Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
Jon Beaver wrote: > <snip> > But don't get me going on PPL. I know a whole lot more about it than > you do. You'd look like a damn fool trying to answer some > embarrassing questions about what you are selling. IIRC, you've rolled up your sleve


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
Curtis wrote, in part: > . . . it is your own <place finger here> energy you are wasting. Oh, the irony! It's nearly palpable.


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Your President is in safe hands. 14000 extra police officers will be on duty in a small area in London. All police leave has been cancelled. Police from other areas of England have been called in on stand-by over and above the 14000 already mentione. W


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
Your President is in safe hands. 14000 extra police officers will be on duty in a small area in London. All police leave has been cancelled. Police from other areas of England have been called in on stand-by over and above the 14000 already mentione. W


Re: Why post legal quesitons, expecting replys from anonymous posters who's credentials are unverifiable if not questionable?
In article <zx6ub.192787$RP2.79042@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: Nothing, but this is at least the third "substantively identical" article it has posted so far (based on the Subject: header). Seth


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:40:04 GMT, "Curtis" <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: > >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message >news:ocjdrvkjnro19kgn48ea50mmjusqjhoadh@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:36:35 GMT, "Curtis" <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >> >> >Ins


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Pulver wrote: > > Mike P wrote: > > > > "Admin" <admin@i70west.com> wrote in message > > news:vrhvef57kq7c0e@corp.supernews.com... > > > > > > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message > > > news:bpab59$lfb$2@reader2.panix.com... > > > > I


Re: Don't buy the HULK DVD...
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 01:37:21 -0500, Artemia Salina wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 06:12:57 +0000, Tarkus wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 01:20:29 GMT, Justin wrote: >> >>> Failure to start the movie at the scheduled time and only after foisting >>


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <UK6ub.192790$RP2.133009@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >Spam, by legal definition Whose definition? The one (never passed) quoted by spammers to the extent that its appearance in a message is an almost certain


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <XGeub.29682$w66.692521@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >"Douglas S. Ladden" <nospamreply@nowayjose.org> wrote in message >news:Xns94368D8C53079Legal1Ladden2Law3@216.148.227.77... >> Curtis on 17 Nov 2003 suggested:


Re: Please help with a medical question
In article <VN6ub.192791$RP2.411@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bp3r8g$56o$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <T2Zsb.109512$jW5.1295083@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, >>


Re: Is this legal?
In article <7W6ub.192795$RP2.116510@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bp3r04$41g$1@panix5.panix.com... >> Esk _is_ a real attorney, with real credentials, that can be c


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
Curtis on 17 Nov 2003 suggested: > Spam, by legal definition is automated email generation, sent, > unsolicited, to private email addresses and newsgroups. Interesting that with all your access to lawyers and legal authorities you can't see


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:01:18 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> wrote: >I hear when Bush arrives in the UK a group of British doctors and >psychologists will try to get him sanctioned under the Mental Health Act. >Assuming they are successful


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
"Mike Mann" <mike@kempston.net> wrote in message news:nvairv068n2p4kka0cubpqt0vuuuo0dsnl@news.kempston.net... > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:52:00 -0500, "Mike Granby" <mikeg@mikeg.net> > wrote: > > >"Paul Burridge" <pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote: >


Re: two questions about Georgia law.
In article <FBstb.179562$RP2.10854@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bp3qe8$23u$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <Y6Ysb.13343$w66.224422@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, >>


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
K. A. Cannon wrote: > "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> scraped it's fingers > across the chalkboard known as usenet and produced a sound amazingly > like <Rh9ub.4811$n56.1318@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> in > us.config: > >> K.


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:24:25 +0000 (UTC), a stranger called by some EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com came forth and told this tale in us.military.army >In us.issues Admin <admin@i70west.com> wrote: > >> I don't care, Troll. Plonk


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 17 Nov 2003 00:35:27 -0700, a stranger called by some "Admin" <admin@i70west.com> came forth and told this tale in us.military.army >"A Real Admin" <real.admin@admins.r.us> wrote in message >news:3FB87342.926EF948@admin


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Lo, many moons past, on Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:58:20 -0500, a stranger called by some K. A. Cannon <kacannon@databasix.con> came forth and told this tale in us.military.army >>Actually, only the LRSDs. > >That's news to me.. We jumped into FOB COB


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:53:41 -0700, a stranger called by some "Admin" <admin@i70west.com> came forth and told this tale in us.military.army >> Huh what? >> He was with the 101st in Grenada? >> >> oH...THAT'S JUICY...oh that's


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Lo, many moons past, on Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:32:56 -0500, a stranger called by some K. A. Cannon <kacannon@insurgent.orgy> came forth and told this tale in us.military.army >>Bwahahahaha........PLONK > >$10 to a $1 sez he replies to me within 10 da


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:52:00 -0500, "Mike Granby" <mikeg@mikeg.net> wrote: >"Paul Burridge" <pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote: > >> If anyone is serious about assassinating the President, they'd be daft >> to try to get through this ring of steel


Re: Your President is safe with us.(UK) Fear not. Precautions we are taking.
.. Your President is in safe hands. 14000 extra police officers will be on duty in a small area in London. All police leave has been cancelled. Police from other areas of England have been called in on stand-by over and above the 14000 already mention


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
In message <3fb9167c$0$10330$ba620e4c@reader0.news.skynet.be>, Hognoxious <hognoxious@_k.o.invalid> writes >"Roger J. P. Jones" <roger@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk> wrote in message >news:FnyCebDkpPu$EwnP@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk... >.... >> PS My


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
Hognoxious wrote: > "Roger J. P. Jones" <roger@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > news:FnyCebDkpPu$EwnP@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk... > .... > >>PS My dad told me at 10 "Never know to much or be to wise". > > > So he was an illi


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
"Roger J. P. Jones" <roger@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:FnyCebDkpPu$EwnP@lawyers-corrupt.demon.co.uk... ..... > PS My dad told me at 10 "Never know to much or be to wise". So he was an illiterate oaf too?


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
K. A. Cannon wrote: > "ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> scraped it's fingers > across the chalkboard known as usenet and produced a sound amazingly > like <Z93ub.4571$n56.3827@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> in > us.config: > >> K.


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:43:51 GMT, "Patriot" <Ontheball@winners.com> wrote: >They are well within Brit law and/or sanctioned to do whatever is necessary >to protect the President. If anyone is serious about assassinating the President, they'd be da


FBI aim to widen DNA net to include the innocent
From http://www.theolympian.com/home/news/20031117/frontpage/151400.shtml Quote Monday, November 17, 2003 Feds aim to widen DNA net Proposed law would add more genetic profiles to database RICHARD WILLING GANNETT NEWS SERVICE WASHINGTON -- D


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
"Admin" <admin@i70west.com> wrote in message news:vrhvef57kq7c0e@corp.supernews.com... > > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message > news:bpab59$lfb$2@reader2.panix.com... > > In us.issues Admin <admin@i70west.com> wrote: > > > > > I don'


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
Curtis wrote: > Gee, I don't see the State of Florida listed here and I could care less what > the highly liberal and very dubious definitions are for California. Your posts reach out to California residents. All it would take is for two former P


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
Curtis wrote: > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > news:3FB92BFA.E7FD8738@sprintmail.com... > > Curtis wrote: > > > > > > > Spam, by legal definition is automated email generation, sent, > unsolicited, > > > to priv


Re: Don't be fooled by ambulance chasers posting "Legal Suggestions" in this forum
Curtis wrote: > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > news:3FB92CC8.1B7F1F03@sprintmail.com... > > Thoth wrote: > > > > > Forwarded to abuse@prepaidlegal.com > > > > Perhaps you'd do better by forwarding to abuse@rr.com


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
"Pulver" <redlen@gta.igs.net> wrote in message news:3FB94AB0.48546A07@gta.igs.net... > > > Mike P wrote: > > > > "Admin" <admin@i70west.com> wrote in message > > news:vrhvef57kq7c0e@corp.supernews.com... > > > > > > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.co


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
"Mike Mann" <mike@kempston.net> wrote: > Operational modifications include in-flight refueling > capability and anti-aircraft missile countermeasures. Exactly. So while people wax lyrical on here about Bush being an idiot and the people who work f


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:32:52 GMT, "Curtis" <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: >It is interesting what people will lable as a scam when it potentially takes >money from their own pockets. For your re-education, a scam is an illegal >operation who's sole intent i


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
Mike P wrote: > > "Admin" <admin@i70west.com> wrote in message > news:vrhvef57kq7c0e@corp.supernews.com... > > > > <EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message > > news:bpab59$lfb$2@reader2.panix.com... > > > In us.issues Admin <admin@i70we


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
"Bob Brenchley." wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:01:18 -0000, "half_pint" <esboella@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >I hear when Bush arrives in the UK a group of British doctors and > >psychologists will try to get him sanctioned under the Mental Health


Re: Some Questions About the Right of a Store to Seek Civil Recovery in a Shoplifting Case
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:bp3qhl$26n$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <VuWsb.12561$w66.208024@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, > Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> whined: > > >No, imbecil. I'm saying that there are currently approxi


Re: Is this legal?
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:bp3r04$41g$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <ZU7tb.14212$w66.274026@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, > Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: > ><EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message > >news:bp30


Re: Dangerous USA trash coming to the UK
In message <3FB8E442.955EA158@off-topic-#@($e.con>, Obsession Watch <OW@off-topic-#@($e.con> writes >STFU Why do children today constantly try to show off as to how clever them and them mummy thinks them is????? And this on the worlds leading ne


Re: Annyone moonlighting collecting judgments?
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:bp3r1v$4tn$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <da6tb.175609$RP2.43156@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, > Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: > >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message > >news:


Re: Please help with a medical question
"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message news:bp3r8g$56o$1@panix5.panix.com... > In article <T2Zsb.109512$jW5.1295083@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, > Curtis <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote: > > >Curtis > >Independant Associate > }http://www.prepaidl


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
"PTRAVEL" <ptravel@ruyitang.com> wrote in message news:bp36tg$1jqsks$1@ID-101118.news.uni-berlin.de... > > "Curtis" <NOYB@NOYB.COM> wrote in message > news:nZYsb.109458$jW5.1294532@twister.tampabay.rr.com... > > Instead of posting a question to a f


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
I commend you. You are the first honest person I've run into to date in this forum. As such, my frustration doesn't apply to you. Only to those who post legal advice behind a thinly veiled flim-flam "suggestions" and don't provide in the same mess


Why post legal quesitons, expecting replys from anonymous posters who's credentials are unverifiable if not questionable?


Re: Don't be fooled by ambulance chasers posting "Legal Suggestions" in this forum
"Thoth" <Thoth@unlisted.net> wrote in message news:3FB66123.35B1410A@unlisted.net... > Forwarded to abuse@prepaidlegal.com > > Curtis wrote: > > > Instead of posting a question to a forum where, for all you know, the poster > > could be Jeffery


Re: The reason(s) for rebellion
"ssnark@bangserver.na" <ssnark@earthlink.net> scraped it's fingers across the chalkboard known as usenet and produced a sound amazingly like <Rh9ub.4811$n56.1318@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> in us.config: >K. A. Cannon wrote: >> "ssnark@bangse


Re: Bush's "armed guards"
"Paul Burridge" <pb@osiris1.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote: > If anyone is serious about assassinating the President, they'd be daft > to try to get through this ring of steel that surrounds him. Far > better to just procure a decent guided missile and laun