us.legal

I'm not going to say anything more about feminism because you clearly don't have a clue as to what it's about for me, or any other posters on here, and don't want to (bearing in mind that we each speak for ourselves, with our self-labelled feminism, an

On Mon, 31 May 2004 20:24:39 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: >> You can disagree to obey a law and then ask a jury to nullify your >> actions. >If I was innocent but charged with a crime I would take whatever deal >the state offer

"Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:C3Nuc.14594$Dm2.10635@front-1.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > I'm not going to say anything more about feminism because you clearly don't > have a clue as to what it's about for me, or any

Bob wrote: >Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>> We consent to be governed when we allow ourselves to be governed >>> without protest. > >>There is no "we". If you want my consent, you have to get it from me. > > You can disagree

In message <2huuflFh93hhU1@uni-berlin.de>, The Todal <iudex@beeb.net> writes > >"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message >news:nhakb019ai33h0gf2murf9o7nkhbmqgrdl@4ax.com... >> >> You will find that in practice the ideology of feminism, far f

"Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >"`Why have any men at all?' wrote Sally Miller Gearhart in a 1982 manifesto >titled `The Future-If There Is One-Is Female.' And your evidence that this person speak

Sarah Anne. --- SarahAnne.co.uk -- Articles and opinions from one of Britain's most opinionated students... "Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message news:aNKuc.4861$CD4.1467@edtnps84... >

"Lexin" <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:u00nb0pavdgd6np79u2da4lt9acl8qn8qs@4ax.com... > "Harry Ballsac" <Harry > Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > >"`Why have any men at all?' wrote Sally Miller Gearhart in a 1

"Tim Alciere" <talciere@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:fb8d65d.0405281415.480f86ca@posting.google.com... > She lost > > Teary mom in custody fight slams 'Heartless' legal system > > By BOB PORT > DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER > ANATOMY OF A LEMM

On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:18:39 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: >> We consent to be governed when we allow ourselves to be governed >> without protest. >There is no "we". If you want my consent, you have to get it from me. You can

"Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:dTKuc.41993$FV7.17005@doctor.cableinet.net... > > Sarah Anne. > > > --- SarahAnne.co.uk -- > Articles and opinions from one of Britain's most opinionated students... > "Harry Ba

"Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >The thousands of women's groups (feminist) state very clearly on their sites >that women are victims when they commit violence and should not get any jail >time, but

spammy <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote: >Then what are job quotas, if not favoritism? Illegal in my country, as it happens, so not really my concern. -- Lexin

Clough <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote: > I would argue that 'liberal' feminists who >are against all forms of discrimination and are in favour of equality >for all are defining themselves incorrectly. They should more rightly >call themselves 'humanists'

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:ertmb01lrhr3tm0teat3joj5j95i2tmdld@4ax.com... > On Mon, 31 May 2004 18:11:50 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry > Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > > >> I think you are in n

"Lexin" <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:vermb0dpeog7ng4kuscrou6qg8bl0m3mqa@4ax.com... > "Harry Ballsac" <Harry > Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > >The thousands of women's groups (feminist) state very clearly

On Mon, 31 May 2004 18:11:50 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >> I think you are in need of psychotherapy. >Hit a nerve did I? You? I don't think so. >Why.... because feminist have stat

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:plqmb09vghc2l7lsnohgnfmh08qm00n2b4@4ax.com... > On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:53:27 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry > Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > > >The thousands of women

On Mon, 31 May 2004 18:37:18 +0100, Lexin <lexin0@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >But "humanists" are (mostly) people who don't believe in (a) god. So >to call someone who believes in equality of the sexes a humanist >wouldn't be accurate, and might lead to co

On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:53:27 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >The thousands of women's groups (feminist) state very clearly on their sites >that women are victims when they commit violence and

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:cc4mb05es786df80g74ju397otj07lvc8c@4ax.com... > On Sun, 30 May 2004 22:34:25 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry > Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: > > >But you sure a hell wo

"Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:tNCuc.13181$Dm2.6270@front-1.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > > > "Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> > wrote in message news:Rjtuc.4336$RK3.1180@

Bob wrote: > Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: > >>My consent can only be granted by me. Your consent can only be granted >>by you. In order for a group to "collectively consent" to something, >>you would have to ask each individual member

see that Law Enforcement in CONCORD and in Contra Costa County California still lets HATE crimes, Terrorism, Crimes against the disabled, weak, elderly welcomed and encouraged. Once again the vermin that is these so called LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS a

-- Sarah Anne. --- SarahAnne.co.uk -- Articles and opinions from one of Britain's most opinionated students... "Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:50hmb0hjk310o1a56g3llguoofm5fo9uuq@4ax.com... > On Mon, 31 May 200

On Mon, 31 May 2004 16:02:00 +0100, "Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote: >> That is a pretty prejudiced and one sided analysis. Some cases may be >> as you say they are, but by no means all. In fact most cases may well >> be the opposi

On Mon, 31 May 2004 12:29:24 GMT, Manny Davis <nothanks@nowhere.com> wrote: >My consent can only be granted by me. Your consent can only be granted by >you. In order for a group to "collectively consent" to something, you >would have to ask each i

On Mon, 31 May 2004 12:03:51 +0100, "The Todal" <iudex@beeb.net> wrote: >Actually, they *are* bloody minded neanderthals if they choose to blame a >"pervading social doctrine" rather than their own objectionable behaviour >(in some cases) or a preju

Lexin wrote: > spammy <spammy@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>Then what are job quotas, if not favoritism? > > Illegal in my country, as it happens, so not really my concern. Does your country have preferential hiring of any kind? A rose by any other n

>It is NOT free. The cost is 3.5%. Time for the bastards to get sued I think. Perhaps you should learn something about business before trying to set one up.

Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote: > Bob wrote: >> Brother Nate wrote: >> > Paey clearly broke the law - that much is not in question. > >> Whatever happened to the legitimacy of a law being conditional upon >> the consent of the govern

To the lawyers..... "ggamble", remarked: > On Mon, 31 May 2004 00:08:30 -0400, "Michael Cook" > <cook368NOSPAM@ameritech.net> wrote: Gamble is an acidic jerk that actually knows the rules of grammar. Why he wants to consort with mikey, I don't

"Clough" <inuit@canoemail.com> wrote in message news:p52mb0lj0amcfepu09f68it4vrut900mms@4ax.com... > On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:26:50 +0100, "The Todal" <iudex@beeb.net> > wrote: > > >What you have to remember though is that for a minority of resentful

rticle can be found at: http://www.globalecho.org/view_article.php?aid=393 by: David Traynier on: This short essay is a collection of my thoughts on the legality of invading Iraq, specifically in relation to the infamous Resolution 1441. It is larg

On Sun, 30 May 2004 22:34:25 GMT, "Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote: >But you sure a hell would see a man charged and jailed for battering a >woman. I am not a feminist and I would see a man who bat

On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:08:20 +0100, "Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote: >I think you'll find that "feminism" is a loose term that can be used for any >number of personal opinions... In the dictionary, if it says that it's about >*equa

"Smicker" <pierre_le_turtle@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:e6507cf3.0405300121.5c73fa3d@posting.google.com... > talciere@yahoo.co.uk (Tim Alciere) wrote in message news:<fb8d65d.0405270127.62136a68@posting.google.com>... > > ***Note: I can only

On Sun, 30 May 2004 21:26:50 +0100, "The Todal" <iudex@beeb.net> wrote: >What you have to remember though is that for a minority of resentful men who >feel that they have been treated badly by the divorce courts or who have >been deprived of their c

"Harry Ballsac" <Harry Ballsac@the_national_socilaist_news_service.NDPP.gob> wrote in message news:Rjtuc.4336$RK3.1180@clgrps13... > > "Sarah Anne" <lying_happy_eyes@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:2Vquc.1153$wf2.213@pathologist.blueyonder.ne

On Sun, 30 May 2004 13:16:36 -0500, Brother Nate <nathan_engle@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Whatever happened to the legitimacy of a law being conditional upon >> the consent of the governed? >Under our form of government that consent is granted and >rev

"Michael Cook", remarked: > I said: > > SBC called me personally about it. > > > > no-ip.com sent me an email. > > mikey said: > And it costs SBC 247 bucks, No ip was a free DNS service. > Did you have any luck with the new net-kooks?

Phil wrote: > > On 30 May 2004 03:50:57 -0700, talciere@yahoo.co.uk (Tim Alciere) > wrote: > > >http://www.copcrims.com/ > > > > > >Have a nice day :o) > > You too. > > http://tim.alciere.has-a-small-penis.com/ Looking at penises ma