as easy one for someone , >> >> Trading standards got a warrant to search my house for breach of The

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:14:41 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >> Do you believe the same is true of images of terrorist atrocities? >> >Pornography on the internet is driven by economics. Some is. But I would be interes

"Alex Buell" <alex.buell@munted.org.uk> wrote in message news:20060329145118.506ae217.alex.buell@munted.org.uk... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 GMT "airbus" <none@hotmail.com> waved a > wand and this message magically appeared: > >> if I am high

"Joel" <joelx@usa.net> wrote in message news:5irk22d0e5d4rhjhtipefrip4l7g1ip5jl@4ax.com... > "airbus" <none@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>Id have given him longer, dealers should get capital punishment if only we >>had it! > > And people call the U.S.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:24:24 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message >news:vt2l229crfrtorrn9p5ll9nrb0ef0bj1vp@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:03 +0100, " Grant" >> <

<inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:1143638604.528787.182800@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... > > airbus wrote: > >> selling something that could kill poeple ? > >> You mean like cigarettes, alcohol and, if you are a yank, guns? > >> do

"Derek Potter" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:qlkk22htf3lnlos0fsnvoe49karatggrcg@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:04:33 +0100, Alex Buell > <alex.buell@munted.org.uk> wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:43:54 GMT Jasbird <Jasbird@houdini.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:28:58 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote: >>It uses the same "logic" to show that images of terrorist incidents >>increase the number of terrorist attacks. >Which I am quite certain is the case. >There would not be

On 28 Mar 2006 16:28:37 -0800, popy_jokey@yahoo.co.uk wrote: >AlanG wrote: >> You're wasting your time. >> Alex grovels to officialdom. >> It's quite possible he would pay to lick clean the shoes of a traffic >> warden. >> >> Well maybe not quite

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:35:52 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote: >On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:53:55 GMT, AlanG <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 22:33:57 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >>wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006

Michael Swift wrote: > In article <1143668768.323341.63010@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, > Turk182 <digitalradiouk@aol.com> writes > >Well ........... Labour took us to war because they have testicles for a > >brain, and now they are forcing this f

Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:51:09 GMT, marc43336@crumhorn.org (marc_CH) > wrote: >>> >Well Cynic, that's not a position I could endorse - but then that's the >>> >nature of discourse - you have your views, and I ha

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:37:38 +0100, Chris Bacon <chrispbacon@thai.com> wrote: >I've already tried to x-post this to u.l and u.l.m - no >joy. Hope 3 copies don't suddenly appear at once! Maybe you would have more success if you didn't use so many s

Reposted from a thread below: The abolition of the Rule of 85 would mean all benefits from post-2006 (probably Oct 2006) membership would only be payable from age 65, or from before then with an actuarial reduction. The abolition would not mean

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:22:06 +0100, scrambled egg wrote: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:43:54 GMT, Jasbird <Jasbird@houdini.com> wrote: > > <snip> >>"You come into the category of a low-level of commercial supply. I have >>decided to make your sentence

"scrambled egg" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:k59l22ltujtd7t4c1nki0s1md8jt74j9u7@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:07:02 GMT, "PhilÅ" <iclgateway@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>Am I understanding it that the staff lose a days pay?? >> >>An

http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1740150,00.html Part Quotes .... Not only has the court confirmed what ISPs had always believed - that in the right circumstances they could benefit from the statutory protection provided to them b

If the inland revenue has decided there is a benefit in kind on this car then your friend should have been contacted by the Inland Revenue and should have been sent a new tax code, clearly showing the tax benefit. Any money deducted from your frien

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:43:54 GMT, Jasbird <Jasbird@houdini.com> wrote: <snip> >"You come into the category of a low-level of commercial supply. >I have decided to make your sentence as low as I can." I agree with you this is outrageous - he should

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:41:26 +0100, "elyob" <newsprofile@gmail.com> wrote: > >"PhilÅ" <iclgateway@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:fNtWf.25373$Nh7.19990@newsfe4-win.ntli.net... >> Emergency maintenance workers for the Mersey Tunnels apparently

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:07:02 GMT, "PhilÅ" <iclgateway@hotmail.com> wrote: >Am I understanding it that the staff lose a days pay?? > >And if so, can I claim a reduction of one day in my council tax as the >council would of saved a fortune in the da

"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in news:065b5eecc91692491dcac9c80ace5aee.111419@mygate.mailgate.org: > http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1740150,00.html > Three weeks ago, three other ISPs, AOL, Tiscali and BT

>hate how they don't update the lottery numbers until much later than >the >draw ends. I play through the National Lottery website, yet I have to >check the numbers through a third party site. You'd think NL would be >the >first place to have them, sin

My mate uses his own car for business - he claims his mileage back at a fixed rate per mile which he puts on an expense claim at the end of the month. He has now been told that he has to include "a receipt" for his petrol with each claim otherwise t

On 27 Mar 2006 08:36:05 -0800, news@europa.demon.co.uk wrote: >Yes, of course - quite reasonable too. The way financing would work is >a bit different to what you're used to with copyright, and might seem a >bit strange at first - it would be much fl

"Daytona" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:i80l22ddphidrkso89goojr8iumgadkjpb@4ax.com... > "I.A.A.L" <I.A.A.L@hotmailNOSPAM.com> wrote: [snip] >>See section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. > > Why do you not think Section 604 of th

On 27 Mar 2006 04:02:08 -0800, news@europa.demon.co.uk wrote: >> So you would reintroduce a culture where a phenomenally wealthy >> minority sponsors the most fashionable artists or else they starve in >> a garret? >Isn't that what happens today u

>For example, jurors often find it hard to believe that a rape victim >would suffer no physical injury, or understand why battered wives >often return to their abusers, he said. Also, jurors sometimes find it >difficult to understand why a victim might

Richard Faulkner <richard@estate.demon.co.uk> writes: > Why not just withhold it and see what happens. Because owing the system of paying 10 installments per year, we have already paid the council tax for yesterday. So maybe people should write to

Dear Tim I would have thought, to stand in front of a crowd of people, whom you have deliberately called,swearing and cursing, telling them that "this **** has set up his own business, is stealing my clients and I am going to sue his **** and I am s

Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> writes: > Morally, it is reasonable use. > > In the normal English usage of the word, it is reasonable use. > > But legally, it isn't covered by the "fair use" exemptions. Not in English law, but in some jurisdiction

Be careful if you check your lottery numbers on Camelots official lottery website. I nearly threw away a winning ticket after checking the numbers on-line, when just by chance I noticed on a TV recap, that I had won =A310, even though the website show

MM <kylix_is@yahoo.co.uk> writes: > Er, how would my writing a letter to you record YOUR responses on > reading it? Sure, I can keep a copy of what *I* wrote, but a telephone > recording tracks BOTH sides of the conversation. Traditional correspon

On 28 Mar 2006 02:18:16 -0800, news@europa.demon.co.uk wrote: >Only then did I start to think about the economics of the digital age, >where it's possible to directly connect to everyone and the costs of >publication and distribution drop to effectiv

Alex Heney wrote: > On 29 Mar 2006 09:17:34 -0800, "Ken" <autosuggestion54@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > >The interesting thing about this case, is why on earth the claimant > >involved the ISPs, which reduced the chances of him

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:vt2l229crfrtorrn9p5ll9nrb0ef0bj1vp@4ax.com... > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:03 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >> >>"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message

I.A.A.L wrote: >> As a tenant, do >> I have a right to seek compensation from the landlord, because >> effectively, the landlord is letting out a flat with no water supply? > > Basically no, not unless the Landlord is in breach of Section 11 or so

.A.A.L wrote: > "Peter" <peterwn@parazzdise.net.nz> wrote in message > news:4429d161@clear.net.nz... >> I.A.A.L wrote: >> >>>> Interestingly I would probably heap more criticism on the original >>>> trial judge of MacLibel... >> I do agree he was

In article <j6ej22dd5pbihp4m1jhodlbn32nbkpt85o@4ax.com>, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> writes >On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:50:37 GMT, marc53612@crumhorn.org (marc_CH) >wrote: >>The idea that there are six year old nyphomaniacs is something best >>reser

>You really think so? If cinemas, TV stations and DVD manufacturers >were permitted to use films without paying the studio, do you suppose >there would be enough profit to be made to enable the sort of films >that are possible on multi-million pound b

In article <76697.2453820@crumhorn.org>, marc_CH <marc14645@crumhorn.org> writes >In article <u3ra2255edcsqptqcrkrqdf4au7nrku93m@4ax.com> cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk >wrote... > >> How do you suppose long term prisoners cope? > >Are you really that na

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:44:14 +0100, Richard Faulkner <richard@estate.demon.co.uk> wrote: <snip> > >And how effective would a strike be if it only affected things which >werent really necessary. > Much more so than if it affects really necessar

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:56:53 +0100, Phil Stovell <phil@stovell.org.uk> was popularly supposed to have said: > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:38:07 +0000, Jasbird wrote: > >> In an online poll, 69 per cent of News readers were in favour of the >> Governm

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:33:58 +0100, Full Name <email@ddress> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:11:06 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:46:13 +0100, Full Name <email@ddress> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:55:0

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 +0000, airbus wrote: > selling something that could kill poeple ? do drug dealers have morals > when they sell to kids ? Cigarettes and booze kill people. We have laws about selling them to kids, the sellers get fine

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:18:05 +0100, Brave New Britain <me@privacy.net> wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:16:32 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:11:36 +0100, Brave New Britain <me@privacy.net> >>wrote: >> >><sni

On 29 Mar 2006 03:44:14 -0800, "Webmanager_CritEst" <webmanager@critest.com> wrote: >Dear Alex, > >>Apart from the ones which are significantly more draconian. > >The point is, other than the USA (and some of its Western and >antipodean allies),

My old washing machine packed it in last week, and I looked on the internet for a replacement. Most of the sites I looked at were fairly similarly priced and offered free delivery, but charged around =A320 for removal of the old washer and installation

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 12:31:41 GMT "airbus" <none@hotmail.com> waved a wand and this message magically appeared: > if I am high and need more money, will you tolerate me breaking into your > house, or selling drugs to any kids you might have ? I'd

In article <442a8ed6$1@newsgate.x-privat.org>, Chris Bacon <chrispbacon@thai.com> writes >I've already tried to x-post this to u.l and u.l.m - no >joy. A cross post to u.l.moderated is emailed to the moderator's or their robot and is binned for b

Superintendant Chris Gregg, boss of the Major Homicide Enquiry squad in West Yorkshire police has framed John Humble with allegations of one in a billion DNA found and we only have his word for it. Allegations never presented in a court of law but to t

I've already tried to x-post this to u.l and u.l.m - no joy. Hope 3 copies don't suddenly appear at once! The children live at another place, with my wife. I still look after them a lot, and also pay a sum of money per month to her for their upkeep.

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:16:03 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message <snip> >>>> >>>It was taken from a BBC website, just one of many >>>> >>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/tec

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:00:53 +0100, Cynic <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:16:58 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >wrote: > >>>So how about the following: >>>Interest in videos of beheadings, terrorist incidents. >>>Marke

popy_jokey@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > The use of those words by Mr Hardwick of the IPCC was > probably less from simple laziness as from a desire not > to offend the Police Federation. He knows he will have > enough trouble if the CPS mistakenly believe t

"Miss Moneypenny" <jellybeans@ntlworld.com> wrote: >Wow, loads of very interesting comments. Mr Moneypenny went to see his >solicitor the other day. She has received a letter from his >ex-employers solicitor. Basically it says "you both have a case f

tum4tummy@gmail.com wrote: >Hi! I have been experiencing bad water pressure and it's effecting the >shower facilities. My landlord got the water company to came in to fix >the problem. Since, we have had no water supply at all. As a tenant, do >I ha

"I.A.A.L" <I.A.A.L@hotmailNOSPAM.com> wrote: ><tum4tummy@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1143536333.189617.250800@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com... >> Hi! I have been experiencing bad water pressure and it's effecting the >> shower facilities. My l

> "It would seem from previous posts that he was not the last one in. If > the > OP can prove disability discrimination then compensation does not have > any > limit (unlike unfair dismissal). " > > The poster did not say he was registered disabled

>Mabon Dane wrote: >> My vote will go to the party who does not support ID cards. >> Mabon Dane >The Liberals claim they oppose ID cards on their website. >One wonders why they don;t make more noise about it - might actually >get them some vo

Tony Holland wrote: > Tony Holland wrote: > > Singapore take on Australia (practise only in Singapore) today!, in > > Singapore. > > Singapore lost, Australia kicked butt.!!! On to Switzerland now, then Berlin , then Vienna

In the recent announcement described as improving the CICS system, Labour claimed the money would go to where it was most needed. Not so, according to a confidential internal memo, the available money has been slashed, and the test of who gets the cas

On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:11:06 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote: >On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:46:13 +0100, Full Name <email@ddress> wrote: > >>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:55:09 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> >>wrote: >> >>>I repeat. >> >>>Why

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:35uk22tsm71l4epj27lrca60ujhf3fi7ia@4ax.com... > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:52:17 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >>> There are *zero* web sites that are making money

tim (in sweden) wrote: > "Emperor's New Widescreen" <me@invalid.net> wrote in message > news:pGAWf.38346$u31.25746@newsfe2-win.ntli.net... > > The laces on my trainers keep coming undone. > > Can I sue? > > Why, does the man from Reebok not do the

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:kqtk22to49o14q9p47piqldclb45saplfi@4ax.com... > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:50:37 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >>>>> (1) How many child abuse (since you do not like

COMPARE THIS: Police in Williamson, Tennessee, pulled a 75year-old pensioner over, after he flashed his car headlights to warn oncoming motorists of a police speed trap. A judge overturned his conviction saying it was "free speech". WITH THIS: A 71

"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message news:2pfk22lbetukvuclsc9jurdaaa7p60l5pf@4ax.com... > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:35:46 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >> >>"Alex Heney" <me8@privacy.net> wrote in message

"Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:2otk225q08h4s0u13qjq3uishj93l3pfle@4ax.com... > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:46:55 +0100, " Grant" > <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: > >>>>Its called basic economics, you idiot if there wa

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:52:17 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >> There are *zero* web sites that are making money out of producing >> pornographic images of children. It is obviously impossible to prove >> that they do not

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:50:37 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >>>> (1) How many child abuse (since you do not like CP, as a term) websites >>>> are there on the WWW at present? >>>> >>>Estimated to be over 200 000. >> >>

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:46:55 +0100, " Grant" <Grant@Mcleod40.fsnet.co.ku.com> wrote: >>>Its called basic economics, you idiot if there was no demand there would >>>be >>>no child pornography on the internet. >> But would the amount of *abuse*

> Were you arrested at any time? > -- > Alex > > Piece by piece the penguins have taken my sanity > www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk > No

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:16:58 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net> wrote: >>So how about the following: >>Interest in videos of beheadings, terrorist incidents. >>Market for videos of beheadings, terrorist incidents >>Demand for BDSM videos of behead

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:04:06 GMT, marc41181@crumhorn.org (marc_CH) wrote: >> >> The idea that an 11 year old *cannot* consent is a legal fiction. >> >> And if she couldn't, then neither could he, since he was only 12 at >> >> the time. >> >You

Firstly a council may not have the power to take this action. Secondly a council will expend a large sum of resources and money to purchase land with the taxpayer gaining an empty plot of land and a huge council tax bill. Mabon Dane

In message <fNtWf.25373$Nh7.19990@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>, PhilÅ <iclgateway@hotmail.com> writes > >"mrcheerful ." <nbkm57@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:%EtWf.44067$wl.8452@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk... >> >> "PhilÅ" <iclgateway@hotmail.com> w