|
|
Hello,
I have a pending 1983 ( Civil Rights Suit ). Does anyone know of a way
to get good reliable help on this since the judge denied my request to have
a attorney appointed in the case to help me ?
Thanks for any help
John
|
|
|
heckidontknow1@hotmail.com (I get scammed) wrote in message news:<1a3e8608.0401250418.11ea0a09@posting.google.com>...
[snip]
> I don't know as much about the law as several people that post here
> but I do know it is illegal to scheme and defraud in or
|
|
|
"international mens organisation"
<international_mens_organisation@internationalmensorganisation.cjb.net>
wrote in message news:fa7a7aec.0401261739.3bc33bb8@posting.google.com...
> http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html
>
> In Praise of Traditional
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:19:54 -0800, Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>
wrote:
> Isaac wrote:
>
>
>> > Submitting evidence ("junk science") which he knew to be false.
>> > (Subornation of perjury.)
>>
>> Perjury means lying. Submitti
|
|
|
bcook@flemingc.on.ca (Cookie) wrote in message news:<b1a4ce24.0401271313.2490df4a@posting.google.com>...
> Now that Canada has decided that paralegals must be certified in order
> to act as a legal paralegal. Since I am a canadian I am not sure on
> h
|
|
|
Isaac wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:30:35 -0800, Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > In some cases of "junk science", we are. Silicone implants come to mind.
>
> We are pretty sure it's junk now. I don't believe there
|
|
|
In article <bv67mv$o4jfb$2@ID-13547.news.uni-berlin.de>
Zippy <zippy@doodah.btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> On 27 Jan 2004 08:52:16 -0600, Good Ole Archibald <me@privacy.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Please stop posting this @$#*ing crap to uk.legal where it is way
|
|
|
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:24:02 GMT, Isaac
<isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote:
>After all it's undisputed which evidence is junk science and which is real
>science. Even if the probability is low that an injury could be caused
>the way Edward's ex
|
|
|
My girlfriend loved this post - thanks for a good laugh - you've brightened
up my day!
|
|
|
Isaac wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:19:54 -0800, Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Isaac wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > Submitting evidence ("junk science") which he knew to be false.
> >> > (Subornation of perjury.)
> >>
> >>
|
|
|
La Site Communique; 27/01/2004 13:16:37
Hello, Bienvenue, Bienvenidos and G'Day. We hope this Communication =
finds you in good health and with Great Spirit.
La Site is proud and privileged to be chosen, as the favoured meeting =
point and dating
|
|
|
Now that Canada has decided that paralegals must be certified in order
to act as a legal paralegal. Since I am a canadian I am not sure on
how the USA system works. Could I kindly have some insight?
|
|
|
Curtis Rowell wrote:
> You go right ahead and believe that if you wish...
Read the words of the Founding Fathers.
|
|
|
Dan Evans wrote:
>
> And how did you lose any money by the bank looking at your credit
> history?
Because the inquiry shows up on your credit reports, usually reducing
your credit score, which may negatively impact your future ability
to get c
|
|
|
Isaac wrote:
> > Submitting evidence ("junk science") which he knew to be false.
> > (Subornation of perjury.)
>
> Perjury means lying. Submitting testimony which the expert believes
> is not perjury.
Hmmm. I'll have to get back to you on
|
|
|
On 26 Jan 2004 17:39:07 -0800,
international_mens_organisation@internationalmensorganisation.cjb.net
(international mens organisation) wrote:
>A current ad for Swanson's TV Dinners goes like this. Working mom
>asked for a big bowl she can eat on the
|
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:02:39 -0800, Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>
wrote:
> Isaac wrote:
>
>
>> Both sides have an opportunity to be heard when an objection is raised.
>> An attorney need not apologize for raising a legitimate object
|
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:56:08 -0800, Arthur L. Rubin <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com>
wrote:
> Isaac wrote:
>
>
>> It's defined that way in the article, but the article lays the blame on
>> Edwards and other plaintiff's attorneys for juries not getting
|
|
