Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Right to Bear Arms
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message news:b88uovgkmvlllquau7m735gjvfgop1o24r@4ax.com... > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo > <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote: > > >It doesn't say "guns", as many people would have you beli


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:55:46 +0100, "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: >POWERHOUSE DIDN'T HONOUR MY PRODUCT GUARANTEES WHEN >THEY WENT BUST. Companies that go bust are not in any position to do so. >NEW POWERHOUSE WOULD NOT COVER


Re: Right to Bear Arms
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote: >It doesn't say "guns", as many people would have you believe. It says >"arms". > >Arms includes tanks, grenades, missles, etc. Good point. The present gun-cont


Re: Right to Bear Arms
A fantasy of gun huggers. No such "right". "Tarapia Tapioco" <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote in message news:3ade8fb7f177afc79640e1ab97c886df@firenze.linux.it... > Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment! > >


Re: Withholding Tax Question??
taR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<cnbuov4lceo4loee2s4c6kv2g5kfuh1vif@4ax.com>... > On 16 Oct 2003 15:11:50 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) > wrote: > > >StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<8q7tov4sujk5


Re: Withholding Tax Question??


Re: What 4th Ammendment
Daniel, thanks, and I belive you are right. A very experienced appeals attorney I met with today told me the same thing. Unfortunately, my trial attorney may not have included this law in the jury instructions, becuase nobody thought the jury would co


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:bmmjuk$ollhv$1@ID-210010.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bmmhpr$okf3o$6@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.n


Re: Right to Bear Arms
"Sugapablo" <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote in message news:votnlf7lstbfce@corp.supernews.com... > > > At one point you could buy one (albiet very expensive) that wasn't able to > > fire rounds, but in all other aspects was working. I think it wa


Re: What 4th Amendment
hanks for your response, Larry. I offer additional comments below to your words of wisdom and your suggestions. However, today I spoke with an attorney that has over 25 years of appeals experience. He hasn't done a misdemeanor since he was a Publi


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bmmhpr$okf3o$6@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > "Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message > news:bmkj75$nth6b$1@ID-210010.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > > > Can I make the people w


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
-- --------------- regards half_pint POWERHOUSE DIDN'T HONOUR MY PRODUCT GUARANTEES WHEN THEY WENT BUST. NEW POWERHOUSE WOULD NOT COVER MY GUARANTEE EITHER. legally they didn't *have* too. BUSH THE MANUFACTURERS MADE ME PAY £15 POSTAGE FOR A


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"Ivor Problem" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:bmkj75$nth6b$1@ID-210010.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bmk7r1$nh7tc$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > > > > > "Ivor Problem" <me


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"Andy Jeffries" <law_news@andyjeffries.remove.co.uk> wrote in message news:pan.2003.10.16.11.24.34.818209@andyjeffries.remove.co.uk... > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:38:15 +0100, half_pint wrote: > > Its not a Troll that arguement has been used to ban smokin


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
<quaker_lawyer@comcast.net> wrote in message news:hmhsov496jfuf4fj4kmv2h61ji676la66l@4ax.com... > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:38:15 +0100, "half_pint" > <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > ><quaker_lawyer@comcast.net> wrote in message > >news:o


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"Blackthorn" <nenagh_uk@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:bmlvil$nn3if$1@ID-202064.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message > news:UWhjb.12787$fK4.6015@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com... > > > > "half_pint" <esb


Right to Bear Arms
Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment! Right to Bear Arms Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/StanRite/petition.html Pass it on. http://www.stanley2002.org/ o Why do "we the people" need to petition for rig


Re: Right to Bear Arms
Sugapablo <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote in news:votd5qeb03ika7@corp.supernews.com: > > Technically, if you wish to uphold the second amendment, and not > infringe upon the rights of the people to keep and bear arms, I should > be allowed to par


Re: Withholding Tax Question??
n Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:03:21 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:30:30 GMT, Stephen Jenuth >> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > >>>> All subj


Re: Withholding Tax Question??
taR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<8q7tov4sujk56eu3amt0kaos4l0r0uguhr@4ax.com>... > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:03:21 GMT, Stephen Jenuth > <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: > > >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > >


Re: I wish to respond to this attempted smear (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised))
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:30 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: >On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:00:42 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID (edward >ohare) >wrote, in us.config: > >>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 03:04:52 GMT, Henrietta K Thom


Re: Right to Bear Arms
> At one point you could buy one (albiet very expensive) that wasn't able to > fire rounds, but in all other aspects was working. I think it was through > US Cavalry or some such nonsense. Not many of their subscribers had the > several million to


Re: I wish to respond to this attempted smear (was Re: 3rd RFD: create us.talk.constitution (revised))
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:00:42 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID (edward ohare) wrote, in us.config: >On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 03:04:52 GMT, Henrietta K Thomas ><hkt79@earthlink.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:57:34 GMT, Tank Fixer <paul.


Re: Right to Bear Arms
"Sugapablo" <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote > Technically, if you wish to uphold the second amendment, and not > infringe upon the rights of the people to keep and bear arms, I should > be allowed to park an Abrahms tank in my driveway. At one po


Re: Right to Bear Arms
Terry Austin wrote: > I got no problem with it. Just not on the front lawn up on blocks, right? :) -- [ Sugapablo ] [ http://www.sugapablo.com <--music ] [ http://www.sugapablo.net <--personal ] [ sugapablo@1


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message news:UWhjb.12787$fK4.6015@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com... > > "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de... > > I work in a pu


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:38:15 +0100, half_pint wrote: > Its not a Troll that arguement has been used to ban smoking in pubs > in many countries. The difference that you accepted a job that was explicitely in serving alcohol for consumption on the pre


Re: Electronic Legalities
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:50:22 GMT, despam.c.street@ntlworld.com (Chris Street) wrote: >Now if I were to >sign >this by writing in plain ascii text as noted below - how is that any >different from a short encoded section that holds a certificate?


Re: Electronic Legalities
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:45:57 GMT, AndrewR <andrew@uk.co.andrewr.REVERSEME> wrote: >Bob Brenchley. wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:08 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" >> <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote: >>>


Re: Right to Bear Arms
Tarapia Tapioco wrote: > Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment! > > Right to Bear Arms Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/StanRite/petition.html Hmmm. Arms? The second amendment reads "A well regulated militi


Request for Discussion (RFD) Creation of a Committee to run the "us.*" hierarchy
I believe that this discussion in us.config may be of interest to any and all who post to a us.* hierarchy newsgroup. Your participation, input and commentaries would be welcome. Request for Discussion (RFD) Creation of a Committee to run the "us.


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
"half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bmkb87$ntaks$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > good point > > -- > regards half_pint > > DON'T BUY FROM POWERHOUSE THE SCUM ARE REFUSING TO HONOUR THEIR > PRODUCT GUARANTEES. BUS


Re: Right to alcohol free bars.
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 23:38:15 +0100, "half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote: > ><quaker_lawyer@comcast.net> wrote in message >news:o2grovclgjr9gq9h13rqckq2ebcapsh0kf@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:37:59 +0100, "half_pint" >> <esboell


Re: Electronic Legalities
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:28:33 +0100, "Dirk Bruere at Neopax" <dirk@neopax.com> wrote: > >"Kevin Munro" <kevin_remove8839421@c3amulet.com> wrote in message >news:3f8c1888$0$65579$65c69314@mercury.nildram.net... >> I've never heard of electronic oaths


Re: Electronic Legalities
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:45:57 GMT, AndrewR <andrew@uk.co.andrewr.REVERSEME> wrote: >Bob Brenchley. wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:08 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" >> <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>


Re: Electronic Legalities
Bob Brenchley. wrote: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:23:08 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" > <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > > >>Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote: >> >> >> >>>As I said, attaching a digital certificate in order to establish proof of >>>iden


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004