|
|
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 11:22:09 -0500, Warren Oates <Warren@InHell.Com>
>In article <f53tpvo1cv1smalfdnm3gfq4ehpou64pfo@4ax.com>,
> a sole practitioner <unknown@conspiracy.com> wrote:
>
>:Everyone who entered was made a fool of if the bike that was sh
|
|
|
In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:10:20 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>>In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:55:04 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
|
|
|
In article <f53tpvo1cv1smalfdnm3gfq4ehpou64pfo@4ax.com>,
a sole practitioner <unknown@conspiracy.com> wrote:
:Everyone who entered was made a fool of if the bike that was shown was brand
:new.
:
:Never patronize that establishment again.
:
:Tel
|
|
|
Paul Nutteing wrote:
>
> Source
>
http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD%2FMGArticle%2FRT
> D_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031771779895&path=!news&s=1045855934842
>
> or shortform http://tinyurl.com/sncr
>
> Quote
> P
|
|
|
The "Human Mrs. S."-Case: Some info not being TV_given?
-------------------------------------------------------
Reactions ONLY!! > NEWsgroup"us.legal"
-------------------------------------------------------
~IUS/~LEX as to Place/Time/Circumstan
|
|
|
"Warren Oates" <Warren@InHell.Com> wrote
> Reminds me of some guy in the US, ran a contest advertising a "Toyota"
> as a prize. When he awarded it, it was a toy Yoda doll. He was sued. The
> customer won.
I think it was a raffle, not a giveaway. Wha
|
|
|
Source
http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD%2FMGArticle%2FRT
D_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031771779895&path=!news&s=1045855934842
or shortform http://tinyurl.com/sncr
Quote
Prosecutors request delay in trial of Rice
|
|
|
n Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:10:20 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
<jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote:
>In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:55:04 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
>> <jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote:
>
>>>> The word
|
|
|
taR,
The fact remains you are an anonymous loser peddling already
discredited ideas to gullible detaxers who don't have the sense to
realize you are enjoying the benefits of "the corporation" at the same
time you tell them they should not.
You ar
|
|
|
In can.taxes StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's true Ron, they only care about having a BODY to put on the PERSON
> as defined in an ACT. Once they have the BODY, they can completely
> CONTROL AND ENSLAVE the BODY by mandating the rights ent
|
|
|
>(Brian Rookard) Oh for the love of god you moron ...
>
> Oh no, not another one of those....
>
> "The truth is the concept of natural persons is God's law revealed
> to us in common law and you just lied to us." - Austin Rayder
>
> >The United
|
|
|
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 20:23:22 GMT, Stephen Jenuth
<jenuths@horace.homacjen.ab.ca> wrote:
>In can.politics Ron <banmilk@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> thank you counsellor.
>>
>> Ron has nothing to do with the tax liabilities of the person RON.
>
>Only
|
|
|
On 27 Oct 2003 06:18:58 -0800, b_rookard@yahoo.com (Brian Rookard)
wrote:
>StaR <starweblaw@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<k8fjpvsa1uan3jd7id6p94lb5giaefc6rl@4ax.com>...
>
>
>Oh for the love of god you moron ...
Oh no, not another one of th
|
|
