us.legal

http://www.triallawyersinc.com/ “Trial Lawyers, Inc.” behaves like the biggest of businesses, as it generates cash from traditional profit centers (like asbestos, tobacco and insurance), explores potential growth markets (like lead paint, mold and r

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:34:29 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes Jimmy <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote: >> So, Rayder, can you give us an example of an artificial person created by >> man's law? >> >> Ji

Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote: >Merlin wrote: Again, no one has defamed you. You are obviously ill, and need some help. A number of people have brought this problem to your attention, including numerous posters, some of who

According to psychologist, Dr. Ehrenfels, anyone can now give themselves the MMPI-2 and score it. Anyone can do this on their own. Thus, all MMPI results are suspect. Anyone could have practiced looking good or bad in any way they want on the MMPI .

StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ssrgov8f3vhj963hss9h8ombg986c7mq4e@4ax.com>... > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:34:29 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > > >In can.taxes Jimmy <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wr

In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 03:02:28 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> ---------- >>> "A person is such, not

In can.taxes Jimmy <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote: > So, Rayder, can you give us an example of an artificial person created by > man's law? > > Jimmy Business Corporations. Incorported societies. In Canada, municipalities. -- Best r

"Robert H. Risch" <rhrisch@optonline.net> wrote in message news:2i4hovoinrik2viokckau0272jph5vfpm8@4ax.com... > http://www.triallawyersaremeanies.com/ > Oh, Robert, this is most disturbing! Why, trial lawyers are ripping the very fabric of soci

In article <3F8849F1.C55710EC@gta.igs.net>, redlen@gta.igs.net says... > > > Tank Fixer wrote: > > > > In article <4vcbovs8tfnc1d6cds3vi5j0ejhv0bapff@4ax.com>, hkt79 > > @earthlink.net says... > > > On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:47:35 +0100, Geoff Berr

On 11 Oct 2003 11:24:46 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >Readers, > >Blackstone: "Natural persons are such as the God of nature formed us; >artificial are such as are created and devised by human laws for the >purposes of soc

In article <4vcbovs8tfnc1d6cds3vi5j0ejhv0bapff@4ax.com>, hkt79 @earthlink.net says... > On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:47:35 +0100, Geoff Berrow > <bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote, in us.config: > > <...> > > >It's a puzzle to me how, with such a large po

In article <bm4b0v$ikgjs$1@ID-203896.news.uni-berlin.de>, me@privacy.net says... > > When one small group is trolling merrily away and has a propensity to troll > their little kiesters off don't look for the average person to submit any > proposa

StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<hg6govos6gekuhcboktsl0q737q8ge1e14@4ax.com>... > On 11 Oct 2003 07:31:36 -0700, b_rookard@yahoo.com (Brian Rookard) > wrote: > > >"Jimmy" <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<DpRh

In us.config Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: > Bellyaching about Management isn't very helpful, Snark. Is that you unbiased opinion? -- ....I'm an air-conditioned gypsy... - The Who

On 11 Oct 2003 07:31:36 -0700, b_rookard@yahoo.com (Brian Rookard) wrote: >"Jimmy" <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<DpRhb.25932$uz1.40355@news1.mts.net>... >> So what are "artificial persons" to quote you and Blackstone, Rayder?

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 11:25:15 GMT, "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> wrote, in us.config: >Geoff Berrow wrote: <...> >> more group proposals => more people involved in config => >> more support for proposals => more successful groups

So, Rayder, can you give us an example of an artificial person created by man's law? Jimmy -- End Oppression! Stop acting like sheep! Stand up for yourself! ICQ 179635133 "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:b

Good clarity on that. However, I'd like to hear Rayder's example of an "artificial person". Must be squirming to find an example that doesn't prove our point since he can reply to other posts but not this one. Jimmy -- End Oppression! Stop actin

2000 run gave 50pairs x 20 digit matches - all siblings. Probably generally valid for brothers or sisters. So for 2000 x 243 sets of 3 siblings then 50 pairs of matches. Of more interest is the non-sibling situation. For same 2000 run of 729 profiles

Tank Fixer wrote: > > In article <4vcbovs8tfnc1d6cds3vi5j0ejhv0bapff@4ax.com>, hkt79 > @earthlink.net says... > > On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:47:35 +0100, Geoff Berrow > > <bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote, in us.config: > > > > <...> > > > > >It's

n Sat, 11 Oct 2003 03:02:28 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> ---------- >> "A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and >> duties are ascr

"ssnark@bangserver.na" wrote: > > redc1c4 wrote: > > Pulver wrote: > >> > >> redc1c4 wrote: > >>> > >>> Pulver wrote: > >>> > >>> (snipage occurs, fore and aft) > >>> > >>>> As the framework for the functioning of the US > government > >

eaders, StaR can't think. He tells us that because natural persons are bound by the rule of law they are a creation of law. Then by the use of a predictable logical fallacy StaR wrongly tells us that since natural persons are such an artificial cr

redc1c4 wrote: > Pulver wrote: >> >> redc1c4 wrote: >>> >>> Pulver wrote: >>> >>> (snipage occurs, fore and aft) >>> >>>> As the framework for the functioning of the US government >>>> ** and the basis for rights of Americans**, the US Constit

Geoff Berrow wrote: > I noticed that Message-ID: <3f855fe8.566935@news.alt.net> from edward > ohare contained the following: > >>>> What do you think, Geoff? >>> >>> I think it's the least of your worries with this proposal. :-) >> >> That's a

Readers, Blackstone: "Natural persons are such as the God of nature formed us; artificial are such as are created and devised by human laws for the purposes of society and government, which are called corporations or bodies of politic." - Blackston

> >Steohen) Actually, it doesn't say that at all. Indeed, there is nothing > > which suggests that anyone can step out of society. > StaR)Well you've certainly stated your position. Let me tell you something > mr. lawyer, I AM NOT YOUR FUCKING P

"Jimmy" <jimmy_for_freedom@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<DpRhb.25932$uz1.40355@news1.mts.net>... > So what are "artificial persons" to quote you and Blackstone, Rayder? Can > you give an example? > Well, I can tell you who ARE NOT artificial

Henrietta K Thomas wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:48:37 GMT, redc1c4 <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> > wrote, in us.config: > > >Henrietta K Thomas wrote: > > > >(snipage occurs) > > > >> "As the framework for the functioning of the US gov

So what are "artificial persons" to quote you and Blackstone, Rayder? Can you give an example? Jimmy -- End Oppression! Stop acting like sheep! Stand up for yourself! ICQ 179635133 "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in messa

In article <c30335e.0310101057.2eab6961@posting.google.com>, wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote: >none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote in message news:<none-0910032230130001@192.168.2.4>... >> In article <c30335e.0310091625.25f60def@posting.google.com>, >>

In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > > ---------- > "A person is such, not because he is human, but because rights and > duties are ascribed to him. The person is the legal subject or > substance of which the rights and duties are

On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 23:48:37 GMT, redc1c4 <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote, in us.config: >Henrietta K Thomas wrote: > >(snipage occurs) > >> "As the framework for the functioning of the US government and >> protector of the rights of all

On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 01:55:23 GMT, redc1c4 <redc1c4@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote: >Pulver wrote: > >(snipage occurs, fore and aft) > >> As the framework for the functioning of the US government >>** and the basis for rights of Americans**, the U

On 10 Oct 2003 15:21:13 -0700, bill.white@us.army.mil (RTO Trainer) wrote, in us.config: >Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<q12cov83jh8dlr6j7v84q74472ebqhsciu@4ax.com>... >> On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:02:04 -0600, RTO Train

Jon Beaver wrote: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:02:36 GMT, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> > wrote: > >Jon Beaver wrote: > > >> It's about not > >> making OUR government officials answerable privately to YOU for their > >> alleged "misconduct." >

"Theodore A. Kaldis" wrote: > Ken Smith wrote: > > Jon Beaver wrote: > >> Ken Smith wrote: > > [...] > > >>> That is the issue, isn't it? If a government official is acting within > >>> the scope of his authority and discretion, he isn't commit

"Steve Walker" <spam-trap@beeb.net> wrote in news:bm7511$29e$1@news7.svr.pol.co.uk: > Whitewolf wrote: > >> And to whom did they apportion the blame? "The perpetrators of the >> atrocities in Washington and New York may well have had their >> or