|
|
Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
> Yep. And the jurisdiction is dictated by the nature of the tax.
> Asserting that the IRS has magical authority over EVERYTHING is absurd.
> The Constitution is clear on the jurisdiction with regard to the nature
> of th
|
|
|
"RTO Trainer" <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote in message
news:3fbtovommg5jrtsirue4h7hka0o2p9qbkj@4ax.com...
> After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:30
> GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> exclaimed:
>
> >On Tu
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:39:26 +0100, "half_pint"
<esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message
>news:m75uovs3824kq0040vgkr407b7ralt05o6@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:55:46 +0100, "hal
|
|
|
news.cis.dfn.de just added you.
They are pickier than most and they do not carry binaries.
"Pulver" <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote in message
news:3F9018B8.5F11B7FB@gta.igs.net...
>
>
> In the debate on the formation of utc, there were 935
> items
|
|
|
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Thu, 16 Oct 2003 13:41:30
GMT, Henrietta K Thomas <hkt79@earthlink.net> exclaimed:
>On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:00:42 GMT, edward_ohare@NOSPAMyahoo.com.INVALID (edward
>ohare)
>wrote, in us.config:
>
>>I w
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:30:26 -0400, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote:
>
>
>In the debate on the formation of utc, there were 935
>items by 24 posters.
>
>How many of the 24, particularly those who said they
>were eager to post, have requested
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:58:57 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
<comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>Whatever happened to inalienable rights?
Never exisred and probably never will.
Governments given time can and do take
away rights when it su
|
|
|
Thanks again for your excellent response.
My counsel was not a public defender.
Your mention of habeas corpus makes sense.
An appeals attorney mentioned this to me yesterday, and I did not
understand what he meant. Thanks for explaining this to m
|
|
|
"Ralph" <getyourjollies@netnutz.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dj40pvki0r494d6s6oq13cp1rgp43gv1q1@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 16:58:57 +0200 (CEST), Tarapia Tapioco
> <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote:
>
> >Whatever happened to inaliena
|
|
|
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:46:43 -0400, Theorem <> wrote:
>On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
><russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>
>>It doesn't say "guns", as many people would have you believe. It says
>>"arms".
>>
>>Arms includes tanks
|
|
|
"Roger R" <jayray29remove@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xSSjb.1056$t07.638@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
> news:UHFjb.12223$yz3.3084@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "Dan Evans
|
|
|
> The idea has a lot of merit half_pint, why don't you wait until you have
> half a dozen pissed up yobs in and ask them if they'd like to step outside
> cos you don't like their breath?
I wish he would.
|
|
|
"half_pint" <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bmk5o4$nec64$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>...
> I work in a pub where a lot of people drink alcohol, I find that
> people are breathing alcohol out on their breath and this means
> that
|
|
|
<Theorem> wrote in message
news:p4evov05klesbjc715l8mfe7i9rgkjrg14@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
> <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>
> >Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
> >> Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2
|
|
|
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:UHFjb.12223$yz3.3084@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message
> news:b88uovgkmvlllquau7m735gjvfgop1o24r@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:
|
|
|
awyers, Pronounced Ly'er! Part 2
Passed along by Billy-Joe Mauldin, Texas
Quote:
ATTORNEY'S LICENSE???
AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!!
IX. MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:
The small handful that are good must get on the right side and
|
|
|
awyers, Pronounced Ly'er!
Passed along by Billy-Joe Mauldin, Texas
Quote:
ATTORNEY'S LICENSE???
AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!!
I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any
state/State Schware v. Boa
|
|
|
understand your skepticism; I was shocked to learn that a PO would
lie so blatantly to cover his you-know-what, and put an innocent man,
not to mention his family, including two infant children, at risk. My
eyes are now wide open. I will again never
|
|
|
Theorem <> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
> <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>Arms includes tanks, grenades, missles, etc.
>
> Don't be stupid. There were no tanks, grenades or missiles when the
> Constit
|
|
|
"Roger R" <jayray29remove@hotmail.com> wrote
> Since you probably can't deliver it far enough away from yourself to
> survive, may we request that you test-fire the weapon in an isolated
> location?
>
> I know of an unused ranch (used only for phot
|
|
|
In the debate on the formation of utc, there were 935
items by 24 posters.
How many of the 24, particularly those who said they
were eager to post, have requested their ISP or
Newsserver to propagate the group?
It would be helpful if you fo
|
|
|
Sugapablo wrote:
> Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
> > Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment!
> >
> > Right to Bear Arms Petition
> > http://www.petitiononline.com/StanRite/petition.html
>
>
> Hmmm. Arms?
>
> The sec
|
|
|
"Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<k4Fjb.1519$vZ3.1385@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...
> A fantasy of gun huggers. No such "right".
>
>
There are at least two different meanings of the word "right" in such
a context. The first is a
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:58:10 GMT, Dan Evans <dan@evans-legal.com>
wrote:
>The present gun-control laws discriminate unfairly against those with
>poor eyesight, tremors, or other conditions that deprive them of their
>constitutional right to kill eff
|
|
|
You are right. There should have been a jury instruction. However,
you still might have grounds for appeal that you had "ineffective
assistance of counsel." The "counsel," by the way, was not a public
defender was it? If you are on probation, you m
|
|
|
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote
> The present gun-control laws discriminate unfairly against those with
> poor eyesight, tremors, or other conditions that deprive them of their
> constitutional right to kill effectively.
I believe in gun
|
|
|
Theorem <> wrote in message news:<p4evov05klesbjc715l8mfe7i9rgkjrg14@4ax.com>...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
> <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>
> >Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
> >> Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the
|
|
|
Wear short sleeve-shirts!
"Tarapia Tapioco" <comesefosse@ntani.firenze.linux.it> wrote in message
news:3ade8fb7f177afc79640e1ab97c886df@firenze.linux.it...
> Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment!
>
> Right to Bear Arms
|
|
|
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
<russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
>> Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment!
>>
>> Right to Bear Arms Petition http://www.petitiononline.com/StanRit
|
|
|
n article <c30335e.0310161727.6fad2a86@posting.google.com>,
wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote:
>Thanks for your response, Larry.
No problem, glad to help/discuss.
>I offer additional comments below to your words of wisdom and your
>suggestions.
|
|
|
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message
news:m75uovs3824kq0040vgkr407b7ralt05o6@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:55:46 +0100, "half_pint"
> <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >POWERHOUSE DIDN'T HONOUR MY PRODUCT G
|
|
|
n 16 Oct 2003 15:11:50 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell)
wrote:
>StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<8q7tov4sujk56eu3amt0kaos4l0r0uguhr@4ax.com>...
>> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:03:21 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
>> <jenuths@horace.h
|
|
