us.legal

Mosley Jones III wrote: > Does anyone have any evidence to show that Iraq destroyed all their WMD > and supplied proof of doing so. > > anything less would show that the Coalition of the willing is in the right > and Iraq in the wrong Some proo

Many people were misleading us telling us that the US was after Iraq's oil. Why haven't they found any stolen oil?

Paul Dietz has just been extradited to the USA. "Alex" <avdeelen.REMOF@wanadoo.nl> schreef in bericht news:... > I was watching this program yesterday, with outrage and astonishment. > The idea that a congressman, fueled with license from the 9/11

"Richard" <nearlynews2_email@email.com> wrote in message news:bf97gt$cdeq6$1@ID-150848.news.uni-berlin.de > Can any acedemic tell me if this is right: > > The ratio decidendi of Donaghue is basically that a manuacture of > products owes a duty of car

Does anyone have any evidence to show that Iraq destroyed all their WMD and supplied proof of doing so. anything less would show that the Coalition of the willing is in the right and Iraq in the wrong

"lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:s_5Sa.3111$vB3.25749560@news-text.cableinet.net... > > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote in message > news:3f18bb2e$2@funnel.arach.net.au... > > > > "lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com>

"Gregory Shearman" <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> wrote in message news:Ft0Qa.224$sI.16586@nasal.pacific.net.au... > On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 02:03:02 +0800, Mosley Jones III wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Provide the @$#*ing quote. > >> > > >> >http://mosley.arac

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:34:30 -0400, Trevor Zion Bauknight <trevzb@comcast.net> wrote: >In article <3f195a26$3@funnel.arach.net.au>, > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote: > >> Many people were misleading us telling us that the US was after

>Absolutely amazing - after years of research and countless experimnets >scientists the world over have been unable to overturn the law of >conservation of mass/energy. > >Now it seems that drug warriors have achieved what was previously >thought to

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 14:21:17 +0100, Dave J. <requiem@freeuk.com> wrote: >In MsgID<u65ihvcemd8rhk51ume19kb1nh3dtcahrl@4ax.com> inside of >uk.politics.drugs, 'Jasbird' wrote: > >>Absolutely amazing - after years of research and countless experimnets

"lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HNOPa.9203$yQ2.69412969@news-text.cableinet.net... > > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote in message > news:3f0e13d3@funnel.arach.net.au... > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Even thou

"Steel Golem" <thoughtless@plantthoughful.org> wrote in message news:wyAPa.6102$oN.258619@newsfeeds.bigpond.com... > > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote in message > news:3f0d4703@funnel.arach.net.au... > > > > "Steel Golem" <thoughtless

"Wotan" <wotan@valhalla.net> wrote in message news:3f0de15c@212.67.96.135... > > Steve <steve@nospam4me.org> wrote in message > news:vzcPa.4039$9f7.442022@news02.tsnz.net... > > Mosley Jones III allegedly said: > > > > >> > > >> Bush said on Marc

In MsgID<u65ihvcemd8rhk51ume19kb1nh3dtcahrl@4ax.com> inside of uk.politics.drugs, 'Jasbird' wrote: >Absolutely amazing - after years of research and countless experimnets >scientists the world over have been unable to overturn the law of >conservati

I was thinking that finding foresight of harm meant there was a duty of care, but finding lack of proximity you would ignore the duty and say no liability. I think thought the truth is that is that if you find forsight but insufficient proximity, y

The neighbour principle or test is really a one stage test, for duty of care, or even of proximity as it involves indiectly a kind of proximity test, because there will be some kind of proximity if there is foresight of harm. But, it's really a for

<jdewitte@wxs.nl> wrote in message news:bfb7ig$k15$1@reader10.wxs.nl... > Bundesgerichtshof ~ DEEP LINKING Commercial/Competitional not rejected.. ?! > [http://www.bundesgerichtshof.de] > --------------------------------------------------------------

Bundesgerichtshof ~ DEEP LINKING Commercial/Competitional not rejected.. ?! [http://www.bundesgerichtshof.de] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reactions ONLY!! > NEWSgroup "us.legal" Evt

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:00:42 -0400, Chris Williamson <cdwilli@erols.com> wrote: >"Bradley K. Sherman" wrote: > >> In article <3f192e7a$1@funnel.arach.net.au>, >> Mosley Jones III <me@info.gov.mars> wrote: >> >Does anyone have any evidence to show

"lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:PWVRa.2612$Yd6.21660911@news-text.cableinet.net... > > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote in message > news:3f18210e@funnel.arach.net.au... > > > > "lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wr

"Steve" <steve@nospam4me.org> wrote in message news:nAVRa.5679$9f7.675234@news02.tsnz.net... > Mosley Jones III allegedly said: > > > so why do most of the world try to immigrate to these countries that have > > this style of government? > > The

Absolutely amazing - after years of research and countless experimnets scientists the world over have been unable to overturn the law of conservation of mass/energy. Now it seems that drug warriors have achieved what was previously thought to be imp

<http://www.fox23news.com/news/regional/story.aspx?content_id=25DA8526-C4F6-4DC6-9627-978C8C48F816> Anti-drug group claims it's being bullied by MADD SYRACUSE, N.Y. (AP) - Mothers Against Drunk Driving has intentionally pursued a trademark infringe

James Hall allegedly said: > > "Steve" ... > >> ... > >> Real democracy these days is based on proportional representation - >> which promotes co-operation, negotiation and consensus. > > There is no such animal as REAL democracy and the be

"lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:i7MRa.2087$0y1.17140850@news-text.cableinet.net... > > "Mosley Jones III" <me@info.gov.mars> wrote in message > news:3f1746ee@funnel.arach.net.au... > > > > "lefty" <lefty90210@hotmail.com> wr