|
|
Christopher Green wrote:
> No, mailed notice to the address of record of the registered owner is
> specifically proper service in the special case of automated traffic
> enforcement infractions, which are still criminal in California. See
> Vehicle
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
>
> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > Actually, that is EXACTLY the proper format for notice in a civil
> > (as opposed to criminal) case, even one with the government as
> > plaintiff. I missed that the first time. Perhaps that'
|
|
|
Baldin Pramer wrote:
> The, -Frog. wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:36:29 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Only a court can decide if it is unconstitutional or not.
>>>> Until then, it is to be obeyed.
>>>
>>> Sieg H
|
|
|
The, -Frog. wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:36:29 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>Only a court can decide if it is unconstitutional or not.
>>>Until then, it is to be obeyed.
>>
>>Sieg Heil ...Comrade!
>
>
> So how
|
|
|
What would you do...... if your civil rights were violated by the VERY
administration you support?
How would that make you feel?
What if you knew about crimes and these crimes were against you, which
involved the NAACP's "back door"
to the EEOC,
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
> Naw, best to keep it quite lest "ugly americans" (or brits)
> visit and @$#* the places up.
Ah - self censorship - the most insidious form of oppression.
Sylvia.
|
|
|
Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote in
news:slrnc2i98p.nb.isaac@latveria.castledoom.org:
> On 10 Feb 2004 18:11:13 GMT, Alun <alun@1stcounsel.com> wrote:
>> Isaac <isaac@latveria.castledoom.org> wrote in
>> news:slrnc289ks.8d.isaac@latveria
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
>
> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote:
> >>
> >> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> >>> "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> >>>>> "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Arthur L. Ru
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
>
> Wai Doan Hsu wrote:
> > The Notice To Appear was NOT processed by a sworn officer. Nobody
> > looked up my DMV file and the ticket does not even have my driver
> > license number. The Proof of Service reads, "I, [person
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
>
> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> > "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote:
> >>
> >> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> >>> "=> Vox Populi ©" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> >>>>> => Vox Populi © wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Arthur L. Rubi
|
|
|
"The, -Frog." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:v17c30lh7hlschnk9q3lnjetue282iu035@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:36:29 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
> >> Only a court can decide if it is unconstitutional or not.
> >>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur L. Rubin wrote:
> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>>
>> Wai Doan Hsu wrote:
>
>>> The Notice To Appear was NOT processed by a sworn officer. Nobody
>>> looked up my DMV file and the ticket does not even have my driver
>>> license number. The Proof o
|
|
|
¤¤ Vox Dei © wrote:
> Bruce Watson wrote:
>
>>In article <5sd8309km2hi9anm56hfj9q2l2trd485c3@4ax.com>,
>>Moi <zis_guy@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 18 Feb 2004 18:03:10 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
>>>wrote in <1077152590.73
|
|
|
rumik wrote:
> ¤¤ Vox Dei © wrote:
>> Bruce Watson wrote:
>>
>>> In article <5sd8309km2hi9anm56hfj9q2l2trd485c3@4ax.com>,
>>> Moi <zis_guy@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 18 Feb 2004 18:03:10 -0700, anon3c67@nyx.nyx.net (Bruce Watson)
>>
|
|
|
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:19:25 GMT, "LawsonE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The, -Frog." <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>news:v17c30lh7hlschnk9q3lnjetue282iu035@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:36:29 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
>>
|
|
|
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:36:29 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>> Only a court can decide if it is unconstitutional or not.
>> Until then, it is to be obeyed.
>
>Sieg Heil ...Comrade!
So how is advocating lawlessness good?
Should
|
|
