Legal Spring Logo

"You've helped me decide which company to choose!"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Thanks
"Lonnie J. Potter" <cuddle35@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:lcmoqv401daota5n4e5fo1bfiqs7kn4f86@4ax.com... > Got some good news for a change . . . I found an attorney to help > Becky. He starts work Monday morning and hopefully she will be home


Re: Definition of "peace officer"????
"Richard" <anonymous@informant.sux> wrote in message news:bocujq011q5@enews1.newsguy.com... > I'm just curious to know how the various states define this term. I thought you already spewed your bulli#@($ on this issue, St00pid. > To me, a "peace


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
n 7 Nov 2003 14:44:41 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: >derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<o7dnqvgnv5n6qd4506rml2o4i0u3utf5c5@4ax.com>... >> On 7 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: >> >


[ELECTION] Election for The us.* Committee
This is a Ballot for The us.* Committee. You May Vote For Up to 25 Individuals. All Persons who receive a vote will be elected to the Committee. You may vote for yourself. Any ballot that you cast will be considered a vote for yourself unless you


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:lr1qqvkpfhc2qsmqcn2f96b1f4o2paaspf@4ax.com... > On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:56:26 +0000, derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> > wrote: > > >>>Rembrandt? Constable? > >> > >>Certainly. >


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:c11qqvog0o742jt84een30g06eqc8avkb5@4ax.com... > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 01:09:38 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >"The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in m


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 19:56:26 +0000, derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >>>Rembrandt? Constable? >> >>Certainly. >> > >No problem for you to name us a couple of dozen examples then >indicating what proportion of the artists output was "Widescr


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 01:09:38 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >"The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message >news:65017aa5.0311071444.65786ad8@posting.google.com... >> derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:<o7dnqv


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bnnamk$12l212$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=529&ncid=529&e=11&u=/ap/2003 > 1028/ap_en_tv/digital_tv_6 > > Quotes < > > The makers of TVs


Re: Legality of antisemitism.
Going back to the original topic. Any form of religious intolerance should be condemned. You go on and on about anti semitism but the real discrimination I can see going on throughout these posts is against Islam. Somehow that is OK now. But are we


Re: Can a City Ordinance Violate the 1st Amendment???
This is great news. It probably means another year of no commercials on The Masters telecast. Yippeeee! Randy "Pulver" <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote in message news:3FAC35EB.1D052D9D@gta.igs.net... > > > Augusta law violates free speech? >


Re: Are emails are legally admissible in court?
In article <X6Kdnc8poeCKtjGiRVn-vA@bway.net>, "JD" <james@bway.net> wrote: >Well, I know they are, or can be, admissible, but I am wondering what >specifically I would have to do to present my email as evidence in a civil >matter. I have the full hea


Re: Can a City Ordinance Violate the 1st Amendment???
I agree they should be able to protest (1st amend.). However, it is a Private club. So I have a question, aren't there gyms in the US that are for women only (Lady of America, etc.)? How come you don't hear about protests against them?


Re: Fox’s ACLU Lawyer ? all wet
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:00:55 -0500, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > Notice that, Judge Napolitano. An American citizen, a >civilian, charged in civilian court for acts allegedly >committed on American soil. That looks to me like the >government


Re: Widescreen vs Pan&Scan examples was: Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"John P Reber" <John.P.Reber@mail.jci.tju.edu> wrote in message news:3FABEC4A.9080701@mail.jci.tju.edu... > > For side by side comparisons between the two, including what they look > like on 16x9 and 4x3 TV's check out www.widescreen.org, click on exa


Re: Fox’s ACLU Lawyer ? all wet
On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:00:55 -0500, Pulver <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote: > The administration's argument that the Gitmo detainees >are beyond the reach of habeas relief is based on the >1950 Supreme Court precedent of Johnson v. Eisentrager >(never me


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:65017aa5.0311071444.65786ad8@posting.google.com... > derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<o7dnqvgnv5n6qd4506rml2o4i0u3utf5c5@4ax.com>... > > On 7 Nov 2003 06:04:06 -0800, cqmman@y


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004