Legal Spring Logo

"Reviewing every type of legal service"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:23:30 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: >Stephen Jenuth wrote: > >> In can.taxes Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > Well -- actually, the "United States of America are..."


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:04:09 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes Quantrell <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote: >> StaR, >> >> How is the United States different from General Motors? > >The United States can m


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:01:35 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: >> StaR wrote: > >>> A LAW DICTIONARY >>> >>> by John Bouvier >>> >>> ADAPTED TO THE CONSTI


Re: StaR still doesn't get it. . .
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:55:04 GMT, Stephen Jenuth <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote: >In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: >> ---------- >> A LAW DICTIONARY >> >> ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERIC


Re: Don't trust StaR. . . .
-- End Oppression! Get educated and so you can stop acting like sheep and stand up for yourself! ICQ 179635133 "Quantrell" <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:bd48ddf5.0310240034.7dd9277a@posting.google.com... > > >From a


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:20:55 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: >Diablo wrote: > > >> Answer this Raider: >> >> How is a MAN different from a PERSON? > >He's answered it. Several times. >> Yes he did. Under the law


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
In can.taxes Quantrell <austinrayder2003@yahoo.com> wrote: > StaR, > > How is the United States different from General Motors? The United States can make laws which bind people within the United States. General Motors has no such power. It ca


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
In can.taxes Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > StaR wrote: >> A LAW DICTIONARY >> >> by John Bouvier >> >> ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA >> AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION


Re: DNA in the Dock
Paul Nutteing <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message news:bnag64$v81nc$1@ID-197301.news.uni-berlin.de... > Not sufficient without extra independent corroboration - More of your pathological lying. > there are far too many false matches of


Re: StaR still doesn't get it. . .
In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote: > ---------- > A LAW DICTIONARY > > ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA > AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION > > by John Bouvier > > PERSON. This w


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
StaR wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:23:30 -0700, "Arthur L. Rubin" > <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > > >Stephen Jenuth wrote: > > > >> In can.taxes Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> > Well -- actually, the "


Re: DNA in the Dock
Anon Poster <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message news:3f987373.377045@news.btinternet.com... > THOUGHT you had got away with your career as a jewel > thief? Think again. Fragments of DNA left at a crime scene > can be analysed years later to free


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
Stephen Jenuth wrote: > In can.taxes Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > > > Well -- actually, the "United States of America are..." has no valid > > referent. I'd be willing to give you a chance to rephrase, except > > that it


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
Diablo wrote: > Answer this Raider: > > How is a MAN different from a PERSON? He's answered it. Several times.


Re: DNA in the Dock
> > Not sufficient without extra independent corroboration - > there are far too many false matches of separate people > with identical DNA profiles. > From Ireland ,recently, at least the Irish judiciary have some > sense regarding uncorroborated DN


Re: DNA in the Dock
"Anon Poster" <nobody@ybodon.not> wrote in message news:3f987373.377045@news.btinternet.com... > THOUGHT you had got away with your career as a jewel thief? Think > again. Fragments of DNA left at a crime scene can be analysed years > later to free


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
In article <bd48ddf5.0310230904.29f14c92@posting.google.com>, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: > StaR, > > How is the United States different from General Motors? > > Q Raider, You seem to enjoy asking YOUR questions over a


Re: A question for StaR. . . .
ustinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<bd48ddf5.0310230920.7141a0b4@posting.google.com>... > austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote in message news:<bd48ddf5.0310222354.fcb3b3b@posting.google.com>... > > banmilk@hotmail.com (


Re: Don't trust StaR. . . .
> >From another thread: > > > >StaR) All "governments" are CORPORATIONS. . . > > > >Arthur L. Rubin)What is your definition of "CORPORATION"? > > > >Q) StaR, how is the United States different from General Motors? > > > >StaR) [to Arthur] Why did


Re: StaR still doesn't get it. . .
> >Readers, > > > >The poor boy is telling us that corporations and nations are the same > >in all ways because they share a similarity. That begin that under the > >right conditions they both can be treated as corporations. > > While Quantrell des


Re: All "governments" are CORPORATIONS
taR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<qj9gpv8eskemf74v7ug8eeakc9nn30e033@4ax.com>... > On 23 Oct 2003 11:52:36 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) > wrote: > > >Readers, > > > >When asked how the United States is different f


Re: StaR still doesn't get it. . .
n 23 Oct 2003 13:57:09 -0700, austinrayder2003@yahoo.com (Quantrell) wrote: >Readers, > >The poor boy is telling us that corporations and nations are the same >in all ways because they share a similarity. That begin that under the >right condition


DNA in the Dock
THOUGHT you had got away with your career as a jewel thief? Think again. Fragments of DNA left at a crime scene can be analysed years later to free someone from a wrongful conviction or to identify a crook at large. But in the US, there is hope for


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004