|
|
In can.politics Tickle Mi <ticklish@you.know.where> wrote:
> What you seem to be implying is that prior to the passage of the 5th
> amendment, it was commonplace (and lawful, and morally acceptable) for
> police to beat confessions out of people.
>
|
|
|
"Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bd48ddf5.0309050543.149a8cb1@posting.google.com...
> Q 11) The fact is I am correct. Those charters of rights are why
> the cops didn't beat a confession out of Eldon, Elmo.
>
> Elm
|
|
|
gordonb.l6jo2@sneaky.lerctr.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote in message news:<bjalso$ro5@library1.airnews.net>...
> >> >For crying out loud... You really are having difficulty. If you claim that
> >> >authority to steal peoples property comes via "consent of
|
|
|
>> >For crying out loud... You really are having difficulty. If you claim that
>> >authority to steal peoples property comes via "consent of the governed", you
>> >better have a damn good argument for how anyones lack of consent is
>> >discounted, when
|
|
|
"Tickle Mi" <ticklish@you.know.where> wrote in message news:<ZM66b.909843$3C2.20868225@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>...
> "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:bd48ddf5.0309050543.149a8cb1@posting.google.com...
> > Q 11) The fact is
|
|
|
In us.legal, David Mitchell <kmitchell1@twmi.rr.com> wrote:
> I would really love to know my options here....
It depends entirely upon local law. In this state, the seller need not
disclose anything unless asked about it.
Did you ask whether t
|
|
|
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote
> >I choose my own course of action. Never.....EVER....vote for anyone who
IS
> >a lawyer.
> Which would have prevented you from voting for both Thomas Jefferson
> and Abraham Lincoln, among others.
Like Bi
|
|
|
Thread copied to uk.gov.agency.csa for the child support brainboxes in there
to assist with.
"John O" <audela@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f58443c$0$12640$afc38c87@news.easynet.co.uk...
>
> "js" <jstars@theamadeusgroup.co.uk> wrote in me
|
|
|
Not sure how she stands legally with regards to divorce laws and what she
may now be able to claim, but would have thought a good solicitor could hold
a good objection to any claim she may make....
>There remains liability for child support, >which c
|
|
|
heres the situation-
Approx 2 years ago I bought a house in Redford, Michigan. I have
had lots of sewer problems since living here, several trips from
roto-rooter and the local plumber to clear the line of roots, Now I have
been told by
|
|
|
austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<bd48ddf5.0309050546.6f73f3b2@posting.google.com>...
> gordonb.l5i87@sneaky.lerctr.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote in message news:<bj8t6j$qsp@library1.airnews.net>...
> > >For crying out loud... Y
|
|
|
"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.p2dch@sneaky.lerctr.org> wrote
> Governments (legitimate or otherwise, the distinction is pointless)
> receive their authority from GUNS.
They receive their authority from the voting public (at least in
democratically ele
|
|
|
"js" <jstars@theamadeusgroup.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f48d481$0$97345$45beb828@newscene.com...
> Question:
>
> Wife (American national) abandons matrimonial home in the UK. Disappears
to
> the USA with child. Husband (American, permanently
|
|
|
gordonb.l5i87@sneaky.lerctr.org (Gordon Burditt) wrote in message news:<bj8t6j$qsp@library1.airnews.net>...
> >For crying out loud... You really are having difficulty. If you claim that
> >authority to steal peoples property comes via "consent of the go
|
|
|
Q 11) The fact is I am correct. Those charters of rights are why
the cops didn't beat a confession out of Eldon, Elmo.
Elmo Boardman) The fact is, you ignorant @$#*head, that various
'charters of rights' can be (and have been) completely igno
|
|
|
>For crying out loud... You really are having difficulty. If you claim that
>authority to steal peoples property comes via "consent of the governed", you
>better have a damn good argument for how anyones lack of consent is
>discounted, when consent cle
|
|
|
--
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/
"Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bd48ddf5.0309011326.1cefb351@posting.google.com...
> > Q 11) The fact is I am correct. Those charters of rights are why the
cops didn't beat a conf
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 07:15:05 -0400, E. Barry Bruyea <blue@sky.org>
wrote:
>On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 20:47:28 -0400, Valentine Michael Smith
><nothanks@spammer.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:58:30 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
>><jenuths@horace.homacjen.a
|
|
