Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: FINAL RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Henrietta K Thomas wrote: (snipage occurs) > "As the framework for the functioning of the US government and > protector of the rights of all Americans, the US Constitution can be > an issue in many events." > > Would that make you happy?


Re: => Kobe Bryant's Babyface Makover - less menacing, less "black" ...!
____ On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:16:50 GMT \__/___ Dave Zero ran through the LI-\o-' streets of talk.rape | waving an axe and screaming: / \ >> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99470,00.html >> >> http://www.foxnews.com/images/104101


Re: What 4th Ammendment
On 9 Oct 2003 17:25:08 -0700, wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote: >I was arrested on 4/19/03 for resisting arrest because I requested a >search warrant from police who were storming into my home. They were >storming my home because someone made false


Re: Irish American Post: IRA Does Double-Talk on Terrorism By David Trimble
Whitewolf wrote: > And to whom did they apportion the blame? "The perpetrators of the > atrocities in Washington and New York may well have had their > origins in the political disaster area which is the Middle East. > But it is a disaster for which


Re: What StaR won't tell you. . .
n 10 Oct 2003 12:15:18 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<nqadovgj1eh4tiufkabsqsbjn6a6l2mg7r@4ax.com>... >> On 9 Oct 2003 23:06:09 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell)


RE Tax and Corporation Question
I want to get into two types of businesses for real estate. One which is buying cheap properties to rehab and then resell. I heard that an S-Corporation is the way to go for this because Taxes are less and corporations have the liability shield. Wha


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 07:22:53 +0100, Geoff Berrow <bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote, in us.config: >I noticed that Message-ID: <q12cov83jh8dlr6j7v84q74472ebqhsciu@4ax.com> >from Henrietta K Thomas contained the following: > >>>You really have no clue.


Re: Serious flaw with forensic DNA databases
I could not understand why I was not picking up sibling matches. The answer is a major error in my routine. Each child was the offspring of one parent and a random mate each time not 3 offspring of the same pair of parents. Ignore the previous versio


Re: FINAL RFD: create us.talk.constitution
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:48:30 GMT, redc1c4 <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote, in us.config: <...> >the Constitution is NOT the basis of the "rights' held by Americans. >it simply lists them, and the restrictions against the government >p


Can CPS be sued for harms while kid in custody?
A court in NC recently ruled that DSS, CPA must pay for brain damage to a child incarcerated in Foster Care who was harmed by abusive foster. California also carries insurance to protect against harms done to minors while in state custody. It appe


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<q12cov83jh8dlr6j7v84q74472ebqhsciu@4ax.com>... > On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:02:04 -0600, RTO Trainer > <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote, in us.config: > > >After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the


Re: FINAL RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Henrietta K Thomas wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:48:30 GMT, redc1c4 > <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote, > in us.config: > > <...> > > >the Constitution is NOT the basis of the "rights' held by Americans. > >it simply lists them,


Re: What StaR won't tell you. . .
n 9 Oct 2003 23:06:09 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<j28cov82e0f3cp5d4bifciiv1gr79i84r6@4ax.com>... >> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:18:28 GMT, StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote:


Re: What StaR won't tell you. . .
taR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<nqadovgj1eh4tiufkabsqsbjn6a6l2mg7r@4ax.com>... > On 9 Oct 2003 23:06:09 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) > wrote: > > >StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<j28cov82e0f3c


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
In us.config Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: > No one can say that unless he has walked in my shoes. No thanks. The stinky, squashed down insoles would be too much for me. You can inhabit your shoes forever. -- ....I'm an ai


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
In us.config EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > In us.config Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > > He is sulking like the little child he is. Yesterday he told me that utc > > had failed. ..... but if he gets something right ??? he goofed > H


Re: What 4th Ammendment
none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote in message news:<none-0910032230130001@192.168.2.4>... > In article <c30335e.0310091625.25f60def@posting.google.com>, > wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote: > > >I was arrested on 4/19/03 for resisting arrest because I req


Re: The insolence of Office; Hoisting them on their own Petards
Jon Beaver wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: >> Jon Beaver wrote: >>> It's about not making OUR government officials answerable privately to >>> YOU for their alleged "misconduct." >> Give me a good reason why they shouldn't be, Jon. > I'm just iden


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > > In us.config EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote: > > In us.config Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > > > > He is sulking like the little child he is. Yesterday he told me that utc > > > had failed. ..


Re: The insolence of Office; Hoisting them on their own Petards
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:02:36 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Jon Beaver wrote: >> It's about not >> making OUR government officials answerable privately to YOU for their >> alleged "misconduct." > > Give me a good reason why t


Re: Sue Corrupt Judges
"Daniel J. Lavigne" wrote: > Arthur L. Rubin wrote: > > > > Tarapia Tapioco wrote: > > > > > Sue Judges.. > > > > > > Judges must follow the Constitution. > > > > > > 28 USC 372 > > > Any person can sue any federal judge.. > > > > Nope. Any


Re: => Kobe Bryant to dump trophy wife... hang out wid da white #@&@^es ...!
torresdD wrote: > who cares? His psycho Trophy Wife ...? > > "Kingfish" <spam_trap_void@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:RrCgb.21$CL.11@news.randori.com... >> >> >>> >>>> PS: It's bad form to reply to your own sockpuppet, Stinkfish. >>> >


Re: The insolence of Office; Hoisting them on their own Petards
Ken Smith wrote: > Jon Beaver wrote: >> Ken Smith wrote: [...] >>> That is the issue, isn't it? If a government official is acting within >>> the scope of his authority and discretion, he isn't committing >>> "misconduct," is he? So then


SEC—
Former Enron official settles Accountant will assist with probe By DAVID IVANOVICH and BILL MURPHY Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle WASHINGTON -- The former chief accounting officer for Enron Wholesale Services has agreed to pay $500,00


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
I noticed that Message-ID: <q12cov83jh8dlr6j7v84q74472ebqhsciu@4ax.com> from Henrietta K Thomas contained the following: >>You really have no clue. > >No one can say that unless he has walked in my shoes. Do not criticise a person until you have


Re: Sue Corrupt Judges
"Paul" <taxman@negia.net> wrote in message news:1065742920.353167@alpha.negia.net... > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote > > Tarapia Tapioco wrote: > > > > Any person can sue any federal judge.. > > > Nope. Any person can FI


Re: FINAL RFD: create us.talk.constitution
Pulver wrote: > > redc1c4 wrote: > > > > Pulver wrote: > > > > (snipage occurs, fore and aft) > > > > > As the framework for the functioning of the US government > > >** and the basis for rights of Americans**, the US Constitution > > > can be


Re: What StaR won't tell you. . .
n Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:18:28 GMT, StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 8 Oct 2003 22:59:15 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) >wrote: > >>StaR, >> >>Please don't tell us that your argument is not exactly the same as >>Eldon Warman's


Re: What 4th Ammendment
In article <c30335e.0310091625.25f60def@posting.google.com>, wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote: >I was arrested on 4/19/03 for resisting arrest because I requested a >search warrant from police who were storming into my home. They were >storming my


Re: What StaR won't tell you. . .
n 8 Oct 2003 22:59:15 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >StaR, > >Please don't tell us that your argument is not exactly the same as >Eldon Warman's. > >On another thread you said: > >"Only those that CONSENT to the LIMITED L


Re: Serious flaw with forensic DNA databases
>>The way forward,next week ,will have to be more generations (but from >>preliminary study beyond 6 generations there is probably too much dilution. >>Or as origionally hypothetised placing these 'families' in a surrounding sea >>of >>families from w


Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised)
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:02:04 -0600, RTO Trainer <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote, in us.config: >After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 09 Oct 2003 19:54:55 >GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> exclaimed: <...> >>us.config is


Attorney Gladys Towles Root
I wrote a story about attorney Gladys Towles Root, a woman who became an extraordinarily successful lawyer at a time when female lawyers were in the low single digits that is up at the Crime Library. I'd be very interested to know what posters here th


Re: Person vs man; what's the difference? II
>Person vs man; what's the difference Squirmy? > > > >You may get Freddy and Jenuths to help you with this one if you wish. > > > >Q) One has to wonder why you continue to a question I have answered > >several times already. > > > >One has to won


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004