Legal Spring Logo

"Should I form an Incorporation or an LLC?"
Find out at LegalSpring.com
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Ford tells law-suers to jump in lake
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:06:17 -0400, "Daniel J. Stern" <dastern@engin.umich> wrote: > >Ford will no longer sell police cars to municipalities suing the company: > >http://www.detnews.com/2003/autosinsider/0307/19/autos-221387.htm Good for Ford.


Should I Report This?.....Am I Liable?
Good evening to all, I am a fairly new loss prevention rep with a grocery chain located in Northern california. Recently I was asked to sit in during an interview with one of our store managers. The person conducting the interview was my boss, the V


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON
"Tickle Mi" <ticklish@you.know.where> wrote in message news:<0EXZa.704194$3C2.16497972@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>... > "StaR" <StaR_x@kissmyass.com> wrote in message > news:k4ceiv4010dh422bqm0ds6g14qam8rgd8a@4ax.com... > > > Lo and behold another "raider


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
"Steven Douglas" <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote in message news:a2b35e99.0308111949.2259f3c7@posting.google.com... > If Jasbird ever desired to become a US citizen and vote here, I'd say > welcome and point him towards the Libertarian Party (they ne


Re: Ford tells law-suers to jump in lake
"edward ohare" <edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:3f382c92.3600992@news.alt.net... > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:06:17 -0400, "Daniel J. Stern" > <dastern@engin.umich> wrote: > > > > >Ford will no longer sell police cars to mu


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
"Robert E. Lewis" <rlewis@brazosport.cc.tx.us> wrote in message news:<ErNZa.1453$GW4.631403@newshog.newsread.com>... > > The leaders of the United States not only spell words differently from > the Iraqis, but us an entirely different alphabet; and ye


Re: Ford tells law-suers to jump in lake


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
On 11-08-2003 17:26, in article h8dfjvo5pdbuell7v5ni46o5pv83ccqulm@4ax.com, "Phil Stovell" <phil@stovell.org.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:22:24 GMT in alt.drugs.pot, Mitchell Holman > <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com> wrote: > >> FORT LAUDERDALE


MCI fighting back against AT&T
Despite new accusations of fraud and allegations of the mishandling of sensitive government traffic, MCI's settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was approved last week. Although the SEC settlement is a step in the right direc


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
Jasbird wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:36:22 -0400, Mot <motton@whim.bat> wrote: > > >In article <7n3cjvckerq3rudjr2bgdovu8ullk1j3s3@4ax.com>, > >jasbird#deletethis#@myrealbox.com says... > > > >> d) Conclusion > >> > >> Legalising current i


Re: More Lies and propaganda by from Nate and drug criminalisers
In article <3F377ECD.5080008@yahoo.com> Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> writes: >Jasbird wrote: >> I hope you burn for a suitable period in purgatory for your sins. >As will we all. I don't make a big deal about the Eternal >Lake of Fire ma


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:47:51 -0500 in alt.drugs.pot, "Richard" <anom@anom> wrote: >You are one @$#*ed up asshole. To determine who is the @$#*ed up arsehole, re-read your own post. -- Phil Stovell South Hampshire, UK


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:22:24 GMT in alt.drugs.pot, Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com> wrote: >FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA -- On November 20, 2002, Fort Lauderdale >stockbroker Irvin Rosenfeld will celebrate his 20th anniversary >as a medica


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
Richard wrote: > > Do you really want to see our cops running around with legal marijuana and > being high while making an arrest? Let alone during driving? > Our school bus drivers legally smoking the stuff before work, being high, > cross a railro


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
In article <3rgejvkloanr1sj2mul89m1o6f38unn9if@4ax.com> jasbird AT myrealbox DOT com writes: >That isn't going to work. The State Liquor Stores in Utah sound like >an anomaly to this British person. I think it would be easier to >legalise heroin rath


Re: Incest practitioners on Springer
Dan Evans <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message news:<jel5jvgisc3ogl8jnutt8f449olileg2p0@4ax.com>... > On 07 Aug 2003 16:32:26 GMT, janatrude@aol.com (Janatrude) wrote: > > >People often go on the Jerry Springer show to admit they live in adult inc


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
DarkMatter wrote: > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:47:51 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> Gave us: > > >>That's only marijuana. > > > That's right. > > >>There are other drugs which do a lot worse in a >>shorter time frame. > > > No #@($, di


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
"»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message news:DVGZa.725124$Vi5.16621573@news1.calgary.shaw.ca... > > > -- > http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ > "Roger R." <jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:zqEZa.378$X91.2


Re: Calif. governor succession law ??


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
Steven Douglas <dsteven@flashmail.com> wrote... > > >Jasbird wrote:>> > > > > > > > a) Current costs of illegal drugs in USA (source NIDA) > > I get nervous when someone who starts a thread by spelling the word > "legalizing" as "legalising" ...


Re: More Lies and propaganda by from Nate and drug criminalisers
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 06:32:29 -0500, Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote: : conspiracy to distribute is not a drug dealing crime - it is a thought crime. I find it significant that you neglect to criticise such vicious sentences for peop


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% ofcurrent cost.
On 11-08-2003 08:23, in article p4dejvk4228ktd90tfla5gu8u1iqja3dvd@4ax.com, "zzz" <zzz@zzz.zzz> wrote: > Okay, but up until very recently, Utah did have a pornography czar. > Yes, they have some extremists in utah. > I forgot you went to BYU -


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:15:06 GMT in talk.politics.drugs, Jasbird <jasbird#deletethis#@myrealbox.com> wrote: >Nope - I'd be happy if the USA (and UK) would just stop trying to >determine everyone else's drug policy. In my opinion Tony Blair's got h


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
On 10 Aug 2003 20:02:26 -0700 in talk.politics.drugs, dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) wrote: >I'll bet Jasbird has never even watched the Rodney King Show. He's >probably never even heard of that great TV entertainer, the one and >only Rodne


Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
<http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/6503307.htm> Posted on Sun, Aug. 10, 2003 Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws ANNE GEARAN | Associated Press SAN FRANCISCO - California and other states that want to make mar


More Lies and propaganda by from Nate and drug criminalisers
A typical lie from drug criminalisers is that no one gets sent to prison from possession of drugs. The fact is that there are far more people being sent to prison for drug possession than for drug trafficking. I hope you burn for a suitable period i


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
"»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message news:<g%BZa.696720$3C2.16339956@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>... > -- > http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ > "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bd48ddf5.0308100447.7


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
Jasbird wrote:>> > <http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/6503307.htm> > Posted on Sun, Aug. 10, 2003 > Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws Jasbird, why do you make readers believe you are a US citizen? Ok. Perhap


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:47:51 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> >Jasbird wrote:>> > > > <http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_news/6503307.htm> > > > Posted on Sun, Aug. 10, 2003 > > > Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws > >Jas


Re: Bush Lawyer Blasts State Marijuana Laws
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 13:22:24 GMT, Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoemail@comcast.com> Gave us: > Remember even the Reagan administration >thought marijuana could be medicinal, and >actually SUPPLIED it to patients? > Yes. It was grown in Biloxi,


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:04:35 -0700, "Steve Harris" <sbharris@ix.RETICULATEDOBJECTcom.com> wrote: >Alcohol is available in every corner gas station in places >like AZ and CA. > >A better model for control of hard drugs would be to make >them availa


Re: Legalising illegal drugs will decrease cost to only 33% of current cost.
On 10 Aug 2003 20:02:26 -0700, dsteven@flashmail.com (Steven Douglas) wrote: >Jasbird <jasbird#nospam#@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:<5hucjvoa0503luulalq11978221u1m3ib8@4ax.com>... >> On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:40:35 -0500, "Richard" <anom@anom> w


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
-- http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ "Roger R." <jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:zqEZa.378$X91.293033090@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com... > > "»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message > news:g%BZa.696720$3C2.


Re: More Lies and propaganda by from Nate and drug criminalisers
Jasbird wrote: > A typical lie from drug criminalisers is that no one gets sent to > prison from possession of drugs. The fact is that there are far more > people being sent to prison for drug possession than for drug > trafficking. That IS a lie t


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
-- http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ "XCobraJock" <X-Cobra@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:p4FZa.182$JB1.22151382@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > > "Roger R." <jayraynospam21@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:uDEZa.379$Fu1.294341785@newssvr12.n


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
"»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message news:h%BZa.692414$ro6.14385705@news2.calgary.shaw.ca... > > > > Your position remains incoherent: Either people have property rights or they > don't.... and if they have propert


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
"»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message news:g%BZa.696720$3C2.16339956@news3.calgary.shaw.ca... > > > -- > Constitutional documents are intended as a means of enshrining *basic > fundamental rights*, and are NOT a gra


Re: RFD: create us.talk.constitution
RTO Trainer wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:19:11 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas > <hkt69@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 22:02:49 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> > >wrote, in us.config: > > > > > >>Daryl Hunt wrote: > >>> >


Re: The OFFICE of PERSON (was office of the person)
-- http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bd48ddf5.0308100454.62d28ae6@posting.google.com... > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > Q 6) You can spare us the haughty professor act, Tyler. > > >


Re: StaR has painted himself in a corner. . .
>> >> >> StaR). . .IN LAW, standing as a natural PERSON, you hold the RANK > >> >> >> of PERSON and are SUBJECTED to the SAME rights entitled and duties > >> >> >> imposed like ANY OTHER PERSON. You will UNDERstand these rights > >> >> >> ENTITLED as y


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004