|
|
Interesting thread and eagerly waiting for more input. So far, I'm
gathering the consensus is you want a bit of circulation at the bottom?
Until last year I've used the method of a couple of airstones slightly
below the surface, which has worked wit
|
|
|
"Anon Poster" <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message
news:3f80602d.9182814@news.btinternet.com...
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:25:23 +0100, "Paul Nutteing"
> <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote:
>
> >The FSI article 112 (2000) p151-161 mentioned before
>
|
|
|
<jdewitte@wxs.nl> wrote in message news:blpqf1$rap$1@reader10.wxs.nl...
> At/Within UN-SYRIA-STATE/Territory living Palestinians attacked by UN-ISRAEL-STATE(/GOV)
x..
::
L.S.,
ANX: UN-ISRAEL-STATE Why NOT (e)valuation/validation "Evidence(s)" >
|
|
|
Paul Nutteing <nutteing@quickfindit.com> averred
>
>"PeteM" <postmaster@bermuda.triangle> wrote in message
>news:dP0DCLAVWJe$EwmQ@arcadia.net...
>> Paul Nutteing <nutteing@quickfindit.com> averred
>> >
>> >You are ommitting one of the main factors.
|
|
|
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:31:25
-0400, Fry <dfry@airmobile.tx> exclaimed:
>In message <s4pqnvc0uphgdgdrs37ghtjntk5gf82qku@4ax.com> Geoff Berrow
><bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote:
>
>>I noticed that Message-ID: <
|
|
|
At/Within UN-SYRIA-STATE/Territory living Palestinians attacked by UN-ISRAEL-STATE(/GOV)
Some "NO SORRY"or"SORRY" for A/The/My Past Behaviours will be sufficient? < Global Model
Having Social cq. Economical Knowledge(s) > IURIDICAL Source(s) too!
-----
|
|
|
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:07:25 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID
(edward ohare) wrote, in us.config:
>On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:23:45 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas
><hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 13:56:33 -0400, Pulver
>><redl
|
|
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:25:23 +0100, "Paul Nutteing"
<nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote:
>The FSI article 112 (2000) p151-161 mentioned before
Is that article available online?
Can you tell from the article whether the "profiles" reported below
ha
|
|
|
Henrietta K Thomas wrote:
>
> On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:07:25 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID
> (edward ohare) wrote, in us.config:
>
> >On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:23:45 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas
> ><hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> >>On S
|
|
|
On 5 Oct 2003 02:16:45 GMT, gordonb.wt4sn@sneaky.lerctr.org (Gordon
Burditt) wrote:
>Some stupid questions about DNA (and I'm sure someone is going to
>call me "pig ignorant" for asking, and I admit not knowing a much
>about the subject). Please fo
|
|
|
"Fry" <dfry@airmobile.tx> wrote in message
news:gq6vnv8frhddk7mgblmfs6tk13ionhjqmv@news.alt.net...
> In message <s4pqnvc0uphgdgdrs37ghtjntk5gf82qku@4ax.com> Geoff Berrow
> <bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote:
>
> >I noticed that Message-ID: <3F7D2AF9.1
|
|
|
Noblesse Oblige! <-> What is/will/shall, should be the UNSCR_"CONVERSION"?!
on UN-IRAQ-STATE?!
Beyond: "P.M._1 + 2 + 3 + 4"
"FURTHER so > Convertibles ?"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------::
|
|
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 10:27:04 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>Anon Poster <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message
>news:3f7f2c85.57745267@news.btinternet.com...
>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>>> The reality is that what speci
|
|
|
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 22:23:45 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas
<hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 13:56:33 -0400, Pulver
><redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote, in us.config:
>>Newsgroups line:
>>us.talk.constitution Discussion of the US Constituti
|
|
|
In article <3F7F0981.3A986EA6@gta.igs.net> , Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net>
wrote:
>
>
>
>>Request for Discussion (RFD)
>>unmoderated group us.talk.constitution
(Snip)
Much better - no significant problewms that I see, or that can't be
correc
|
|
|
In article <3F7DBB48.F13C3BBF@gta.igs.net> , Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net>
wrote:
>The only part of 'religion' that will be on topic is
>the separation of church and state and synagogue and mosque.
Of course!
Add to that the 'under God' issue,
|
|
|
Gordon Burditt <gordonb.wt4sn@sneaky.lerctr.org>
wrote in message news:blnuud$jiu@library1.airnews.net...
> Some stupid questions about DNA (and I'm sure
> someone is going to call me "pig ignorant" for asking,
Bet no one does.
> and I admit
|
|
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 01:51:09 -0700, "Colleen & Chuck Williams"
<csquared@computerconnect.net> wrote:
>What can you expect from a society that put GW
>Bush in office?
About the same as one that sent Klintoon in twice...
|
|
|
A friend of mine is planning to travel the US. After
his Mom passed 6 months ago he decided he would
buy a van/rv and re-explore North America. He has
always been sort of a hobo, extensively traveling the US
hopping trains/hitch hiking when he was mu
|
|
|
In article <blnuud$jiu@library1.airnews.net>, Gordon Burditt
<gordonb.wt4sn@sneaky.lerctr.org> writes
<snip>
>
>6. Someone invents a "new" method of comparing a person's driver's
>license against a dossier using "loci" such as Middle Initial, Day
|
|
|
Anon Poster <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message
news:3f7f2c85.57745267@news.btinternet.com...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Anon Poster <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> Anon Poster <nobody@ybodo
|
|
|
"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.wt4sn@sneaky.lerctr.org> wrote in message
news:blnuud$jiu@library1.airnews.net...
> Some stupid questions about DNA (and I'm sure someone is going to
> call me "pig ignorant" for asking, and I admit not knowing a much
> abo
|
|
|
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Sat, 4 Oct 2003 16:32:17
-0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed:
>They have lost it all so they want to win one. Let's let them win this one
>is they will just move on.
>
Move on to what?
--
|
|
|
Some stupid questions about DNA (and I'm sure someone is going to
call me "pig ignorant" for asking, and I admit not knowing a much
about the subject). Please forgive me if I misuse terminology.
1. Given a single DNA sample and a database that summ
|
|
|
Boy, aint that the truth! What can you expect from a society that put GW
Bush in office? And prosecutes pain Dr.'s for doing their job?
The local authorities would've been happier if it was wine....
"Delta Nine" <d_nineNOSPAM@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrot
|
|
|
In message <s4pqnvc0uphgdgdrs37ghtjntk5gf82qku@4ax.com> Geoff Berrow
<bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote:
>I noticed that Message-ID: <3F7D2AF9.104D3DD9@gta.igs.net> from Pulver
>contained the following:
>
>>> OTOH, what is not excluded, is allowed.
|
|
