Legal Spring Logo

"Why Shop or Review Legal Services anywhere else?"
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Juris Doctorate and Lawyer/Attorney
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:06:05 -0800, Thoth <Thoth@unlisted.net> wrote: > Apsianco Cartegas wrote: > >> Etymylogical/nomenclature question here: >> >> Is someone who has completed a Juris Doctorate (from an ABA accredited >> institution) a lawyer? An


Re: Online Game Theft
In article <1OZFb.67916$Dt6.1677267@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"CaVeDoG" <asdf@asdf.asdf> wrote in message >news:KfWFb.4$s04.11026@news.uswest.net... >> On an online game, Diablo II, if two players agre


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
In article <jFHEb.99386$%h4.23474@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: ><EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com> wrote in message >news:brtiqm$e7c$2@reader2.panix.com... >> In us.legal, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
In article <cW1Gb.68050$Dt6.1703614@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"JG" <nospam@maol.com> wrote in message >news:3fe87a91$0$4761$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... >> "Curtis Rowell" <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
In article <nREDb.83718$%h4.71774@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >I would be less worried about how much legal trouble you can get into and >worry more about what you are doing to your body and your brain.


Re: Annyone moonlighting collecting judgments?
In article <pujEb.96523$%h4.37518@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:brllue$io9$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <OdOzb.7370$AM3.349692@twister.tampa


Re: us.legal to be renamed to us.schisters
In article <I18zb.979$AM3.80930@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >3) I didn't think that any reasonable individual would think that an junior >associate in whatever position is going to work unsupervised, the


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <On4Ab.11829$AM3.477584@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bqo1eq$pf3$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <Dc8zb.983$AM3.82309@twister.tampab


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <XsFDb.83851$%h4.3672@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:brllsd$ime$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <RdHBb.2$Dt6.112@twister.tampabay.rr.


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <MyHEb.99324$%h4.18669@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> top-posted: >There are currently 14 states in which we are regulated in this manner. To >what end do you wish to see this list? Do I need to state


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <BCZFb.67885$Dt6.1676920@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message >news:3FE7367A.9806334D@sprintmail.com... >> No. You're ignoring the law


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <D1FDb.83807$%h4.60729@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >Yes, the attorney would likely "represent" the insured. Granted, this is my >OPINION, but, as attorneys' motivations, as with most people,


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <HbkEb.96561$%h4.27040@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >I don't see any attorneys running to get in line to setup a sliding scale >fee structure based upon an individuals ability to pay rather tha


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
"JG" <nospam@maol.com> wrote in message news:3fe87a91$0$4761$61fed72c@news.rcn.com... > "Curtis Rowell" <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote ... > > Nice evidence... Quotes of unknown, alledged Doctors > > > Nonsense. Dr. Lester Grinspoon is a prof


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <Te5Ab.12264$AM3.483491@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bqp29d$7if$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <7r2zb.3675$%h4.2450@twister.tampab


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <JOqwb.37941$M31.843791@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Jon Beaver" <jbeaver@NO.com> wrote in message >news:kvfqrv4u55iqmb4hl90g9as6h14r88m3g4@4ax.com... >>If a defense lawyer is >> doing his


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
In article <Fx4Ab.11923$AM3.478434@twister.tampabay.rr.com>, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote: >"Seth Breidbart" <sethb@panix.com> wrote in message >news:bqp21r$7a7$1@panix5.panix.com... >> In article <SMcyb.66549$M31.1505423@twister.ta


Re: Neighbors !
"Isaac" <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote in message news:slrnbuebgr.hj.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org... > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:54:39 GMT, Curtis Rowell <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > I agree with this statement. But call


Re: Online Game Theft
"CaVeDoG" <asdf@asdf.asdf> wrote in message news:KfWFb.4$s04.11026@news.uswest.net... > On an online game, Diablo II, if two players agree to exchange items, is > that a legally binding contract? I ask this because there are certain items > that c


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:3FE7357E.1E0B75DA@sprintmail.com... > Curtis Rowell wrote: > > > Anyone with even a _modicum_ of intelligence knows that studies can be > > > slanted anyway the person conducting


Re: Don't be taken in by the charlatans passing themselves as attorneys...
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:3FE7367A.9806334D@sprintmail.com... > Curtis Rowell wrote: > > > "Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message > > news:3FE1E79B.39586814@sprintmail.com... > > >


Re: Juris Doctorate and Lawyer/Attorney
Isaac wrote: > ARIZONA > > 3.Definition: Unauthorized Practice of Law. Unauthorized practice of law > includes but is not limited to: I'd heard previously that UPL was not illegal in AZ. The definitions exist, but don't correspond to a crime.


Notorious e-mail scam snares retiree's nest egg
X-NO-ARCHIVE- YES Notorious e-mail scam snares retiree's nest egg By Jim Stratton | Orlando Sentinel Staff Writer Posted December 23, 2003 In a windowless room, in a nondescript house on the other side of the world, Rupert Sessions gl


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
Thoth wrote: > "Arthur L. Rubin" wrote: > > > It's been done. Most of them started with illegal alcohol. > > /sarcasm filter off > No. All those drug users start with caffeine. The correlation between caffeine > use and hard drug use is much


Re: Juris Doctorate and Lawyer/Attorney
Apsianco Cartegas wrote: > Etymylogical/nomenclature question here: > > Is someone who has completed a Juris Doctorate (from an ABA accredited > institution) a lawyer? An attorney? Or do they have to have passed the > bar to call themselves this?


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
"Arthur L. Rubin" wrote: > Curtis Rowell wrote: > > > If you want an accurate study, try asking those in the drug rehab centers > > who are addicted to heroin, crystal meth, etc, what they got started with > > and in what kind of environment. > >


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
Curtis Rowell" <curtis_rowell@hotmail.com> wrote ... > Nice evidence... Quotes of unknown, alledged Doctors Nonsense. Dr. Lester Grinspoon is a professor of medicine at Harvard, a recognized authority on marijuana, and has researched the subject


Re: marijuana laws los angeles
Curtis Rowell wrote: > > Claiming the study was paid for by government funding doesn't carry an ounce > of credibility. I agree -- studies paid for by government funding DON'T carry an ounce of credibility. I know that's not what you said,


Re: Online Game Theft
CaVeDoG wrote: > On an online game, Diablo II, if two players agree to exchange items, is > that a legally binding contract? I suppose it could be. There was a recent case of an individual suing the game company for the the return of items in hi


Re: Neighbors !
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:02:42 -0600, Elasticonoclast > > Personally, I wouldn't allow the kids to play on the pond at all. > It's inviting trouble. Also, OP indicated desire for privacy "left > land undeveloped by design", so I'd guess this isn't an


Online Game Theft
On an online game, Diablo II, if two players agree to exchange items, is that a legally binding contract? I ask this because there are certain items that can't be placed in the trade screen, so it takes a much riskier method of trading when one of tho


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004