Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:65017aa5.0311070035.1b36bcc5@posting.google.com... > "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<boe5ap$1d32kg$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > > "The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk>


Thanks
Got some good news for a change . . . I found an attorney to help Becky. He starts work Monday morning and hopefully she will be home before next weekend!!! Thanks to Terry Keddy and the folks at www.prepaidlegal.com/info/terrykeddy May God Bles


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Alexander Baron" <a_baron@abaron.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:mfHnyzANS1q$EwBD@abaron.demon.co.uk... > In article <1lvqb.174973$ox6.2428281@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis & > Mayra Rowell <mrowell@prepaidlegal.com> writes > >Actually, no, I


Re: What is the validity of posts requesting legal advice in this and related forums???
"Dan Evans" <dan@evans-legal.com> wrote in message news:uvnlqvspnrihkrq0bolv6b4mp4vgedktu8@4ax.com... > On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 15:27:09 GMT, "Curtis & Mayra Rowell" > <mrowell@prepaidlegal.com> wrote: > > >Repeatedly, I keep wondering, why would anyon


¯
November 07, 2003, 8:51 a.m. Fox¢s ACLU Lawyer Judge Andrew Napolitano. By Matthew J. Franck I like Fox News Channel. I think it's "fair and balanced," just as its slogan claims (certainly it is by comparison with the other news outlets


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:42:34 +0000, Bob Brenchley. <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:08:34 +0000, derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> >wrote: > >>That cinema films were made in 4:3 for half a century and TV followed >>sui


Can a City Ordinance Violate the 1st Amendment???
Augusta law violates free speech? ATLANTA (AP) ¯ Martha Burk's lawyer told a panel of federal judges Friday that an Augusta law used to govern protests at the Masters violates free speech rights. The city ordinance allows authorities to ran


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:65017aa5.0311070604.47d2d512@posting.google.com... > derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<4vsmqvs0go057i53m16t6mqqvfelc2feti@4ax.com>... > > On 6 Nov 2003 01:08:00 -0800, cqmman@


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 11:08:34 +0000, derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >That cinema films were made in 4:3 for half a century and TV followed >suit after doing research. I trained as a TV broadcast engineer in the >'70s and sat through lectures d


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 01:24:12 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> Humans have a wide-angle view on the world. That is a scientific FACT >> you cannot escape. >> -- >> Bob. >> >But no television set will ever make use of your full


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 00:43:17 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message >news:v4llqvc8i7ktk5qosl8p2bshge9gsem4c4@4ax.com... >> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 18:52:15 -0000, "half_pint" <es


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
Please, please, let's correct the atributions here "Tilly" <Bright1@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7DCqb.10971$Mn.281631@news.xtra.co.nz... > Don Freeman wrote: >>Someones else wrote (attribution was removed in previous post): > >> In contrast,


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message news:3fabe221$0$91659$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com... > I am against Islam.... thats all you need to know... You are a man of reason, DOD. Only intentionally blind (or politicians) c


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FABD99E.E675C6FD@myrealbox.com... > > > TonyaK911 wrote: > > > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > > news:3FABD15D.13C10E1B@myrealbox.com... > > > > > Als


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
TonyaK911 wrote: > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > news:3FABD15D.13C10E1B@myrealbox.com... > > > Also I would point out that there is not unanimity amongst Jews on this > issue, > > or amongst Christians, Muslims o


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FABD15D.13C10E1B@myrealbox.com... > Also I would point out that there is not unanimity amongst Jews on this issue, > or amongst Christians, Muslims or indeed any other faith. "Alr


Ken Lay to give Enron documents to SEC
Ken Lay to give Enron documents to SEC By DAVID IVANOVICH Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle WASHINGTON  -  Former Enron Chairman Ken Lay has agreed to hand over documents sought by the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its pr


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
TonyaK911 wrote: > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > news:3FAB7355.A039D672@myrealbox.com... > > > > > > TonyaK911 wrote: > > > > > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > > > news:3FAAF24F.E76


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
TonyaK911 wrote: > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > news:3FAB6D7D.B0350B42@myrealbox.com... > > The Department of Defense wrote: > > > > > I dont have a problem with them...let them have their > > > beliefs...but y


Re: What is the validity of posts requesting legal advice in this and related forums???
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:3FAAEEEC.AF05235B@sprintmail.com... > Curtis wrote: > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > > news:3FAA9EDC.AD3A3CE9@sprintmail.com... > > > Curtis &


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On 7 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: >derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<4vsmqvs0go057i53m16t6mqqvfelc2feti@4ax.com>... >> On 6 Nov 2003 01:08:00 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: >> >>


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FAB7355.A039D672@myrealbox.com... > > > TonyaK911 wrote: > > > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > > news:3FAAF24F.E762DD42@myrealbox.com... > > > TonyaK91


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FAB6D7D.B0350B42@myrealbox.com... > The Department of Defense wrote: > > > I dont have a problem with them...let them have their > > beliefs...but you, you muslim pig...I have a prob


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Serf" <null@nospamthanx.com> wrote in message news:3fab89ed$0$19531$afc38c87@news.easynet.co.uk... > > "The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message > news:3fab2559$0$91692$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com... > > Listen here you stupi


Are emails are legally admissible in court?
Well, I know they are, or can be, admissible, but I am wondering what specifically I would have to do to present my email as evidence in a civil matter. I have the full headers of the email, but since some of them are years old, I doubt I will be able


Re: What is the validity of posts requesting legal advice in this and related forums???
his is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C3A51D.9D37CBA0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0026_01C3A51D.9D37CBA0" ------=_NextPart_001_0026_01C3A51D.9D37CBA0 Content-Type: text/pl


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
Benedict White <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:<3FAAA32B.AF478C15@myrealbox.com>... > Curtis & Mayra Rowell wrote: > > > You make a few, a few mind you, interesting claims which I will investigate. > > > > I see. I could go on. I ha


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
Benedict White <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:<3FAA8771.B1FA4D91@myrealbox.com>... > Curtis & Mayra Rowell wrote: > > > > > As for invading and stealing, if you have issue with that, then you need to > > address it to the United Nati


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
erek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<o7dnqvgnv5n6qd4506rml2o4i0u3utf5c5@4ax.com>... > On 7 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: > > >derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<4vsmqvs0go057i53m16t6


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
Don Freeman wrote: >> In contrast, the bikinied Western Christians/Jew sluts practically >> naked in front of millions, she belongs to herself. In >> practice,paradoxically,she is public property. > > And the problem is...? This is the mantra Dan


Re: What is the validity of posts requesting legal advice in this and related forums???
Curtis wrote: > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > news:3FAAEEEC.AF05235B@sprintmail.com... > > Curtis wrote: > > > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > > > news:3FAA9EDC.AD3A3CE9@sprin


Widescreen vs Pan&Scan examples was: Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
For side by side comparisons between the two, including what they look like on 16x9 and 4x3 TV's check out www.widescreen.org, click on examples


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
derek wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:42:37 -0800, "Arthur L. Rubin" > <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > > > > >The image broadcast can extend beyond the borders of the > >set. > > The set is designed to show as far as possible the whole of t


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
In article <3FABD15D.13C10E1B@myrealbox.com>, Benedict White <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote: > Well, I am not American. > > I have not actually made any "anti Israeli" remarks, I have merely tried to > balance anti remarks the other way. He'


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"TonyaK911" <TonK911@excite.com> wrote in message news:PsRqb.1271$6c3.954@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > > "The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message > news:3fabe221$0$91659$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com... > > > I am aga


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Serf" <null@nospamthanx.com> wrote in message news:3fab89ed$0$19531$afc38c87@news.easynet.co.uk... > > "The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message > news:3fab2559$0$91692$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com... > > Listen here you stupi


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FAB6D7D.B0350B42@myrealbox.com... > > > The Department of Defense wrote: > > > I dont have a problem with them...let them have their > > beliefs...but you, you muslim pig...I have


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"The Department of Defense" <thecats@ss.mil> wrote in message news:3fab2559$0$91692$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com... > Listen here you stupid prick... I am sick of these childish arguements that > Muslims make.... For the record Jews dont have probl


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
>Curtis & Mayra Rowell wrote: >>Only those who read this who ARE minorities are likely to understand >>what it means to live under the threat of violence from the day you >>are born to the day you die. "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in messa


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:42:37 -0800, "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote: > >The image broadcast can extend beyond the borders of the >set. The set is designed to show as far as possible the whole of the active picture area given


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On 6 Nov 2003 01:08:00 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: > >It also provided a much better experience for the viewer. Within the limitations of a typical 1930's bug hutch cinema, and I'd still challenge it's better. One of the formats


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
TonyaK911 wrote: > "Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message > news:3FAAF24F.E762DD42@myrealbox.com... > > TonyaK911 wrote: > > > > > > It shows you know nothing about the Palestinians... who is their > > > > > > prophet? Do you


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On 5 Nov 2003 00:55:47 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: > >I would doubt that unless you only had one eye, in which case it could >be argued that 4:3 is closer to "optimum". Not sure what it is easier >to create a film on a wider form


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
The Department of Defense wrote: > I dont have a problem with them...let them have their > beliefs...but you, you muslim pig...I have a problem with....Clean up your > act...otherwise after the next 9/11 we are really gonna @$#* you up..... A


Gee, and I knew it all!
Look, I'm sorry. I'm sorry if I have offended you by saying that you suborn all our leaders. And I'm so sorry I ever said that you instigate and maintain our type of adversarial politics so you can promote pliable presidents and prime ministers


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
In article <1lvqb.174973$ox6.2428281@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis & Mayra Rowell <mrowell@prepaidlegal.com> writes >Actually, no, I do not understand the people who wish to call themselves >Palestinians. There is no historical evidence that such


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
In article <pVtqb.174184$ox6.2422500@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis & Mayra Rowell <mrowell@prepaidlegal.com> writes >Placing a lable on Israelis, such as "Zionists" is also a form of >anti-semitism. To say that Israel is overly sensitive to such t


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<4vsmqvs0go057i53m16t6mqqvfelc2feti@4ax.com>... > On 6 Nov 2003 01:08:00 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: > > > > >It also provided a much better experience for the viewer. > > With


New Recalls - Nov 6, 2003 - http://Recall-Warnings.com
R E C A L L - W A R N I N G S . C O M November 6, 2003 Consumer Product, Auto, Food and Drug Recalls http://recall-warnings.com ________________________________________________________________


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
"Benedict White" <benedict@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3FAAF24F.E762DD42@myrealbox.com... > TonyaK911 wrote: > > > > > It shows you know nothing about the Palestinians... who is their > > > > > prophet? Do you think they have one religion?