Legal Spring Logo

"Should I form an Incorporation or an LLC?"
Find out at LegalSpring.com
Reviewing Legal Services Online
 LEGAL SPRING
     


Google
 
 

 

Re: Beheading video
On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:21:03 -0400, Carey Gregory <tiredofspam123@comcast.net> wrote: >pfriley@watt-not.com (PF Riley) wrote: > >>Anyone know why I get a file that's only 552,982 bytes? > >No idea. Neither the full version nor the one clipped to


Re: copyright and employment agreement
Rik Brooks wrote: > In this case Richard is right. There is a lot of history of these cases > and the company doesn't prevail unless the item in question was done on > company time or with company equipment or was otherwise directly related > to


Re: Beheading video
Scott" <someone@spamtrap.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<c87to2$5o9$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>... > "Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS." <purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote in message > news:b72aca93.0405160110.47286d67@posting.google.com... > > "Scott" >


Re: Beheading video
On Sun, 16 May 2004 21:10:23 +0000 (UTC), nobody@ybodon.not (Anon Poster) wrote: >>It is a streaming video clip and I don't know how to save it, so I can then >>post it. Sorry. > >Not to worry, I can probably guess what CNN's take on this story is


Re: Beheading video
Scott" <someone@spamtrap.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<c87to2$5o9$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>... > "Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS." <purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote in message > news:b72aca93.0405160110.47286d67@posting.google.com... > > "Scott" >


Re: Beheading video
Scott" <someone@spamtrap.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<c87to2$5o9$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>... > "Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS." <purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote in message > news:b72aca93.0405160110.47286d67@posting.google.com... > > "Scott" >


Re: Beheading video
On Sun, 16 May 2004 15:10:21 GMT, RHR <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote: >On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:48:31 +0000 (UTC), nobody@ybodon.not (Anon >Poster) wrote: > >>>Some comments about the Berg video, more intelligent than what I have >>>read in this newsgroup,


Re: Beheading video
pfriley@watt-not.com (PF Riley) wrote: >Anyone know why I get a file that's only 552,982 bytes? No idea. Neither the full version nor the one clipped to only the violence is that length. Perhaps ogrish made it smaller by lowering the quality due


Re: Beheading video
"PF Riley" <pfriley@watt-not.com> wrote in message news:40a79478.29364143@news1.nwlink.com... > On Sat, 15 May 2004 02:32:20 +0000 (UTC), nobody@ybodon.not (Anon > Poster) wrote: > > > >That said, the movement is quite clear in the video downloaded


Re: Beheading video
On Sat, 15 May 2004 02:32:20 +0000 (UTC), nobody@ybodon.not (Anon Poster) wrote: > >That said, the movement is quite clear in the video downloaded from >www.ogrish.com. The file is called >"ogrish-dot-com-american-nic-berg-beheaded-in-iraq.wmv" and i


Re: Beheading video
"Alexander Vasserman DDS., BS." <purple543210@yahoo.ca> wrote in message news:b72aca93.0405160110.47286d67@posting.google.com... > "Scott" > > Don't put words in my mouth. > I said nothing of Iraq and how prisoners of war should be treated. > I am


Re: Beheading video
On Sun, 16 May 2004 14:48:31 +0000 (UTC), nobody@ybodon.not (Anon Poster) wrote: >>Some comments about the Berg video, more intelligent than what I have >>read in this newsgroup, can be found in the top video link, in the >>group on the right at, >


Re: Beheading video
On Sat, 15 May 2004 00:06:30 +0100, smicker <rossprat@hotmail.com> wrote: >The video did not show a live man being decapitated at all IMO. That seems to be the consensus on this thread. Since the video attempts to deceive the viewer, at least th


Re: Beheading video
On Sun, 16 May 2004 00:11:33 GMT, RHR <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote: >On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:26:40 -0400, Carey Gregory ><tiredofspam123@comcast.net> wrote: > >>nobody@ybodon.not (Anon Poster) wrote: >> >>>Did you not wonder why, when cheap, high-quali


Re: Beheading video
Thank you for correcting me. Maybe juries should only be composed of people such as you. On Sat, 15 May 2004 15:03:08 GMT, RHR <RHR@nospammy.com> wrote: >On Sat, 15 May 2004 08:24:00 -0500, James Michael Howard ><jmhoward@arkansas.net> wrote: >


Re: copyright and employment agreement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 06:30:01 GMT, "Rik Brooks" <rik@texasmob.com>,wrote: >In this case Richard is right. There is a lot of history of these cases and >the company doesn't prevail unless the item in question was done on company >time or with company e


Re: copyright and employment agreement
In this case Richard is right. There is a lot of history of these cases and the company doesn't prevail unless the item in question was done on company time or with company equipment or was otherwise directly related to the company. Non-competitive agr


Re: Pope ripped on sex abuse hypocrisy
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk "If there's anyone in the world who has no right to speak on sexual abuse, it's the Vatican," said Rep. King, an anti-abortion Republican. "This is the height of hypocrisy.">> So true. Cynical fudge-packing child mo


Re: Pope ripped on sex abuse hypocrisy


Re: Beheading video
Scott" Don't put words in my mouth. I said nothing of Iraq and how prisoners of war should be treated. I am referring to terrorists whether it be Alqueda, "the Letter bomber" or Oklahoma City Bombing etc.... Anyone who uses terror for political a


Re: Beheading video
On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:26:40 -0400, Carey Gregory <tiredofspam123@comcast.net> wrote: >nobody@ybodon.not (Anon Poster) wrote: > >>Did you not wonder why, when cheap, high-quality digital camcorders >>are widely available, any attention-seeking grou


Continued...



Subdirectories


site map |  disclaimer |  privacy
All Rights Reserved, Legal Spring, Inc. 2004