|
|
>> You are saying in effect that a person who has never had sex has no
>> sexual orientation. "Celibate" is not a sexual orientation. You can
>> have celibate heterosexuals, celibate homosexuals and celibate
>> paedophiles. I would wager that the ma
|
|
|
Seppo Renfors goes:
>Alan Hope wrote:
>> Seppo Renfors goes:
>> >If you HAD left my text intact you would see the connection in the
>> >DEFINITIONS. The definition, none of them mentioned the act of sex at
>> >all. The definition does ASSUME the
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:25:57 GMT, axel@white-eagle.co.uk wrote:
>As an aside note, I do get annoyed when so many websites will only use
>one of these expensive methods to post items - what is wrong with normal
>postal services?
>
They probably ge
|
|
|
axel@white-eagle.co.uk! wrote:
>> Mike wrote:
> >> I ordered packages from 3 different internet order sites.
> >> Each site I ordred 3 packages of about 10 records or so.
> >> One company used UPS to ship.
> >> FexEx dilivered my packages
|
|
|
"kjm" <newsbox@NOSPAMbwknight.net> wrote in message
news:dSwxb.26731$Wy4.17466@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> The devil is in the details. Rosario Muñoz was a definite foreigner. She
> shouldn't have even been protected by a legal system havin
|
|
|
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote...
> > Please give one instance of a statute that explicitly defines the term
> > 'pedophilia' or 'paedophilia', and makes it an offence.
>
> FIRST you tell me why there MUST be that specific term in
|
|
|
> Mike wrote:
> > I ordered packages from 3 different internet order sites.
> > Each site I ordred 3 packages of about 10 records or so.
> > One company used UPS to ship.
> > FexEx dilivered my packages fine and i signed for them and
> > that was
|
|
|
The fact that you quote Lillie & Reed in this fashion indicates that you
have no interest in understanding the issues regarding the law and
paedophilia. Do some basic research.
*plonk*
|
|
|
| Mike wrote:
|| I ordered packages from 3 different internet order sites.
|| Each site I ordred 3 packages of about 10 records or so.
||
|| One company used UPS to ship.
||
|| FexEx dilivered my packages fine and i signed for them and
|| that was
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 06:45:01 GMT, Seppo Renfors
<Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote:
I see you avidly follow all the child sex accusations. too bad you
don't do any follow-ups.
I note you quote the Lillie/Reed case:
>Lillie & Anor v Newcastle Ci
|
|
|
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote in message
news:3FC6EE12.8E313331@not.pollis.net.au...
>
>
> serf wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Please will you direct me to one instance of a statute that
> > penalises
> > > > > > pedophilia?
> > > >
|
|
|
>
> Lillie & Anor v Newcastle City Council & Ors [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) (30
> July 2002)
> "An inquiry was commissioned by the Newcastle City Council pursuant to
> s.81 of the Children Act 1989, and carried out by an experienced
> practitioner, Mr
|
|
|
<jdewitte@wxs.nl> wrote in message news:bpqcqb$hr3$1@reader10.wxs.nl...
> Historical Recruitments < Under Hiërarchical: 1.Religion, 2.Philosophy/Ideology
> "complex criminal"commissions/omissions/commissions by omissions/etc <-> TERROR
> -------------
|
|
|
serf wrote:
>
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote in message
> news:3FC54610.9A6EB939@not.pollis.net.au...
> >
> >
> > PAEDOPHILE - (US pedophile) noun a person who is sexually attracted to
> > children. - OED
> >
>
> <snip
|
|
|
Cynic wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:09:51 GMT, Seppo Renfors
> <Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote:
>
> >FACT: You cannot KNOW the sexual orientation of a celibate person.
>
> You cannot know for 100% certain the sexual orientation of *any
|
|
|
serf wrote:
>
> > > > > Please will you direct me to one instance of a statute that
> penalises
> > > > > pedophilia?
> > > >
> > > > So which part of statutory rape or sex with a minor is not pedophilia?
> Is
> > > it
> > > > the label you
|
|
|
Alan Hope wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors goes:
>
> >If you HAD left my text intact you would see the connection in the
> >DEFINITIONS. The definition, none of them mentioned the act of sex at
> >all. The definition does ASSUME the act also takes pla
|
|
|
Derek Hornby wrote:
>
> "Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@not.pollis.net.au> wrote
>
> > Just take your lollies to the kiddie park, leave the adults alone!
>
> I take it you're not an adult then, going by your childish comments.
> However, assuming y
|
|
|
In reviewing a will, it's obvious that the attorney and executor that
distributed the will's assets screwed up significantly in determining the
distribution to heirs, due to obvious misinterpretation of the will. This
happened several years ago.
Wh
|
|
|
Seppo Renfors goes:
>If you HAD left my text intact you would see the connection in the
>DEFINITIONS. The definition, none of them mentioned the act of sex at
>all. The definition does ASSUME the act also takes place - the
>definition is ONLY there
|
|
|
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 01:15:06 +0100, Alan Hope <ahope@skynet.be> wrote:
>Seppo Renfors goes:
>
>>If you HAD left my text intact you would see the connection in the
>>DEFINITIONS. The definition, none of them mentioned the act of sex at
>>all. The de
|
|
