|
|
Hi,
I hope this is the right NG for this, but here goes anyway:
My daughter and her family are about to move out of their rented apartment ,
and into their own
house, which is due for completion 11th June.
The relationship between the family and
|
|
|
"Scott" <someone@spamtrap.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:c8q7kp$eou$1$8302bc10
@news.demon.co.uk:
> What's the matter, have you had a sense of humour bypass?
Not at all. You, apparently, missed the fact that it was satire.
I was being kind and pointin
|
|
|
Oregon officers turned strategy into sex coercion, critics say
By The Associated Press
E-mail this article
Print this article
Search archive
EUGENE, Ore. — A common police investigation technique is partly to
blame fo
|
|
|
If she doesn't have any money, why worry?
j.
Jerry Diamond wrote:
> A New York supreme court judge wrongfully decided the defendant has to
> pay a sum to a bank's lawyers (regarding a senseless issue of a
> late-payment fee.)
>
> The defendant
|
|
|
You realize that the colonies were populated, to a great extent, by
refugees of the legal system of Britain. How do you think the legal
system in Britain was regarded in the colonies?
j.
Harry The Horse wrote:
> In Britain, for the eighteent
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 May 2004 15:25:59 +0100, Alan G <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>Tom Moore wrote:
>> "Steve" <noeail987@hotmail.com> wrote :
>>
>>
>>>Considering it's just reposting information posted by
>>>someone else unchanged, is this considered slander
|
|
|
Tom Moore wrote:
> "Steve" <noeail987@hotmail.com> wrote :
>
>
>>Considering it's just reposting information posted by
>>someone else unchanged, is this considered slander or not?
>
>
> Repeating defamation is defamation. Reporting the allega
|
|
|
Can somebody tell me if it's considered Slander or not, to go over old
archived Usenet Posts made by somebody else (possibly containing slander)
and repost them again unchanged?
Considering it's just reposting information posted by someone else
unch
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 May 2004 04:43:26 GMT, "Tom Bishop"
<Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> wrote:
>> >I assume you think this is the best thing to run on a server?
Check the Administration Advanced page to see if you are building
meaningful rules.
When prompted t
|
|
|
On Tue, 25 May 2004 04:43:26 GMT, "Tom Bishop"
<Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> wrote:
>Actually it is a dedicated server hosting I am thinking about
>and they want to charge $450 to install the hardware firewall.
You really should shop around for a bette
|
|
|
Steve wrote:
>
> Can somebody tell me if it's considered Slander or not, to go over old
> archived Usenet Posts made by somebody else (possibly containing slander)
> and repost them again unchanged?
>
> Considering it's just reposting information
|
|
|
McGyver wrote:
>
> "Say not the Struggle nought Availeth" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in
> message news:ncesc.3211$lZ4.297@newssvr32.news.prodigy.com...
> > Not necessarily so;
> > A federal law passed after the treaty would prevail over the treaty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libel!
|
|
|
"Steve" <noeail987@hotmail.com> wrote :
> Considering it's just reposting information posted by
> someone else unchanged, is this considered slander or not?
Repeating defamation is defamation. Reporting the allegation, and the
like, are no defen
|
|
|
"Bob" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message news:40b211c2.12085808@news-server.houston.rr.com...
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:08:16 GMT, "Tom Bishop"
> <Tom@Bishop-NotREAL.com> wrote:
>
> >I assume you think this is the best thing to run on a server?
>
> A
|
|
