|
|
Tony Smith wrote:
> In other words, the person may very well have an honest belief in a
> certain state of affairs, but whether a jury would find that belief a
> reasonable one is another matter.
>
> For example, there is a man down the road who
|
|
|
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 19:26:06 -0600, "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li>
wrote:
>Tony Smith wrote:
>> Sylvia wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In the case in point, the accused believed that he was engaging in a
>>> consensual act, so even in Queensland I think an acc
|
|
|
Ann wrote:
>
> Your rather pathetic splitting of the idea has of course altered the
> meaning. Of course rape fantasies aren't illegal and shouldn't be but
> carrying out one in a public place is surely not very reasonable or
> normal.
>
> Ann
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sylvia wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this would be a question of law (for the judge
> to decide) or of fact (for the jury to decide).
Fact. and as the jury would decide, hence my doubt that it would ever
get up.
> It's a fine line, and in t
|
|
|
Callipygian Nullifidian wrote:
> "=> Vox Populi ©" <vox@popu.li> wrote in message
> news:zdAcc.19$rt1.31223@news.uswest.net...
>> kensmithiscool wrote:
>> Fuck your Jesus in the ass ... and #@($ upon your pathetic religion
>> and all that it stands f
|
|
|
Sylvia wrote:
> Ann wrote:
>> And what if someone kills me because they mistake me for someone
>> else... does that get downgraded to a civil case too?
>
> It's difficult to see how that would arise, given that it is would be
> unlawful for a person
|
|
|
Tony Smith wrote:
> Might be able to get past the "honest" part.
> But I suspect he would be buggered on the "reasonable" part.
> Reasonable, average, law abiding citizens do not play rape fantasy
> games with people they have never met, in places the
|
|
|
Ken Smith wrote:
> "Vox Populi" wrote:
>> kensmithiscool wrote:
>>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>>> Because you are an obsessive-compulsive religious @$#*wit, that's why.
>>>> Your ChristianInanity is a disease.
>>> Ken, your impiety and blasphemy is re
|
|
|
In Australia, there is also a defence of honest and reasonable belief as
to the facts. If no offence would have been committed had the facts had
been as the accused reasonably believed them to be, then the accused is
not guilty. This has been held t
|
|
|
Lord Haw Haw wrote:
> => Vox Populi © wrote:
>> So, neo-con fascist @$#*s like Uncle Spammy spout
>> their belligerent colonialist #@($ all over the world,
>> resulting in the inescapable morass of killing and
>> bloodshed that now infests the Middle
|
|
|
International Mens Organisation and Fathers Fighting Injustice
Press release
UK MEDIA BEING USED TO INSTILL FEAR IN POPULATION
While the UK media endlessly go on about terror attacks ,the only
complaints our organisations receive are the threats f
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
> So, neo-con fascist @$#*s like Uncle Spammy spout
> their belligerent colonialist #@($ all over the world,
> resulting in the inescapable morass of killing and
> bloodshed that now infests the Middle East, and
> when the whol
|
|
|
=> Vox Populi © wrote:
> kensmithiscool wrote:
>>Ken Smith <forget@it.com> wrote in message
>>news:<40714104.8010605@it.com>...
>>>Theodore A. Kaldis wrote:
>>>>"Vox Populi" wrote:
>>>>>Ken Smith wrote:
[snip]
>>> Because you are an obses
|
|
|
Sylvia wrote:
>
> In the case in point, the accused believed that he was engaging in a
> consensual act, so even in Queensland I think an accquital would have
> been possible.
>
Sylvia.
Might be able to get past the "honest" part.
But I su
|
|
