|
|
We have got off to a good start, but we need more of
you to request <us.talk.constitution> from your ISP or
newsserver. It is important to the success of the
hierarchy in general and the new newsgroup in
particular to get good propagation quickly and
|
|
|
not available on my ISP server...
|
|
|
"Paul A. Thomas" <taxman@negia.net> wrote in message
news:1066408117.149474@alpha.negia.net...
>
> "Roger R" <jayray29remove@hotmail.com> wrote
> > Since you probably can't deliver it far enough away from yourself to
> > survive, may we request tha
|
|
|
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message
news:1o30pv82bmk8857v9unorisf21augi7nvg@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:46:43 -0400, Theorem <> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
> ><russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>
|
|
|
"Don Freeman" <freeman.REMOVE@smrn.com> wrote in message
news:H7Ujb.8834$yF4.6694@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Roger R" <jayray29remove@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xSSjb.1056$t07.638@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "Don Freema
|
|
|
In message <3f915008$0$554$45beb828@newscene.com>, J Spears wrote:
> It's a bit of an odd situation, and I will ultimately seek qualified legal
> opinion, but would like to gather commentary and advice from this news
> group.
>
> Chronological Sum
|
|
|
CIVIL RIGHTS SUIT
South Florida surgeon: L.A. cops ruined my life
The trial of a Miramar man who says he was the victim
of racial profiling and brutal manhandling by the Los
Angeles Police Department begins Monday morning.
By SARA OLKON
solk
|
|
|
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 00:41:06 +0100, "half_pint"
<esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >Our peripheral vision evolved to stop us getting eaten by animals, not
>watch
>> >TV.
>>
>> Our vision evolved for many different reasons, TV is at long last
|
|
|
Make sure you timely file your notice of appeal. If the notice is one
day late, you can't appeal. You can "worry" about grounds for appeal
later. If I were appealing my case, I would get declarations from the
jury members, and file a post-trial moti
|
|
|
After reviewing Paragraph 5 pf the OPORD of Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:37:08
-0600, "Daryl Hunt" <me@privacy.net> exclaimed:
>
>"RTO Trainer" <bill.whtie@us.army.mil> wrote in message
>news:3fbtovommg5jrtsirue4h7hka0o2p9qbkj@4ax.com...
>> After reviewing
|
|
|
It's a bit of an odd situation, and I will ultimately seek qualified legal
opinion, but would like to gather commentary and advice from this news
group.
Chronological Summary:
American wife leaves the UK, refuses to provide forwarding address or
|
|
|
In article <c30335e.0310171250.1cb9469a@posting.google.com>,
wowfee2@yahoo.com (Wowfee) wrote:
>I understand your skepticism; I was shocked to learn that a PO would
>lie so blatantly to cover his you-know-what, and put an innocent man,
>not to menti
|
|
|
Jim Austin wrote:
> Sugapablo wrote:
>
>
>>Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
>>
>>>Please sign, it only takes a minute -- Support the 2nd. Amendment!
>>>
>>>Right to Bear Arms Petition
>>>http://www.petitiononline.com/StanRite/petition.html
>>
>>
|
|
|
Lynn K. Circle wrote:
> "Roger" <rogerfx@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<k4Fjb.1519$vZ3.1385@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...
>
>>A fantasy of gun huggers. No such "right".
>>
>>
>
> There are at least two different meanings of the word "ri
|
|
|
Don Freeman wrote:
>>>>>It doesn't say "guns", as many people would have you believe.
>>>>>It says "arms".
>>>>>
>>>>>Arms includes tanks, grenades, missles, etc.
>>>>
>>>>Good point.
>>>>
>>>>The present gun-control laws discriminate un
|
|
|
his is a woman from my pazt (parents against zero tolerance group)
and she's living a nightmare
From: "Diane" <artmis105@aol.com>
Date: Wed Oct 15, 2003 9:34 pm
Subject: Zero Tolerance Appeal
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PAZT/message/4509
|
|
|
fsds18t wrote:
> There were also no automatic or semi- automatic guns then either. So
> all you can have then is a front loading 200 year old POS rifle that
> explodes in your face half the time :)
>
> The 2nd amendment says the militia can be
|
|
|
Roger R wrote:
>>>So what shall it be? Guns and a second amendment gutted and
>>>meaningless, a mockery of its intentions, or the second amendment upheld
>>>and the people begin arming themselves with more substantial weaponry?
> But was th
|
|
|
Dan Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:08:02 -0400, Sugapablo
> <russREMOVE@sugapablo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>It doesn't say "guns", as many people would have you believe. It says
>>"arms".
>>
>>Arms includes tanks, grenades, missles, etc.
>
|
|
|
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message
news:ihg0pv0ohgn9pc7qr42treauek3941fon3@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 01:39:26 +0100, "half_pint"
> <esboella.nospammm@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.public
|
|
