us.legal

"half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bmk7r1$nh7tc$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > "Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:bmk73t$nrspn$1@ID-210010.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > > "half_pint" <esboe

<quaker_lawyer@comcast.net> wrote in message news:o2grovclgjr9gq9h13rqckq2ebcapsh0kf@4ax.com... > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:37:59 +0100, "half_pint" > <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> Quit your job. You're not entitled to it. > >> > >Tha

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:08 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: >Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote: > > >> As I said, attaching a digital certificate in order to establish proof of >> identity will not be construed as abuse. >>

In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:30:30 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >>> All subjects of the law are PERSONS. When the word "person" is applied >>> to a man, he is called a "na

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:37:59 +0100, "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Quit your job. You're not entitled to it. >> >Thats constructive dismissal. And more than your silly trolling deserves.

good point -- regards half_pint DON'T BUY FROM POWERHOUSE THE SCUM ARE REFUSING TO HONOUR THEIR PRODUCT GUARANTEES. BUSH THE MANUFACTURERS WON'T COUGH UP EITHER. "Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message news:UWhjb.12787$fK4

"Hywel Jenkins" <hyweljenkins@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MPG.19f7bb444c8303ad98975e@news.individual.net... > In article <bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>, > esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com says... > > I work in a pub where a lot of p

"Cynic" <cynic@none.none> wrote in message news:f834c7f539e6e4b3bf701c02e92dea96@news.teranews.com... > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:04:10 +0100, "half_pint" > <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: > > >I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol,

In article <bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>, esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com says... > I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that > people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means > that I am inhaling th

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:28:33 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >------=_NextPart_000_0191_01C39278.976C3DD0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:48:18 +0100, "Bob Regis" <bob_regis@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >Bob Brenchley. wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:09:57 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" >> <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: >> >>> This is a multi-part message in MIME form

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:28:26 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: > >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message >news:ajeoov8lat1r30lh9qbj49gv7f1jaskr6k@4ax.com... >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:09:57 +0100, "

> I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that > people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means > that I am inhaling their alcohol. > Alcohol is a poison and I don't see why I should be forced to breath > in a pois

"Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:bmk73t$nrspn$1@ID-210010.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > I work in a pub where a

"half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that > people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means > tha

I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means that I am inhaling their alcohol. Alcohol is a poison and I don't see why I should be forced to breath in a poison in the

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:04:10 +0100, "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: >I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that >people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means >that I am inhaling their alcohol

Saudi Arabia holds American citizens in white slavery http://www.omdurman.org/whitslav.html

On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:30:30 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:36:50 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >> >>>In can.

In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:36:50 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>The word taxpayer in the ITA includes both co

Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote: > As I said, attaching a digital certificate in order to establish proof of > identity will not be construed as abuse. > This time, for your benefit only (and assuming you could not see what it > was) I have omitted it

Bob Brenchley. wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:09:57 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" > <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: > >> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. >> >> ------=_NextPart_000_0138_01C3926D.9CC3E400 >> Content-Type: text/plain; >>

> Abuse Report Filed. > > -- > Bob. > > Your stupidity sets new standards - even for Usenet. Tit.

Q 2) StaR, I believe your manic post constitutes some sort of mentally ill break from reality. StaR) Well Mrs Rayder, I was simply demonstrating that a man's person, that is, the legal subject, the term "natural person", is a fictitious legal entity

n article <c30335e.0310141509.5f74ae74@posting.google.com>, wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote: >none@nowhere.com (Larry) wrote in message news:<none-1410030056270001@192.168.2.4>... >> >> The difference is that you're looking at it from the man's p

-- End Oppression! Stop acting like sheep! Stand up for yourself! ICQ 179635133 "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bd48ddf5.0310150141.4fe3cd9c@posting.google.com... > StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in me

On 14 Oct 2003 17:47:20 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >> >> >> So, Rayder, can you give us an example of an artificial person created by >> >> >> man's law? >> >> >> >> >> >> Jimmy >> >> > >> >> >Business Corporations. In

n Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:36:50 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>>The word taxpayer in the ITA includes both corporations and individuals. >> >> You mean who or what the

eaders, Eldon and StaR tell us that the ability of the law to create artificial persons (a point which has never been questioned) somehow means that natural persons are also artificial. ". . [a] .'natural person' describes a man who has been chang

StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<tgfpov8s7o77t2avffsqi1oopl98a85f5e@4ax.com>... > On 14 Oct 2003 17:47:20 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) > wrote: > > >> >> >> So, Rayder, can you give us an example of an artificial

http://www.stanley2002.org/releases/release100203.htm Stanley was "convicted" in what has all the appearance of kangaroo court proceedings in Denver and Thornton before the March 18, 2003 effective date of SB-25 (but NOT before the enactment of the

"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:ajeoov8lat1r30lh9qbj49gv7f1jaskr6k@4ax.com... > On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:09:57 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" > <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: > > >This is a multi-part message in MIM