us.legal

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 22:20:14 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:49:24 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>>>>Reven

http://endzerotolerance.com/ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PAZT/

In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:02:55 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:14:29 GMT, Stephen Jen

StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:<3n0okv0agp1o2amc5u8b1b85k0tdjio942@4ax.com>... > And now we will see why income tax is indeed needed in these corporate > units called CANADA and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. But before I > begin, I

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:49:24 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:57:09 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >> >>>In ca

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 14:02:55 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:14:29 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >> >>>In ca

In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:57:09 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >>> And now we will see why income tax is indeed

Nate isn't criminalising drug users; the law does that, after they have morally incriminated themselves. I'm not talking about someone who smokes a little pot here, but drug use as a lifestyle has been proven to be a very poor one. ~If you wanna

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:57:09 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> And now we will see why income tax is indeed needed in these corporate >> units called CANADA and the UNI

kenpangborn@aol.com (Kenpangborn) wrote in message news:<20030827120903.26721.00000027@mb-m26.aol.com>... > >From: sdtomso@aol.com (sdtomsx) > >Newsgroups: us.legal, soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, fl.general, > >milw.general > > >fl.general

While gathering your hypocritical quotes to use in my follow-ups to the threads, "Re: Harry it was ALL Ronny Raygun's fault remains the liar" in milw.general and "Re: THE BLACKOUT WAS CHUCKLE'S FAULT!" in alt.true-crime, I ran across your statement, "d

> > > > > > You are absolutely correct that a person can withdraw himself from > > > > > > government ... that is called expatriation. HOWEVER, there is a > > > > > > procedure for doing so ... and that procedure invariably involves > > > > > > leavi

>From: sdtomso@aol.com (sdtomsx) >Newsgroups: us.legal, soc.men, alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, fl.general, >milw.general >fl.general, milw.general >Date: 27 Aug 2003 08:33:23 -0700 >Organization: http://groups.google.com/ >Lines: 13 >Message-ID:

In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:14:29 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>In can.taxes StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> >>> Stephen, when will you APOLOGIZE for LYING t

In can.politics StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote: > And now we will see why income tax is indeed needed in these corporate > units called CANADA and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. But before I > begin, I would like to ask you a simple question. Are "i

n 26 Aug 2003 23:33:57 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >> >> >> >> >The United States Federal Government is a corporate entity or society >> >> >> >> >which makes it a person. A monarch is, "a single or sole ruler of a >> >> >>

n 26 Aug 2003 23:44:01 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >StaR <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:<u6rnkv4n110a53pb4efjqafgkdv5bnsmiq@4ax.com>... >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 22:14:29 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.ho

"Paul" <jottings@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<oIY2b.16236$8i2.7528@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>... > "Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > news:c31fa7b1.0308262224.37af0b4@posting.google.com... > > "Paul" <jot

"Christopher Green" <cj.green@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:c31fa7b1.0308262224.37af0b4@posting.google.com... > "Paul" <jottings@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<d6V2b.16094$8i2.8888@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>... > [snip] > >

I sent you an email but it was returned to me so I'll copy it here: Thank you for your kind words. I'm feeling a bit better over this whole thing now. I think sleeping on it helped. I'm still pretty worried and have quite a few questions, but I do

"»»Tylêr Dûrdên««" <tyler_durdre@revolution2^3.otr> wrote in message news:6AQ2b.41914$la.668034@news1.calgary.shaw.ca... > > > -- > http://www.bcrevolution.ca/ > "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > It would seem that

And now we will see why income tax is indeed needed in these corporate units called CANADA and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. But before I begin, I would like to ask you a simple question. Are "income tax" and "revenue" commercial terms? Anyone? StaR

"StaR" <star_law2003@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:a0jnkv8sraja6sfk0a1evmop4qeup0lln6@4ax.com... > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:56:44 GMT, "Interstate RoGue Socialist" > <Interstate....RoGue...Socialist@.Caneedea..gov.cls> wrote: > > > > >"StaR" <star