Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Would you use us.talk.constitution? (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution_
edward ohare wrote: > > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:36:37 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > > > > >Request for Discussion (RFD) > >unmoderated group us.talk.constitution > We've had a lot of discussion during the RFDs about Charters and such


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Igor Godenov wrote: > > In article <3F7B728C.962B82DD@gta.igs.net> , Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> > wrote: > > > > >Request for Discussion (RFD) > >unmoderated group us.talk.constitution > > (snip) > > For whatever it's worth, I cannot a


Re: => American Family Values: Dad gave Kids, 4 and 6 yrs old, Pot ...!
"=> Vox Populi ?" <vox@popu.li> wrote: >Dad gave kids pot, police say > >Mom called cops in case involving young children > >By Tillie Fong, Rocky Mountain News >October 2, 2003 > >A Denver man has been arrested on charges of smoking marijuana w


Re: DNA system may be thrown into chaos
"Anon Poster" <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message news:3f7c7e57.4071925@news.btinternet.com... > On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:54:49 +0100, "Paul Nutteing" > <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote: > > >Police have interviewed the 22-year-old rape victim and told


Re: Question: moral / legal - car issue
"Mr. X" <greenbaboon1@cox.net> wrote in message news:Kp3fb.11172$gi2.1288@fed1read01... > > "Bill Smith" <xfwsexyg6001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message > news:be3fb.392437$2x.131390@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > > > > > > Let's see. > > and


Re: Question: moral / legal - car issue
In us.legal Mr. X <greenbaboon1@cox.net> wrote: > I would like to know your thoughts on this. You sound like a very reasonable person. I think that you should go speak to the store manager, and see what he has to say. Impress him with your fra


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
In article <blg1bl$bn6lj$1@ID-203896.news.uni-berlin.de> , "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> wrote: > > > >I am against anything that has talk in it that is better suited for politics >or government. Using Talk will draw every fruitcake that's out t


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
In article <3F7B728C.962B82DD@gta.igs.net> , Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > >Request for Discussion (RFD) >unmoderated group us.talk.constitution (snip) For whatever it's worth, I cannot agree with this charter. For many years I was


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
> > On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:08:24 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas > <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > > >Note to Pulver: I'm going out now, and won't be back > >until after 3 pm Chicago time. Will respond to your RFD > >at that time. > > > >He


Re: DNA system may be thrown into chaos
A bit more clarification concerning what seems to be the first female false DNA match. Previously males Raymond Easton,Peter Hamkin and the Goettingen Prisoner From http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,7433016%255E2862,0 0.html


Re: Would you use us.talk.constitution? (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution_
edward ohare wrote: > On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:36:37 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > >> >> Request for Discussion (RFD) >> unmoderated group us.talk.constitution > We've had a lot of discussion during the RFDs about Charters and such, >


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
RTO Trainer wrote: > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 02 Oct 2003 05:50:31 > GMT, "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> exclaimed: > >> RTO Trainer wrote: >>> After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct >> 2003 2


Re: DNA system may be thrown into chaos
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:54:49 +0100, "Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote: >Police have interviewed the 22-year-old rape victim and told the coroner >they do not believe she was in any way involved in the disappearance of >Jaidyn, but can'


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:08:24 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: >2. We have no way of knowing whether Daryl was the >'only person in the us.* hierarchy that was ever cancelled >for spamming'. The Usenet spam cancelers cancel lo


Would you use us.talk.constitution? (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution_
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:36:37 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > >Request for Discussion (RFD) >unmoderated group us.talk.constitution We've had a lot of discussion during the RFDs about Charters and such, but very little on whether people


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"Igor Godenov" <izzy16@hotmale.spam.com> wrote in message news:uvqcncdEb4vtXuGiU-KYgA@provide.net... > In article <blg1bl$bn6lj$1@ID-203896.news.uni-berlin.de> , "Daryl Hunt" > <me@privacy.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > >I am against anything that


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"RTO Trainer" <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote in message news:jmsonvcvcmilhoif2idaqj1h0ajl7pk3qi@4ax.com... > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 2 Oct 2003 02:17:34 > -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > > > > >"ssnark@ba


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"edward ohare" <edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:3f7c74fa.6602644@news.alt.net... > On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:08:24 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas > <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > >2. We have no way of knowing whether Daryl wa


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"RTO Trainer" <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote in message news:v8sonvojs641fpb0nfgesqdgjhqo2nalr5@4ax.com... > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:44:31 > -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > > > > >"RTO Train


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"edward ohare" <edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID> wrote in message news:3f7c6fff.5327010@news.alt.net... > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:44:31 -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> > wrote: > > > >It's an opinion. Remember those? Those are what other


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:44:31 -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> wrote: >It's an opinion. Remember those? Those are what other people are allowed >to have. Yes, but whether people give it any weight depends on two things. One is the argume


Re: => American Family Values: Dad gave Kids, 4 and 6 yrs old, Pot ...!
BlackWater wrote: > "=> Vox Populi ?" <vox@popu.li> wrote: > > >>Dad gave kids pot, police say >> >>Mom called cops in case involving young children >> >>By Tillie Fong, Rocky Mountain News >>October 2, 2003 >> >>A Denver man has been arres


DNA system may be thrown into chaos
Not my subject heading From http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,7442645% 255E2862,00.html Quote DNA system may be thrown into chaos By KEITH MOOR 03oct03 SCORES of accused and convicted criminals may get their tria


Re: Then stop provoking him, you twat ... Re: Incestuous child rapist, paedophile ******
On 2 Oct 2003 11:20:15 -0500, Archibald <me@privacy.net> wrote: >My Big Bruvver Scorer wrote: > >> For an anonymous poster, Obi is surprisingly transparent. > >He has this habit of copying words and expressions and repeating them >back as if he is


Re: Question: moral / legal - car issue
"Bill Smith" <xfwsexyg6001@sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:be3fb.392437$2x.131390@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net... > > > > Let's see. and then went on to some snotty ass sarastic comments that were snipped and ignored because the original aut


Re: Would you use us.talk.constitution? (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution_
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 02 Oct 2003 18:55:46 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID (edward ohare) exclaimed: >On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 20:36:37 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > >> >>Request for Discussion (RFD) >


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
RTO Trainer wrote: > > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 2 Oct 2003 02:17:34 > -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > > > > >"ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message > >news:H0Peb.10865$RW4.2027


Re: Firm Tied to Bush Consults on Iraq
"David Martel" <marte005@hostingstorm.net> wrote in message news:ZTeeb.37758$pP6.25595@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net... > Despite all the writing about the > Bushes and the Kennedys being American "royal families", associates it is > expected in


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:46:59 GMT, "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote, in us.config: >Daryl Hunt wrote: >> "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> >>wrote in message >> >news:3vReb.12151$NX3.4764@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink


1.UNSCR_As LOW as possible > reasonable > practicable 2.(F)Actual_Overall
1.UNSCR_As LOW as possible > reasonable > practicable 2.(F)Actual_Overall ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reactions ONLY!! > NEWsgroup "us.legal" -------------------------------------------------


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 02 Oct 2003 14:08:24 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> exclaimed: >On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:46:59 GMT, "ssnark@bangserver.na" ><ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote, in us.config: > >>Daryl Hunt wro


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 2 Oct 2003 02:17:34 -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > >"ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message >news:H0Peb.10865$RW4.2027@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >>


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 02 Oct 2003 05:50:31 GMT, "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> exclaimed: >RTO Trainer wrote: >> After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct >2003 20:10:20 >> -0600, "Daryl Hunt"


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:44:31 -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > >"RTO Trainer" <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote in message >news:2t9nnvc0hlh106pbn2l335mlbt82eblhc1@4ax.com... >> After reviewing P


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Daryl Hunt wrote: > "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:3vReb.12151$NX3.4764@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.. .. >> Daryl Hunt wrote: >>> "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message >>> >>


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Daryl Hunt wrote: > "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:H0Peb.10865$RW4.2027@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net.. .. >> RTO Trainer wrote: >>> After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct >> 2003 20:10:20


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"ssnark@bangserver.na" wrote: > > Pulver wrote: > > Request for Discussion (RFD) > > unmoderated group us.talk.constitution > > > > > > This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to create > > a new newsgroup in the us.* hierarchy, > us.t


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
RTO Trainer wrote: > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct 2003 20:10:20 > -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed: > >> >> "Pulver" <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote in message >> news:3F7B728C.962B82DD@gta.igs.net... >>> >>> Re


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:3vReb.12151$NX3.4764@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Daryl Hunt wrote: > > "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in > message > > > news:H0Peb.10865$RW4.2027@n


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Pulver wrote: > Request for Discussion (RFD) > unmoderated group us.talk.constitution > > > This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to create > a new newsgroup in the us.* hierarchy, us.talk.constitution. > This is not a call for votes. New


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution
"ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:H0Peb.10865$RW4.2027@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > RTO Trainer wrote: > > After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Wed, 1 Oct > 2003 20:10:20 > > -0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me


Re: Justice beyond the looking glass
Peter Putz wrote: > > Michael Wanker QC wrote: > > > Also, get this: an unfit to plead hearing was ABANDONED. You'd think > > with so many psychiatrist involved it would be easy to nut off the > > insignificant little nobody in the dock, yet they


Re: Justice beyond the looking glass
Michael Wanker QC wrote: > Also, get this: an unfit to plead hearing was ABANDONED. You'd think > with so many psychiatrist involved it would be easy to nut off the > insignificant little nobody in the dock, yet they had to abandon the > hearing. Th


Re: Justice beyond the looking glass
A N Other wrote: > This case is unusual because something like fifteen forensic > psychiatrists became involved (maybe more). Where did you get the number fifteen from? The case files contain references to over THIRTY medical reports! (I know, I c


Re: Justice beyond the looking glass
Professor Plonker wrote: > The psychiatric opinions called at trial were hardly professional. Those > psychiatrists appear to have conspired to fabricate a medical history > that simply did not exist. Are you serious? That trial featured some of t


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004