|
|
Sock Puppet wrote:
> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>
>> Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
>>
>>> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> How many times did one of those dead Kennedys fail the bar exam...?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Jello B
|
|
|
Orwellian Prophecy wrote:
> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>
>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>
>> How many times did one of those dead Kennedys fail the bar exam...?
>>
>>
>
> Jello Biafra took the Bar exam? Talented guy.
>
> http://www.deadkennedysnews.com/
|
|
|
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:19:39 GMT, Orwellian Prophecy
<Orwell@told.youso.org> wrote:
>This is the People's country. Act that way.
Seig Heil komrade smacky!
|
|
|
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:12:14 GMT, Sock Puppet
<antithetical@uncle.sammy.org> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>
>>>Your false god, Jesus H. Lewinsky? Is he off sodomizing young
>>>boys on the golf course, or is he just dead? If Jesus is alive, then
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:07:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:40:33 GMT, Ken Sm
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:58:04 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:48 GMT, Ken Sm
|
|
|
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:17:09 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>>> How many times did one of those dead Kennedys fail the bar exam...?
>>
>> Not enough...
>
>You're thinking of
JFK Jr.
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:39:09 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
> Packman) wrote:
>
>>It is understandable
>>that Jesus was not considered by many to be the messiah at that
>>period of history since he didn't fulfill the pr
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>What I expected, you will some day have regrets.
>>
>> As e
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>>On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:18 GMT, Ken Smi
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:44:37 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:06:00 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:07:29 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:44:28 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:58:04 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
Christopher Green wrote:
> ... Trial by written declaration
> is always worth trying first. If you go for trial by written
> declaration, you can always go back and get a trial in person if you
> don't like the outcome.
Cite, please. I thought
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:58:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:39:09 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
>> Packman) wrote:
>>
>>>It is understandable
>>>that Jesus was not considered by many t
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:58:04 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:57:51 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
> What I expected, you will some day have regrets.
As expected, you're conceding that you can't prove up your claim
about your ancient tribal sky-pixie.
|
|
|
Daniel Packman wrote:
> In article <4043E46B.60508@it.com>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>
> .....
>
>>>...... Jeremiah 31:15 Herod was
>>>to blame, because fearful of a new King, he ordered every male child
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>>Shrub should be impeached and shot at sunrise.
>>>
>>>Oh my,
|
|
|
xlanmanx@aol.com (XLanManX) wrote in message news:<20040301221514.18277.00000625@mb-m06.aol.com>...
> Bids I have received for a new roof on my home vary by a wide margin. I suspect
> the lower bids are from companies whose workers don't have proper ins
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:38:21 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Your religion is a pathetic joke Spammy ...
>
> Which religion poxie?
*Your* religion, #@($eater.
>
> You demented dripwit.
Fuck your
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:21:05 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 01 Mar 200
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:22:46 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
> wrote:
>
>> Spammy needs to be told what to do.
>
> Poxie hates all authority.
It's ok to hate fascists Spammy ... in fact it's a moral imperative.
|
|
|
"Arthur L. Rubin" <ronnirubin@sprintmail.com> wrote in message news:<40449703.628C@sprintmail.com>...
> Christopher Green wrote:
>
> > ... Trial by written declaration
> > is always worth trying first. If you go for trial by written
> > declaration,
|
|
|
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 10:22:46 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Spammy needs to be told what to do.
Poxie hates all authority.
|
|
|
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 05:39:09 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
Packman) wrote:
>It is understandable
>that Jesus was not considered by many to be the messiah at that
>period of history since he didn't fulfill the primary requirements:
>http://w
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:35 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:48 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>> What I expected, you will some day have regrets.
>
> As expected, you're concedi
|
|
|
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 13:09:15 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrot
|
|
|
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:38:21 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Your religion is a pathetic joke Spammy ...
Which religion poxie?
You demented dripwit.
|
|
|
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:24:07 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:47:46 +0000 (UTC), pack@eos.ucar.edu (Daniel
>> Packman) wrote:
>>
>>> In article <f2d740d3vlht4i7kclhkr29qg61tphgigr@4ax.com>,
|
|
|
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:21:05 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:55:49 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forge
|
|
|
Interesting book by Wall Street Journal columnist Dorothy Rabinowitz
and interview with her on cases of false accusations and convictions
for sex abuse (mostly child sex abuse) that she investigated.
No Crueler Tyrannies: Accusation, False Witness, a
|
|
|
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:10:46 -0700, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
> where Bu$h and his criminal mob rig the election?
What election?
"The Right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Free men own guns - s
|
|
|
In article <4043E46B.60508@it.com>, Ken Smith <Ranger57@concentric.net> wrote:
>Uncle Samuel wrote:
......
>> ...... Jeremiah 31:15 Herod was
>> to blame, because fearful of a new King, he ordered every male child
>> under two years old in Bethlehem
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:18 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Shrub should be impeached and shot at sunrise.
>
> Oh my, making death threats against the President,
Another lie from our Spammy? What a, er, su
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:09:58 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>>Lee Weaver wrote:
>>
>>>OHHH....okay, now I get it. You're pissed because you failed the bar and
>>>instead of admiting you're just too stupid you'd rather pla
|
|
|
I don't understand. If you buy a product in good faith. Regardless of the
ramblings on of what happened to cause a lawsuit how can a company go after
another's company's customers? I am trying to figure this SCO stuff out.
I don't get it. If I bu
|
|
|
Bids I have received for a new roof on my home vary by a wide margin. I suspect
the lower bids are from companies whose workers don't have proper insurance. If
I decide to hire one of the lower bid companies, how can I protect myself
should one of the
|
|
|
Uncle Samuel wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 13:19:20 GMT, Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Uncle Samuel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>To a kook nothing can make sense.
>>
>>Best assessment I've ever seen.
>
>
> Yup, you and Libs, 2 of a kind.
>
|
|
|
"=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
news:Y3P0c.68$e25.36669@news.uswest.net...
> It's lowlife fascists like you who will be ex-nationalized, with
> extreme prejudice, in short order.
>
What are you Malcolm X now?
_______________
|
|
