Legal Spring Logo

"Your one and only source for online legal services"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: What is the validity of posts requesting legal advice in this and related forums???
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:3FAC1683.BB55E446@sprintmail.com... > Curtis wrote: > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > > news:3FAAEEEC.AF05235B@sprintmail.com... > > > Curtis


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On 9 Nov 2003 03:15:27 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: >Oh? What is the peripheral vision used for then? When watching 4:3 do >you have to constantly move you eyes across and down the screen to >take in the picture? > >Christ you must


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:19:34 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message >news:mf0rqv0o2mm1vgtsq9r0eftf3lgh25bnc5@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 18:53:50 -0000, "half_pint"


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:47:47 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: ><snip> >> >My Sony 32" widescreen doesn't have an auto format, but if it did it >> >would still display 4:3 piccies smaller then me mam's B&W set did in >> >1965 >> >> Th


Re: DNA in the Dock
Mike <nospam@at.all> wrote in message news:3fae057c$0$12698$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk... > Well this is a mature standard of debate! Some stupid johnny come lately pom gets no say what so ever on that or anything else at all. Ever.


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
In article <bojghl$1er966$6@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>, esboella@yahoo.com says... > Here are the top Leonardo da Vinci top 20 pictures only 2 could > be remotely described as widescreen, the other 18 are definately *NOT* > widescreen, Including


Re: DNA in the Dock
"Paul Nutteing" <nutteing@quickfindit.com> wrote in message news:bol23u$1fo9mk$1@ID-197301.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Mike" <nospam@at.all> wrote in message > news:3fae057c$0$12698$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk... > > > > Well this is a mature standa


CPS and undocumented Mexican parents???
Is there any group or agency (or law) set up to advocate for undocumented parents getting their children back once their children fall under the umbrella of CPS? It appears there is no policy in stone so it is up to the advocacy or biases of any given


Re: DNA in the Dock
"Mike" <nospam@at.all> wrote in message news:3fae057c$0$12698$fa0fcedb@lovejoy.zen.co.uk... > > Well this is a mature standard of debate! > > In case your comment was irony please go to http://www.nutteing2.freeservers.com/dnay.htm for a debat


Re: DNA in the Dock
Well this is a mature standard of debate!


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<boh5cu$1e482e$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > "The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:65017aa5.0311070035.1b36bcc5@posting.google.com... > > "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com>


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bohhqg$1e2ubd$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > "The CQMMAN" <cqmman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message > news:65017aa5.0311071444.65786ad8@posting.google.com... > > derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wr


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bojghl$1er966$6@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > "Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message > news:lr1qqvkpfhc2qsmqcn2f96b1f4o2paaspf@4ax.com... > > On Fri, 07 Nov 2003


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<bok9u1$1fjm8g$1@ID-204080.news.uni-berlin.de>... > "Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message > news:mf0rqv0o2mm1vgtsq9r0eftf3lgh25bnc5@4ax.com... > > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 18


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
<snip> > >My Sony 32" widescreen doesn't have an auto format, but if it did it > >would still display 4:3 piccies smaller then me mam's B&W set did in > >1965 > > Then she had a big set and you need a bigger one. What like 20 meters wide? Prehaps


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
"Bob Brenchley." <Bob@format.publications.ukf.net> wrote in message news:mf0rqv0o2mm1vgtsq9r0eftf3lgh25bnc5@4ax.com... > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 18:53:50 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >> >the eyes perspective for viewing objects in


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
n Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:24:10 +0000, derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote: >On 7 Nov 2003 14:44:41 -0800, cqmman@yahoo.co.uk (The CQMMAN) wrote: > >>derek <dgg@miniac.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<o7dnqvgnv5n6qd4506rml2o4i0u3utf5c5@4ax.com>...


Re: New televisions must be able to receive digital TV signals by July 2007
n Sat, 8 Nov 2003 18:53:50 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >the eyes perspective for viewing objects in detail >> >is circular, >> >> But the eye's view on the world is widescreen. > >No total peripheral vision is wide but detai


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004